We should be winning

PJ_Poolie · **Posted:** Sat Jan 30, 2010 4:18 pm

according to BBC Radio Norfolk, three good chances already, Larkin missing a good one.

PJ_Poolie · **Posted:** Sat Jan 30, 2010 4:27 pm

Goooooaaalll Austin!!!

PJ_Poolie · **Posted:** Sat Jan 30, 2010 4:28 pm

1-1 nice one lads...

tigro · **Posted:** Sat Jan 30, 2010 4:30 pm

CT must have changed his tactics the instant we went 1 up rolfl

alleztfc · **Posted:** Sat Jan 30, 2010 4:34 pm

Peej, you are a part-timer according to Andy Krap.
Get in your jet now, and you might catch the last 10! rolfl

tREE_wiTH_hAMStER · **Joined:** Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am **Posts:** 20758

Should be winning but were getting beat. A plucky performance none the less.

PJ_Poolie · **Posted:** Sat Jan 30, 2010 4:36 pm

The Norwich commenators are saying we have been the better team and are praising us to the hilt, but we are losing again!

banghead

Doug the head · **Posted:** Sat Jan 30, 2010 4:43 pm

Sounds like turners match comments will be the same old story.

paulus the woodgnome and a side salad · **Posted:** Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:02 pm

Rearrange the following sentence:- in score larkin a brothel couldnt.
He's missing too many IMO.

parmopooly · **Posted:** Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:23 pm

he should easily have equalised at Exeter at 2-1 down, that miss cost us a point.
Mind you Boyd was the best player on the park that day and Turner replaced him with Bjornsson.
Absolutely ridiculous, and everyone in the away end went off it!!!!

Spender · **Posted:** Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:35 pm

Would you have started those two Phil?? confised

barrywardrobe · **Posted:** Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:38 pm

we have had 13 shots on goal, compared to Norwich's 7. Come on Pools, make the next one count !

PJ_Poolie · **Posted:** Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:40 pm

barrywardrobe wrote:

we have had 13 shots on goal, compared to Norwich's 7. Come on Pools, make the next one count !

As I said I'm listening BBC Radio Norfolk and we have been the better side throughout the game, the really annoying thing is how easily we conceded after working so hard to get the lead.

Spender · **Posted:** Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:41 pm

I'll take you're advice marra, I'm just desperate for a win. sadx

barrywardrobe · **Posted:** Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:45 pm

PJ_Poolie wrote:

barrywardrobe wrote:

we have had 13 shots on goal, compared to Norwich's 7. Come on Pools, make the next one count !

As I said I'm listening BBC Radio Norfolk and we have been the better side throughout the game, the really annoying thing is how easily we conceded after working so hard to get the lead.

i know, can't get the bugger online.

PJ_Poolie · **Posted:** Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:47 pm

barrywardrobe wrote:

PJ_Poolie wrote:

barrywardrobe wrote:

we have had 13 shots on goal, compared to Norwich's 7. Come on Pools, make the next one count !

As I said I'm listening BBC Radio Norfolk and we have been the better side throughout the game, the really annoying thing is how easily we conceded after working so hard to get the lead.

i know, can't get the bugger online.

It's through 'Pools World' the Norwich commentary is that, I would listen to ours but when the opposition commentators say we are playing well you know it's true.

We should be winning

Gadgies online