Perkins

PJ_Poolie · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 2:48 pm

1) Can we sign him please Danny?

2) I hope that justice prevails and that red card is overturned, in my eyes that wasn't even a booking. It was only Foster and Ravenhill's reaction that led to the red card, in fact Ravenhill went in just as hard. It was no more than an old fashioned 50:50. It would be a crying shame in such a good young player missed out on a game at Wembley because of an incompetent referee and two cheating Darlo not nice people.

aido87 · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 2:50 pm

i concur, except i thought it was nelthorpe he missed with that tackle. never a yellow never mind a fookin red. foster should have been booked and that's it. he's shyte that ref like

Mute Witness · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:10 am **Posts:** 3572

Here here.

Agree on both counts.

Jonny · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 2:51 pm

I agree on both points - you would think that the ref would show a bit of common sense especially as they had been playing for about 110 minutes.....

JohnnyMars · **Joined:** Tue Jun 12, 2007 10:24 am **Posts:** 2471

That was never a sending off - shocking decision.

PJ_Poolie · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 3:11 pm

aido87 wrote:

i concur, except i thought it was nelthorpe he missed with that tackle. never a yellow never mind a fookin red. foster should have been booked and that's it. he's shyte that ref like

Aido's avatar rolfl

aido87 · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 3:23 pm

my new third club :grin:

Obafemi Obsession · **Posted:** Tue May 20, 2008 6:47 pm

Was the appeal described as "frivolous"? rolfl

Matty_Robson's_Chin · **Joined:** Tue Mar 13, 2007 12:57 pm **Posts:** 2155

could be banned for 5 games!!!!

Gibsons Beard · **Posted:** Tue May 20, 2008 8:12 pm

PJ_Poolie wrote:

1) Can we sign him please Danny?

2) I hope that justice prevails and that red card is overturned, in my eyes that wasn't even a booking. It was only Foster and Ravenhill's reaction that led to the red card, in fact Ravenhill went in just as hard. It was no more than an old fashioned 50:50. It would be a crying shame in such a good young player missed out on a game at Wembley because of an incompetent referee and two cheating Darlo c***.

quality avatar PJ (Oh and Aido too)

PJ_Poolie · **Posted:** Tue May 20, 2008 8:23 pm

What is the point in the appeal system?

Unless the referee admits he's got it wrong they don't do anything and just stick by the ref. Are you telling me that red would have stood for let's say for example against Frank Lampard? Is it now an offenece to be a bit aggressive on a football field? What's the game coming to it wasn't even a foul!!

The appeal process may as well be scrapped as it's an absolute joke. They have several angles as the game was televised yet because the shite hawk dog noncer of a referee sticks to his guns the decision stands, you can clearly see there is no contact and it wasn't an 'over the top' challenge so what has he actually been sent off for? Because Foster and Ravenhill thought he'd gone in a bit hard? I bet the ref feels he got the penalty decision right as well :roll:

It's turned into a mincers game. Tell the ref he was wrong, tell him he's shite and tell Foster and Ravenhill to stop being girls and to enjoy division four next season. That is how I would have dealt with the appeal :wink:

Actually I'd have banned Foster for all of next season while I was at it.

and docked Darlo 25 points.

Mr Ripper · **Posted:** Tue May 20, 2008 8:25 pm

PJ_Poolie wrote:

What is the point in the appeal system?

Unless the referee admits he's got it wrong they don't do anything and just stick by the ref. Are you telling me that red would have stood for let's say for example against Frank Lampard? Is it now an offenece to be a bit aggressive on a football field? What's the game coming to it wasn't even a foul!!

The appeal process may as well be scrapped as it's an absolute joke. They have several angles as the game was televised yet because the shite hawk dog noncer of a referee sticks to his guns the decision stands, you can clearly see there is no contact and it wasn't an 'over the top' challenge so what has he actually been sent off for? Because Foster and Ravenhill thought he'd gone in a bit hard? I bet the ref feels he got the penalty decision right as well :roll:

It's turned into a mincers game. Tell the ref he was wrong, tell him he's shite and tell Foster and Ravenhill to stop being girls and to enjoy division four next season. That is how I would have dealt with the appeal :wink:

Actually I'd have banned Foster for all of next season while I was at it.

and docked Darlo 25 points.

Well said that man, well said. clappp

I fully concur. clappp

Gibsons Beard · **Posted:** Tue May 20, 2008 8:36 pm

PJ_Poolie wrote:

What is the point in the appeal system?

Unless the referee admits he's got it wrong they don't do anything and just stick by the ref. Are you telling me that red would have stood for let's say for example against Frank Lampard? Is it now an offenece to be a bit aggressive on a football field? What's the game coming to it wasn't even a foul!!

The appeal process may as well be scrapped as it's an absolute joke. They have several angles as the game was televised yet because the shite hawk dog noncer of a referee sticks to his guns the decision stands, you can clearly see there is no contact and it wasn't an 'over the top' challenge so what has he actually been sent off for? Because Foster and Ravenhill thought he'd gone in a bit hard? I bet the ref feels he got the penalty decision right as well :roll:

It's turned into a mincers game. Tell the ref he was wrong, tell him he's shite and tell Foster and Ravenhill to stop being girls and to enjoy division four next season. That is how I would have dealt with the appeal :wink:

Actually I'd have banned Foster for all of next season while I was at it.

and docked Darlo 25 points.

LOL, that post is probably amusing but it is so 'right' at the same time! clappp

Perkins

Gadgies online