Without their points deduction

Gibsons Beard · **Posted:** Mon Apr 14, 2008 8:00 am

Nobodys Hero wrote:

we would now only be two points ahead of bournemouth.

And am I right in thinking we are only 3 points ahead of what we got when Scotty got us relegated?

Ok there are three games to go, but I am not expecting any more points.

I suspect we may finish level with Crewe and less than 10 points ahead of bournemouth.

Its appalling and utterly shameful.

Everyone wanted Scott out, but some of you say Wison has done OK.

Its a fine line innit?

and what is more worrying is that Scotty was not an experienced manager like Danny Wilson. Wilson out

Tax Paying Poolie · **Joined:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am **Posts:** 9053

MadJohn wrote:

Nobodys Hero wrote:

we would now only be two points ahead of bournemouth.

And am I right in thinking we are only 3 points ahead of what we got when Scotty got us relegated?

Ok there are three games to go, but I am not expecting any more points.

I suspect we may finish level with Crewe and less than 10 points ahead of bournemouth.

Its appalling and utterly shameful.

Everyone wanted Scott out, but some of you say Wison has done OK.

Its a fine line innit?

All I can read into that is that Bournemouth have done well, which is true. They've won their last four games and generally done very well over the last 2-3 months. It probably still won't be enough but I hope they dig themselves out of it.

Exactly. I don't think Dibble knows what he is trying to say there. So fuck- Bournemouth would have finished above us, what has that got to do with anything?

Poolie_Girl · **Joined:** Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:45 pm **Posts:** 148

Thats selective statistics isn't it?

How about Swindon, Bristol Rovers, Milwall, Yeovil, Cheltenham, Crewe and Gillingham. The other clubs who are actually in between us and Bournemouth meaning we would still be no where near the relegation zone regardless of Bournemouth being given their points back or not.

I disagree with a lot of Wilsons decisions, most of them in fact and strongly believe that if we are to progress as a club then it will be with someone else in charge but sadly this isn't one argument that we can use against him.

For me Wilsons downfall is that he makes some horrendous decisions week in week out particularly when it comes to picking his starting 11. Now if he was a player who was making mistakes week in week out in his job he would be dropped and someone else would take his place. There is only so long that Wilson can go on making the same mistakes before its time for someone else to have a go in my opinion.

Montpoolier · **Posted:** Mon Apr 14, 2008 12:01 pm

Nobodys Hero wrote:

And am I right in thinking we are only 3 points ahead of what we got when Scotty got us relegated?

No. You are wrong. We are only 3 points ahead of what we got when STEPHO got us relegated.

Scott might have finished with more points than Wilson for all we know if he'd seen the season out.

Poolie_Girl · **Joined:** Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:45 pm **Posts:** 148

Nobodys Hero wrote:

SO, if say, we finish 5th bottom, 9 points ahead of Bournemouth, that wouldnt be shameful?

As some of you seem to have money to burn, it doesnt surprise me that you appear "satisfied" with this season.

I am certainly not satisfied with this season, I think we have greatly underachieved for what this squad of players should be capable of and have said for some time I don't think Wilson is the man to take us any further. See my post on the other thread about the Hereford game, that for me was when his poor decisions just got even worse.

Equally though, I don't think we will finish 5th bottom as I can't see all of those teams below us picking up enough points to climb above us in the last 3 games. I reckon we will finish round about where we are just now but in some ways I feel our position is despite Wilson not because of him.

Jonny · **Posted:** Mon Apr 14, 2008 12:19 pm

Nobodys Hero wrote:

SO, if say, we finish 5th bottom, 9 points ahead of Bournemouth, that wouldnt be shameful?

As some of you seem to have money to burn, it doesnt surprise me that you appear "satisfied" with this season.

BTW........

We have found a way of ensuring we get to see all of next seasons games for 230 quid for the whole season. But I know some of you would prefer to pay the 400quid predicted as the season ticket price for next season. So I will keep it to myself.

Unless you give me 50 quid each.

Do you get in for a tenner a game because you are now over the age of 60? Or do you just look over the age of 60 so you are presuming there will be no questions asked when you ask for a concession ticket....?

Mr Ripper · **Posted:** Mon Apr 14, 2008 12:22 pm

MadJohn wrote:

Nobodys Hero wrote:

As some of you seem to have money to burn, it doesnt surprise me that you appear "satisfied" with this season.

What in the name of living holy fook does THAT mean stpid

I'd guess it means that some people would smile happily while chucking 20 quid notes down a drain if they thought that the drain belonged to HUFC.

Fetish_Bob · **Posted:** Mon Apr 14, 2008 1:35 pm

And without thier points deduction Leeds are 2nd and Swansea wouldn't won promotion on Saturday though by end of week they may not have won it anyway if Leeds get their points back. So some teams suffer a lot more than us. a pointless reply I know but the thread is pointless so I'm just going along with it.

Spender · **Posted:** Mon Apr 14, 2008 2:54 pm

Nobodys Hero wrote:

we would now only be two points ahead of bournemouth.

They have it, we aren't.

And am I right in thinking we are only 3 points ahead of what we got when Scotty got us relegated?

And?? We aren't going to get relegated.

Ok there are three games to go, but I am not expecting any more points.

You said that in December. Not the games thing, the points thing. :roll:

I suspect we may finish level with Crewe and less than 10 points ahead of bournemouth.

So what?? If we don't get relegated and we don't need points for pay off or promotion, what difference does it make??

Its appalling and utterly shameful.

Why is it??

Everyone wanted Scott out, but some of you say Wison has done OK.

Scott took a winning challenging team and turned it into a big pile of reeking cack. Wilson took the same team, got it promoted and kept it safe in the higher division, which Scott didn't.

Its a fine line innit?

What, the difference between hysteria and common sense??

Yeah I know, I don't go and they're only statistics. :roll:

Funny, everyone else calls them league placings........

Spender · **Posted:** Mon Apr 14, 2008 4:28 pm

No, I just have to sit in front of a commentary at ten o'clock at night until midnight. On a Saturday. 5000 miles away.

But share your pain by all means..... :roll:

gremmlin · **Joined:** Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:23 am **Posts:** 3141

more pathos required in the next report :sweeeet:

Spender · **Posted:** Mon Apr 14, 2008 5:02 pm

Aye, well, there's been a lot of similar Saturdays this year. :roll:

But there's always next year!! :laugh:

Without their points deduction

Gadgies online