Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Mon Jul 21, 2025 1:31 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 8:31 am 
Offline
My real name is ADG, Don't take me seriously, I'm a fat Victor Meldrew on a wind up.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 11:05 pm
Posts: 1887
So, if we win the toss today, do we bat or stick them in?

_________________
Gone for good. Worn down by the Nish haters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 8:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
bat

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 8:43 am 
In their current fragile state, I'd stick 'em in.

BTW, watched Steven Finn in the C40 game last night on Sky...took 5 for 33, looked in VERY good fettle, I'd have had him on standby...


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 8:51 am 
Offline
My real name is ADG, Don't take me seriously, I'm a fat Victor Meldrew on a wind up.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 11:05 pm
Posts: 1887
Have we ever had so many great bowlers that cant get a game?

_________________
Gone for good. Worn down by the Nish haters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
Not having seen the pitch it's hard to judge, however if there looks to be a little bit of help early on stick them in and see how they cope. Alternatively if it looks like it'll turn later on then you might want to bowl last.

If Tremlett is out I'd stick Finn in, more of a like for like replacement to keep the balance right. Bresnan is good but I'd probably have him as reserve to Broad and / or Anderson.

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:08 am 
Can you still bowl underarm sctatchinghead


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
monkeybutt wrote:
Can you still bowl underarm sctatchinghead


In theory yes, however I believe that you would struggle to get your arm past your belly. :wink:

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:15 am 
Mr Ripper wrote:
monkeybutt wrote:
Can you still bowl underarm sctatchinghead


In theory yes, however I believe that you would struggle to get your arm past your belly. :wink:


You havin a laugh, I wouldn`t get to the wicket, the amble up would do me in :uhoh:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 9:20 am
Posts: 252
I'd be putting India in, although I have a bet on that no side will be bowled out for less than 200 in the series, so I dont want anymore dodgy starts like our 2nd innings at Lords confised


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:40 am 
Bowl.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:45 am 
Also I'm pretty sure the thread title said no time wasters...? Monkey 'butt'....?

Butt, what an awful word. I know the yanks use it, so I'm saying its an Americanisation....up there with the worst imo.

Swear filter!!


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:46 am 
I know and I can`t stand the yanks, however monkeyarse didn`t quite have the same ring to it :roll:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:48 am 
I dunno, monkey.arsehole seems about right! :wink smiley:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:50 am 
Salty wrote:
I dunno, monkey.arsehole seems about right! :wink smiley:


sadx :uhoh: :roll:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:53 am 
:wink smiley: !!!


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 10:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2011 8:20 am
Posts: 82
Overcast here in the East Midlands, Trent Bridge is a swingers paradise, at least in terms of cricket!, so insert Tendulkah and co and then watch the little maestro get his 100th test century!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 10:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2006 12:24 pm
Posts: 7529
Location: Rocking my soul in the bosom of Abraham
Can we lock this thread please.

_________________
Dont need no country,wont fly no flag
Cut no slack for the Union Jack,Stars & Stripes got me jet lagged


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 11:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 7:41 pm
Posts: 242
Location: gods country
Does anyone bat for the other side around here.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 11:18 am 
Offline
My real name is ADG, Don't take me seriously, I'm a fat Victor Meldrew on a wind up.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 11:05 pm
Posts: 1887
you asking?

_________________
Gone for good. Worn down by the Nish haters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 11:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 1:26 pm
Posts: 2414
Location: I love Kylie me like.
My kids love Jimmy Cricket Walt Disney films,I think they waste a lot of time watching these on those rainy days. :roll:

_________________
I once snogged Helen Chamberlain.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 11:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 9:20 am
Posts: 252
Sounds like a dodgy LBW decision, anybody watching on TV?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 11:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:25 am
Posts: 12959
Location: Huntingdon, Cambridge
23-2 dam

_________________
"Whenever you're feeling stupid just remember, some people believe the Earth is 6000 years old"
"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 11:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am
Posts: 9053
SeasonTicketHolder wrote:
Sounds like a dodgy LBW decision, anybody watching on TV?


I slept through the first one so not sure, from what I've read it was 'marginal'.

No doubt at the second one though rage

_________________
Apols


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 11:52 am 
Should have bowled first banghead


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 11:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
monkeybutt wrote:
Should have bowled first banghead


India won the toss. stpid

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 11:57 am 
Mr Ripper wrote:
monkeybutt wrote:
Should have bowled first banghead


India won the toss. stpid


Ah that would explain it, I didn`t know that as my crystal ball is in for servicing and all my spare time at work is spent on here waiting to be jumped on for making an error :wink:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 7:41 pm
Posts: 242
Location: gods country
Mr Creosote wrote:
you asking?


Yer just so im aware :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
GroovyCrimes wrote:
Can we lock this thread please.


:laugh: clappp

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 2:43 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:40 pm
Posts: 3561
Location: Still trying to find myself
We've managed to screw this up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 2:44 pm 
Shhhhhh, ripper will knack yer....


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 3:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 9:20 am
Posts: 252
Love England's tactics, its hard batting conditions, so lets give our wickets away and get India in batting while the ball is swinging - pure genius


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 3:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 9:20 am
Posts: 252
SeasonTicketHolder wrote:
I'd be putting India in, although I have a bet on that no side will be bowled out for less than 200 in the series, so I dont want anymore dodgy starts like our 2nd innings at Lords confised



banghead banghead banghead sadx


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 3:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 9:20 am
Posts: 252
True, the bet was for the whole series, was hoping for a washout at Nottingham bbolt


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 3:54 pm 
MadJohn wrote:
There have been very few poor shots, just great bowling. But I admit it wouldn't disappoint me too much if we sacrificed a few dozen runs for a chance to take a good bite out of the Indian top order.


I think England will be even better than India in these conditions, if we have 20 overs at them tonight I wouldn't be shocked if they finished 4 or 5 down. I am looking forward to watching Anderson bowl :coool:

...they will finish 80 for 0 now I've posted this.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 6:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:48 pm
Posts: 1278
Should have played Finn, instead of Bresnan
(that'll probably get him a 5'fer )

_________________
Form is temporary
Class is permanent


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 6:37 pm 
LeicesterPoolie wrote:
Should have played Finn, instead of Bresnan
(that'll probably get him a 5'fer )


Hope it does but I can't agree with you. Bresnan is a pitch up swing bowler, Finn is a hit the deck bowler. Given Trent Bride since they built the new stands is a swing bowlers paradise Bresnan is a no brainer really. Plus Bresnan was superb in Australia and has earned the right to be in the side, Finn although he's had a great start to his test career is one for the future.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 8:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am
Posts: 9053
PJ_Poolie wrote:
LeicesterPoolie wrote:
Should have played Finn, instead of Bresnan
(that'll probably get him a 5'fer )


Hope it does but I can't agree with you. Bresnan is a pitch up swing bowler, Finn is a hit the deck bowler. Given Trent Bride since they built the new stands is a swing bowlers paradise Bresnan is a no brainer really. Plus Bresnan was superb in Australia and has earned the right to be in the side, Finn although he's had a great start to his test career is one for the future.


Agreed, Finn took a 5 for on national tele 15 hours before the Test started but that apart he hasn't really set the world alight for Middlesex recently.

Bresnan has taken far more wickets of late and was excellent in the one dayers against Sri Lanka. Given he almost replaced Broad last week it would have been a very strange decision to suddenly promote Finn head of him purely based on one game.

_________________
Apols


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:41 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:40 pm
Posts: 3561
Location: Still trying to find myself
At least we weren't as bad as Leicestershire today.

34 all out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Mon Aug 01, 2011 4:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:48 pm
Posts: 1278
LeicesterPoolie wrote:
Should have played Finn, instead of Bresnan
(that'll probably get him a 5'fer )


how good am I ?

_________________
Form is temporary
Class is permanent


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Mon Aug 01, 2011 5:43 pm 
offshorepoolie wrote:
344 runs to go 2 wickets remaining and just over a day to hold out.. Do you think India can hang on for a draw?


No :coool:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Mon Aug 01, 2011 6:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 1:49 pm
Posts: 1526
Finn needs to pitch it up more and be a bit more consistent with his line before he gets a decent run in the England team I reckon. If he was averaging around 90mph speed I could perhaps forgive him his shorter length but he's only around 85mph. Not quick enough for that sort of bowling.

But enough of that. Fantastic win for England especially when you consider the situation they found themselves in just before Broad's hattrick on Saturday.

To win so handsomely after being in such a difficult situation, against a team as good as India, is the hallmark of a truly great team.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Mon Aug 01, 2011 10:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 4:48 pm
Posts: 1852
For me, Finn was played in the build up to the Ashes series in Australia where he did OK on those hard pitches. He relies a lot on bounce, much like Harmison before him but you'd have to be a very good bowler to get into this England side at the moment. 10 of whom are good with the bat, and that's without sacrificing the bowling quality. Best side in the world at the moment and could be even better if Swann can find some of what makes him one of the best bowlers in test cricket


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2011 9:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:25 am
Posts: 12959
Location: Huntingdon, Cambridge
The next test if trott is injured then we should play five bowlers and play Prior at six, given Bresnan ability yesterday with the bat and bowling figures you cant really argue with or drop him.

_________________
"Whenever you're feeling stupid just remember, some people believe the Earth is 6000 years old"
"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2011 4:57 pm 
I was completely staggered watching that last night. There's nowhere England aren't a threat apart from the openers.

How can an opener not reach double figures and yet a bowler can get 90 in the same innings against the same attack?? sctatchinghead

The England bowling performance was the best I've seen for 25 years. clappp


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2011 6:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 1:49 pm
Posts: 1526
I think it would be more accurate to describe Bresnan as an all rounder. His bowling has gone up a notch since he first played against Bangladesh. Yard or two quicker and a lot more menacing. If him and Broad can keep performing like this England will be onto a very good thing. The last time a team had two genuinely superb all rounders was South Africa, IMO, when McMillan and Kallis were in the same team.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2011 11:30 pm 
Spender wrote:
I was completely staggered watching that last night. There's nowhere England aren't a threat apart from the openers.

How can an opener not reach double figures and yet a bowler can get 90 in the same innings against the same attack?? sctatchinghead



If you need that answering you don't understand cricket, or when it's the hardest to bat in a game of Cricket. Especially Test Cricket, especially in the first hour.

New Ball?

Fresh Bowlers?

Pressure?

Moisture in a new wicket?

Early morning conditions?

The conditions when Cook and Strauss walked out on day one were hardly the same as when Bresnan made hay while the sun shined. Cook 'not a threat' apart from the last two Tests he's been a modern day Bardman for best part of a year!!


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2011 11:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 7:14 pm
Posts: 302
Location: North of The Border (The Crimdon Border)
PJ_Poolie wrote:
The conditions when Cook and Strauss walked out on day one were hardly the same as when Bresnan made hay while the sun shined. Cook 'not a threat' apart from the last two Tests he's been a modern day Bardman for best part of a year!!


He's releasing a single to cash in. "Do the Bardman" :wink:

_________________
What would happen if you took a turkey & boned it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2011 11:56 pm 
Spiff wrote:
PJ_Poolie wrote:
The conditions when Cook and Strauss walked out on day one were hardly the same as when Bresnan made hay while the sun shined. Cook 'not a threat' apart from the last two Tests he's been a modern day Bardman for best part of a year!!


He's releasing a single to cash in. "Do the Bardman" :wink:


That's slightly direspectful towards 'The Jon'


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 12:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am
Posts: 9053
When your worst performing bowler is Graeme Swann and your worst performing batsment is Alistair Cook you know you're having a pretty good series

_________________
Apols


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket thread - no time wasters
PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 4:02 pm 
I bow to all the superior knowledge I am offered. I know about footy, but I know nowt about the five day game although I find it compelling.

I need a PM exchange with the Fat Man.


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: Corner Flag, Darylmore, Freaky Teeth, garthwd, Hawklord, Infidel, itwontwork, Jamie1952, JBPoolie, Jules, loan_star, MutleyRules, Ozzy Saltburn, Porter’s porter, PTID, Sandman, Stomper409, The Kit Kat Kid, Warwick Hunt and 282 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.