Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Mon Aug 18, 2025 11:02 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 5:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:31 am
Posts: 5637
im over the moon with the win but they were awful. I love pools to bits and always want what's best but is that really an x1 to take us up?

Shouldn't be negative and I alpoligise but that didn't look like a top half team.

Austin for me again was man of the match. Murray played well as did monky. James cameo was superb and the goal was world class, monkeys work to set him up was top drawer.

Plenty of positives but I still see signs off trouble.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 5:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 7:47 pm
Posts: 943
Ritchies birthmark wrote:
im over the moon with the win but they were awful. I love pools to bits and always want what's best but is that really an x1 to take us up?

Shouldn't be negative and I alpoligise but that didn't look like a top half team.

Austin for me again was man of the match. Murray played well as did monky. James cameo was superb and the goal was world class, monkeys work to set him up was top drawer.

Plenty of positives but I still see signs off trouble.



Concur exept for the Austin bit, i thought he was shocking.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 5:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:31 am
Posts: 5637
I'm glad somebody agrees lol but what did Austin do wrong?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 5:28 pm 
Thought Austin had one of his better games, solid apart from one pass that nearly caused trouble sctatchinghead


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 5:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:31 am
Posts: 5637
monkeybutt wrote:
Thought Austin had one of his better games, solid apart from one pass that nearly caused trouble sctatchinghead


I agree fully remember that pass. Apart from The scare I thought he played very well. Horwood was good on the ball aswell I'd much prefer him to play lw. In the other half he looked a problem.

On a side note Holden was impressive AGAIN


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 5:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:42 pm
Posts: 6592
Location: Hartlepool - for now....
Agree with most of the original post but can't stand the term 'world class', all things said though it was a quality finish.

I thought Sweeney had a decent game as well but I'm still not convinced he will be the right person to start against the better teams in the division.

It was good to see the team playing a bit more positively and a great 3 points but in no way was it as comfortable as the result may suggest.....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 5:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm
Posts: 25266
What? When was Holden impressive?

The 2 crosses that hit no one, granted he wasn't shite but he didn't do anything, to be described as impressive is way over the top

_________________
Michaelbarron ‏@Mickyb22
@9howie yes defo I need my mate for golf and social ‪#bessiemate


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 5:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
Disagree, I thought he was fucking awful.

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 5:48 pm 
Howard did the square root of fuck all today. He just didn't look interested in the game from the start. Is he carrying a knock or something?


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 5:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 12:16 pm
Posts: 77
Not been training much due to knee problems I believe (which doesn't bode well)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 5:55 pm 
How could anyone watch that game and think Austin was 'shocking' our back four all had good games, loads of blocks and tackles. Austin played one awful pass, apart from that he was sound.

Howard was awful, his body language was poor from about ten minutes in. Poole doesn't impress me at all, James should start ahead of him every time at least you get work rate.

A win is a win, we won!


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 6:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 12:37 pm
Posts: 689
Howard did fuck all other than miss the penalty and Holden looked woefully out of his depth when he came on, other than that I thought the rest of the players played well without setting the world alight. Still cant see why Monkhouse and Franks are playing on opposite wings like, although both had decent games.

I thought Sweeney looked a lot brighter today, against one of the weakest sides in the division. But can he do it against a better quality opponent?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 7:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am
Posts: 20758
Holden was diabolical and showed why he not starting games.

_________________
I'd recommend a more stealthy plan than googling 'afternoon tea dog'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 11:26 pm
Posts: 180
Do people forget that we are not man utd?
We beat a division one team today quite easily.
Yes, we are never gonna get promoted with this team but i have Definately seen worse teams in my time supporting pools.
Holden wasn't on long enough to be given such a hard time and Howard won his headers as he Is supposed to do.
It's not his fault the defenders don't jump!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 3:57 pm
Posts: 734
Ritchies birthmark wrote:
monkeybutt wrote:
Thought Austin had one of his better games, solid apart from one pass that nearly caused trouble sctatchinghead


I agree fully remember that pass. Apart from The scare I thought he played very well. Horwood was good on the ball aswell I'd much prefer him to play lw. In the other half he looked a problem.

On a side note Holden was impressive AGAIN


I usually think you speak a lot of sense but what game did you watch?

Austin did ok but we where playing a very poor team and they mainly attacked down our left side.

I have been critical of horwood in the past but I think he is a damn sight better than Holden. As for playing Holden as a winger, I really struggle with that when we have luscombe on the bench.

I will be surprised if Holden makes it at our level, we have had hundreds of young lads like him over the years and very few make it.

_________________
Formally Superboydy11


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 9:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 11:26 pm
Posts: 180
We won and it's the third game of the season.
Im happy with that, admittedly it wasn't great but not every team can win easily every game.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 9:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 7:47 pm
Posts: 943
im in a minority if not on my own but mark my words , Austin will cost us a lot of goals this season.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 9:37 pm 
If you had the choice of playing attractive football that entertained the crowd and lost, or a bit boring scored 2 decent goals and won, I know which I would take :hand:

Yes I would like to be on the edge of my seat at the skill etc, but hey, I am a realist, we will get the odd game like that, although in general, the 3 points is what matters rolf


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 10:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 11:26 pm
Posts: 180
Well said monkey.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 10:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 12470
I welcome the three points as much as the next man, but the quality and strength of our squad, given that it appears that we are not generating enough income to strengthen, worries me.
On today's game, I thought James Poole was very under par.
I have seen Howard twice now and to be honest, I'm not impressed so far.
I don't see the point of bringing Holden on to play left side midfield, when Luscombe and Walton are sat on the bench.
I hope young James gets a big confidence boost from his goal.

_________________
Come on Pools


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 11:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:31 am
Posts: 5637
To answer the questions.......

Yea we were battered down the left, finally you noticed!! This happens every game.

Horwood had an ok game today though for me so no bother there? However Holden isn't a winger so were no further on if that's supposed to help.

Up top we created fuck all so 3 pts is awesome.( bar the goal)

As said I'm happy but not exstatic


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 11:17 pm 
Ritchies birthmark wrote:

As said I'm happy but not exstatic


I once had a caravan that we got an engine and steering wheel for that was similar.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 11:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:31 am
Posts: 5637
PJ_Poolie wrote:
Ritchies birthmark wrote:

As said I'm happy but not exstatic


I once had a caravan that we got an engine and steering wheel for that was similar.


Ahhhhhh so your a pikey..... Now it makes sense...,,....... ???!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 11:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:22 pm
Posts: 418
3 points is 3 points well taken. Espesh against Scunny who have been a bit of a hex in recent times. Let me say that I won't be going to the away game later in the season. Boring drive....parking in Scunny away carpark...unaccessable boozers...we get stuffed on pitch...Scunny parking stewards let us leave carpark at 7 pm.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 11:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:11 pm
Posts: 1791
Good 3 points today in my opinion against a side who are struggling but can put the ball in the net at will, so a big gold star for the back four.

I wasn't at the match today but was given a very good point by someone who was: He said that if Adam Boyd had played the same way Steve Howard had today he would have been slated all game and probably been booed off the pitch.

:?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 12:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:42 pm
Posts: 6592
Location: Hartlepool - for now....
3Quid wrote:
Good 3 points today in my opinion against a side who are struggling but can put the ball in the net at will, so a big gold star for the back four.

I wasn't at the match today but was given a very good point by someone who was: He said that if Adam Boyd had played the same way Steve Howard had today he would have been slated all game and probably been booed off the pitch.

:?


Howard lost possession a few times and gave away some clumsy fouls, I had doubts when we signed him but still hope he comes good.

I also think Austin should be on penalties. At least he tries to send the keeper the wrong way and puts some thought into his run up to at least wrong foot the keeper. In this day and age I can't believe professional players still take penalties like school kids. I wonder how many penalties Howard practiced this week..?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 8:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
What a pile of shite some folk are writing on here. At times it must just be cos you need to have somebody to slag off. And as for the second goal, I thought it was excellent buildup play and a great finish but I'm gonna have to see it on the telly cos the way I'm reading it on here it was only Monkhouse and James involved but that's not how i remember it.

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 9:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:31 am
Posts: 5637
I mentioned only monky as it was his assist and the way he did it was class and I thought it deserved praise. I honestly couldn't tell you who passed it to him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 9:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 9:10 am
Posts: 647
Location: Winlaton
Monky got to a Howard flick on; one of his few headers which worked all afternoon.

Howard didn't look fit, but if he's carrying a knock, then he ain't fit, which would explain why he he was not in position for some crosses in the first half - Franks goal being a case in point


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 10:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:31 am
Posts: 5637
Well if hes not 100% why is he playing??

We released Boyd brown hassan and snaith and loaned out nish yet we start a striker who's not fit, you couldn't make it up.

Get noble in asap is all I can say


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 10:07 am 
Players play when they are not 100% all of the time, he had a bad day it happens, he still had a nuisance factor and contributed in the build up to the second goal though.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 10:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 9:10 am
Posts: 647
Location: Winlaton
Can't disagree PJ, but if the plan is to get crosses into the box, the strikers have to be fit enough to get on the end of them


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 10:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:31 am
Posts: 5637
I wonder if cooper will keep him on penalties. Only 1 miss but were do you draw the line?? Horwood is good with dead balls maybe he should take them.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 1:49 pm
Posts: 1526
Pleased as punch with the 3 points but it was a very lacklustre display and Scunthorpe were horrendous. A far cry from the good teams they have put out in recent years.

I still don't think the system Cooper is using is getting the best out of the squad we have although it was good to see Murray make a return to the team. There is clearly a deliberate ploy to get the ball out wide as soon as possible but it's pointless given no one appears to be able to cross the ball well.

The 2nd goal was superb. Excellent play from Monkhouse and the control from James was magnificent.

Disappointing performance but ultimately winning is everything. Onward and upwards.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 10:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 5:56 pm
Posts: 9187
Location: nearest takeaway
Murray was involved in everything in the middle of the park - brilliant player when he plays like that. Sweeney was a ghost for 80 to 85 minutes yet again. I can't believe we persist with him in a central 4. Apart from two runs from deep in the 1st half (one header and one mis-control) and the last 10 minutes when the game got stretched, I don't remember him making a contribution except for fouling their midfielders on the half way line. If we had someone else in the centre alongside Murray who contributed even half as much to the game as he does, then we would be a lot tougher proposition to opponents

Just my opinion like, but this will cost us over the season.

Sweeney should only ever play in a midfield 5, and in no other circumstances should he play

_________________
Come on Pools


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 11:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 12:16 pm
Posts: 77
Hope it puts to bed the ridiculous misconception that Murray can't play in a 4 because he is old when in fact he needs a decent footballer like him in there to help him. This will only help his game rather than raise doubts over it due to the failings of others


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 11:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:31 am
Posts: 5637
Murray is class and only a select few on here fail to see it


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 11:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:42 pm
Posts: 6592
Location: Hartlepool - for now....
Daltons Haircuts wrote:
Hope it puts to bed the ridiculous misconception that Murray can't play in a 4 because he is old when in fact he needs a decent footballer like him in there to help him. This will only help his game rather than raise doubts over it due to the failings of others


Totally agree clappp

Murray always takes responsibility and tries to play football rather than hit and hope. We are a far better team with Paul Murray in it.....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 11:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:42 pm
Posts: 6592
Location: Hartlepool - for now....
Ritchies birthmark wrote:
Murray is class and only a select few on here fail to see it


Sadly it's not only people on here who are clueless. You have to wonder what Cooper & Barron were thinking pre-season and earlier in the season. Murray isn't a player that is just a flash in the pan, he has been consistently superb over the past 2 years and dropping him when he was playing well was ridiculous....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 1:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am
Posts: 20758
Id rather see Murray and Walton start in the middle than Murray and Sweeney.

_________________
I'd recommend a more stealthy plan than googling 'afternoon tea dog'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3 pts
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 5:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am
Posts: 9053
3Quid wrote:
Good 3 points today in my opinion against a side who are struggling but can put the ball in the net at will, so a big gold star for the back four.

I wasn't at the match today but was given a very good point by someone who was: He said that if Adam Boyd had played the same way Steve Howard had today he would have been slated all game and probably been booed off the pitch.

:?


A very good point? I don't remember Boydy getting booed the whole time he ever played for us.

Howard has had one poor game for us, Boydy had loads. I don't really see the comparison.

_________________
Apols


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: bobby lemonade, Essex poolie, fckpoolie, JBPoolie, northumberland, Our Younguns Dad, poolie1966, PTID and 94 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.