Why would Darlo...

John the Baptist · **Joined:** Tue Jun 26, 2007 12:04 am **Posts:** 634

No idea.

Doesn't seem very logical.

It's not like they're planning on doing the same thing themselves to get around their current financial problems

dawlishmonkey · **Joined:** Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:53 am **Posts:** 1588

people who live in glass houses....

Mute Witness · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:10 am **Posts:** 3572

Is there a list of who voted what?

ptbap · **Posted:** Thu Aug 09, 2007 3:33 pm

Because you think corruption in football is okay and we should all stick together, stand shoulder to shoulder, etc etc....

Oh yeah, and refred

to the inland revenue

bbolt

ADG wrote:

So by defeinition, those saying Leeds are cheats and should be ostrisised, do you all think the not small amount of clubs that supported Leeds are also cheats?

If not, why do you think so many supported them?

I actually wish Pools had supported them as well. Dont know why.

John the Baptist · **Joined:** Tue Jun 26, 2007 12:04 am **Posts:** 634

DIBBLE IS A LEEDS FAN
DIBBLE IS A LEEDS FAN

rolfl

John the Baptist · **Joined:** Tue Jun 26, 2007 12:04 am **Posts:** 634

Anybody got a photo?

Or can anybody make one?

Can you use some software to wrap a Greggs pasty in a Leeds kit?

Mute Witness · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:10 am **Posts:** 3572

Was it Turner or Hodcroft who turned up or did they both?

As if it was Turner, don't forget Bates did threaten to take over Sheff Wed and sack him cause "goalkeepers don't make good managers".

ptbap · **Posted:** Thu Aug 09, 2007 3:55 pm

corruption, breaking the rules, whateva rolfl

Gibsons Beard · **Posted:** Thu Aug 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Darlo will have done it out of spite as it would make it more likely that we will get relegated (albeit only slightly)

bounders

bluemonkey · **Joined:** Sat Apr 07, 2007 8:54 pm **Posts:** 1101

Seems strange that Rotherham didn't vote to back Leeds when they did the very same kind of thing the season prior.

It's like a game of spot the odd ones out from the list, all the older or bigger teams seem to have backed Leeds and then there are Darlo, Wrexham & Stockport.

Moriarty · **Posted:** Thu Aug 09, 2007 7:18 pm

I am pleased my club backed Leeds. That 15 point deduction is a farce

bluemonkey · **Joined:** Sat Apr 07, 2007 8:54 pm **Posts:** 1101

I am pleased my club backed Leeds. That 15 point deduction is a farce

I can't see any problem in the points deduction, the FA/FL have closed the loophole from this season and the 2 teams the exploited it last season have been shafted.

I expect Boston are none too pleased at being dumped down 2 leagues and not just the one they expected, Leeds still think of themselves as Giants who can get away with anything and now they know they can't.

The list shows a fair few doing the old pals act in trying to save them and as I have just read on the Darlo site they may have voted for Leeds as a way of thank you for playing the pre=season game a couple of weeks back.

Gibsons Beard · **Posted:** Thu Aug 09, 2007 8:57 pm

Darlo may have backed Leeds as darlo could yearn to become a feeder club to a massive side like them some day!

Moriarty · **Posted:** Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:02 pm

Yet again, more bowlocks :roll:

Gibsons Beard · **Posted:** Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:07 pm

well you never know thrilled

Jonny · **Posted:** Thu Aug 09, 2007 10:34 pm

Can someone explain briefly why it is 15 points and not 10....? I do believe Leeds deserve to have a punishment.....

Fensy · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:15 pm **Posts:** 6471

I think that it is a 10 point deduction when a team goes into administration which they did at the end of last season, and i think that the 15 point penalty is because they broke some rules when trying to come back out of administration.

Jonny · **Posted:** Thu Aug 09, 2007 10:43 pm

Oh well - never mind - rather them than us.... Their punishment last season wasn't really a punishment so they deserve to have a bit of grief......

Why would Darlo...

Gadgies online