your bunker this afternoon...

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Tue Apr 27, 2010 5:32 pm

Feck-Off!!!! confised

verbalkint · **Joined:** Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:08 pm **Posts:** 3135

chip fireball wrote:

was moderated by chip fireball.

i hope you all enjoyed some lively debate and good natured banter.

todays only outstanding agenda item was mr talbots request that sexual avatars be removed. this has been raised in the moderators forum where it is being debated moving forward.

hopefully i will have a resolution for him early tomorrow.

in the meantime im off for a meal with my beautiful children, followed by some quality time with the dog.

i hope you all have a wonderful evening, and i look forward to your company again the morrow. :grin:

I think Chip should ban himself for referring to one of his many women as a dog and been a sexist pig :wink:

katcha · **Posted:** Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:19 pm

he wants to get on with what he's paid for rather than asking me to sort shoit out for him when he's leaving whilst correcting the behaviour of what he calls spectards.....ya big palooka.

One of these days....

PoolieBarnes · **Posted:** Tue Apr 27, 2010 11:17 pm

chip fireball wrote:

was moderated by chip fireball.

todays only outstanding agenda item was mr talbots request that sexual avatars be removed. this has been raised in the moderators forum where it is being debated moving forward.

I hope that the debate can be opened up to all Bunkerites. After all, a mass debate over the aforementioned avatars can only be a good thing! bbolt

Loid Haw-Haw of Sussex · **Posted:** Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:19 am

Is talbot or Mary Whitehouse as he now known, offended by semi-naked women ? :laugh:

grabec · **Posted:** Wed Apr 28, 2010 9:26 am

Sussex07 wrote:

Is talbot or Mary Whitehouse as he now known, offended by semi-naked women ? :laugh:

No, probably Talbot is quite keen on semi-naked women. I think what he's objecting to is the use exploitative pictures of semi-naked women for grown-up-but-immature-and-witless men to drool and sneer over.

The fact that you've confused the two concepts kind of proves his point, Sussex.

Mr Ripper · **Posted:** Wed Apr 28, 2010 9:37 am

grabec wrote:

Sussex07 wrote:

Is talbot or Mary Whitehouse as he now known, offended by semi-naked women ? :laugh:

No, probably Talbot is quite keen on semi-naked women. I think what he's objecting to is the use exploitative pictures of semi-naked women for grown-up-but-immature-and-witless men to drool and sneer over.

The fact that you've confused the two concepts kind of proves his point, Sussex.

Ms. G makes a valid point.

your bunker this afternoon...

Gadgies online