Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Sat Jun 28, 2025 9:29 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 68 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Media Ban @ Vic
PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:23 am
Posts: 3141
katcha wrote:
gremmlin wrote:
clappp clappp clappp clappp clappp



clappp clappp

more sarcasm for you

I know the crack re this Gremm and just cos Frankie boy talks to you (or could well be you at times :laugh: ) or a n other talks to you then you think you can slate others - you will only get the one-eyed one sided part of the story and will, by habit, fall for it.

At the end of the day the ban is there for SEVERAL reasons on all sides - it's up to them to sort it out if they can, if they can't is it going to make the result of the game any different?

Don't think so.

Are Pools still playing every weekend?

Yep

Do Pools charge you for selling MB on their premises?

If not then you should well sit on the fence on this one just in case they cast their eye in your direction.

Can the reporters get to now even look Mr Wilson in the eye?

Nope

Personally I find it funny but there's funnier things going on in the world and much much more serious things to worry about and get all aggressive and emotional about.


i thought fodroffs quote on the mail deserved a clap

you know the crack so you have spoken to both parties?
i have never discussed this with frankie boy and again you are misinformed on the frankie being me
at this moment i am waiting for a reply from the instigator of the lies to get back still waiting john if you want to debate it on an open forum then lets do it
and where have i slated anyone??
just passing comment
we all know it is for several reasons but it is not for us to comment on here which is why i posted misinformed
but again people on the bunker put two and two together and come up with five
so what has pools results got to do with it and for that matter what has MB got to do with it that is a pretty stupid statement
also i think you will find unless a ground purchase has gone ahead without any of us knowing it still isnt actually their premises
and as i have never commented one way or the other yet accused of being biased?
as for emotional you are simply here having a pop at me for your own ends thats what i call aggression

_________________
Image
innocent of all charges and still no evidence
it is easy to accuse when you dont have to prove


go back to your drum and your anti depressants yes you


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Media Ban @ Vic
PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am
Posts: 20758
As I said before, The Mail is utter shite anyway so I find it hilarious and hope they never get to use pictures of pools again. Well done Ken!

_________________
I'd recommend a more stealthy plan than googling 'afternoon tea dog'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Media Ban @ Vic
PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
Tree_With_Hamster wrote:
As I said before, The Mail is utter shite anyway so I find it hilarious and hope they never get to use pictures of pools again. Well done Ken!


:shock: :shock: :shock:

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Media Ban @ Vic
PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 11:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 11:26 pm
Posts: 5832
Location: number 8
as it's a sunday

prov 28:13

he who conceals his transgressions will not prosper, but he who confesses and forsakes them will obtain mercy

or something like that

or something like

stop talking bollocks

_________________
I have forgotten more than you will ever know


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Media Ban @ Vic
PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 12:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:23 am
Posts: 3141
so you are saying the mail can run a story but "it is not for us to comment on here" about it ????
would you care to expand on that ?
read again chip i said you were misinformed and stick by that

you see the last time i checked this was a message board and we were living in a democracy ?????
we are living in a democracy and i can be condemned with out a trial by people who know nowt about what went on

you are the one alleging people are misinformed. is that your opinion or the opinion of your mates at the mail????
my opinion and i have no mates at the mail

as for you never having discussed it with frank reid.............. whatever.
so in this democracy i am called a liar again with out proof
you and i know your beef chip but you can have your cheap shot

_________________
Image
innocent of all charges and still no evidence
it is easy to accuse when you dont have to prove


go back to your drum and your anti depressants yes you


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Media Ban @ Vic
PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:23 am
Posts: 3141
katcha wrote:
as it's a sunday

prov 28:13

he who conceals his transgressions will not prosper, but he who confesses and forsakes them will obtain mercy

or something like that

or something like

stop talking bollocks

an empty vessel makes the most noise

_________________
Image
innocent of all charges and still no evidence
it is easy to accuse when you dont have to prove


go back to your drum and your anti depressants yes you


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Media Ban @ Vic
PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 12:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am
Posts: 20758
gremmlin wrote:
so you are saying the mail can run a story but "it is not for us to comment on here" about it ????
would you care to expand on that ?
read again chip i said you were misinformed and stick by that

you see the last time i checked this was a message board and we were living in a democracy ?????
we are living in a democracy and i can be condemned with out a trial by people who know nowt about what went on

you are the one alleging people are misinformed. is that your opinion or the opinion of your mates at the mail????
my opinion and i have no mates at the mail

as for you never having discussed it with frank reid.............. whatever.
so in this democracy i am called a liar again with out proof
you and i know your beef chip but you can have your cheap shot


Suddenly id quite happily read POKs posts. yawn2 yawn2

_________________
I'd recommend a more stealthy plan than googling 'afternoon tea dog'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Media Ban @ Vic
PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 2:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:23 am
Posts: 3141
yes i am still posting on here and trying to get someone to show some proof of the allegations but he seems to have ducked out for what ever reason i am guilty in the eyes of those ignorant of the facts that is the way it works on here


again you just can't stick to the script chip
read again i said i had not discussed this with frank reid
as someone on this board will confirm the mail employees are not allowed to discuss the situation
i don't need to explain to you who i talk to or what i discuss

_________________
Image
innocent of all charges and still no evidence
it is easy to accuse when you dont have to prove


go back to your drum and your anti depressants yes you


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Media Ban @ Vic
PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 3:38 pm 
gremmlin wrote:
yes i am still posting on here and trying to get someone to show some proof of the allegations but he seems to have ducked out for what ever reason i am guilty in the eyes of those ignorant of the facts that is the way it works on here


again you just can't stick to the script chip
read again i said i had not discussed this with frank reid
as someone on this board will confirm the mail employees are not allowed to discuss the situation
i don't need to explain to you who i talk to or what i discuss

You are wasting your time mate.......you just can't educate pork or cockernees. :roll:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Media Ban @ Vic
PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 5:57 pm 
Frodraff wrote:
I've just found out from Chip's post that they've scrapped the Football Mail. It's like we're on a downward spiral with all the really valuable but possibly unessential things i.e. bits of luxury that make life worth living, being rationalised out of existence.

What a shame.

As much my fault I suppose for not being there to buy it.


Were you at Millwall yesterday, you bugger...... :evil: :evil: :evil:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Media Ban @ Vic
PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 4:27 pm
Posts: 2175
Location: Frodsham where ladies have plums in their mouth
Spender wrote:
Frodraff wrote:
I've just found out from Chip's post that they've scrapped the Football Mail. It's like we're on a downward spiral with all the really valuable but possibly unessential things i.e. bits of luxury that make life worth living, being rationalised out of existence.

What a shame.

As much my fault I suppose for not being there to buy it.


Were you at Millwall yesterday, you bugger...... :evil: :evil: :evil:


Not me, I haven't that much influence. But it wasn't good hearing the result read out by Mrs Stelling's eldest. You'll just have to resort to blaming Wilson like everyone else.

There's a bit of bickering going on on here isn't there.

It's crackers that the Mail isn't able to fully report on Pools matches though. I expect the matches are written up but with no pics it'll make it into a very bland account. I would've thought that Pools reports in the Mail would be regarded by the club as one of it's major promotion vehicles. Sounds like a major footshooting excercise to me.

By the way did you hear that the Liverpool Echo is now going to be printed in Manchester. :laugh:

I managed to arrange it to get my own back on the scouser that pinched my strimmer.

_________________
I think I know A Short Cut


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Media Ban @ Vic
PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:26 pm 
[quote="Frodraff"]
There's a bit of bickering going on on here isn't there.

It's crackers that the Mail isn't able to fully report on Pools matches though. /quote]

I agree......difficult to say which is the more juvenile.


ps Jeff is Mrs Stelling's youngest


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Media Ban @ Vic
PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:36 pm 
Frodraff wrote:
Spender wrote:
Frodraff wrote:
I've just found out from Chip's post that they've scrapped the Football Mail. It's like we're on a downward spiral with all the really valuable but possibly unessential things i.e. bits of luxury that make life worth living, being rationalised out of existence.

What a shame.

As much my fault I suppose for not being there to buy it.


Were you at Millwall yesterday, you bugger...... :evil: :evil: :evil:


Not me, I haven't that much influence. But it wasn't good hearing the result read out by Mrs Stelling's eldest. You'll just have to resort to blaming Wilson like everyone else.

There's a bit of bickering going on on here isn't there.

It's crackers that the Mail isn't able to fully report on Pools matches though. I expect the matches are written up but with no pics it'll make it into a very bland account. I would've thought that Pools reports in the Mail would be regarded by the club as one of it's major promotion vehicles. Sounds like a major footshooting excercise to me.

By the way did you hear that the Liverpool Echo is now going to be printed in Manchester. :laugh:

I managed to arrange it to get my own back on the scouser that pinched my strimmer.


Well, they're going to have to go back to broadsheet if they want to 'give a wet leg' from Manchester, that's for sure.

To be honest I'm on the club side on that dispute. The papers have had a free ride for donkeys and then the photographers start calling copywrite in, as do the papers employing the photographers. Well, who's actual product are they selling, and now there's a media department, even in the small clubs, it's a different question to be asked. If I've got sympathy, it's for the reporters, who in three cases are genuine fans.

The bickering is finished.

Stone cold Kev says so.....I don't wake up to read that over coffee...craps on my day. :evil:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Media Ban @ Vic
PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:37 pm 
grabec wrote:
Frodraff wrote:
There's a bit of bickering going on on here isn't there.

It's crackers that the Mail isn't able to fully report on Pools matches though. /quote]

I agree......difficult to say which is the more juvenile.


ps Jeff is Mrs Stelling's youngest


Weren't you at school with the second eldest?? sctatchinghead sctatchinghead


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Media Ban @ Vic
PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:42 pm 
Spender wrote:


To be honest I'm on the club side on that dispute. The papers have had a free ride for donkeys and then the photographers start calling copywrite in, as do the papers employing the photographers. Well, who's actual product are they selling, and now there's a media department, even in the small clubs, it's a different question to be asked. If I've got sympathy, it's for the reporters, who in three cases are genuine fans.

The bickering is finished.

Stone cold Kev says so.....I don't wake up to read that over coffee...craps on my day. :evil:


Well, I'm not sure what the dispute is yet, since no official statement is forthcoming. But copyright is copyright...the writer, artist, photographer or whatever has the ownership of her/his work. If capitalists (c. K Marx) are able to demand a cut, where will it end?


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Media Ban @ Vic
PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:42 pm 
Spender wrote:
grabec wrote:
Frodraff wrote:
There's a bit of bickering going on on here isn't there.

It's crackers that the Mail isn't able to fully report on Pools matches though. /quote]

I agree......difficult to say which is the more juvenile.


ps Jeff is Mrs Stelling's youngest


Weren't you at school with the second eldest?? sctatchinghead sctatchinghead


No


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Media Ban @ Vic
PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 8:08 pm 
grabec wrote:
Weren't you at school with the second eldest?? sctatchinghead sctatchinghead


No[/quote]

Behind the bike sheds?? :shock:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Media Ban @ Vic
PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 4:27 pm
Posts: 2175
Location: Frodsham where ladies have plums in their mouth
Spender wrote:
grabec wrote:
Weren't you at school with the second eldest?? sctatchinghead sctatchinghead


No


Behind the bike sheds?? :shock:[/quote]

Definitely not. The High School was an all girls school. And don't even go there.

_________________
I think I know A Short Cut


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 68 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: accrington fan, ALMoody, billinghampoolie1908, Bluebones, bobby lemonade, Colcol, Corner Flag, Daz2, Elephant Rock, Essex poolie, Infidel, JBPoolie, Littlewaster, loyal_fan, Mikey76, mugsy, MutleyRules, nat the poolie, Optimistic, Our Younguns Dad, pollyo, Poolie27, Poolie_merv, Pooly_Imp, PTID, RichyHpool, TFP and 213 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.