Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Sat May 10, 2025 8:28 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: Willie boland
PostPosted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 6:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 12:35 pm
Posts: 183
Location: Hartlepool
Starting to show why wilson brought him to the club


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 7:32 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:53 pm
Posts: 1201
Location: Seaton Carew, Hartlepool
Hear, Hear!

Some numpty on Rivals reckons Tinkler would do a better job ??? Did he not go to the game today?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 7:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 12:35 pm
Posts: 183
Location: Hartlepool
him and liddle ran the midfield


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 8:58 pm 
we had more than 2 chances chipball.....duffy had 2 fair do's

sweeneys 1st touch was a save ffs! :roll: :laugh:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 9:00 pm 
Why be so bloody negative chip?

Two chances?? I remember quite a few more how about when Sweeney was clean through?

I thought Liddle had a very good game today and every single one of them gave everything which resulted in a very good win against a half decent side.

Three wins in week and it looks like we have our goalscorer in Duffy, surely things are looking up?


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 9:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 9787
Location: Just down the road from the Telstar
chip fireball wrote:
im not being negative. im being honest. ive said it was a fantastic result ffs.

apologies for forgetting sweeneys trademark surge into the box, but they played better than us in the first half. thats a fact. they were virtually camped in our half . they had one disallowed, 3 headed off the line, and 5 or 6 corners. dimi has made two excellent saves in the second half and mooney got 3 headers on target that dimi took in his stride. if you look at the stats you will find that they had at least 10 attempts on goal. we have played much better than we did today and lost.

on the plus side we kept a clean sheet. dimi was vey impressive. barron was superb. two clearances off the line and two superb blocks on the edge of the box. nelson was immense. clark was competenent, and rithchie was very good defensively. boland did well to stem the tide in midfield where he was carrying passengers. daly got stuck in and won some good balls in the air, and duffys finishing was sublime.

we are all entitled to our opinions. i thought liddle was average at best. he coughed up possession regularly and gave away about 10 free kicks by fouling.effion was very poor and the new lad looked like he hadnt played for a while. i thought their midfield was very impressive, and would have been better if betsy wasnt so ball greedy. for what its worth i thought the black lad in the middle for them, number 30, was the best midfielder on the park. thats just my opinion.


I suppose he should be the one who shined, he is on loan from Chelski

_________________
I like the comfort zone. It's where all the sandwiches are.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 10:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 9787
Location: Just down the road from the Telstar
I guess Wycombe is a little closer to them than we are. But we should be able to get good loans from our 'big three'.

_________________
I like the comfort zone. It's where all the sandwiches are.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 10:40 pm 
To be fair the so called 'big three' can't turn out decent sides for themselves!


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 12:27 am 
i know it is all down to opinions Chip but i thought Effion did ok today
they were a good side and first twenty minutes it was end to end i dont think it was all one way as you suggest
they became an aggressive side once they went behind and to some extent it contributed to their down fall


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 12:49 am 
poolpower wrote:
i know it is all down to opinions Chip but i thought Effion did ok today
they were a good side and first twenty minutes it was end to end i dont think it was all one way as you suggest
they became an aggressive side once they went behind and to some extent it contributed to their down fall


Agree with all of that, they were a very good side & played the ball about well, defensively however we had an excellent game, the midfield were ok (ish) & Duffy had a stormer up front. Still think Daly is a bit slow off the mark & tends to wait for the ball to come to him, rather than chasing to get it

Not sure about Effion, did ok, didn't really stand out though.Thought Liddle had a poor game.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 12:56 am 
liddle must certainly be heading for a ban he is booked every game now


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 1:27 am 
poolpower wrote:
liddle must certainly be heading for a ban he is booked every game now


He seemed very hot headed, I would have subbed him at 1/2 time


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 1:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am
Posts: 9053
Cowboy wrote:
poolpower wrote:
liddle must certainly be heading for a ban he is booked every game now


He seemed very hot headed, I would have subbed him at 1/2 time


I'd get him back at left back where excelled earlier in the season. For me, he doesn't suit this division's style of play in the middle

We also need to keep him away from the free kicks


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 9:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 6471
Just as well Sweeney is back, a straight swop for next week then?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 5:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am
Posts: 9053
Fensy wrote:
Just as well Sweeney is back, a straight swop for next week then?


Indeed. If Sweeney plays like he did on Saturday Liddle might regret that silly tackle on Saturday


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 6:39 pm 
Tax Paying Poolie wrote:
Fensy wrote:
Just as well Sweeney is back, a straight swop for next week then?


Indeed. If Sweeney plays like he did on Saturday Liddle might regret that silly tackle on Saturday


I hope not, our best midfield for me would be Liddle, Sweeney, Boland, Monkhouse. A midfield that is far more suited to this league, three of them over 6' and Liddle has played quite a lot as a right winger for Middlesbrough yoofs hasn't he? We haven't had a chance to see him play in that position and with his energy and pace he could be good.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 7:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am
Posts: 9053
PJ_Poolie wrote:
Tax Paying Poolie wrote:
Fensy wrote:
Just as well Sweeney is back, a straight swop for next week then?


Indeed. If Sweeney plays like he did on Saturday Liddle might regret that silly tackle on Saturday


I hope not, our best midfield for me would be Liddle, Sweeney, Boland, Monkhouse. A midfield that is far more suited to this league, three of them over 6' and Liddle has played quite a lot as a right winger for Middlesbrough yoofs hasn't he? We haven't had a chance to see him play in that position and with his energy and pace he could be good.


Although clearly a class player, Liddle has done nothing in the middle and isn't half the player he showed the promise to be. At a time when we're crying out for goals, I hope we can find the form of Sweens from two seasons ago...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 9:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
BillinghamPoolie wrote:
chip fireball wrote:
for what its worth i thought the black lad in the middle for them, number 30, was the best midfielder on the park. thats just my opinion


I suppose he should be the one who shined...


It's amazing what a bit of Cherry Blossom can do.

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 9:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:48 pm
Posts: 1278
If Eiffion was as poor as people are making out, think of the alternative - Ali G :uhoh:

I know Foley is another option, but he is an option our Manager seems reluctant to play.

So the question is, did Eiffion offer more than Ali G has :!:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 9:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
LeicesterPoolie wrote:
If Eiffion was as poor as people are making out, think of the alternative - Ali G :uhoh:

I know Foley is another option, but he is an option our Manager seems reluctant to play.

So the question is, did Eiffion offer more than Ali G has :!:


He did even though he is not a midfielder.

Eiffion's best performance this season was at his proper position of centre forward when he got half a game there against Rochdale. Once he was moved we lost the initiative and nearly the game.

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
Is that Monty in the foreground of that poster?

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 12:54 pm 
Mr Ripper wrote:
Is that Monty in the foreground of that poster?


Nope, that's him between the two geezers!! :razz: :razz: :razz:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:46 am
Posts: 16992
Location: The people's democratic illegal republic of Catalonia
Pooliekev wrote:
Mr Ripper wrote:
Is that Monty in the foreground of that poster?

Nope, that's him between the two geezers!! :razz: :razz: :razz:

She's not me but she's a dead ringer for my last girlfriend. :sweet:

_________________
No, your children are not the special ones.
(Nor is your dog.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 5:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:54 pm
Posts: 13354
Location: on me bike
she looks harder than Bullock though.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: Bazil, bobby lemonade, Bosh85, charltonclive, Dorset Poolie, dykey, Freaky Teeth, Jazzmorgans123, JBPoolie, JohnnyMars, kevin pooles gloves, Manchester Exile, Pooly_Imp, PTID, Rinkender, Smokin Joe, stupoolie, Warwick Hunt and 274 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.