Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Wed Jul 30, 2025 7:46 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: Match of the Day
PostPosted: Sat Aug 29, 2015 11:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 6:28 pm
Posts: 15342
I'm getting more embarrassed about the game we love with every game/red card.

Players behaving like tits and refs sending them off for fuck all. Absolute fannies game these days.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Match of the Day
PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2015 12:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 6:36 pm
Posts: 900
One of the guys I go to pools with is a big Aussie rules football fan. He has family in Australia and goes there every year.

He said that you can't send players off in Aussie rules, technically you could punch someone deliberately in the face in front of the ref and yet still not get sent off. You would no doubt get banned for 6 months afterwards but nothing would happen during the game.

We have all seen games where a player is sent off incorrectly and even if it was a correct sending off, the game is often ruined because of it and the more I think about it, I think the Aussies are onto something here. Folk pay good money to watch 22 players on a pitch, not 21, 20 or 19 and so why don't players simply get bans after games. Hypothetically, the ref could give out as many yellow cards as he liked and the players would suffer afterwards dependent on the severity of the card.

Maybe harder to introduce into the lower leagues but with the number of cameras at premiership games, it would soon see players racking up bans for diving, play acting, dangerous play etc.

Probably needs some thought but if you take the Newcastle sending off for instance after 17 mins today. Defo red by the letter of the law but ruined the game. Haven't seen the Stoke sendings off but the same principal goes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Match of the Day
PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2015 1:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 6:28 pm
Posts: 15342
For the first sending off in the Stoke game everybody involved with that including the crowd who were present watching utter fannies behaving like that should be embarrassed with themselves.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Match of the Day
PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2015 7:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm
Posts: 25266
Nobles was a good tackle n never a yellow never mind a red.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
Michaelbarron ‏@Mickyb22
@9howie yes defo I need my mate for golf and social ‪#bessiemate


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Match of the Day
PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2015 7:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 3:59 pm
Posts: 3998
Location: The Town End
I'd be embarrassed to pretend that a slight brush of a hand against my cheek could almost down me. It'd pathetic, no red and book the one play acting!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Match of the Day
PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2015 7:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 6:46 pm
Posts: 7331
Location: East Durham Riviera
Chesssington wrote:
One of the guys I go to pools with is a big Aussie rules football fan. He has family in Australia and goes there every year.

He said that you can't send players off in Aussie rules, technically you could punch someone deliberately in the face in front of the ref and yet still not get sent off. You would no doubt get banned for 6 months afterwards but nothing would happen during the game.

We have all seen games where a player is sent off incorrectly and even if it was a correct sending off, the game is often ruined because of it and the more I think about it, I think the Aussies are onto something here. Folk pay good money to watch 22 players on a pitch, not 21, 20 or 19 and so why don't players simply get bans after games. Hypothetically, the ref could give out as many yellow cards as he liked and the players would suffer afterwards dependent on the severity of the card.

Maybe harder to introduce into the lower leagues but with the number of cameras at premiership games, it would soon see players racking up bans for diving, play acting, dangerous play etc.

Probably needs some thought but if you take the Newcastle sending off for instance after 17 mins today. Defo red by the letter of the law but ruined the game. Haven't seen the Stoke sendings off but the same principal goes.


Or the players could just behave themselves banghead

_________________
Social Media - giving idiots a voice since 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Match of the Day
PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2015 7:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 6:46 pm
Posts: 7331
Location: East Durham Riviera
Yubep wrote:
Nobles was a good tackle n never a yellow never mind a red.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Agree with that one, and there were some soft decisions made today in the Premier, but there is so much play acting going on, refs are bound to get it wrong from time to time. The players need to man up, but that's not going to happen whilst there is so much money at the top.

_________________
Social Media - giving idiots a voice since 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Match of the Day
PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2015 8:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm
Posts: 25266
The refs dammed if he does n damned if he doesn't.

Coutinho could have easily got a final warning for the foul on payet my friend argued. But then If coutinho stays on the field n influences the result you get people hammering the ref for that (coquelin against palace a fine example)

Coutinho was on a yellow, you fly in n you lose any control over where you end up n your asking for a second yellow.

Of the Reds yday I think the first Stoke one was soft, Charlie Adam was stupid to do that infront of a lino, noble was very soft but coutinho can have no complaints.

2 outta 4 right. Bout normal these days


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
Michaelbarron ‏@Mickyb22
@9howie yes defo I need my mate for golf and social ‪#bessiemate


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Match of the Day
PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2015 8:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 6:46 pm
Posts: 7331
Location: East Durham Riviera
Watching MOTD at the moment, and to be fair to the officials, a lot of decisions were justified. I think something like a card between a yellow and red may help. Once a player had this, then he would just have to sneeze and then he was off ,eg the first Stoke player that got sent off yesterday, this would render the player almost ineffective, therefore you would expect the manager to replace him, thus ensuring the spectacle of 11 v 11 is not ruined as Chessington alludes too.

As an ex ref I will say the score at the time can influence your decision. If it is borderline and the player in question plays for a team losing 3-0 on 60 minutes, you are inclined to cut him some slack, this is the common sense players and managers are always calling for. A couple of times I have anxiously awaited full time as said team pull a couple of goals back. Of course if it goes wrong the players and officials of team that were winning have your ar*e.

Also what you don't see on MOTD is what a player is saying to the ref throughout the game, or what he is up to off the ball. Sometimes you just get so fed up with an individual ruining the game through constant bickering/moaning, you think to yourself first chance I get to send him off I will. Wrong I know but human nature

_________________
Social Media - giving idiots a voice since 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Match of the Day
PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2015 9:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm
Posts: 25266
Oh n the Newcastle red, no arguments, raked his foot down his shin. He's been trying to get sent off since his debut.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
Michaelbarron ‏@Mickyb22
@9howie yes defo I need my mate for golf and social ‪#bessiemate


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Match of the Day
PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2015 11:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 10:24 am
Posts: 2480
I don't know how Mark Hughes can claim Charlie Adam shouldn't have seen red. It was a blatant stamp and Adam has a history of doing it - a straight red if ever I saw one.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Match of the Day
PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2015 2:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am
Posts: 20758
Mark Hughes is a horrible human being.

_________________
I'd recommend a more stealthy plan than googling 'afternoon tea dog'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Match of the Day
PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2015 8:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 6476
JohnnyMars wrote:
I don't know how Mark Hughes can claim Charlie Adam shouldn't have seen red. It was a blatant stamp and Adam has a history of doing it - a straight red if ever I saw one.


Even my mrs, who hates football, asked why he stamped on him like that. You could see his momentum going backwards but he leaned forward just so he could stamp on him. I hope he does appeal and gets an extra game ban for a frivolous appeal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Match of the Day
PostPosted: Mon Aug 31, 2015 9:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:31 am
Posts: 5637
Chesssington wrote:
One of the guys I go to pools with is a big Aussie rules football fan. He has family in Australia and goes there every year.

He said that you can't send players off in Aussie rules, technically you could punch someone deliberately in the face in front of the ref and yet still not get sent off. You would no doubt get banned for 6 months afterwards but nothing would happen during the game.

We have all seen games where a player is sent off incorrectly and even if it was a correct sending off, the game is often ruined because of it and the more I think about it, I think the Aussies are onto something here. Folk pay good money to watch 22 players on a pitch, not 21, 20 or 19 and so why don't players simply get bans after games. Hypothetically, the ref could give out as many yellow cards as he liked and the players would suffer afterwards dependent on the severity of the card.

Maybe harder to introduce into the lower leagues but with the number of cameras at premiership games, it would soon see players racking up bans for diving, play acting, dangerous play etc.

Probably needs some thought but if you take the Newcastle sending off for instance after 17 mins today. Defo red by the letter of the law but ruined the game. Haven't seen the Stoke sendings off but the same principal goes.


Completely different sport. Players push and punch each other all game which is not deemed against the rules. I watch a few games a week and follow the Richmond Tigers. To compare it with football is like comparing kelly brook to lily savage.

Mark nobles red card is the worst I have ever seen giving. Clearly wins the ball and never touched him. Ref should be fined and suspended himself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Match of the Day
PostPosted: Mon Aug 31, 2015 9:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 6:46 pm
Posts: 7331
Location: East Durham Riviera
If they appeal I am sure that will be rescinded.

_________________
Social Media - giving idiots a voice since 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: Arthurpoolie, bobby lemonade, Corner Flag, Essex poolie, Gerry Mandrake, Infidel, JBPoolie, Jules, jumbodabber, Kettering Poolie, Mute Witness, nbthree3, Ozzy Saltburn, paulus the woodgnome and a side salad, poolie1966, stevven, WindyMilitant and 465 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.