Ritchie Humphreys

poolie bri · **Posted:** Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:47 pm

who,s better in the middle then?

thetownendfaithful · **Posted:** Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:52 pm

poolie bri wrote:

who,s better in the middle then?

Jones.

poolie bri · **Posted:** Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:54 pm

thetownendfaithful wrote:

poolie bri wrote:

who,s better in the middle then?

Jones.

yes we could play with just 1 in there :wink:

thetownendfaithful · **Posted:** Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:59 pm

sometimes it seems that we only play with 1 in there !

Spender · **Posted:** Mon Oct 26, 2009 6:02 pm

I once had a fight in Wynstay Gardens. :grin:

Spender · **Posted:** Mon Oct 26, 2009 6:18 pm

See the magic of what I did there?? :grin:

Yubep put up one of his one smiley posts and I just deleted it, 'cos i can!! :laugh:

Wuhuhuhuhhahahah.......

Yubep · **Joined:** Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm **Posts:** 25266

Moderation at it's finest.

Your contribution to a perfectly debated topic is once again laughably embarrassing.

tREE_wiTH_hAMStER · **Joined:** Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am **Posts:** 20758

Humps best midfielder?? Thats better than anything POK has written.

I kinda agree with what Grave written about Monky. Yeah its square pegs in round holes but were not creative enough.

We have no attacking midfielders who can hold the ball and pass and run with it. We need that link between the midfield and attackers as having Jones and Humps is far too defensive imo and is why were creating next to fuck all.

Jones sitting back like he did against West Ham with Monky with license to attack through the middle. Im sure he would be happier as would get more of the ball and his tough tackling would get things going. We havent had a midfielder with a bit of pace and ability to beat a man for ages and I think its what we need over a tough defensive midfielder. Monky linking off Behan Boyd and Brown would be good in my opinion and im sure we would get a lot more football played as the defenders will know they have someone in the middle who can hold onto the ball and actually do something with it.

Obviously Fredriksen on left wing who again offers pace and the ability to play football. However i can only assume he aint been impressing in reserves as he aint even getting on as a sub?

Things wont change as Turner doesnt change winning teams but I think its one of our best options especially at home.

thetownendfaithful · **Posted:** Mon Oct 26, 2009 7:02 pm

Why don't we just bypass the centre of midfield for creating chances and constantly look to Brown and Monkhouse to create for the front two , and just leave Humphs and Jones to defend in the middle of the park

tREE_wiTH_hAMStER · **Joined:** Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am **Posts:** 20758

thetownendfaithful wrote:

Why don't we just bypass the centre of midfield for creating chances and constantly look to Brown and Monkhouse to create for the front two , and just leave Humphs and Jones to defend in the middle of the park

Brown and Monky dont seem to be too interested at the moment.

thetownendfaithful · **Posted:** Mon Oct 26, 2009 7:11 pm

Tree_With_Hamster wrote:

thetownendfaithful wrote:

Why don't we just bypass the centre of midfield for creating chances and constantly look to Brown and Monkhouse to create for the front two , and just leave Humphs and Jones to defend in the middle of the park

Brown and Monky dont seem to be too interested at the moment.

maybe they'll be a bit more intrested if we started giving them the ball :wink:

tREE_wiTH_hAMStER · **Joined:** Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am **Posts:** 20758

thetownendfaithful wrote:

Tree_With_Hamster wrote:

thetownendfaithful wrote:

Why don't we just bypass the centre of midfield for creating chances and constantly look to Brown and Monkhouse to create for the front two , and just leave Humphs and Jones to defend in the middle of the park

Brown and Monky dont seem to be too interested at the moment.

maybe they'll be a bit more intrested if we started giving them the ball :wink:

Concur fully but we lump balls to the front two not the wingers.

Yubep · **Joined:** Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm **Posts:** 25266

lumping balls?

just pass it

whats the diference between a lump and a pass?

Warwick Hunt · **Posted:** Mon Oct 26, 2009 9:27 pm

We're on to page 5 already.

tREE_wiTH_hAMStER · **Joined:** Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am **Posts:** 20758

Yubep wrote:

lumping balls?

just pass it

whats the diference between a lump and a pass?

pass = kicking it towards someone inparticular.

lump = kick it anywhere like our defence does.

poolie bri · **Posted:** Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:27 pm

Tree_With_Hamster wrote:

Humps best midfielder?? Thats better than anything POK has written.

I kinda agree with what Grave written about Monky. Yeah its square pegs in round holes but were not creative enough.

We have no attacking midfielders who can hold the ball and pass and run with it. We need that link between the midfield and attackers as having Jones and Humps is far too defensive imo and is why were creating next to f*** all.

Jones sitting back like he did against West Ham with Monky with license to attack through the middle. Im sure he would be happier as would get more of the ball and his tough tackling would get things going. We havent had a midfielder with a bit of pace and ability to beat a man for ages and I think its what we need over a tough defensive midfielder. Monky linking off Behan Boyd and Brown would be good in my opinion and im sure we would get a lot more football played as the defenders will know they have someone in the middle who can hold onto the ball and actually do something with it.

Obviously Fredriksen on left wing who again offers pace and the ability to play football. However i can only assume he aint been impressing in reserves as he aint even getting on as a sub?

Things wont change as Turner doesnt change winning teams but I think its one of our best options especially at home.

said he was best what we,ve got at moment for middle of park

Ritchie Humphreys

Gadgies online