Gu1aQarWwAAEr9H.jpg
kevin pooles gloves wrote:How did he pass the medical?
Was he really injured at Pools?
kevin pooles gloves wrote:How did he pass the medical?
Was he really injured at Pools?
loyal_fan wrote:He’ ll do great for them another clusterfuck of a decision by the club
Double figures for goals I predict
bobby lemonade wrote:I'm absolutely gutted we never gave him a contract, best player in the national league by a country mile.
I don't care if he didn't tackle, he was a joy to watch.
I'd have quite happily seen him sign for twenty games a season.
Good luck to the lad, it was an absolute pleasure to see him play for Pools.
bobby lemonade wrote:I'm absolutely gutted we never gave him a contract, best player in the national league by a country mile.
I don't care if he didn't tackle, he was a joy to watch.
I'd have quite happily seen him sign for twenty games a season.
Good luck to the lad, it was an absolute pleasure to see him play for Pools.
Bluestreak wrote:When he plays us he will get the biggest cheer at the Vic ever!
poolie1966 wrote:Bluestreak wrote:When he plays us he will get the biggest cheer at the Vic ever!
That's assuming he plays against us & isn't injured!!
accrington fan wrote:really doubt our league positions in the two seasons he was with us would have been different if we had never signed him. even when available on a good day he did show his magic but never consistantly for a full game apart from the pre chesterfield away days.
bobby lemonade wrote:accrington fan wrote:really doubt our league positions in the two seasons he was with us would have been different if we had never signed him. even when available on a good day he did show his magic but never consistantly for a full game apart from the pre chesterfield away days.
Dunno like, the game against Boston changed our season. We were on a really bad run and I think starting mancini saved limbricks bacon.i don't think mancini was fit enough to start tbh but limbrick was desperate for the win. Mancini won us that game, I think if he hadn't started we wouldn't have won and would have finished the season very close to the relegation zone.
I'd argue the same about the oldham game where mancini won us the game. Manicini MOTM against boston did change the end of the season for us.
bobby lemonade wrote:Dunno like, the game against Boston changed our season. We were on a really bad run and I think starting mancini saved limbricks bacon.i don't think mancini was fit enough to start tbh but limbrick was desperate for the win. Mancini won us that game, I think if he hadn't started we wouldn't have won and would have finished the season very close to the relegation zone.
I'd argue the same about the oldham game where mancini won us the game. Manicini MOTM against boston did change the end of the season for us.
billinghampoolie1908 wrote:Pointless having someone who you can't get more than 10 games out of no matter how good he was in patches. Having said that to then bring in someone who also hardly plays could only happen at pools. Clueless.
billinghampoolie1908 wrote:Obviously two different type of players. But considering we already have about 4 of the same sort then you are always going to take mancini than walker. Unfortunately either mancini is crocked constantly or feigning injury no good to us that.
accrington fan wrote:loyal_fan wrote:He’ ll do great for them another clusterfuck of a decision by the club
Double figures for goals I predict
after the last two years with us i predict a double figure of starts. unless fans there have changed they will be far less forgiving than many of us were.
Return to The Ripper & Monkeybutt Forum
Dodgepots browsing this forum: frankie1951, kevin pooles gloves, MutleyRules, PTID, swedpool5157 and 607 guests