Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Thu May 01, 2025 12:34 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 55 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2025 4:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2023 3:07 pm
Posts: 3843
Common sense applied by the Supreme Court. Hopefully it stops all the nonsense of which prison a convicted criminal should go to, stop the stupidity of people born as male trying to compete on equal terms with real women in sport.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2025 4:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2024 3:29 pm
Posts: 912
What about women wanting to be men? Was there a ruling on that?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2025 4:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2018 5:00 pm
Posts: 703
Well would you Madam and Steve it?

Best news I've heard for quite a while.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2025 6:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2013 6:58 pm
Posts: 3240
Location: Somewhere in me head.
It,s simple, if you have one hole between your legs your a bloke if you have two your a woman. FFS!!!

_________________
..science flies you to the Moon........religion flies you into buildings...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2025 6:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2014 2:28 pm
Posts: 8838
Hartleblue wrote:
It,s simple, if you have one hole between your legs your a bloke if you have two your a woman. FFS!!!


100%.
Bunch of sick pervy freaks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2025 7:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:36 pm
Posts: 2512
Live and let live.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2025 8:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 36209
It’s a pity it had to go the High Court to state the bleedin obvious( I refuse to use Blair’s daft title of the Supreme Court, we aren’t bloody yanks)
When you deny Biology and Science you are taking a step backwards.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2025 8:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2025 1:09 am
Posts: 19
(comment redacted, also mods, why can't we delete posts anymore? Take it this was done after the mass exodus of 2020?)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2025 8:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2023 3:07 pm
Posts: 3843
A man who's had a leg amputated is still a man, as is a man who's had his meat and two veg. Don't have a problem with any man who chooses to live like a woman but they are still a man. But it's wrong for biological men to expect to compete in women's sport and use women's facilities.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2025 9:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2014 12:13 pm
Posts: 6589
"biological men to expect to compete in women's sport and use women's facilities"

Its not only wrong its fucking disgusting and taking the piss :laugh:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2025 6:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 36209
There’s always been these people around and I can only assume it’s some compulsion, but it didn’t really bother anybody…..but when we all have to go along with this delusion and pretend it’s the norm, it’s a step too far.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2025 8:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2018 5:00 pm
Posts: 703
If some gadgie wants to pretend to be a woman, then that is absolutely fine by me. None of my business - though I can't pretend I won't snigger like a naughty schoolboy behind their back.

But any attempt to persuade an entire civilisation that he is really a woman is both insanity and tyranny of the highest order.

And that is precisely what we have been subjected to in recent years.

If this ruling marks the long-overdue "turning of the tide" in the journey back to reality, then we all owe these judges our gratitude.

Wear your make-up, frocks and high-heels with pride by all means gentlemen.

But if you've got no vag, then you're still a gadge.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2025 8:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:22 pm
Posts: 18751
Snowy wrote:
There’s always been these people around and I can only assume it’s some compulsion, but it didn’t really bother anybody…..but when we all have to go along with this delusion and pretend it’s the norm, it’s a step too far.

there is sure to be some backlash and even an objection to the decision. its one issue where i,d say more are in agreement with than any other court decision. might start off another new craze to follow and less will want to walk about not only embarresing themselves in public but anybody who comes into contact with them. know a few who did this but it was left in clubs where the like minded went and not seen by impressionable kids.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2025 2:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 36209
Kenny Bottles wrote:
If some gadgie wants to pretend to be a woman, then that is absolutely fine by me. None of my business - though I can't pretend I won't snigger like a naughty schoolboy behind their back.

But any attempt to persuade an entire civilisation that he is really a woman is both insanity and tyranny of the highest order.

And that is precisely what we have been subjected to in recent years.

If this ruling marks the long-overdue "turning of the tide" in the journey back to reality, then we all owe these judges our gratitude.

Wear your make-up, frocks and high-heels with pride by all means gentlemen.

But if you've got no vag, then you're still a gadge.

I sometimes wonder if these things are a test of our resistance to falling in line, a bit like 1984 scenario where 2+2=5…in other words you are programmed to ignore the obvious…?

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2025 2:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2014 12:13 pm
Posts: 6589
Snowy wrote:
Kenny Bottles wrote:
If some gadgie wants to pretend to be a woman, then that is absolutely fine by me. None of my business - though I can't pretend I won't snigger like a naughty schoolboy behind their back.

But any attempt to persuade an entire civilisation that he is really a woman is both insanity and tyranny of the highest order.

And that is precisely what we have been subjected to in recent years.

If this ruling marks the long-overdue "turning of the tide" in the journey back to reality, then we all owe these judges our gratitude.

Wear your make-up, frocks and high-heels with pride by all means gentlemen.

But if you've got no vag, then you're still a gadge.

I sometimes wonder if these things are a test of our resistance to falling in line, ab like 1984 scenario where 2+2=5…in other words you are prayed to ignore the obvious…?


People who prey really are avoiding/ignoring the obvious.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2025 2:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 8:27 am
Posts: 7492
Location: Stoke Bank
The Crocodile Dundee test..........just making sure!

Attachment:
hqdefault-853733601.jpg


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck it is probably a duck!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2025 2:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 8:27 am
Posts: 7492
Location: Stoke Bank
Whats this called?
Check under the bonnet!

Attachment:
tranny.jpg


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck it is probably a duck!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2025 6:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2014 12:13 pm
Posts: 6589
Kenny Bottles wrote:
If some gadgie wants to pretend to be a woman, then that is absolutely fine by me. None of my business - though I can't pretend I won't snigger like a naughty schoolboy behind their back.

But any attempt to persuade an entire civilisation that he is really a woman is both insanity and tyranny of the highest order.

And that is precisely what we have been subjected to in recent years.

If this ruling marks the long-overdue "turning of the tide" in the journey back to reality, then we all owe these judges our gratitude.

Wear your make-up, frocks and high-heels with pride by all means gentlemen.

But if you've got no vag, then you're still a gadge.


Been saying this all along Kenny, Do what they like
BUT do not tell me that i must accept this as the norm, And then make out i,m a Bigot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2025 9:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:22 pm
Posts: 18751
Grayhoundend wrote:
Kenny Bottles wrote:
If some gadgie wants to pretend to be a woman, then that is absolutely fine by me. None of my business - though I can't pretend I won't snigger like a naughty schoolboy behind their back.

But any attempt to persuade an entire civilisation that he is really a woman is both insanity and tyranny of the highest order.

And that is precisely what we have been subjected to in recent years.

If this ruling marks the long-overdue "turning of the tide" in the journey back to reality, then we all owe these judges our gratitude.

Wear your make-up, frocks and high-heels with pride by all means gentlemen.

But if you've got no vag, then you're still a gadge.


Been saying this all along Kenny, Do what they like
BUT do not tell me that i must accept this as the norm, And then make out i,m a Bigot.

its not just us as we can make our minds up. its when kids get involved who are still learning and have to be subhected to this with drag actors reading fairy stories to them and possibly turning there minds. that was a form of child molesting but parents who complained were made out to be the bad guys in all this. one good thing to come out of it all is more parents finding out what goes on in the classrooms.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2025 10:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2021 7:38 am
Posts: 911
Yeah but kids have been going to Pantomimes for years and years where the leading lady plays a man and vice versa. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2025 10:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 36209
MutleyRules wrote:
Yeah but kids have been going to Pantomimes for years and years where the leading lady plays a man and vice versa. :wink:

If women looked like panto Dames you’d need a sedative to marry one on a drip for life and sex would be out of the question :laugh:

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2025 10:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:22 pm
Posts: 18751
MutleyRules wrote:
Yeah but kids have been going to Pantomimes for years and years where the leading lady plays a man and vice versa. :wink:

that was an old tradition and not a new thought up fad for a very small percentage of the male population that might make kids think about a subject they might not ever think about. one is acting the other is a way of life. the reason why kids have to be a certain age to see acting on film.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2025 10:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:22 pm
Posts: 18751
Snowy wrote:
MutleyRules wrote:
Yeah but kids have been going to Pantomimes for years and years where the leading lady plays a man and vice versa. :wink:

If women looked like panto Dames you’d need a sedative to marry one on a drip for life and sex would be out of the question :laugh:

and a bad sense of dress and make up to copy them.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2025 11:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2025 7:00 pm
Posts: 71
I'm happy with the decision, but I think we have much more important things going on in the world than worrying about this. How often does this impact on the likes of us, who reside in sleepy old Hartlepool and East Durham? rarely if ever I'd say.

My problem with this, is if this ruling had been lost, then the extremists among all these groups, and they are feckin extremists, would've went even further down the wrong road, wanting even more laws changing to suit their agenda. eIMO a lot of these Feminists, LGBT, Trans groups etc, who will call anyone who doesn't agree with them a Misogynist, racist, sexist, bigot etc, essentially hate men, the Labour MP Jess Phillips being a case in point.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2025 11:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:22 pm
Posts: 18751
you have to start somewhere to reverse the lunacy of the last 5 years where everything has kicked off. it might not put pounds in our pockets, but its rare now that legislation has the backing of a large majority which should always be the case.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2025 12:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:36 pm
Posts: 2512
If you judge people on how kind, generous, tolerant and all the good things they are and treat the rest as mere details (race, gender, religion and all that) then you ain't going to be a bigot. If you want to condemn whole groups of people because they all share one of these mere details then you are a bigot. Choose whichever cap fits.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2025 12:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:22 pm
Posts: 18751
Pooly_Imp wrote:
If you judge people on how kind, generous, tolerant and all the good things they are and treat the rest as mere details (race, gender, religion and all that) then you ain't going to be a bigot. If you want to condemn whole groups of people because they all share one of these mere details then you are a bigot. Choose whichever cap fits.

the problem with that is that it would end all discussions about a subject if you need to know all the good about individuals rather than discussing the whole group. we can all agree that the nazi,s were bad but cannot change our mind because one was kind to your grandad in a pow camp.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2025 1:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2014 2:28 pm
Posts: 8838
This is one subject where 100 % respect goes to North African countries.
Ya stay what ya born n same sex sick relationships ain't allowed.

But they should still be banned from freebie England.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2025 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 36209
Colin Jack wrote:
I'm happy with the decision, but I think we have much more important things going on in the world than worrying about this. How often does this impact on the likes of us, who reside in sleepy old Hartlepool and East Durham? rarely if ever I'd say.

It’s important to women……..and what’s all this ‘us who reside in sleepy old Hartlepool ‘ waffle, you may be in a bleedin coma…I’m wide awake.
You been drinking Jamie’s Carbolic Lager with a cauliflower wine chaser?

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2025 2:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2014 12:13 pm
Posts: 6589
accrington fan wrote:
you have to start somewhere to reverse the lunacy of the last 5 years where everything has kicked off. it might not put pounds in our pockets, but its rare now that legislation has the backing of a large majority which should always be the case.


Trump reversed it from day 1. clappp


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2025 2:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:36 pm
Posts: 2512
accrington fan wrote:
Pooly_Imp wrote:
If you judge people on how kind, generous, tolerant and all the good things they are and treat the rest as mere details (race, gender, religion and all that) then you ain't going to be a bigot. If you want to condemn whole groups of people because they all share one of these mere details then you are a bigot. Choose whichever cap fits.

the problem with that is that it would end all discussions about a subject if you need to know all the good about individuals rather than discussing the whole group. we can all agree that the nazi,s were bad but cannot change our mind because one was kind to your grandad in a pow camp.


No it wouldn't. This is how billions of good people treat others. They also discuss loads of things bigotry free. A nazi who is kind and generally a good egg really isn't a nazi though is he? It kust provrs how crap these labels are. Ww2 saw lots of people coerced by the state to join the party and go to war.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2025 2:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2021 7:38 am
Posts: 911
accrington fan wrote:
Pooly_Imp wrote:
If you judge people on how kind, generous, tolerant and all the good things they are and treat the rest as mere details (race, gender, religion and all that) then you ain't going to be a bigot. If you want to condemn whole groups of people because they all share one of these mere details then you are a bigot. Choose whichever cap fits.

the problem with that is that it would end all discussions about a subject if you need to know all the good about individuals rather than discussing the whole group. we can all agree that the nazi,s were bad but cannot change our mind because one was kind to your grandad in a pow camp.


Schindler was a 'nazi' and I like him. :-D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2025 5:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 36209
True Nazi’s we’re not nice people….Germans could be.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2025 7:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2025 7:00 pm
Posts: 71
Snowy wrote:
Colin Jack wrote:
I'm happy with the decision, but I think we have much more important things going on in the world than worrying about this. How often does this impact on the likes of us, who reside in sleepy old Hartlepool and East Durham? rarely if ever I'd say.

It’s important to women……..and what’s all this ‘us who reside in sleepy old Hartlepool ‘ waffle, you may be in a bleedin coma…I’m wide awake.
You been drinking Jamie’s Carbolic Lager with a cauliflower wine chaser?


Sounds like you have. You may be the exception, but Hartlepool is sleepy, not much going on, and you know that. Do you know any women its important to ? cos I don't, most of the women I know, are too busy trying to survive in this Clown world we now live in.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2025 7:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 36209
Colin Jack wrote:
Snowy wrote:
Colin Jack wrote:
I'm happy with the decision, but I think we have much more important things going on in the world than worrying about this. How often does this impact on the likes of us, who reside in sleepy old Hartlepool and East Durham? rarely if ever I'd say.

It’s important to women……..and what’s all this ‘us who reside in sleepy old Hartlepool ‘ waffle, you may be in a bleedin coma…I’m wide awake.
You been drinking Jamie’s Carbolic Lager with a cauliflower wine chaser?


Sounds like you have. You may be the exception, but Hartlepool is sleepy, not much going on, and you know that. Do you know any women its important to ? cos I don't, most of the women I know, are too busy trying to survive in this Clown world we now live in.

Are you going round the houses to try and imply you don’t approve of the Court’s decision…?…...and incidentally all the women I encounter do approve of the action.
Hartlepool…may be sleepy to suit your interpretation ….I find that viewpoint patronising….just to try and justify your thinly veiled rejection.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2025 10:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:22 pm
Posts: 18751
actually it bothers proper women more than it does blokes as especially in sport they are the ones who have suffered the most. the toilet issue is far less important as if people only used them for what they are there for there is no issue. men, women and trans all need a piss or a shit and remember years back somewhere that i was bursting and my ex had to check out the ladies to see if it was empty and then stand guard outside for a minute till i did what everyone has to do. just because the gents was out of order.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2025 7:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2025 7:00 pm
Posts: 71
Snowy wrote:
Colin Jack wrote:
Snowy wrote:
Colin Jack wrote:
I'm happy with the decision, but I think we have much more important things going on in the world than worrying about this. How often does this impact on the likes of us, who reside in sleepy old Hartlepool and East Durham? rarely if ever I'd say.

It’s important to women……..and what’s all this ‘us who reside in sleepy old Hartlepool ‘ waffle, you may be in a bleedin coma…I’m wide awake.
You been drinking Jamie’s Carbolic Lager with a cauliflower wine chaser?


Sounds like you have. You may be the exception, but Hartlepool is sleepy, not much going on, and you know that. Do you know any women its important to ? cos I don't, most of the women I know, are too busy trying to survive in this Clown world we now live in.

Are you going round the houses to try and imply you don’t approve of the Court’s decision…?…...and incidentally all the women I encounter do approve of the action.
Hartlepool…may be sleepy to suit your interpretation ….I find that viewpoint patronising….just to try and justify your thinly veiled rejection.


I do agree with the decision. I really don't know what you are getting your knickers in a twist about.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2025 8:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 36209
I’m not …….you are.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2025 11:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2018 5:00 pm
Posts: 703
Pooly_Imp wrote:
If you judge people on how kind, generous, tolerant and all the good things they are and treat the rest as mere details (race, gender, religion and all that) then you ain't going to be a bigot. If you want to condemn whole groups of people because they all share one of these mere details then you are a bigot. Choose whichever cap fits.


I agree.

But if you've either got a cock or previously possessed one, and you're not there to administer emergency medical assistance, then you do not venture into places where women undress.

That is the epitome of being kind, generous and tolerant.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2025 11:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:22 pm
Posts: 18751
Kenny Bottles wrote:
Pooly_Imp wrote:
If you judge people on how kind, generous, tolerant and all the good things they are and treat the rest as mere details (race, gender, religion and all that) then you ain't going to be a bigot. If you want to condemn whole groups of people because they all share one of these mere details then you are a bigot. Choose whichever cap fits.


I agree.

But if you've either got a cock or previously possessed one, and you're not there to administer emergency medical assistance, then you do not venture into places where women undress.

That is the epitome of being kind, generous and tolerant.

wrong. only minorities can have those characteristics and the rest of us are just evil bastards who need educating.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2025 12:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2024 3:29 pm
Posts: 912
Women don't generally like men.
Quite a lot of them are lesbians, and very few woman are 100% straight.
Women generally like being with each other.
The last thing most of them want is men pretending to be women.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually womeuse the most disputes aro
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2025 1:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 36209
I think the ‘mere detail’ trio are the ones that cause trouble most of the thornless around the world…race is part of life but the other two are of the imagination.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2025 3:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2018 5:00 pm
Posts: 703
Stocksfield_Poolie wrote:
Women don't generally like men.
Quite a lot of them are lesbians, and very few woman are 100% straight.
Women generally like being with each other.
The last thing most of them want is men pretending to be women.


I'm a lesbian, and so is my wife.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2025 3:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2024 3:29 pm
Posts: 912
What about the mother in law?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2025 4:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2018 5:00 pm
Posts: 703
Stocksfield_Poolie wrote:
What about the mother in law?



Died a couple of years ago, so you've shit out if you're after a date with her...!

:wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2025 4:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 10:34 pm
Posts: 3436
Stocksfield_Poolie wrote:
Women don't generally like men.
Quite a lot of them are lesbians, and very few woman are 100% straight.
Women generally like being with each other.
The last thing most of them want is men pretending to be women.


ever tried Hai Karate or brut aftershave ,Mr Stocks??....might change your luck.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2025 4:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2024 3:29 pm
Posts: 912
I knew it must have been my aftershave.

Ordered some straight away:

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Hai-Karate-Lot ... JXED&gQT=1

If it doesn't work, will certainly knock them out!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2025 4:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 36209
Stocksfield_Poolie wrote:
Women don't generally like men.
Quite a lot of them are lesbians, and very few woman are 100% straight.
Women generally like being with each other.
The last thing most of them want is men pretending to be women.


Good, about time, I’ll get some bleedin peace finally.

REMEMBER…..The worst, most terrifying sentence any woman can say is….’Y’know, I’ve been thinking, why don’t we……’ then is the time to run and hide. bbolt

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Mon Apr 21, 2025 9:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:22 pm
Posts: 18751
Stocksfield_Poolie wrote:
Women don't generally like men.
Quite a lot of them are lesbians, and very few woman are 100% straight.
Women generally like being with each other.
The last thing most of them want is men pretending to be women.

wrong. they just like to see us beg and get the best deal they can get for their services to us. mind you if you live in keighley or hebden bridge you do have a point.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trans "Women" not actually women
PostPosted: Wed Apr 23, 2025 11:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2021 9:46 am
Posts: 106
Used to think The Bunker was quite an apt name for this place. Now think The Cave would be more appropriate.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 55 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: Kettering Poolie, RobbieE1 and 347 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.