Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Sun Jul 27, 2025 3:29 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: Team Changes
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 4:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:43 pm
Posts: 2256
Location: EX Hartlepool now in sunny Billingham
Rowell Boydy Freddy in Sweeney Humps Behan out easy peasy well thats just my idea jones should maybe start also


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team Changes
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 8:49 pm
Posts: 309
alybaba wrote:
Rowell Boydy Freddy in Sweeney Humps Behan out easy peasy well thats just my idea jones should maybe start also


I wasn't at Carrow Rd Aly but Loughlin reckons Humps was our best player against Norwich.
I think against Leeds we should probably stick with Sweens & Humps leave Behan out put Jones in & play a 4-5-0 formation.
That way we might just hang on for 0-0 & stop bloody Beckford from scoring again banghead .

Only joking but it has probably crossed Tubster's mind.

Come On Pools- let's take at least a point of the arroganht cnts.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team Changes
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 10:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am
Posts: 20758
effionthedragon wrote:
alybaba wrote:
Rowell Boydy Freddy in Sweeney Humps Behan out easy peasy well thats just my idea jones should maybe start also


I wasn't at Carrow Rd Aly but Loughlin reckons Humps was our best player against Norwich.
I think against Leeds we should probably stick with Sweens & Humps leave Behan out put Jones in & play a 4-5-0 formation.
That way we might just hang on for 0-0 & stop bloody Beckford from scoring again banghead .

Only joking but it has probably crossed Tubster's mind.

Come On Pools- let's take at least a point of the arroganht cnts.



Laughlin always reckons Humps is motm though so i wouldnt take much notice.

4-5-0? Playing with a player less might make it tricky?

_________________
I'd recommend a more stealthy plan than googling 'afternoon tea dog'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team Changes
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 12:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 3:41 pm
Posts: 5661
Location: Following Hartlepool's number one golfist Tiger Woods
For Saturday as Turner already has a 'They are a big team with big players' excuse at his disposal then I think the starting 11 should be.

Cook
Austin
Cherel
Collins
Hartley
Rowell
Gamble
McSweeney
Fredriksen
Monkhouse
Foley

_________________
Lard.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team Changes
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:40 pm 
alienlife wrote:
For Saturday as Turner already has a 'They are a big team with big players' excuse at his disposal then I think the starting 11 should be.


Foley


sctatchinghead


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team Changes
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:07 pm
Posts: 2082
Location: British West Hartlepool
alienlife wrote:
For Saturday as Turner already has a 'They are a big team with big players' excuse at his disposal then I think the starting 11 should be.

Cook
Austin
Cherel
Collins
Hartley
Rowell
Gamble
McSweeney
Fredriksen
Monkhouse
Foley


Shit off i'm taking me ticket back. Foley can't spell football let alone play the game, and Fredriksen definately can't...

_________________
If it wasnae fur yer wellies, where would you be.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team Changes
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:53 pm 
poolietim wrote:

Shit off i'm taking me ticket back. Foley can't spell football let alone play the game, and Fredriksen definately can't...


And what do you judge Freddy on then???


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team Changes
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 2:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:07 pm
Posts: 2082
Location: British West Hartlepool
H99 wrote:
poolietim wrote:

Shit off i'm taking me ticket back. Foley can't spell football let alone play the game, and Fredriksen definately can't...


And what do you judge Freddy on then???


His school report, he got a D for English

_________________
If it wasnae fur yer wellies, where would you be.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team Changes
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 3:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 3:41 pm
Posts: 5661
Location: Following Hartlepool's number one golfist Tiger Woods
AberdeenPools wrote:
alienlife wrote:
For Saturday as Turner already has a 'They are a big team with big players' excuse at his disposal then I think the starting 11 should be.


Foley


sctatchinghead



I shall elaborate. The current strike rate of our forwards is dire, Larkin and Behan both had good chances at Norwich and ballsed them up, Boyd is looking off the pace, Bjornsson doesn't seem to fit into our team and Greulich hasn't shone when brought on. Foley, Tymon or Greulich should be given a crack as they are forwards and of those Foley has scored at first team level more than once.

_________________
Lard.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team Changes
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 5:50 pm 
alienlife wrote:
For Saturday as Turner already has a 'They are a big team with big players' excuse at his disposal then I think the starting 11 should be.

Cook
Austin
Cherel
Collins
Hartley
Rowell
Gamble
McSweeney
Fredriksen
Monkhouse
Foley


Maybe Chris Turner isn't that bad after all :shock: That team would lose 5-0.

Foley up front on his own, really?? :shock: rolfl

Got to be a piss take!


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team Changes
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 6:21 pm 
Offline
Partially Top Guano Man
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 11:09 pm
Posts: 11204
Location: i am busy right now, can i ignore you some other time?
Tree_With_Hamster wrote:
effionthedragon wrote:
alybaba wrote:
Rowell Boydy Freddy in Sweeney Humps Behan out easy peasy well thats just my idea jones should maybe start also


I wasn't at Carrow Rd Aly but Loughlin reckons Humps was our best player against Norwich.
I think against Leeds we should probably stick with Sweens & Humps leave Behan out put Jones in & play a 4-5-0 formation.
That way we might just hang on for 0-0 & stop bloody Beckford from scoring again banghead .

Only joking but it has probably crossed Tubster's mind.

Come On Pools- let's take at least a point of the arroganht cnts.



Laughlin always reckons Humps is motm though so i wouldnt take much notice.

4-5-0? Playing with a player less might make it tricky?


Humphreys had a good game at Norwich, close to MOTM in my opinion but not quite, played well till probably tired towards the end. So from someone who doesn't watch games with any, preconceived idea's and thinks player's should be picked on what he has done in previous games then Humphreys has done to keep his place. I can see the same team starting as did at Carrow Road.

If I picked teams on the whole season form then Jones for Sweeney would be my only change.

_________________
I was awoken last night by Darlo fans in the street playing football with a hedgehog
I was absolutely digusted and about to call the RSPCA when the hedgehog went 1-0 up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team Changes
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 6:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:35 pm
Posts: 589
Location: West of Flensburg
If he sticks with 4-5-1 we need someone to burst from the midfield i think Foley could do a job playing just of Behan.

_________________
All I can do is be me, whoever that is.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team Changes
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 6:31 pm 
He couldn't do the job he isn't good enough, he's been proven not to be good enough in 98 football league appearances in which he hasn't scored!

God times must be hard. Not playing doesn't half make you a better player in peoples minds!


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team Changes
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 7:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 7:10 pm
Posts: 1101
Just a thought, i would revert back to 4-4-2 and get at the kunts

Here's my team

Flinders GK

Austin RB
Hartley LB
Collins CB
Liddle CB

Sweeney RW
Monkhouse LW
Gamble CM
Jones CM

Boyd CF
Behan CF

I think the back 5 pick themselves at the minute, the midfield i would put Jones in there alongside Gamble simply as he is one of the better more creative players we have and i think Boyd would thrive on the service from him and also the wings, i also think Behan would be better suited to getting the ball into feet and letting Jones bomb forward the way Sweeney used to years ago.

FFS Turner man, we are the home team none of this 4-5-1 negative dross PLEASE!!

rolf rolf rolf

_________________
Get your shit and get out.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: No registered users and 296 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.