Wasn't that good?!

Mr Ripper · **Posted:** Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:57 am

Was it shite.

Budtz- 0- sod off you big dopey sod before you get us relegated
Sweeney- 9- well played, best player on the pitch
Nelson- 5- poor again
Antwi- 0- did we get him from the flea market? share a taxi with butter fingers please
Humphreys- 6- ok, by no means the worst
Foley- 4- still not good enough
Liddle- 7- not his best game
Boland- 5- ineffective. again.
Thompson- 4- is he only there to take free kicks?
Barker- 8- thank you for two goals and the get out of jail card
Porter- 8- creates so much space for others and still scares opponents
McCunnie- 7- steadied things
Robson- 7- injected some pace and put them on the back foot
Mackay- 7- same as Robson

But how is Wilson still in a bloody job?

11 v 11 we lost 2-0 at home to the bottom of the league team.

Fair play for the comeback but it shouldn't have been needed and does anybody seriously think it would have happened if they didn't have a bloke sent off?

Mr Parmo, as discussed yesterday, where do you think that this puts us on the shiteometer then?

Mr Ripper · **Posted:** Wed Feb 13, 2008 10:52 am

Nobodys Hero wrote:

If anyone at the club REALLY cared Wilson would be sacked today.

I doubt any of us have ever witnessed such a spineless gutless performance in 30 odd years of watching pools.

He is in charge of that utter cack. He HAS to answer for it. We well and truly escaped an embarrassing defeat due only to poor finishing from Port Vale, and the sending off.

It was beyond belief.

And anyone defending it must have another agenda.

GUTLESS SPINELESS BOTTLELESS.

grabec · **Posted:** Wed Feb 13, 2008 11:36 am

MadJohn wrote:

But we were anything but gutless. No lack of effort throughout, just a lack of quality.

That's exactly where fans who yell and boo are wrong. There' s no point at all in vilifying players who are trying their best at the time. Unless you think abuse is an incentive

Mr Ripper · **Posted:** Wed Feb 13, 2008 11:37 am

grabec wrote:

MadJohn wrote:

But we were anything but gutless. No lack of effort throughout, just a lack of quality.

That's exactly where fans who yell and boo are wrong. There' s no point at all in vilifying players who are trying their best at the time. Unless you think abuse is an incentive

grabec · **Posted:** Wed Feb 13, 2008 11:47 am

Nobodys Hero wrote:

Grabec. We were appalling from the start.

No one was been abusive then.

So whats their excuse for the first 20 minutes.

And lets face it.....a keeper that couldnt get a hand to the two goals, air kicked the ball at least twice, collided with his own defenders twice, and flapped at crosses numerous times is hardly likely to get any better with a bit of jolly boy encouragement is he?

He is way beyond that.

Yes that is true, also. Lots of things can be true at the same time :sweeeet:

Mr Ripper · **Posted:** Wed Feb 13, 2008 11:50 am

Nobodys Hero wrote:

And lets face it.....a keeper that couldnt get a hand to the two goals, air kicked the ball at least twice, collided with his own defenders twice, and flapped at crosses numerous times is hardly likely to get any better with a bit of jolly boy encouragement is he?

If Jeremy Beadle hadn't been so publicly decreed as deceased recently then I would have been convinced that the ref was him in disguise and that Budtz and Antwi's performances were some kind of prank being played on us all.

Fetish_Bob · **Posted:** Wed Feb 13, 2008 12:23 pm

Last night's performance was totally inept. And apart from gaining 3 points, there was only one other positive from the game, the fact we looked more balanced when McCunnie came on.And with Nelson out on Saturday, he should at least get a starting place. Who plays centre defence is the major problem, on last's night's performance and most of his recent one's Antwi shouldn't even be in the 16,but with Nelson Collins and Clark,Wilson will probably pick ,unless we bring someone in before 5pm Friday,so if not my team would be.

Barrett
McCunnie
Liddle
Elliott
Humphreys
Sweeney
Boland
Thompson
Monkhouse
Porter
Barker

Subs
Budtz
McKay
Antwi
Robson
Foley

The fact I pick Elliott in centre defence will probably cause some resentment amongst most on here, but No way would i start Antwi.

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Wed Feb 13, 2008 6:31 pm

Mr Ripper wrote:

Budtz- 0- sod off you big dopey sod before you get us relegated

That's a bit harsh don't you think????

Don't forget....in about 10 months time he's going to be Brilliant!!!! :sweeeet:

And what mark out of 10 would you give Wilson????

Someone gave him an 8 you know!!!! :shock:

Mr Ripper · **Posted:** Wed Feb 13, 2008 6:46 pm

MutleyRules wrote:

Mr Ripper wrote:

Budtz- 0- sod off you big dopey sod before you get us relegated

That's a bit harsh don't you think????

Don't forget....in about 10 months time he's going to be Brilliant!!!! :sweeeet:

And what mark out of 10 would you give Wilson????

Someone gave him an 8 you know!!!! :shock:

Aye, dead harsh. rolfl

Have you seen their goals on the telly yet? :shock:

I'd give Wilson negative points for getting us into the mess in the first place. :evil:

gremmlin · **Joined:** Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:23 am **Posts:** 3141

just seen the goals
butz at fault both low down and he just can't get down there on time
would be intersting to see the goals he has conceded and show it to george wood
but then again the language difficulty :laugh:

Yossarian · **Joined:** Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:29 pm **Posts:** 801

MutleyRules wrote:

That's a bit harsh don't you think????

Don't forget....in about 10 months time he's going to be Brilliant!!!! :sweeeet:

And what mark out of 10 would you give Wilson????

Someone gave him an 8 you know!!!! :shock:

Talking of harsh ratings Nick Loughlin gave Barker 5 out of 10 in the Northern Echo today, now thats harsh!

PJ_Poolie · **Posted:** Wed Feb 13, 2008 8:49 pm

Yossarian wrote:

MutleyRules wrote:

That's a bit harsh don't you think????

Don't forget....in about 10 months time he's going to be Brilliant!!!! :sweeeet:

And what mark out of 10 would you give Wilson????

Someone gave him an 8 you know!!!! :shock:

Talking of harsh ratings Nick Loughlin gave Barker 5 out of 10 in the Northern Echo today, now thats harsh!

I thought that must have been a mistake as Foley got a higher mark rolfl

Wasn't that good?!

Gadgies online