A Poor Final....

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Sun Jul 11, 2010 9:43 pm

For a very poor World Cup!!!! confised

paulus the woodgnome and a side salad · **Posted:** Sun Jul 11, 2010 9:54 pm

Agreed,....... littered with free-kicks.

Yubep · **Joined:** Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm **Posts:** 25266

the finals are always tight and dull, i enjoyed the tournament though, minus england.

Mick Tait's Head Bandage · **Posted:** Sun Jul 11, 2010 10:09 pm

Pleased Spain won, the Dutch were kicking owt above the grass!

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Sun Jul 11, 2010 10:11 pm

I watched about 90% of the games and thought it was a shite Tournament!!!! confised

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Sun Jul 11, 2010 10:23 pm

I've seen dirtier!!!! confised

But Holland were very very poor like!!!! sadx

TalbotAvenger · **Posted:** Sun Jul 11, 2010 10:28 pm

Brasil were cack

I won a big £22.5

gerinn and all that

Shame Muller got more assists then Vanillia though

TalbotAvenger · **Posted:** Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:16 am

chip fireball wrote:

TalbotAvenger wrote:

Brasil were cack

I won a big £22.5

gerinn and all that

Shame Muller got more assists then Vanillia though

im sorry but thats just horseshit.

you had a quid on crouch to be top scorer which lost, and five pounds likewise on villa at 7/1.

villa was joint top scorer with 3 others meaning you had £1:25 on him at 7/1 giving a total return of £9.

less the 6 quid you staked making a whopping profit of £3.

unless of course you backed them both to win the golden boot, in which case you lost £6.

hth. :roll:

villa was joint top scorer with 3 others meaning you had £1:25 on him at 7/1 giving a total return of £9.

I thought they would pay out only on Muller, because joint scores are decided on assists, ot is that wrong as well?

And regardless of that, I predicted the winner, a team from Europe

Yubep · **Joined:** Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm **Posts:** 25266

My mates lost out on about £300 quid as when he put the bet on for muller he put top scorer, which technically he isnt he's just the golden boot winner, ladbrokes taking the mick over a technicality and have quartered the odds now to about 16/1

Poolie of Kent · **Posted:** Mon Jul 12, 2010 11:32 am

That was probably the dirtiest World Cup final I've ever seen myself.

Tax Paying Poolie · **Joined:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am **Posts:** 9053

Yubep wrote:

My mates lost out on about £300 quid as when he put the bet on for muller he put top scorer, which technically he isnt he's just the golden boot winner, ladbrokes taking the mick over a technicality and have quartered the odds now to about 16/1

I've been paid £13.13 when I should have had £30 back for Villa being top scorer. Had £2.50 e/w on him at 8's.

chunky1988 · **Joined:** Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:33 pm **Posts:** 1066

Yubep wrote:

My mates lost out on about £300 quid as when he put the bet on for muller he put top scorer, which technically he isnt he's just the golden boot winner, ladbrokes taking the mick over a technicality and have quartered the odds now to about 16/1

They aren't taking the mick over a technicality....dead heat rules apply and what happens is your stake is divided by the amonut of people who split the winner and paid out at full odds

God knows how the golden boot (for scoring goals) is decided by assists...should just all split it

A Poor Final....

Gadgies online