just read the 10 questions by the mail for a response from laurel and hardy.

maybe i am a bit thick and got this wrong but 2 quotes from them do not add up.
:- "the income recieved from the jack baldwin sale £500,000, is treated as one payment in that financial season and reflects on our SCMP as to our limit to invest in players as we have only recieved £100,000...blah,blah,blah,
hartlepool mail dec 12.

go back to pre-season, an interview in the mail with russ green, dig the interview out hartlepool mail!!!
not word for word - " if the club recieve income that is not planned for, i.e cup run,sponsorship etc, is this available to strenghen the squad without FFP ?

russ green - "absouletely, if this is money not catered for or falls into leauge rules that is available to the club as extra income........

so why can't/ won't you invest the extra payments recieved from the baldwin/james sale's?

the leauge treated the sale(s) as the full value. so why can't they invest the extra as it is does not come under the rules. hiding behind ffp and scmp.

they speak with forked tongue and total hypocrits. totally hit me as soon as i read it. as i say maybe a bit thick but hurt's when you see a club like rochdale running over very nicely in league 1 who are basically the same size as us and they can do it! just like we did.

hole in one mate. But they won't pass comment on anything that exposes them for what they are