Conspiracy theories?

howlin wolf · **Posted:** Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:32 pm

Diana and Dodi murdered by MI5 and Prince Phillip (he's a nazi apparently)........911 actually caused by CIA planted explosives or underground lizards.......the one about Neale Cooper and the chairmans daughter :wink:

*
Whats your favourite conspiracy theory?

*copyright B.Muriel

Moriarty · **Posted:** Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:44 pm

JFK without doubt

Snowy · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm **Posts:** 36418

I think all conspiracy theories are a conspiracy..... :evil:

Moriarty · **Posted:** Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:46 pm

Is that fact or just a theory? :roll:

Snowy · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm **Posts:** 36418

sarf wrote:

Is that fact or just a theory? :roll:

It's a 100% definite theoretical fact ..... possibly.

Salty · **Posted:** Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:01 pm

howlin wolf wrote:

*copyright B.Muriel

Moriarty · **Posted:** Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:21 pm

Snowy wrote:

sarf wrote:

Is that fact or just a theory? :roll:

It's a 100% definite theoretical fact ..... possibly.

Just to clarify then.

You think you are definitely positive that all conspiracy theories are in fact - theoretical. At least, that's what I think you are thinking :shock:

Snowy · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm **Posts:** 36418

sarf wrote:

Snowy wrote:

sarf wrote:

Is that fact or just a theory? :roll:

It's a 100% definite theoretical fact ..... possibly.

Just to clarify then.

You think you are definitely positive that all conspiracy theories are in fact - theoretical. At least, that's what I think you are thinking :shock:

Your thought process is in line with Sir Frederick Altons theory that all thought is in delayed deference to the relativity of the concept in a state of variable flux. To accept that theoretical definitions in the field of extended stabilisation can in fact be reversed to produce positive responses to the problem is never fully acknowledged, so can't really be used as a valid reference point in this case. However, the fact remains that it is 99.99% effective and indeed can be safely used to define theoretical states of conspiracy in relation to the political sub clause definitions. :wink:

Moriarty · **Posted:** Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:39 pm

Snowy wrote:

sarf wrote:

Snowy wrote:

sarf wrote:

Is that fact or just a theory? :roll:

It's a 100% definite theoretical fact ..... possibly.

Just to clarify then.

You think you are definitely positive that all conspiracy theories are in fact - theoretical. At least, that's what I think you are thinking :shock:

Your thought process is in line with Sir Frederick Altons theory that all thought is in delayed deference to the relativity of the concept in a state of variable flux. To accept that theoretical definitions in the field of extended stabilisation can in fact be reversed to produce positive responses to the problem is never fully acknowledged, so can't really be used as a valid refernce point in this case. However, the fact remains that it is 99.99% effective and indeed can be safely used to define theoretical states of conspiracy in relation to the political sub clause definitions. :wink:

Pardon?

Conspiracy theories?

Gadgies online