Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Sat Jun 14, 2025 10:53 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: so who was to blame for todays
PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 10:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
i think your out of order mate.

i dont know who is more negative, you or the elusive Mr Headlander.

we played against a good team today, without 3 of our better players (who were injured) and got beat. Its hardly the end of the world.

The fact that you keep harping on about how Clark was dropped and Porter has barely gotten a sniff is really boring now.
Cant you just forget it, its in the past now!

Clark will be back in along side Nelse and Porter has proved he can add something extra when he does play.

Wilson doesnt deserve the amount of rubbish that is spouted in his direction from the likes of you.

And why does there have to be somebody to blame? Cant we just accept that we are a mid-table team at best who will invariably lose quite a lot of away matches this season?

Were you even there today? :roll:


p.s. Come on Hatton! clappp

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: so who was to blame for todays
PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 11:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
misterb2001 wrote:
i think your out of order mate.

i dont know who is more negative, you or the elusive Mr Headlander.

we played against a good team today, without 3 of our better players (who were injured) and got beat. Its hardly the end of the world.

The fact that you keep harping on about how Clark was dropped and Porter has barely gotten a sniff is really boring now.
Cant you just forget it, its in the past now!

Clark will be back in along side Nelse and Porter has proved he can add something extra when he does play.

Wilson doesnt deserve the amount of rubbish that is spouted in his direction from the likes of you.

And why does there have to be somebody to blame? Cant we just accept that we are a mid-table team at best who will invariably lose quite a lot of away matches this season?

Were you even there today? :roll:


p.s. Come on Hatton! clappp


Who are you, like? sctatchinghead

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: so who was to blame for todays
PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 11:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37067
misterb2001 wrote:
i think your out of order mate.

i dont know who is more negative, you or the elusive Mr Headlander.

we played against a good team today, without 3 of our better players (who were injured) and got beat. Its hardly the end of the world.

The fact that you keep harping on about how Clark was dropped and Porter has barely gotten a sniff is really boring now.
Cant you just forget it, its in the past now!

Clark will be back in along side Nelse and Porter has proved he can add something extra when he does play.

Wilson doesnt deserve the amount of rubbish that is spouted in his direction from the likes of you.

And why does there have to be somebody to blame? Cant we just accept that we are a mid-table team at best who will invariably lose quite a lot of away matches this season?

Were you even there today? :roll:


p.s. Come on Hatton! clappp
....is that you Danny?

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: so who was to blame for todays
PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 11:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:23 am
Posts: 3141
sure i have seen the name some where or similar
what i will say is having read a report from the ground it was not as bad as it sounds

antwi was off for approx 11 minutes if that was the case then it needed more than a re shuffle
but again i think the final score makes it sound worse than it was
two in that short time we had ten men is bad but the only one possible to bring on would have been boland
it is still hard to take as our form over the last 10 we have only won 2 and drawn 1 not good enough

_________________
Image
innocent of all charges and still no evidence
it is easy to accuse when you dont have to prove


go back to your drum and your anti depressants yes you


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: so who was to blame for todays
PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 11:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
gravedisorder wrote:
misterb2001 wrote:
i think your out of order mate.

i dont know who is more negative, you or the elusive Mr Headlander.

we played against a good team today, without 3 of our better players (who were injured) and got beat. Its hardly the end of the world.

The fact that you keep harping on about how Clark was dropped and Porter has barely gotten a sniff is really boring now.
Cant you just forget it, its in the past now!

Clark will be back in along side Nelse and Porter has proved he can add something extra when he does play.

Wilson doesnt deserve the amount of rubbish that is spouted in his direction from the likes of you.

And why does there have to be somebody to blame? Cant we just accept that we are a mid-table team at best who will invariably lose quite a lot of away matches this season?

Were you even there today? :roll:


p.s. Come on Hatton! clappp


Who are you, like? sctatchinghead



i'm me, who are you? :wink:

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: so who was to blame for todays
PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 12:16 am 
They maybe trouble ahead............wait till ADG finishes his pies :D


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: so who was to blame for todays
PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 12:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37067
I fear Dibble will want a good run up to this one...stand clear :laugh:

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: so who was to blame for todays
PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 12:38 am 
Offline
Partially Top Guano Man
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 11:09 pm
Posts: 11204
Location: i am busy right now, can i ignore you some other time?
Well i just back, and so feel I can comment. It was just one those days, the Loss of Antwi resulted in the 2 goals being conceded, and from leading to being behind, and then having to play against the wind in the 2nd half. 3 poor defensive mistakes cost us today,something Wilson, on the sidelines can do nothing about.

Barker puts a glancing header just wide and from the resulting goal kick a poor back pass allows them to score the 3rd,a very small dividing line between being 2-2 and it being 3-1.

And to make matters worse Humphries may have done a metatarsal and be out for a few weeks as well,though more should be known on Monday.

It means Humphries will miss his first game for Pools' DUE TO INJURY since he joined us in 2001.

_________________
I was awoken last night by Darlo fans in the street playing football with a hedgehog
I was absolutely digusted and about to call the RSPCA when the hedgehog went 1-0 up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: so who was to blame for todays
PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 12:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:42 pm
Posts: 6592
Location: Hartlepool - for now....
ADG wrote:
pathetic attempt at an away performance? :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:

Wilson?

Or the gutless lot that cant manange without the three class players, other than young brown, left to rescue this sorry season?

Without Brown, Monkhouse, Porter and Clark we are fooked.

And Wilson has dropped three of them this season. stpid stpid stpid stpid

Oh well, at least we wont have any worries getting tickets for the rest of the season.



We are just giving away too many sloppy goals, same old story sadly. it looks like a season of mid table mediocrity as we haven't seemed capeble of putting 2 or 3 decent performances in a row together all season. i really thought we were going to get something at yeovil but by the sounds of things the players switched off when Antwi was getting treatment.....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: so who was to blame for todays
PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 1:12 am 
chip fireball wrote:
fair comment bob, but these " defensive mistakes " seem to occur in just about every game, and we always seem to get punished by them.

you state instead of being 2-2 within a minute it was 3-1, but isnt that the story of the season in the league, we dont take our chances and we cant keep a clean sheet. after every good performance we get beaten.

at some point the manager has to sort that out, surely thats what he is paid for ?


Come along Mr Chip, how come Bob's description of Barkers glancing header was a fair comment when earlier it was a sitter from 6 yards sctatchinghead sctatchinghead


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: so who was to blame for todays
PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 1:18 am 
The way Radio Borer described it, it was easier to score than to miss

From what I heard (& I only managed to hear the second half) we were poor AGAIN today

I too am worried by us conceding 2 in 10 minutes when someone is off for treatment - it isn't as though anyone regards Antwi as a "key" player


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: so who was to blame for todays
PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 1:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:10 am
Posts: 3572
It was Yeovil's doctors fault.

From what I've been told from a friend...we weren't that bad today.

I'll take his word for it as he normally very honest when we play badly and goes on about it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: so who was to blame for todays
PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 10:46 am 
ADG wrote:
misterb2001 wrote:
i think your out of order mate.

i dont know who is more negative, you or the elusive Mr Headlander.

we played against a good team today, without 3 of our better players (who were injured) and got beat. Its hardly the end of the world.

The fact that you keep harping on about how Clark was dropped and Porter has barely gotten a sniff is really boring now.
Cant you just forget it, its in the past now!

Clark will be back in along side Nelse and Porter has proved he can add something extra when he does play.

Wilson doesnt deserve the amount of rubbish that is spouted in his direction from the likes of you.

And why does there have to be somebody to blame? Cant we just accept that we are a mid-table team at best who will invariably lose quite a lot of away matches this season?

Were you even there today? :roll:


p.s. Come on Hatton! clappp


Negative? Headlander?

Unlike you,errrrrrr mate :roll: , I am realistic. You are right of course, we played today without our best three players.............but Wilson doesnt want them anyway. Silly bounder.

And no I wont just accept we are a midtable team...........once you do THAT its too easy to acceot defeats. You sound like a loser. Loser.

As proven by your love of that other Loser.....Hatton. rolfl rolfl rolfl rolfl

And dont give me an bollox about Hatton, he is a good mate of that w**ker Rooney.

Fook him. :sweeeet
:[/quote

Ooh you have such a sweet way with words Dibbs rolfl rolfl rolfl


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: so who was to blame for todays
PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 11:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 9:26 pm
Posts: 127
Location: European Court of Justice, Bruxelles
Monsieur Gloves, Has someone replaced the meat in your pies for a vegetarian variety recently cos I feel a touch of anger in your recent posts.

There seems to be a disinct lack of love on the Bunker at present

Remember its nearly the season of joy and goodwill to all men!!!

_________________
The Court Will Rise. Honorable Judge Presiding


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: so who was to blame for todays
PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 11:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 9:26 pm
Posts: 127
Location: European Court of Justice, Bruxelles
For the record.............I have never loved any of you on here.

Apart from that one time....................... :uhoh: :uhoh: :uhoh: :uhoh:

And I fookin hate vegetables. :grin:[/quote]

So it was the veggies wot done it! refred

_________________
The Court Will Rise. Honorable Judge Presiding


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: so who was to blame for todays
PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 1:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:10 am
Posts: 3572
chip fireball wrote:
how the living fook was it the yeovil doctors fault ??????

thats quite possibly the dumbest excuse i have ever heard in my life.

did the yeovil doctor leap salmon like and nod two in for yeovil. if he did why wasnt someone fookin marking him ?

did the yeovil doctor spray mace in barkers eyes just as he was about to head in from six yards out ?

we played with 10 men for ten minutes. these are the same crap excuses we had after the brighton game. then it was the refs fault for sending off boland ( despite the fact we were already losing ) and now its the doctors fault.

we have won one game in 7. whose fault was huddersfield, and bournemouth and morecambe and hereford ffs ?

we lost, again, and at some point you have to ask whether the team selection, the tactics, the signings etc are possibly to blame.


I wasn't been exactly serious when I said that!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: so who was to blame for todays
PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 2:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:46 am
Posts: 16992
Location: The people's democratic illegal republic of Catalonia
I must admit there are a lot of arguments in support of the theory that our defence is shite. Even when Clark is playing it isn't that brilliant.
And yet the only player we don't have available from last season's clean sheet champions is Dimi.

_________________
No, your children are not the special ones.
(Nor is your dog.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: so who was to blame for todays
PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 2:13 pm 
Richard M. Head wrote:
I must admit there are a lot of arguments in support of the theory that our defence is shite. Even when Clark is playing it isn't that brilliant.
And yet the only player we don't have available from last season's clean sheet champions is Dimi.


Thank you Mr Richard that's what I've been trying to get accross, we have not played badly in all these games we've lost but the opposition know they are never out of it so long as they keep knocking crosses into the box, because a simple cross from the opposition is as dangerous for them as some of our football and runs by Brown, and results in more goals.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: so who was to blame for todays
PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 4:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
ADG wrote:
Negative? Headlander?

Unlike you,errrrrrr mate :roll: , I am realistic. You are right of course, we played today without our best three players.............but Wilson doesnt want them anyway. Silly bounder.

And no I wont just accept we are a midtable team...........once you do THAT its too easy to acceot defeats. You sound like a loser. Loser.

As proven by your love of that other Loser.....Hatton. rolfl rolfl rolfl rolfl

And dont give me an bollox about Hatton, he is a good mate of that w**ker Rooney.

Fook him. :sweeeet:


me a loser? you know how to hurt a guys feelings sadx

how about a truce...... about fifty doughnuts should do......or so i hear :wink:

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: so who was to blame for todays
PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 6:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:13 am
Posts: 7496
Location: Errr, Nottingham
Quote:
as cowboy said, nash and gannon on the radio said it was a dreadful miss, a free header from six yards out, similar to his miss against bournemouth where it was easier to score.

bob, who was at the game, reckons it wasnt as bad a miss as the radio is making out.


It was nowt like the miss against Bournemouth. The cross curled away from Barker, someone (McKay?) might have got a touch which took it even further away from him.

Barker did make a difference when he came on, unfortunately it didn't translate into a goal for him or anyone else.

_________________
If there's any more chew, the bar will be closed!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: so who was to blame for todays
PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 6:58 pm 
ADG wrote:
pathetic attempt at an away performance? :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:

Wilson?

Or the gutless lot that cant manange without the three class players, other than young brown, left to rescue this sorry season?

Without Brown, Monkhouse, Porter and Clark we are fooked.

And Wilson has dropped three of them this season. stpid stpid stpid stpid

Oh well, at least we wont have any worries getting tickets for the rest of the season.



Young Brown, is he Chinese?

I blame Hodcroft, after all he did pick the team on Tuesday, so its obvious he picked it yesterday


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: so who was to blame for todays
PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 11:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 2:35 pm
Posts: 1544
Location: stuck in my bivvy on the ressy with my delkims and 4k of scopex squid livers
yeah, but you can make facts say anything, can't yer :shock:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: so who was to blame for todays
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 10:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
Richard M. Head wrote:
I must admit there are a lot of arguments in support of the theory that our defence is shite. Even when Clark is playing it isn't that brilliant.
And yet the only player we don't have available from last season's clean sheet champions is Dimi.


Yeah, but there's folk on here who reckon that Jam Butties is the new Messiah so surely your theory about the goalkeeper doesn't stack up? sctatchinghead

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: so who was to blame for todays
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 2:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 12:59 pm
Posts: 569
We struggled to prevent two really good wingers from getting crosses in time after time and when the crosses did come in, we failed to deal with most of them. The biggest problem was lack of communication.

Butz should be dealing with a lot of the crosses or, at the very least, marshalling the defence and telling them what to do. He hardly ever opens his mouth, the defenders don't trust him and mayhem ensues. Antwi's judgement of a high ball is also very questionable and anything can happen if it comes near him.

Three defensive mistakes cost us dearly but there were many more that went unpunished. we were actually pretty good in other areas of the field and created enough chances to perhaps merit a more respectable scoreline. Their captain, Skiverton, deservedly won man of the match and thwarted most of our best attacks.

Robbie Elliot had a good game and put in some great balls. Humphreys played well, Sweeney abnd Liddle were solid. James Brown didn't get the ball enough, maybe he should go looking for it a bit more in these sort of games.

Overall, disappointing result, played ok, dodgy in defence but should easily dust ourselves down and get on with the next match.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: so who was to blame for todays
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:54 pm
Posts: 13354
Location: on me bike
I've never liked "quiet" goalkeepers, and that's probably the main reason I'm not keen on Budtz. The likes of Dimi, Provett,Hodge, Horne, Williams (although he was rubbish at the end of his time here) - all played the keeper's part fully - i.e. because keepers can ALWAYS see up the pitch, they are never facing their own goal (or in theory they shouldn't)! and they barked out the orders to the defence based on what they could see - because that's what they should be doing.
It certainly makes defenders know who's around/behind/running up at them.
If a person lacks that confidence to do it, then put simply they shouldn't be between nets. End of.

_________________
personal assistant to Nelson the German Shepherd


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: so who was to blame for todays
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 11:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:10 am
Posts: 3572
parmopooly wrote:
I've never liked "quiet" goalkeepers, and that's probably the main reason I'm not keen on Budtz. The likes of Dimi, Provett,Hodge, Horne, Williams (although he was rubbish at the end of his time here) - all played the keeper's part fully - i.e. because keepers can ALWAYS see up the pitch, they are never facing their own goal (or in theory they shouldn't)! and they barked out the orders to the defence based on what they could see - because that's what they should be doing.
It certainly makes defenders know who's around/behind/running up at them.
If a person lacks that confidence to do it, then put simply they shouldn't be between nets. End of.


ALB shouts a lot... :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: so who was to blame for todays
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 11:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:54 pm
Posts: 13354
Location: on me bike
ho'way man, yer narr worram on about like!!!!!

_________________
personal assistant to Nelson the German Shepherd


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: so who was to blame for todays
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37067
Our lass shouts a lot, commands her area well and orders everyone about, but if a corner came across she would be easily distracted by soneone behind the goal saying ..."I see so and so has had her hair done different".... GOAL!!! :roll:......... :laugh:

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: BarryHarris57, Bazil, bobby lemonade, Brian Honour's Left Foot, charltonclive, DrPool, jonnyraf, Jules, jumbodabber, Kettering Poolie, loan_star, loyal_fan, Manchester Exile, millhouseseats, Pitlad, poolie1966, Pooly_Imp, PTID, RichyHpool, Sedgefield Poolie, Snailwood2, SomethingClever, Stotty1908, stupoolie, Tonto1968 and 292 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.