Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Sun Jul 13, 2025 10:02 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 90 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Sat Apr 25, 2009 11:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:10 am
Posts: 3572
Porter looks likely to miss the Bristol Rovers game.

Was yesterday the last we've seen of Joel? sadx


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Sat Apr 25, 2009 11:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 7:10 pm
Posts: 1101
No, i seen him today. bbolt

_________________
Get your shit and get out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Sat Apr 25, 2009 11:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 2:04 pm
Posts: 2361
Location: The Town End
it seemed the players couldn't wait to get off , at least Porter stayed out and signed shirts and that , good on him he will be sorely missed sadx


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Sat Apr 25, 2009 11:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am
Posts: 20758
I cant believe we did a "lap of honour" :roll:

_________________
I'd recommend a more stealthy plan than googling 'afternoon tea dog'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 7:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
chip fireball wrote:
also sad to see how few people stayed behind after the game for the " lap of honour "


rolfl rolfl rolfl

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 8:43 am 
It was a chance to say goodbye to a true Pools legend. I don't see why that is funny. Trust Grave and Tree to see the wrong side. The proper fans stayed back.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 8:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:28 am
Posts: 971
Location: you will find me here there and everywhere
chip fireball wrote:
yeah, i suspect he has played his last game for us. very very sad.

bit of a letdown all round, i thought he was very poor today and he could easily have been subbed with 20 minutes to go.


Chip I have to thoroughly agree. What started as, and should have been, an emotional day, really did turn to shit by the end.

I trust Joel didnt complete "his unfinished business", that he had talked about. What the hell was up with him? sctatchinghead

_________________
78 revolutions a minute now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 9:17 am 
ADG wrote:
chip fireball wrote:
yeah, i suspect he has played his last game for us. very very sad.

bit of a letdown all round, i thought he was very poor today and he could easily have been subbed with 20 minutes to go.


Chip I have to thoroughly agree. What started as, and should have been, an emotional day, really did turn to shiit by the end.

I trust Joel didnt complete "his unfinished business", that he had talked about. What the hell was up with him? sctatchinghead


Carrying injuries perhaps?


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 9:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:28 am
Posts: 971
Location: you will find me here there and everywhere
he looked like he was. I wonder why he was played then, in such an important match. It wasnt a "lets say goodbye to joel" friendly was it? sctatchinghead

_________________
78 revolutions a minute now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 9:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
Obafemi Obsession wrote:
It was a chance to say goodbye to a true Pools legend. I don't see why that is funny. Trust Grave and Tree to see the wrong side. The proper fans stayed back.


Apologies. I assumed Chip meant a lap of honour for the players. If he was referring to Joel however then fair enough.

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 10:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am
Posts: 20758
Obafemi Obsession wrote:
It was a chance to say goodbye to a true Pools legend. I don't see why that is funny. Trust Grave and Tree to see the wrong side. The proper fans stayed back.



The lap of honour was for the team not just Joel I believe?

I bet the players were embarrased they had to do a "lap of honour" after the dross they have served up this season.

_________________
I'd recommend a more stealthy plan than googling 'afternoon tea dog'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 10:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:09 pm
Posts: 8066
Location: Five minutes from the Priestfield Stadium.
We really can't afford to have Nelson not travel to Bristol. A gash over the eye is serious but it can be patched up.

I've got a feeling Porter will make himself fit for the Bristol Rovers game, so we can secure safety next season.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 11:16 am 
Poolie of Kent wrote:
I've got a feeling Porter will make himself fit for the Bristol Rovers game, so we can secure safety next season.



How the fook can he 'make himself fit' you daft of the daftest cn.uts?

And how come we didn't secure safety yesterday?

At home?

I'll tell you this, Pools WILL do their UTMOST next week to go down, because quite frankly they are fooking useless

That might make me a disloyal bounder, who DID stay to watch the 'lap of honour', which like 90% of matches this season, the players didn't seem particularly interested in


That is all


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:10 am
Posts: 3572
Porter really showed his class yesterday, not as a footballer but a decent person.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:09 pm
Posts: 8066
Location: Five minutes from the Priestfield Stadium.
TalbotAvenger wrote:
Poolie of Kent wrote:
I've got a feeling Porter will make himself fit for the Bristol Rovers game, so we can secure safety next season.



How the fook can he 'make himself fit' you daft of the daftest cn.uts?

And how come we didn't secure safety yesterday?

At home?

I'll tell you this, Pools WILL do their UTMOST next week to go down, because quite frankly they are fooking useless

That might make me a disloyal bounder, who DID stay to watch the 'lap of honour', which like 90% of matches this season, the players didn't seem particularly interested in


That is all


We just got to make sure we see the season out, Porter didn't exactly go out with a bang unfortunately at home, he'll want to finish his time here on a high so we can give him a proper farewell along with Turner next Saturday.

He won't want to be sitting on the bench next Saturday.

To use a cricket analogy, it's about 5pm on the 4th day of a 4 day Test and our last batsmen need to bat the evening out to draw the Test Series.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 1:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:10 am
Posts: 3572
Poolie of Kent wrote:
To use a cricket analogy, it's about 5pm on the 4th day of a 4 day Test and our last batsmen need to bat the evening out to draw the Test Series.

sctatchinghead


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:09 pm
Posts: 8066
Location: Five minutes from the Priestfield Stadium.
What I was saying was that that's all we need to do just match Carlisle's result, and see the season out...and God willing, we'll be a League One club next season.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:54 pm
Posts: 13354
Location: on me bike
that deserves a picture of an aeroplane!!!!

_________________
personal assistant to Nelson the German Shepherd


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 1:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:09 pm
Posts: 8066
Location: Five minutes from the Priestfield Stadium.
parmopooly wrote:
that deserves a picture of an aeroplane!!!!


Why?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 2:46 pm 
chip fireball wrote:

as for comments about us being shyte at the vic all season ????? we were top scorers again at home and served up some cracking entertainment. jesus wept could you imagine 10 years ago that folk would be twisting like a pack of bairns about us being 18th in division 3 and losing 1-0 to leeds ?




Whooooaaaa there Lord of the Central

I never said we have been sh1te at the Vic all season, I said we have been sh1te all season, which we have

This is indicated by the fact we can still be relegated


As far as the our home record goes, yes its fooking fanbastardtastic the fact we have scored shedloads but we have only won EIGHT matches in the process, so that does fit in well with ten years ago, Keith Houchen & Mick Take would of been proud of that very record


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 4:45 pm 
Poolie of Kent wrote:

To use a cricket analogy, it's about 5pm on the 4th day of a 4 day Test and our last batsmen need to bat the evening out to draw the Test Series.



therethere


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 6:51 pm 
chip fireball wrote:
TalbotAvenger wrote:
chip fireball wrote:

as for comments about us being shyte at the vic all season ????? we were top scorers again at home and served up some cracking entertainment. jesus wept could you imagine 10 years ago that folk would be twisting like a pack of bairns about us being 18th in division 3 and losing 1-0 to leeds ?




Whooooaaaa there Lord of the Central

I never said we have been sh1te at the Vic all season, I said we have been sh1te all season, which we have

This is indicated by the fact we can still be relegated


As far as the our home record goes, yes its fooking fanbastardtastic the fact we have scored shedloads but we have only won EIGHT matches in the process, so that does fit in well with ten years ago, Keith Houchen & Mick Take would of been proud of that very record


so we were shyte when we beat clochester 4-2 and huddersfield 5-3 ? and shyte at yeovil last week ? shyte when we beat peterborough at their place ? shyte when we drew 2-2 with leicester who pissed the league ? were we shyte when we went and won at carlisle or walsall after being 2 down ? were we shyte when putting 4 past cheltenham or 3 past premiership west brom ? we must have been shyte when dumping stoke out of the f.a. cup because they are also a premiership side ?

what a cracking post talbot. we truly have been shyte all season. thanks so much for making me realise i was wrong. indeed on gates of 3,500 we should be beating every single side in europe.

gonk.




You can't take on board the fact that even though our goal scoring record is A1 at home we have still only won eight matches at the Vic

That was my point

We WERE shite yesterday, with a powderpuff midfield
We were shite against Scunny
We were shite against Orient


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 9:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
chip fireball wrote:

as for the likes of grave and tree... why do you actually bother going to games ?



I attend games because I could barely rely on your after match opinions could I? I would end up wondering what conspiracy kept us from automatic promotion given our great team.

chip fireball wrote:
you clearly hate everything about the club. perhaps you would prefer to go back to the days when we were bottom of the 4th division ? that you couldnt be arsed to hang around for 5 minutes after the game yesterday to give joel and others a bit of a send off, speaks volumes for you both as "fans" and as people.


yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1 yawn1

as I have said previously, when the players put in 100% I will thank them for it. Until then they will have to make do with a proportion of my season ticket money. It has been a godawful season with amaturish mistakes been made on and off the field, if you want to applaud that then go ahead.

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 10:51 pm 
chip fireball wrote:
so we were shyte when we beat clochester 4-2 and huddersfield 5-3 ? and shyte at yeovil last week ? shyte when we beat peterborough at their place ? shyte when we drew 2-2 with leicester who pissed the league ? were we shyte when we went and won at carlisle or walsall after being 2 down ? were we shyte when putting 4 past cheltenham or 3 past premiership west brom ? we must have been shyte when dumping stoke out of the f.a. cup because they are also a premiership side ?

what a cracking post talbot. we truly have been shyte all season. thanks so much for making me realise i was wrong. indeed on gates of 3,500 we should be beating every single side in europe.

gonk.


The League Table doesn't lie!!!! confised


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 12:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 10:45 am
Posts: 2411
I'm with Chip on his last post !

_________________
http://i11.tinypic.com/2vwcmeb.jpg


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 12:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:09 pm
Posts: 8066
Location: Five minutes from the Priestfield Stadium.
I agree, Chip. clappp clappp


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: re
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 12:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:46 am
Posts: 16992
Location: The people's democratic illegal republic of Catalonia
Are there no shades of grey on this board? Seems to me there's plehty of slots to be filled between not wanting us to finish 5th bottom on goal difference and wanting us to be Manyoo.

_________________
No, your children are not the special ones.
(Nor is your dog.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 4:02 pm
Posts: 1221
Location: Barnestoneworth
chip fireball wrote:
on my living room wall ive got an autographed and framed photo of the 1998/1999 squad. thats 10 years ago for the thick peasants on this board .

the top row of players includes paul moss, mickey dunwell, glen downey, denny ingram, chris macdonald, j d briggs and craig lake.

the middle row includes nicky evans, mark nash, steven hutt, darren timmons, and martin pemberton.

the bottom row includes stuart brightwell, stuart irvine, gus di lella, ian clark and craig midgely.

it wasnt actually the worst pools side ive ever seen, but there was absolutely no indication of what was to come in the next 9 years.

prior to that point pools had been in the lowest division of english football for almost its entire existence, and nearly always in the bottom half of the lowest division.

we were shiit, a laughing stock, and almost permanently on the brink of going bust.

if someone had told me then that 10 years down the line folk would be kicking off because we couldnt beat leeds united at home id have assumed they were bonkers.

what do folk realistically expect from a club that pulls in attendances of 3,500 ? do they seriously expect them to compete with the likes of leeds united who made nearly 3 million quid profit last year, and who have a huge and expensively assembled squad of players, playing in front of 20 odd thousand at home ?

we beat 2 premier league teams and survived for another season in league one, serving up some decent games along the way, as well as some duffers granted.

okay it wasnt as good as we expected, but did any of the deluded, moaning, tramps on this board genuinely think we were going to finish in the top 6 ?

as for those suggesting ior/hodcroft walk away, who do you think will replace them ?

look at darlo ffs, 2 administartions and on the brink of going out of existence.

i stayed to applaud the pools players yesterday, because while some of them may not be world beaters, and some of them are little better than non league standard,and some of them have made a series of stupid bloody mistakes repeatedly throughout the season, at the end of the day they are still MY FOOKING TEAM.

those beggar tramps and peasants who only want to support them when they are doing well, or who secretly hope that they get beat every game so they can shoot their sad inadequate mouths off on here really should go and support liverpool or man utd.

in fact they probably do.


I agree with the sentimemt of what you are saying but times change. No one can tell me that we don't have a squad capable of finishing higher than the bottom 6 of this division. That's what the issue is here. Some of the football has been woeful this season. Schoolboy errors in practically every game. Simply not good enough.

We can all say that we used to be a small struggling team. The key words in that sentence is used to be. Other teams (take Doncaster for example) built on the success. We're slowly going backwards.

Am I the only one who thinks that this tramps and beggars stuff is also completely purile and unfunny? Some posters on here are getting a slating off you for having an opinion. It's wrong.

Rant over.

_________________
When did it fall apart? Sometime in the 80s.
When the great and good gave way to the greedy and the mean


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm
Posts: 25266
Humphreys?

Come on Phil you seriously can not suggest he is a first team regular next season?

_________________
Michaelbarron ‏@Mickyb22
@9howie yes defo I need my mate for golf and social ‪#bessiemate


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 10:10 am 
ElvisAintDead wrote:
Yubep wrote:
Humphreys?

Come on Phil you seriously can not suggest he is a first team regular next season?


I tell you what, we improved 110% when he came on on Saturday. I would seriously give him the first half-dozen games in his proper position.

If he can't do it, drop him to sub but I don't think he'd let us down and we'd need SOME experience in there.


Thank God someone can see the bigger picture.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 10:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:28 am
Posts: 971
Location: you will find me here there and everywhere
I agree with elvis.

Humphreys improved our team on saturday. He was the first player, for us, all aftenoon trying to find his man with short first time passes.

Unlike Ben Clark who struggled to even control the bastad ball. banghead

_________________
78 revolutions a minute now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm
Posts: 25266
big ben was bad, but we can't blame him, he's a centre back, pushed into midfield.

His turning circle is that big i had too move out the way on the millhouse terrace

_________________
Michaelbarron ‏@Mickyb22
@9howie yes defo I need my mate for golf and social ‪#bessiemate


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 10:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:28 am
Posts: 971
Location: you will find me here there and everywhere
I agree.

Ben Clark great centrehalf, rubbish midfielder, getting his confidence destroyed.

Ritchie Humphreys great midfielder, rubbish left back, getting his confidence destroyed.

Gary Liddle, decent midfielder, utterly shit defender getting his confidence destroyed.

I see a pattern emerging here.

ALB, and Jan Budtz, shit keepers...........errrrrrr................, bbolt

_________________
78 revolutions a minute now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 10:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:23 am
Posts: 796
ADG wrote:
I agree.

Ben Clark great centrehalf, rubbish midfielder, getting his confidence destroyed.

Ritchie Humphreys great midfielder, rubbish left back, getting his confidence destroyed.

Gary Liddle, decent midfielder, utterly shiit defender getting his confidence destroyed.

I see a pattern emerging here.

ALB, and Jan Budtz, shiit keepers...........errrrrrr................, bbolt
I would agree with you regarding Liddle and Humphreys - I too thought ritchie did well when he came on. However, I think Liddle has been absolute garbage for most of the season and that includes a lot of games in midfield.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 10:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am
Posts: 9053
The reason I'm in the Turner out brigade is because he has taken us even further backwards than we were going with Wilson at the helm. If we stay up now it'll be by default and by the skin of our teeth.

He talks a good game and it's a major factor why he's so popular but his lack of managerial skills have been exposed. His performance in the January window was shocking and I would sack him purely on that alone.

God forbid, If results don't go well on Saturday and we go down, there will be a lot more people pointing the blame at Turner which goes to show you how borderline his popularity is at the moment. I'm shocked that people don't think he is more responsible for the demise of the team since December.

_________________
Apols


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 10:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am
Posts: 9053
ElvisAintDead wrote:
Tax Paying Poolie wrote:
The reason I'm in the Turner out brigade is because he has taken us even further backwards than we were going with Wilson at the helm. If we stay up now it'll be by default and by the skin of our teeth.

He talks a good game and it's a major factor why he's so popular but his lack of managerial skills have been exposed. His performance in the January window was shocking and I would sack him purely on that alone.

God forbid, If results don't go well on Saturday and we go down, there will be a lot more people pointing the blame at Turner which goes to show you how borderline his popularity is at the moment. I'm shocked that people don't think he is more responsible for the demise of the team since December.


What's your opinion on the players TPP? Do you think individuals have let the Management/Fans down? Which ones?


There have definitely be some that have underperformed, it'd be stupid to argue otherwise but there are managerial reasons why a lot of them have played this way.

As ADG says- Humphreys has been out of position and Turner did nothing about it until the end of February, Sweeney has played right back despite being the most attacking midfielder we have, Ben Clark has unbelievably not been played in defence despite us leaking goals every game and he's the best defender at the club by a country mile, Jan Budtz came in put in three decent shifts and was then axed for non league Arran. Ritchie Jones has been played all over the shop so it's little wonder he has been inconsistent.

I don't blame any of those for this season, it's not their fault they have been badly managed. That's a core of players in important decisions that successive managers have inexplicably neglected.

You can't blame Joel as he has single handedly kept us up.

So of the regular players that leaves ALB, Nelse, Collins, Lids and Monky who I think have all underperformed through no fault but their own. I'd get rid of them all except Nelse who I think is still a good centre half when he doesn't have to carry another player like he has done with Antwi and Collins.

You can't go a season having your two centre halves and your goalie performing like we have. How did Turner try to remedy this in January? By signing 5 fcking forwards. :roll: banghead

_________________
Apols


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
with respect, the defenders we have should be good enough, whereas the strikers we had at the time definately were not. Turner made several changes to the defense which didnt work. His one big mistake was leaving lee-barrett in goal. Nobody knows what would have happened had wilson still been in charge so there is no point is assuming. The only way turner can be judged properly is to let him put his own squad together and see where we are after 15 games. However i think hodcroft will appoint a new manager who is not currently connected to the club.

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am
Posts: 9053
misterb2001 wrote:
with respect, the defenders we have should be good enough, whereas the strikers we had at the time definately were not. Turner made several changes to the defense which didnt work. His one big mistake was leaving lee-barrett in goal. Nobody knows what would have happened had wilson still been in charge so there is no point is assuming. The only way turner can be judged properly is to let him put his own squad together and see where we are after 15 games. However i think hodcroft will appoint a new manager who is not currently connected to the club.


I just don't buy any of that.

The club didn't need 5 strikers in January, we were scoring goals and although I agree the area needed strengthening did we need 5 fcking forwards??!! Never. It was a scandalous bit of management.

I remember when I got the text that Lewis Guy had signed. I finally thought it was going to say he had bought a defender. I almost launched my phone at the cat when it said it was Lewis Guy. Turner himself even said 'if we score goals you're always going to win games'. This has proved to be factually incorrect.

'the defenders we have should be good enough' - despite proving for the first few months of the season that they were far from good enough?

_________________
Apols


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
Tax Paying Poolie wrote:
misterb2001 wrote:
with respect, the defenders we have should be good enough, whereas the strikers we had at the time definately were not. Turner made several changes to the defense which didnt work. His one big mistake was leaving lee-barrett in goal. Nobody knows what would have happened had wilson still been in charge so there is no point is assuming. The only way turner can be judged properly is to let him put his own squad together and see where we are after 15 games. However i think hodcroft will appoint a new manager who is not currently connected to the club.


I just don't buy any of that.

The club didn't need 5 strikers in January, we were scoring goals and although I agree the area needed strengthening did we need 5 fcking forwards??!! Never. It was a scandalous bit of management.

I remember when I got the text that Lewis Guy had signed. I finally thought it was going to say he had bought a defender. I almost launched my phone at the cat when it said it was Lewis Guy. Turner himself even said 'if we score goals you're always going to win games'. This has proved to be factually incorrect.

'the defenders we have should be good enough' - despite proving for the first few months of the season that they were far from good enough?
rubbish. Turner signed two quality strikers and a young one. He brought guy in to play on the wing due to injuries. One striker then got suspended and the other got a bad injury so he brought in parker. All the while porter was carrying several niggling injuries. He brought in 4 strikers and a winger(that just happens to be able to play up front). And only brought that many in because two of them were injured/suspended. But dont let facts get in the way of a good rant.

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am
Posts: 9053
misterb2001 wrote:
Tax Paying Poolie wrote:
misterb2001 wrote:
with respect, the defenders we have should be good enough, whereas the strikers we had at the time definately were not. Turner made several changes to the defense which didnt work. His one big mistake was leaving lee-barrett in goal. Nobody knows what would have happened had wilson still been in charge so there is no point is assuming. The only way turner can be judged properly is to let him put his own squad together and see where we are after 15 games. However i think hodcroft will appoint a new manager who is not currently connected to the club.


I just don't buy any of that.

The club didn't need 5 strikers in January, we were scoring goals and although I agree the area needed strengthening did we need 5 fcking forwards??!! Never. It was a scandalous bit of management.

I remember when I got the text that Lewis Guy had signed. I finally thought it was going to say he had bought a defender. I almost launched my phone at the cat when it said it was Lewis Guy. Turner himself even said 'if we score goals you're always going to win games'. This has proved to be factually incorrect.

'the defenders we have should be good enough' - despite proving for the first few months of the season that they were far from good enough?
rubbish. Turner signed two quality strikers and a young one. He brought guy in to play on the wing due to injuries. One striker then got suspended and the other got a bad injury so he brought in parker. All the while porter was carrying several niggling injuries. He brought in 4 strikers and a winger(that just happens to be able to play up front). And only brought that many in because two of them were injured/suspended. But dont let facts get in the way of a good rant.


I don't debate any of that. The fact is that he signed a ridiculous amount of forwards when we had a defence that was conceding goals like they were going out of fashion.

If you'd have been in charge in January, would you have signed 5 forwards and 0 defenders? Actually, don't answer that. You'd probably do the same as your Messiah.

Quality football teams are built from the back. Look at Man U this year (not that you need prompting to do that)- they kept clean sheet after clean sheet so even when they had huge injury problems they were still churning out wins. Arsenal a few years ago won the league despite having players like Christopher Wreh upfront for them. Why? Because they didn't concede goals. To give you an example at our level- a couple of years ago Yeovil got to the play-offs. They hardly scored any goals but they didn't concede any. For me there is conclusive proof that if you have a sound defence then you'll win games.

Turner said 'bollox to this, we can achieve anything with this defence as long as we keep scoring goals'. This has bit him on the arse spectacularly. How many times have these forwards been required to score 2 or 3 goals just to get us a point?

I was always a big Turner fan but the thought of him in charge next season fills me with fear.

_________________
Apols


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
i agree about building from the back. However when you look at the two centre backs, they both should be good enough to play at this level easily. Turner obviously thought that with a bit of coaching that would be enough to cut out the mistakes, it hasnt. However there was a serious lack of quality up front which he resolved but was unlucky with injuries. He changed 3 of the back 5 and it still didnt work. our centrebacks technically speaking are easily good enough for this level, but for whatever reason they have made too many mistakes. Whos to say if he had brought a defender in that the new defender wouldnt have made loads of mistakes too? I have written this season off as experience and now expect several signings which should put right what went wrong.

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 12:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am
Posts: 9053
misterb2001 wrote:
i agree about building from the back. However when you look at the two centre backs, they both should be good enough to play at this level easily. Turner obviously thought that with a bit of coaching that would be enough to cut out the mistakes, it hasnt. However there was a serious lack of quality up front which he resolved but was unlucky with injuries. He changed 3 of the back 5 and it still didnt work. our centrebacks technically speaking are easily good enough for this level, but for whatever reason they have made too many mistakes. Whos to say if he had brought a defender in that the new defender wouldnt have made loads of mistakes too? I have written this season off as experience and now expect several signings which should put right what went wrong.


'our centrebacks technically speaking are easily good enough for this level'

Techinically speaking they aren't good enough seeing as they make up the central defence of the 4th worst defence in League 1. Collins has been rubbish all season and Nelse performs well once in every five games. It's been happening since day 1 when we butchered Colchester to bits we still needed 3 goals to win the game. Who was the central defensive partnership that day? Shock horror it was Collins and Nelse. If they're easily 'good enough' for this level they wouldn't be make such shoddy errors on a weekly basis, it's not one or two errors over a season we talking about dozens. You only make these mistakes if you're not good enough.

You say we had a 'serious lack of quality upfront' but our defenders are 'easily good enough for this level'. WTF? The League table at the turn of the year tells a far different story to that.

'Whos to say if he had brought a defender in that the new defender wouldnt have made loads of mistakes too?'

A very weak point made with little substance. If you're strengthening an area then it would essentially mean that these mistakes are cut out.

_________________
Apols


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 12:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 3:04 am
Posts: 1723
TPP is correct.. our goals for column prooves if we actually had a defence we wouldn't still be needing a result on Saturday.. (not that the shaggers will win at Millwall anyway.... bbolt )

_________________
SING YER HEARTS OUT FOR THE LADS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 12:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
Tax Paying Poolie wrote:
misterb2001 wrote:
i agree about building from the back. However when you look at the two centre backs, they both should be good enough to play at this level easily. Turner obviously thought that with a bit of coaching that would be enough to cut out the mistakes, it hasnt. However there was a serious lack of quality up front which he resolved but was unlucky with injuries. He changed 3 of the back 5 and it still didnt work. our centrebacks technically speaking are easily good enough for this level, but for whatever reason they have made too many mistakes. Whos to say if he had brought a defender in that the new defender wouldnt have made loads of mistakes too? I have written this season off as experience and now expect several signings which should put right what went wrong.


'our centrebacks technically speaking are easily good enough for this level'

Techinically speaking they aren't good enough seeing as they make up the central defence of the 4th worst defence in League 1. Collins has been rubbish all season and Nelse performs well once in every five games. It's been happening since day 1 when we butchered Colchester to bits we still needed 3 goals to win the game. Who was the central defensive partnership that day? Shock horror it was Collins and Nelse. If they're easily 'good enough' for this level they wouldn't be make such shoddy errors on a weekly basis, it's not one or two errors over a season we talking about dozens. You only make these mistakes if you're not good enough.

You say we had a 'serious lack of quality upfront' but our defenders are 'easily good enough for this level'. WTF? The League table at the turn of the year tells a far different story to that.

'Whos to say if he had brought a defender in that the new defender wouldnt have made loads of mistakes too?'

A very weak point made with little substance. If you're strengthening an area then it would essentially mean that these mistakes are cut out.

so what your saying is that turner should have brought in a defender who could guarantee that he wouldnt make a mistake? Impossible

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 12:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am
Posts: 9053
misterb2001 wrote:
Tax Paying Poolie wrote:
misterb2001 wrote:
i agree about building from the back. However when you look at the two centre backs, they both should be good enough to play at this level easily. Turner obviously thought that with a bit of coaching that would be enough to cut out the mistakes, it hasnt. However there was a serious lack of quality up front which he resolved but was unlucky with injuries. He changed 3 of the back 5 and it still didnt work. our centrebacks technically speaking are easily good enough for this level, but for whatever reason they have made too many mistakes. Whos to say if he had brought a defender in that the new defender wouldnt have made loads of mistakes too? I have written this season off as experience and now expect several signings which should put right what went wrong.


'our centrebacks technically speaking are easily good enough for this level'

Techinically speaking they aren't good enough seeing as they make up the central defence of the 4th worst defence in League 1. Collins has been rubbish all season and Nelse performs well once in every five games. It's been happening since day 1 when we butchered Colchester to bits we still needed 3 goals to win the game. Who was the central defensive partnership that day? Shock horror it was Collins and Nelse. If they're easily 'good enough' for this level they wouldn't be make such shoddy errors on a weekly basis, it's not one or two errors over a season we talking about dozens. You only make these mistakes if you're not good enough.

You say we had a 'serious lack of quality upfront' but our defenders are 'easily good enough for this level'. WTF? The League table at the turn of the year tells a far different story to that.

'Whos to say if he had brought a defender in that the new defender wouldnt have made loads of mistakes too?'

A very weak point made with little substance. If you're strengthening an area then it would essentially mean that these mistakes are cut out.

so what your saying is that turner should have brought in a defender who could guarantee that he wouldnt make a mistake? Impossible


Obviously at this level that would be unrealistic. He should have brought in a defender who was better than one of the current two.

Not a massive ask but we had to strengthen those forward areas first as a priority, didn't we?

_________________
Apols


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 12:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
Tax Paying Poolie wrote:
misterb2001 wrote:
misterb2001 wrote:
i agree about building from the back. However when you look at the two centre backs, they both should be good enough to play at this level easily. Turner obviously thought that with a bit of coaching that would be enough to cut out the mistakes, it hasnt. However there was a serious lack of quality up front which he resolved but was unlucky with injuries. He changed 3 of the back 5 and it still didnt work. our centrebacks technically speaking are easily good enough for this level, but for whatever reason they have made too many mistakes. Whos to say if he had brought a defender in that the new defender wouldnt have made loads of mistakes too? I have written this season off as experience and now expect several signings which should put right what went wrong.


'our centrebacks technically speaking are easily good enough for this level'

Techinically speaking they aren't good enough seeing as they make up the central defence of the 4th worst defence in League 1. Collins has been rubbish all season and Nelse performs well once in every five games. It's been happening since day 1 when we butchered Colchester to bits we still needed 3 goals to win the game. Who was the central defensive partnership that day? Shock horror it was Collins and Nelse. If they're easily 'good enough' for this level they wouldn't be make such shoddy errors on a weekly basis, it's not one or two errors over a season we talking about dozens. You only make these mistakes if you're not good enough.

You say we had a 'serious lack of quality upfront' but our defenders are 'easily good enough for this level'. WTF? The League table at the turn of the year tells a far different story to that.

'Whos to say if he had brought a defender in that the new defender wouldnt have made loads of mistakes too?'

A very weak point made with little substance. If you're strengthening an area then it would essentially mean that these mistakes are cut out.

so what your saying is that turner should have brought in a defender who could guarantee that he wouldnt make a mistake? Impossible


Obviously at this level that would be unrealistic. He should have brought in a defender who was better than one of the current two.

Not a massive ask but we had to strengthen those forward areas first as a priority, didn't we?[/quote]well seems as we only had one half fit striker and two who arent even good enough for the conference then yes, it was the priority. But at the end of the day we are all but guaranteed to be in this division next year so now we have a chance to put it right for next season...

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
MadJohn wrote:
I think it's too simplistic to say that our problems this season have been exclusively defensive ones. That would be true if you were only talking about games at the Vic. 40 goals conceded at home is suicidal, and would surely have relegated us but for the superb efforts of the forwards.

Our defensive record away from home is better than that of Hereford, Cheltenham, Crewe, Carlisle, Yeovil, Oldham, Huddersfield, Southend and Scunthorpe. We only conceded three less than Peterborough. So you could equally argue that our defence would have kept us well out of trouble away from home had it not been for the pitiful efforts of the forwards, who scored less than all teams bar Hereford and Yeovil.

These are the same players at both ends of the pitch. The defence is capable of being reasonably tight; the attack is capable of scoring tons of goals. Suggests to me that there's something wrong with the balance we have struck between attack and defence, home and away.
must be the midfields fault then lol

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 12:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am
Posts: 9053
[/quote]well seems as we only had one half fit striker and two who arent even good enough for the conference then yes, it was the priority. But at the end of the day we are all but guaranteed to be in this division next year so now we have a chance to put it right for next season...[/quote]

We'll have to agree to disagree. You think the priority was the forwards, I thought it was the defence.

I personally think I have been proved right given the results since he took over and Turner has got it massively massively wrong. It's a shame its cost me so much money to watch this bufoon almost out of the division - I won't be making that mistake again next season if he is in charge.

_________________
Apols


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
and i personally think that given a chance to make his own signings we will have a much better season next year.

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Porter to miss Bristol Rovers Game
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 12:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am
Posts: 9053
misterb2001 wrote:
and i personally think that given a chance to make his own signings we will have a much better season next year.


I hope you're right.

End of argument. Conclusion- I win.

:wink:

_________________
Apols


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 90 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: Arthurpoolie, billinghampoolie1908, bobby lemonade, Daz2, dykey, Essex poolie, Exiledpoolie62, Gatehouse, Infidel, Jules, loyal_fan, Manchester Exile, millhouseseats, Ozzy Saltburn, Pigeonace1, poolie1966, Poolie_on_Tyne, Pooly_Imp, PTID, Smokin Joe, Snowy, Splod, stevven, Stomper409, stupoolie and 253 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.