Smokin Joe wrote:Absolutely agree, yes it was an act of wanton, unnecessary vandalism by two nobheads but the media reaction has been quite ridiculous. They could have axed any other tree in the country and virtually no-one would have batted an eyelid. As you say, perpetrators of acts of vandalism by the likes of JSO and other numpty groups have not all been scrutinised and dealt with in such a manner.
Infidel wrote:Smokin Joe wrote:Absolutely agree, yes it was an act of wanton, unnecessary vandalism by two nobheads but the media reaction has been quite ridiculous. They could have axed any other tree in the country and virtually no-one would have batted an eyelid. As you say, perpetrators of acts of vandalism by the likes of JSO and other numpty groups have not all been scrutinised and dealt with in such a manner.
That's the point though - they could have chopped down any other tree but they chose to go for a world famous tree, to get attention and to get a thrill. They've got the attention!!
Idiots..
PTID wrote:Was the felling of the tree any worse than the toppling of statues, defacing of works of art, etc we've seen over the last couple of years?
The tree felling has been on the news every day for a while and no doubt having been found guilty the perpetrators will have the maximum allowable sentencing whereas the other vandals in the main got away with it.
Infidel wrote:Apparently it was a such an important case that the police had to get Special Branch in.
Poolie27 wrote:They're idiots and indicative off generations of people who don't give a flying fuck. I can imagine their kids are lovely as well.
Snowy wrote:Sadly, the police seem to have little time for good old fashioned policing.
A bit too much time enforcing ‘crimes’ where the only thing injured is pride or ego from the easily offended.
I can drive around town and count the ex police houses scattered across the town when the police lived in the community…they appear to travel in then out, rather like Council bosses from time to time, now they have no stake in the town….that’s the trouble nowadays.
Kenny Bottles wrote:It's a tree.
The only reason those two divvies are having the book thrown at them is because it made English Heritage loads of money at zero cost.
Just like all those old bricks between Geordie-land and sheep-shagging land.
Kenny Bottles wrote:It's a tree.
The only reason those two divvies are having the book thrown at them is because it made English Heritage loads of money at zero cost.
Just like all those old bricks between Geordie-land and sheep-shagging land.
PTID wrote:Agree as long as the book is thrown equally hard at all vandals.
PTID wrote:Agree as long as the book is thrown equally hard at all vandals.
PTID wrote:And you've hit the nail on the head, why is this case particularly bad? It's purely subjective when criminality is quite objective the rules are the rules.
Imo the vandalism of works of art and national treasures was far worse than chopping down this tree, Churchills statue being vandalised being a case in point.
PTID wrote:Subjective indeed, I was more upset when someone keyed my new car. That was no ordinary case of vandalism for me personally.
Herr Flick wrote:
And the local communities whose economies benefit from the Tree and the Wall? It may not matter to you, but it did, and does, to a lot of people, hence the outcry. Too many people nowadays think they can act how they want, and there should be little to no consequences. Too many people seek to excuse them. Frankly, I'll be delighted if they get the book thrown at them, if it means other selfish, ignorant scrotes think twice about their actions.
Pooly_Imp wrote:Wow that's a lot of writing. I think in a nutshell Kenny Bottles feels that as he doesn't care, nobody should.
Kenny Bottles wrote:Pooly_Imp wrote:Wow that's a lot of writing. I think in a nutshell Kenny Bottles feels that as he doesn't care, nobody should.
Not quite Mr Imp. I don't understand why anyone cares at all, so I concocted what I hoped would be a humourous read for my Bunkerite brethren and would lighten the mood a bit.
You are all free men, and are well entitled to boil your blood to the point of achieving a throbbing sensation in your temples over two smackrats paying homage to Jack and his beanstalk.
It seems extremely trivial to me, but if you need a lie down and a cold compress on your forehead after hearing about wanton acts of tree abuse then so be it.
I could lend you some statins and a few beta-blockers if you're worried about your heart throwing a wobbler if they get a suspended sentence...
Pooly_Imp wrote:Kenny Bottles wrote:Pooly_Imp wrote:Wow that's a lot of writing. I think in a nutshell Kenny Bottles feels that as he doesn't care, nobody should.
Not quite Mr Imp. I don't understand why anyone cares at all, so I concocted what I hoped would be a humourous read for my Bunkerite brethren and would lighten the mood a bit.
You are all free men, and are well entitled to boil your blood to the point of achieving a throbbing sensation in your temples over two smackrats paying homage to Jack and his beanstalk.
It seems extremely trivial to me, but if you need a lie down and a cold compress on your forehead after hearing about wanton acts of tree abuse then so be it.
I could lend you some statins and a few beta-blockers if you're worried about your heart throwing a wobbler if they get a suspended sentence...
Well that's a bit better. Much more in a nutshell
Still sounds like you're saying the same thing though.
Sounds like it's bothering you more than me though judging by war and peace up there
Kenny Bottles wrote:Pooly_Imp wrote:Kenny Bottles wrote:Pooly_Imp wrote:Wow that's a lot of writing. I think in a nutshell Kenny Bottles feels that as he doesn't care, nobody should.
Not quite Mr Imp. I don't understand why anyone cares at all, so I concocted what I hoped would be a humourous read for my Bunkerite brethren and would lighten the mood a bit.
You are all free men, and are well entitled to boil your blood to the point of achieving a throbbing sensation in your temples over two smackrats paying homage to Jack and his beanstalk.
It seems extremely trivial to me, but if you need a lie down and a cold compress on your forehead after hearing about wanton acts of tree abuse then so be it.
I could lend you some statins and a few beta-blockers if you're worried about your heart throwing a wobbler if they get a suspended sentence...
Well that's a bit better. Much more in a nutshell
Still sounds like you're saying the same thing though.
Sounds like it's bothering you more than me though judging by war and peace up there
![]()
I'm only bothered about your health mate.
I daren't imagine the state you'll be in if their solicitor gets them off with community service.
PTID wrote:Conversely, on many subjects some believe that because they care everyone should.
I'll be quite honest, I'd never heard of the Sycamore Gap Tree until it made the news for being transformed into the Sycamore Gap Stump.
Poolie27 wrote:Only this bunker could make such a meal out of two vandalising twats. Zero tolerance for any such shit!
PTID wrote:Subjective indeed, I was more upset when someone keyed my new car. That was no ordinary case of vandalism for me personally.
Infidel wrote:It got lots of publicity.
Jamie1952 wrote:This didn’t get much publicity, the oak tree was 500 years old ?
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cewgypewepno
Jamie1952 wrote:Infidel wrote:It got lots of publicity.
No trial by jury nor even a prosecution,no different from the sycamore tree,
Enfield Council's leader, Ergin Erbil, previously said they were treating the matter as criminal damage and had reported it to the police.
The Met Police confirmed it had received a report from the council, but it is understood the force believes there is no evidence of criminality
Jamie1952 wrote:Infidel wrote:It got lots of publicity.
No trial by jury nor even a prosecution,no different from the sycamore tree,
Enfield Council's leader, Ergin Erbil, previously said they were treating the matter as criminal damage and had reported it to the police.
The Met Police confirmed it had received a report from the council, but it is understood the force believes there is no evidence of criminality
Jamie1952 wrote:This didn’t get much publicity, the oak tree was 500 years old ?
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cewgypewepno
Return to The Ripper & Monkeybutt Forum
Dodgepots browsing this forum: frankie1951, Johnjo1, jumbodabber, Ozzy Saltburn, poolie1966 and 532 guests