Quote by Mr Norman

bresslaw · **Joined:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 10:45 am **Posts:** 2411

'Why do you think some of our so called fans ate the the club enough to want to jepodsy it?'

He's got a point.

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 22671

If I could understand it I might answer.

bresslaw · **Joined:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 10:45 am **Posts:** 2411

Have a read of the board. It's incredible.

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 22671

Are you on about the 'friends' board? I'd rather not look there thanks. I'll never get that time back.

bresslaw · **Joined:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 10:45 am **Posts:** 2411

Seriously. They walk amongst us !

3Quid · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:11 pm **Posts:** 1791

Spelling mistakes?

Clutching at straws there bresslaw. You had a bottle of wine or summat?

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Sun Feb 05, 2017 4:56 am

Spelling mistakes????
Howay 3Quid....a bit of intelligence will do!!!! confised

pooliecrab · **Joined:** Tue Dec 16, 2014 9:31 pm **Posts:** 6028

Like Bresslaw says, he has a point. You're only going to jepodsy the club if you are eating it.

Seriously though it's sad that fans can't unite, sadder still that people ignore facts purely because it suits their agenda rather than benefits the club.

Yubep · **Joined:** Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm **Posts:** 25266

Him n his crew are best ignored. No clue what Tonya is even on about here

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sussex UK · **Joined:** Wed Dec 28, 2016 10:34 pm **Posts:** 3580

bresslaw wrote:

Have a read of the board. It's incredible.

I'm too scared to after reading about the slaps and kicks they dished out to us Loids back in the 70's/80's..Are they a bunch of ex boxers or bouncers or something .

Dalton'sHaircut · **Joined:** Sun Oct 05, 2014 9:26 pm **Posts:** 1013

I think with that lot it's a case of projection, they think the people questioning the club and involved in the Trust do so because they are 100% hell bent on being in control of the club (as opposed to wanting to secure the survival of the club).

If you remember when JPNG started and the Trust were engaging with them the other board we're totally anti JPNG and 'Tweety'. The response was to set up this sort of pseudo Trust called the Friends Group so they could also be talking to the Chairman and be in the clique again somehow. It's worth remembering that the indirect ringleader of that group is the fancy dress guy and they all loved the insider craic from Russ Green.

It appears they've been brought back inside and are now back in the pro club camp.

Hopefully they will realize that people who worry about the current state of the club are in the pro club camp and would have preferred some of the questions Brian Honours Left Foot proposed to have been answered rather than questions about biscuits and Parmos or wanking off because Gary Coxall was matey with one of them

grabec · **Joined:** Thu Jun 04, 2015 10:45 am **Posts:** 830

It's odd though, why there's often this tendency for groups to split into factions, even if they've originally got together because they've something in common. Even the Nursery folk club used to have one group of people who weren't speaking to the other.

After the initial split, it's generally just a matter of agreeing with whatever anyone in your group says, and criticising all members of the other group. What the facts are doesn't come into it usually.

Of course there's usually a reason why the groups split in the first place .....which, in the present case, it might not be wise to go into, in public.

kevin pooles gloves · **Joined:** Tue Oct 07, 2014 2:28 pm **Posts:** 9712

Rivalry between fans who support the same team.
This shit could only happen at Pools.
Probably wont be resolved until the league table says we in the top seven.
We could have a long wait before all fans are UNITED again.
Strange how social media works people slaging each other off who probably wudent say boo to you in the street.

GeoffcN · **Joined:** Fri Sep 26, 2014 8:10 pm **Posts:** 463

I think we all know what Mr Norman was saying, despite the obvious and amusing mistakes he made.
To continue the name calling , by people on both ,boards does no ne any favours.
Nor does calling people who attended the q/a "retards" "arse lickers" or only having one brain cell.
I am concerned about what is going on. Answers given on Tuesday didn't clarify things to me. However the venom being spouted on here and the blind loyalty on the other board is not at all helpful.

bresslaw · **Joined:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 10:45 am **Posts:** 2411

Venom?
Where?

poolieinnottingham · **Posted:** Sun Feb 05, 2017 1:29 pm

GeoffcN wrote:

I think we all know what Mr Norman was saying, despite the obvious and amusing mistakes he made.
To continue the name calling , by people on both ,boards does no ne any favours.
Nor does calling people who attended the q/a "retards" "arse lickers" or only having one brain cell.
I am concerned about what is going on. Answers given on Tuesday didn't clarify things to me. However the venom being spouted on here and the blind loyalty on the other board is not at all helpful.

It would be good if people in both camps rose above it. We're all Poolies at the end of the day.

grabec · **Joined:** Thu Jun 04, 2015 10:45 am **Posts:** 830

To be fair, most people do rise above it. The vast majority say nothing about it.

GeoffcN · **Joined:** Fri Sep 26, 2014 8:10 pm **Posts:** 463

poolieinnottingham wrote:

GeoffcN wrote:

I think we all know what Mr Norman was saying, despite the obvious and amusing mistakes he made.
To continue the name calling , by people on both ,boards does no ne any favours.
Nor does calling people who attended the q/a "retards" "arse lickers" or only having one brain cell.
I am concerned about what is going on. Answers given on Tuesday didn't clarify things to me. However the venom being spouted on here and the blind loyalty on the other board is not at all helpful.

It would be good if people in both camps rose above it. We're all Poolies at the end of the day.

Exactly

Yubep · **Joined:** Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm **Posts:** 25266

Dalton'sHaircut wrote:

I think with that lot it's a case of projection, they think the people questioning the club and involved in the Trust do so because they are 100% hell bent on being in control of the club (as opposed to wanting to secure the survival of the club).

If you remember when JPNG started and the Trust were engaging with them the other board we're totally anti JPNG and 'Tweety'. The response was to set up this sort of pseudo Trust called the Friends Group so they could also be talking to the Chairman and be in the clique again somehow. It's worth remembering that the indirect ringleader of that group is the fancy dress guy and they all loved the insider craic from Russ Green.

It appears they've been brought back inside and are now back in the pro club camp.

Hopefully they will realize that people who worry about the current state of the club are in the pro club camp and would have preferred some of the questions Brian Honours Left Foot proposed to have been answered rather than questions about biscuits and Parmos or wanking off because Gary Coxall was matey with one of them

This 1000%.

They labelled him tweety whilst we welcomed his presence at the trust launch night.

Since then, as opinions have changed, so has that of a few bottom feeders who fancy a few freebies and acclaim that the fancy dress ringleader gets.

Only reason the friends group was set up was because 1. Mr I n a few others thought of the trust first 2. For freebies (getting them already) 2. Perks and getting info first 4. To derail trust momentum.

monkeybutt · **Posted:** Sun Feb 05, 2017 1:52 pm

I have risen above it, so can you lot and I get more shit than any of you, take the high road comrades.

3Quid · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:11 pm **Posts:** 1791

poolieinnottingham wrote:

GeoffcN wrote:

I think we all know what Mr Norman was saying, despite the obvious and amusing mistakes he made.
To continue the name calling , by people on both ,boards does no ne any favours.
Nor does calling people who attended the q/a "retards" "arse lickers" or only having one brain cell.
I am concerned about what is going on. Answers given on Tuesday didn't clarify things to me. However the venom being spouted on here and the blind loyalty on the other board is not at all helpful.

It would be good if people in both camps rose above it. We're all Poolies at the end of the day.

True. I know a few lads off both boards and all are sound as a pound. Maybe time to just get along as we are all pools fans. If you can't get along just maybe ignore each other?

Yubep · **Joined:** Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm **Posts:** 25266

Your smashing Mick, don't care what board you post on me

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

misterb2001 · **Posted:** Sun Feb 05, 2017 2:34 pm

3Quid wrote:

poolieinnottingham wrote:

GeoffcN wrote:

I think we all know what Mr Norman was saying, despite the obvious and amusing mistakes he made.
To continue the name calling , by people on both ,boards does no ne any favours.
Nor does calling people who attended the q/a "retards" "arse lickers" or only having one brain cell.
I am concerned about what is going on. Answers given on Tuesday didn't clarify things to me. However the venom being spouted on here and the blind loyalty on the other board is not at all helpful.

It would be good if people in both camps rose above it. We're all Poolies at the end of the day.

True. I know a few lads off both boards and all are sound as a pound. Maybe time to just get along as we are all pools fans. If you can't get along just maybe ignore each other?

bingo.

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 22671

Mr 3 Quid is one of the few who use both boards and one who has the intelligence to see through the nonsense.

Soma · **Joined:** Tue Aug 21, 2012 11:29 pm **Posts:** 574

It's basically a Monty Python sketch all these groups/forums popping up all hating each other despite all wanting the same thing.

PJPoolie · **Joined:** Wed Mar 06, 2013 6:28 pm **Posts:** 15342

He's always been negative and it's rubbed me up the wrong way a few times but Mr Horden is another on that board who has posted plenty of sense lately from the bits I've read.

ElvisC · **Joined:** Mon Aug 15, 2011 9:55 am **Posts:** 4504

PJPoolie wrote:

He's always been negative and it's rubbed me up the wrong way a few times but Mr Horden is another on that board who has posted plenty of sense lately from the bits I've read.

Ron Chambers. A very, very good bloke. Doesn't seem to like me, but there's plenty in that club lately. He's got his head screwed on.

appleyapper · **Joined:** Tue Dec 12, 2006 6:25 pm **Posts:** 483

This trust thing irritates me I mentioned having one many years,ago and was totally shot down by all and sundry on here, so what changed I don't really know but felt humilliated by the reaction to my suggestion. I am happy that one exists as we have needed one for a long time, hopefully we can all move forward together

offshorepoolie · **Joined:** Wed Oct 14, 2009 7:32 pm **Posts:** 6011

Marching on together... (maybe that sounds too dirty leeds)

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

Yubep · **Joined:** Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm **Posts:** 25266

PJPoolie wrote:

He's always been negative and it's rubbed me up the wrong way a few times but Mr Horden is another on that board who has posted plenty of sense lately from the bits I've read.

Top bloke Ron.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

monkeybutt · **Posted:** Sun Feb 05, 2017 8:42 pm

Who is pipedreamfantasy?, writes a bit Joe Macish!

yloop · **Posted:** Sun Feb 05, 2017 8:44 pm

No one from here as I understand it. I'd like him/her to post on both boards, talks a lot of sense.

Dalton'sHaircut · **Joined:** Sun Oct 05, 2014 9:26 pm **Posts:** 1013

appleyapper wrote:

This trust thing irritates me I mentioned having one many years,ago and was totally shot down by all and sundry on here, so what changed I don't really know but felt humilliated by the reaction to my suggestion. I am happy that one exists as we have needed one for a long time, hopefully we can all move forward together

Fair enough mate, I guess anyone who did shoot you down at the time probably would eat humble pie and agree with you now. That's what normal people do react to the evidence in front of them and it's possible to change your mind.

Your last sentence is spot on

monkeybutt · **Posted:** Sun Feb 05, 2017 9:03 pm

appleyapper wrote:

This trust thing irritates me I mentioned having one many years,ago and was totally shot down by all and sundry on here, so what changed I don't really know but felt humilliated by the reaction to my suggestion. I am happy that one exists as we have needed one for a long time, hopefully we can all move forward together

Have you joined the trust by the way?

pooliecrab · **Joined:** Tue Dec 16, 2014 9:31 pm **Posts:** 6028

appleyapper wrote:

This trust thing irritates me I mentioned having one many years,ago and was totally shot down by all and sundry on here, so what changed I don't really know but felt humilliated by the reaction to my suggestion. I am happy that one exists as we have needed one for a long time, hopefully we can all move forward together

Fair enough if you did, you were right. Hopefully the doubters that remain can also be won around. I think all it takes is a little scare for most people, others maybe a bit a more.

appleyapper · **Joined:** Tue Dec 12, 2006 6:25 pm **Posts:** 483

I have a wedding to pay for so money is tight at the moment but when this has been sorted I will be joining

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Sun Feb 05, 2017 11:31 pm

Another olive branch offered by the other board!!!!
I wonder how long this 'ceasefire' lasts considering the one from last week lasted less than 24 hours!?!?
You couldn't make it up!!!! :laugh:

Gerry Mandrake · **Joined:** Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:23 pm **Posts:** 1441

Only live once at they're wasting time bickering about some shite...

Quote by Mr Norman

Gadgies online