Youse lot with an inane hate of Newcastle

Pierrepoint · **Joined:** Sat Jan 17, 2009 3:04 am **Posts:** 1723

Sound like a load of closet mackems to me (I bet you're all from yakker land well apart from parmo who is of course from Hartlepool).. You'll soon change your choon when Big Al is lending all his fringe players to his second most favourite club... :wink:

tigro · **Posted:** Sun May 31, 2009 4:47 pm

thats a good point. headlines today say he is ready to walkout tho

Pierrepoint · **Joined:** Sat Jan 17, 2009 3:04 am **Posts:** 1723

You don't believe the newspapers do you?? FFS O.o works for them!! :shock:

TalbotAvenger · **Posted:** Sun May 31, 2009 5:57 pm

Of course I will

'Big Al' and Sandcastle can bounder right off regardless of what they do or don't for Hartlepool United

Snowy · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm **Posts:** 37573

Pierrepoint wrote:

Sound like a load of closet mackems to me (I bet you're all from yakker land well apart from parmo who is of course from Hartlepool).. You'll soon change your choon when Big Al is lending all his fringe players to his second most favourite club... :wink:

No I won't.

peterleepoolie · **Posted:** Sun May 31, 2009 7:57 pm

ive grew up with a family full of sunderland fans apart from my father who is a palace fan so i guess sunderland are my second team.

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Sun May 31, 2009 10:50 pm

So YOU are Lawrence's Son!?!? :shock:

peterleepoolie · **Posted:** Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:58 am

MutleyRules wrote:

So YOU are Lawrence's Son!?!? :shock:

U CHEEEKY bounder !! refred

Montpoolier · **Posted:** Mon Jun 01, 2009 10:10 am

MadJohn wrote:

I can't remember ever having much of an issue with Newcastle United. They have regularly sent a decent strength side for friendlies. My problem is, and always has been, with the hartlepool mag. That won't change any time soon.

Similar here. I have no issue whatsoever with Newcastle, and since I don't live within their sphere of contamination, the only barcode supporters I know are all Geordies and they are fine.

Having said that I AM glad Newcastle went down, but it's purely out of self-interest

a) it can only help eradicate Hartlepool pubmags
b) we might get some very useful fall-out, mightn't we :wink:

Nobodys Hero · **Posted:** Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:16 pm

Is someone suggesting that Pools are to become Newcastles feeder club?

""Shudders""

Pierrepoint · **Joined:** Sat Jan 17, 2009 3:04 am **Posts:** 1723

ADG wrote:

Is someone suggesting that Pools are to become Newcastles feeder club?

""Shudders""

I also will be glad to see the back of the lesser striped hartlepool pub mag...

As for being a Newcastle feeder club ..

Its far better than being a Leeds one... rolfl

Nobodys Hero · **Posted:** Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:27 pm

There is nothing good about becoming anyone feeder club. NOTHING.

""Shudders again""

Nobodys Hero · **Posted:** Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:46 pm

Nobody. Directly.

But I thought I would get the "shuddering" in first. Just in case.

Shall we do a group "shudder"? :grin:

Pierrepoint · **Joined:** Sat Jan 17, 2009 3:04 am **Posts:** 1723

MadJohn wrote:

Who is suggesting anything about a feeder club?

( I agree, it would be worth a shudder )

Don't think anyone is....

Newcastle have always helped us out in the recent past far more than either Sunderland or the other wankers we kept in the league..

It may be of benefit to us if we manage get some quality loan players here due to a "special" relationship with Newcastle (even if it does mean we have to have a big welcome to the board picture of Big Al in the Centenary Suite)

Nobodys Hero · **Posted:** Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:53 pm

OK no feeder club.

But "Special relationship" though with the geordies.

"Shudders" again.

Pierrepoint · **Joined:** Sat Jan 17, 2009 3:04 am **Posts:** 1723

Come on the loiq's (and before you say it hasn't done them much good) have been doing this thing with the Boero's for years..
It won't do us any harm if we manage to get some GOOD local talent (even if it is on loan) from our neighbours instead of the donkeys / mecenary donkeys we've had on loan over the last few years....

Compo · **Posted:** Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:57 pm

I agree totally why would that be a bad thing

misterb2001 · **Posted:** Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:59 pm

as long as it benefits hartlepool united then i couldnt care less

threepintwonder · **Posted:** Mon Jun 01, 2009 2:06 pm

Pierrepoint wrote:

Come on the loiq's (and before you say it hasn't done them much good) have been doing this thing with the Boero's for years..
It won't do us any harm if we manage to get some GOOD local talent (even if it is on loan) from our neighbours instead of the donkeys / mecenary donkeys we've had on loan over the last few years....

who are these loiq's of whom you spoke?

Nobodys Hero · **Posted:** Mon Jun 01, 2009 2:15 pm

Hold on a minute.

Are we talking about the same thing here?

If the skunks offered us some decent players on loan, and not 17 year old skinny kids, and they added something then thats perfectly OK.

But if we have "special" arrangement, would it mean these players have to have a game?

And would we be forced to take more than we actually want?

And would that upset the moral of the pools players.

So GOOD loan players = great idea.

Special arrangement = No thanks we dont want to be your feeder club.

And we know how much KH loves the skunks.

Pierrepoint · **Joined:** Sat Jan 17, 2009 3:04 am **Posts:** 1723

ADG wrote:

Are we talking about the same thing here?

If the skunks offered us some decent players on loan, and not 17 year old skinny kids, and they added something then thats perfectly OK.

So GOOD loan players = great idea.

.

So we agree on this point..

ADG wrote:

Hold on a minute.

Are we talking about the same thing here?

.

Probably not....

ADG wrote:

But if we have "special" arrangement, would it mean these players have to have a game?

And would we be forced to take more than we actually want?

And would that upset the moral of the pools players.

.

I agree on that as well ..playing bambi antwi showed how stupid this idea would be!

ADG wrote:

Special arrangement = No thanks we dont want to be your feeder club.

And we know how much KH loves the skunks.

Yes you're right we don't want to be their feeder club.."special" RELATIONSHIP", where it is to the mutual benefit of all parties is a definite YES from me

Special arrangement..such as we're had before with other clubs where a loanee is played to the detriment of the team is and always was a big FAT NO from me.. Ok ..so are we clear what I'm talking about?

stupoolie · **Posted:** Mon Jun 01, 2009 3:41 pm

MadJohn wrote:

Despite the rumours that were flying around regarding Godwin Antwi, I would be stunned if we have EVER been forced to play a loan player whether we wanted to or not. Taking a player on loan and then not using him might affect our chances of getting other players on loan from that club, but I believe Antwi's place in the starting line-up was down to Danny Wilson and not some external arrangement.

Totally agree John! I dont think for one second a club can force another club into how many games a player plays. I know a recent case of Craig Gordon at Sunderland if he made X amount of appearances for the club they then owed the Scottish club he bought them from a fair bit of cash. I dont think that applies to Loan players

misterb2001 · **Posted:** Mon Jun 01, 2009 3:42 pm

MadJohn wrote:

Despite the rumours that were flying around regarding Godwin Antwi, I would be stunned if we have EVER been forced to play a loan player whether we wanted to or not. Taking a player on loan and then not using him might affect our chances of getting other players on loan from that club, but I believe Antwi's place in the starting line-up was down to Danny Wilson and not some external arrangement.

dont be so s..............ensible

Youse lot with an inane hate of Newcastle

Gadgies online