Just back from that fooking shambles

The Lightning Tree · **Joined:** Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:30 pm **Posts:** 5804

Wilson Out. No strikers on the bench, replaces Bolland with cant even remember his now now i'm that mad, clueless, bottleless, shocking, disgraceful, an absolute waste of space the lot of them.

Albatross · **Posted:** Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:30 pm

The Lightning Tree wrote:

Wilson Out. No strikers on the bench, replaces Bolland with cant even remember his now now i'm that mad, clueless, toothless, bottleless, shocking, disgraceful, an absolute waste of space the lot of them.

Maidens is who came on. We put Robson to Left back/wing back and Humphreys into Midfield, Eifion up front and he was nominally right wing. Not much credit for the players at all in my view.....

The Lightning Tree · **Joined:** Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:30 pm **Posts:** 5804

Talking to Foley after the match, went to see the useless bounders get on the team bus, he said he is fine, not sure about brown.

The clueless get in charge could have cost us a lot of money with his clueless tactics and non motivational skills.
Maccs were poor but we made them look good. This game was a banker and we blow it. I'm angry.

WILSON OUT.

Snowy · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm **Posts:** 36882

Let's face it, some of the players aren't interseted or just not up for it ..... it would appear. :roll:

The Lightning Tree · **Joined:** Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:30 pm **Posts:** 5804

Can anyone name a man of the match? Effion put himself about but no service at all from the midfield, 50/50 balls were lost, Daly munching grass everytime a defender went near him.

Where was strachan, where the foook was foley, get Darrell Clarke back, at least he gives 100% and drop that useless greek twit.

I'm more than seething, i'm absolutely bouncing, spolit my weekend, hopefully Hodcroft will be very bit as mad as me.

Mute Witness · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:10 am **Posts:** 3572

MadJohn wrote:

The Lightning Tree wrote:

Wilson Out. No strikers on the bench, replaces Bolland with cant even remember his now now i'm that mad, clueless, toothless, bottleless, shocking, disgraceful, an absolute waste of space the lot of them.

Not sure what exactly we could have done regarding strikers on the bench. As far as I understand it Foley and Brown were injured. Porter and Proctor were definitely injured, Duffy was ineligible. Daly and Williams played. That doesn't leave us much else. Michael Rae maybe?

I need to see the penalty/red card incident again. I have no doubt it changed the game as we were very comfortable up until that point. The only thing I couldn't be sure of from 100 yards away was whether or not the decision was correct.

From what I could see, it might have hit his arm. But the shot was hit pretty fast and it could have been difficult to get his arm out of the way. I'll have to see the replays.

Edit: Having said that it might have hit his face.

parmopooly · **Posted:** Sat Dec 02, 2006 10:44 pm

well we tried so hard to get rid of the "joke club" tag - but we're finding it a piece pf piss to become it once again.

The Lightning Tree · **Joined:** Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:30 pm **Posts:** 5804

We do it the easy way. Mind were u there today? a shambles is too good a word to say about the pack of poofs, at least when we were shoite we accepted it, its hard to accept it when you have players earning a good whack who dont care and a manager who plays players just not good enough and blames everything but himself.

Wilson Out.

Mute Witness · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:10 am **Posts:** 3572

What upset me was that once we went a goal down there heads went down and they never threatened to get back into it until the last few minutes.

Macclesfield were very poor and even with 10 men we should have won. There only good player was Bullock and I think he's on loan. Talking about their Bullock, why were we letting him run. Why weren't we getting stuck in. It was painful to watch. Now onto our Bullock...he sums up our midfield...he wasn't in the game today.

parmopooly · **Posted:** Sat Dec 02, 2006 11:07 pm

the team that started today,well put it this way I wouldn't want to watch that bunch of arseholes for free (Nelson, Barron and Clark excepted)

Cowboy · **Posted:** Sat Dec 02, 2006 11:52 pm

chip fireball wrote:

and who was it that decided to sell our one proven goalscorer and replace him with...... errr nobody. .

Man you like to bang on about this don't you?

BOYD WANTED TO LEAVE - FACT!

BOYD HADN'T HAD A DECENT GAME SINCE COMING BACK FROM INJURY -FACT!

WILSON WAS APPOINTED TOO LATE TO HAVE A HOPE OF SIGNING A REPLACEMENT STRIKER IN THE SUMMER - FACT!

Now I'm no Wilson lover, as far as I'm concerned the jury is out, but he inherited a bunch of no hopers, he was appointed too late to do much about it (the good players available would have been snapped up early) & don't forget there was the transfer embargo to contend with! The team had a losing mentality (& still has in my view). We can't hope for much better than mid table this season, it takes time to rebuild

But most of all

STOP BANGING ON ABOUT BOYD BEING SOLD, HE WANTED IT, HE WASN'T PLAYING WELL, IF HE'D STAYED WITH US HE WOULD HAVE CONTINUED NOT TO PLAY WELL - BECAUSE HE DIDN'T WANT TO BE HERE!!

GIVE IT A FOOKING REST

Cowboy · **Posted:** Sun Dec 03, 2006 1:11 am

chip fireball wrote:

as for giving it a rest, fine, i fookin will. i shall join the good doctor on the sidelines.

No you won't!

Tax Paying Poolie · **Joined:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am **Posts:** 9053

chip fireball wrote:

boland. past his best. a decent player nonetheless, but is he that much better than strachan ? and as for wilsons comment that hes a leader and a fighter... he wont even acknowledge the fans after the game.

That's a total knee jerk reaction to a bad performance. Boland is a quality signing and much better than Strachan who is rarely anything other than a 6/10 player

PJ_Poolie · **Posted:** Sun Dec 03, 2006 4:16 pm

Scott inherited a team that had finished sixth and had nearly been promoted to the championship, he had an unprecedented (for Pools) wage budget and the club had never been a more acctractive proposition for prospective new signings. Chuckle signed shite, the rest in history.

Wilson on the other inherited a relegated team with a goalscoring problem, he was then impeded further by a transfer embargo.

Who do you think had the harder job?

I think any Wilson/Scott comparisons are hugely unfair.

TalbotAvenger · **Posted:** Sun Dec 03, 2006 7:03 pm

PJ_Poolie wrote:

Scott inherited a team that had finished sixth and had nearly been promoted to the championship, he had an unprecedented (for Pools) wage budget and the club had never been a more acctractive proposition for prospective new signings. Chuckle signed shite, the rest in history.

Wilson on the other inherited a relegated team with a goalscoring problem, he was then impeded further by a transfer embargo.

Who do you think had the harder job?

I think any Wilson/Scott comparisons are hugely unfair.

PJ that is far to clear and fair and well thought out, what we need is RAGE

Just back from that fooking shambles

Gadgies online