PJPoolie wrote:
Aye Laura Kuenssberg always gives Johnson such a hard time. It’s as if she wants him to be her Dad. Mind the law of averages given the amount of illegitimate children he has says he might be.
PJPoolie wrote:
Aye Laura Kuenssberg always gives Johnson such a hard time. It’s as if she wants him to be her Dad. Mind the law of averages given the amount of illegitimate children he has says he might be.
horden wrote:Kuenesberg is horrible , even I wouldn't give her one
Mr Irrelevant wrote:Simply because I can’t be bothered. It’s not worth my energy to argue with the insanity of your little gang.
Mr Irrelevant wrote:Ah, so parody is the new Marxist insult on here.
Unless your opinion is in line with the failed leftie agenda you’re a parody. Unless you are oh so wise after the event you’re a parody. Unless you take your view from that utter petulant shithouse Owen Jones then you’re a parody.
The irony is that a lot of you don’t realise how much of a parody you have become yourselves. You’re a bunch of socialist worker placards brought to life. Fortunately no one is listenening you you except each other. Boris will come out of this even more popular and you’ll become more beetroot faced and apoplectic by the day.
Jhumps84 wrote:Panorama is one of those shows though. I don't think it's a lefty agenda as it'll attack pretty much anyone on any topic. The problem is they tend to only look at one part of the story and present it as fact, then package it up as an outrage story. It does kind of belong on channel 4 and not BBC though, as it's far from impartial and belongs on a channel with an agenda, not a national broadcaster. Look at previous shows and the one about anti-semitism int he Laour party. It wanted story X, found a number of people who tell that story and support it. Ignore the other side and question people who say it's bollocks and edit it to make it look like they're liars and avoiding the truth then show it to gain as much debate and ratings as possible. It's utter trash and you'll never win by engaging with it.
That aside, while they may be on to something here, but there's not much that can be done about it now so save it for the enquiry. Let people get on with their jobs, get as much equipment as is possible given the damnd is from the whole world and look at what could have been done better or worse when all this is over based on what was known at the time, without applying the gift of hindsight to it all. It's very easy to critise all of this 2-3 weeks down the line but at the time the decision was made, that was the available information and someone made a judgement call based on that. It's all very human. Christ
Jhumps84 wrote:Panorama is one of those shows though. I don't think it's a lefty agenda as it'll attack pretty much anyone on any topic. The problem is they tend to only look at one part of the story and present it as fact, then package it up as an outrage story. It does kind of belong on channel 4 and not BBC though, as it's far from impartial and belongs on a channel with an agenda, not a national broadcaster. Look at previous shows and the one about anti-semitism int he Laour party. It wanted story X, found a number of people who tell that story and support it. Ignore the other side and question people who say it's bollocks and edit it to make it look like they're liars and avoiding the truth then show it to gain as much debate and ratings as possible. It's utter trash and you'll never win by engaging with it.
That aside, while they may be on to something here, but there's not much that can be done about it now so save it for the enquiry. Let people get on with their jobs, get as much equipment as is possible given the damnd is from the whole world and look at what could have been done better or worse when all this is over based on what was known at the time, without applying the gift of hindsight to it all. It's very easy to critise all of this 2-3 weeks down the line but at the time the decision was made, that was the available information and someone made a judgement call based on that. It's all very human. Christ
PJPoolie wrote:Said nowt again.
Javed Miandad Stance wrote:Jhumps84 wrote:Panorama is one of those shows though. I don't think it's a lefty agenda as it'll attack pretty much anyone on any topic. The problem is they tend to only look at one part of the story and present it as fact, then package it up as an outrage story. It does kind of belong on channel 4 and not BBC though, as it's far from impartial and belongs on a channel with an agenda, not a national broadcaster. Look at previous shows and the one about anti-semitism int he Laour party. It wanted story X, found a number of people who tell that story and support it. Ignore the other side and question people who say it's bollocks and edit it to make it look like they're liars and avoiding the truth then show it to gain as much debate and ratings as possible. It's utter trash and you'll never win by engaging with it.
That aside, while they may be on to something here, but there's not much that can be done about it now so save it for the enquiry. Let people get on with their jobs, get as much equipment as is possible given the damnd is from the whole world and look at what could have been done better or worse when all this is over based on what was known at the time, without applying the gift of hindsight to it all. It's very easy to critise all of this 2-3 weeks down the line but at the time the decision was made, that was the available information and someone made a judgement call based on that. It's all very human. Christ
You talk like the number crunching middle management type that send staff on front line emails threatening to end their career if they speak to journalists, while desperately brushing stuff under the carpet, while they risk their lives because you couldn't do your job properly .
Lets have an enquiry 10 year down the line and appoint one of our own to Chair it - that's your perspective is it ?
Watching from afar wrote:Jhumps84 wrote:Panorama is one of those shows though. I don't think it's a lefty agenda as it'll attack pretty much anyone on any topic. The problem is they tend to only look at one part of the story and present it as fact, then package it up as an outrage story. It does kind of belong on channel 4 and not BBC though, as it's far from impartial and belongs on a channel with an agenda, not a national broadcaster. Look at previous shows and the one about anti-semitism int he Laour party. It wanted story X, found a number of people who tell that story and support it. Ignore the other side and question people who say it's bollocks and edit it to make it look like they're liars and avoiding the truth then show it to gain as much debate and ratings as possible. It's utter trash and you'll never win by engaging with it.
That aside, while they may be on to something here, but there's not much that can be done about it now so save it for the enquiry. Let people get on with their jobs, get as much equipment as is possible given the damnd is from the whole world and look at what could have been done better or worse when all this is over based on what was known at the time, without applying the gift of hindsight to it all. It's very easy to critise all of this 2-3 weeks down the line but at the time the decision was made, that was the available information and someone made a judgement call based on that. It's all very human. Christ
You really believe all you have just written there?
You really believe MPs, even when the evidence is put in front fo them, say something completely different?
You still really believe that?
PJPoolie wrote:I wouldn’t expect you to add anything of note as you never do or have.
Jhumps84 wrote:I wasn't even trying to stand up for the right here. Personally i think govt have been very cute citing "following scientific advice" which roughly translates to if this all goes wrong, we'll hang them out to dry. But god, people are dying, now isn't the time to be getting angry at other people on messages boards for saying come on see it from another point of view. Equally, no party, whatever the colour would have done everything 100% right, because they are people and have biews and make mistakes, so making it all politically charged is utterly abhorrent right now
Javed Miandad Stance wrote:How is suggesting someone sounds like middle management offensive ?
I tell you what is fucking insulting, describing a programme where nurses are actually asked for their views and then letting them express it as trash, without even fucking watching it.
Javed Miandad Stance wrote:How is suggesting someone sounds like middle management offensive ?
I tell you what is fucking insulting, describing a programme where nurses are actually asked for their views and then letting them express it as trash, without even fucking watching it.
Soma wrote:I've been reading the Bunker pretty regularly for the last few weeks, since the lockdown really, given how much time I have. In that time I'm yet to really see any reasonable, evidence-based argument for the government in that time. Granted, I think some people are little aggressive at times in attacking this government but there are also a lot of very reasonable people putting reasonable criticisms out there. The typical response from those trying to defend the government (if you can call it that) is to dismiss/ignore those points and turn the thread into a slanging match.
I'm more than willing to hear a genuine opposition to my view, I'm not entrenched. Given actual facts or explanations I would happily shift my position. In fact I'm actively seeking some opposing views because I want someone to convince me that I'm wrong. To convince me that this government isn't as incompetent as I believe it to be. I'm yet to be convinced, mostly because no one in support of the government on this board has actually tried yet.
At the end of the day, an effective government is what will get us out of this crisis as unscathed as possible and regardless of politics that is what I, and the majority of others, actually want.
Dodgepots browsing this forum: No registered users and 608 guests