Spurs v Leeds

alybaba · **Posted:** Sat Jan 23, 2010 8:14 pm

2-2 what a finish where did all the added time come from

Hangem · **Posted:** Sat Jan 23, 2010 8:16 pm

As much as I hate Leeds I thought they deserved it and it was a defo pena!!! But I can't stand there goalie still. Does this mean the replay will be before or after they play us???

PoolieBarnes · **Posted:** Sat Jan 23, 2010 8:17 pm

Replay on the Tuesday before they come to us. Hope it goes to extra time, so there's more of a chance of them being fooked!

PJ_Poolie · **Posted:** Sat Jan 23, 2010 8:19 pm

H99 wrote:

As much as I hate Leeds I thought they deserved it and it was a defo pena!!!

They should have been 5-0 down after 15 minutes, after that they settled down but Spurs were still very, very wasteful and that challenge from Dawson was ridiculous. In the fifth minute of added time just stay on your feet!

Great cup tie like, refreshing to see.

PoolieBarnes · **Posted:** Sat Jan 23, 2010 8:22 pm

Steve Rider, what a cock. 'Need Leeds back in the Top Flight just as soon as they can make it!!

Err . . . . . . Why?

Cock!

Poolie of Kent · **Posted:** Sat Jan 23, 2010 8:33 pm

H99 wrote:

As much as I hate Leeds I thought they deserved it and it was a defo pena!!! But I can't stand there goalie still. Does this mean the replay will be before or after they play us???

Am I the only then that could clearly see Dawson get the whole of the ball and not the man?

I need to see that again to make sure.

I thought at the time that it was criminal to give Leeds a 96th minute penalty. No wonder the 'Spurs fans booed at the end of the game - they were seconds away from a place in the next round.

tREE_wiTH_hAMStER · **Joined:** Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am **Posts:** 20758

Poolie of Kent wrote:

H99 wrote:

As much as I hate Leeds I thought they deserved it and it was a defo pena!!! But I can't stand there goalie still. Does this mean the replay will be before or after they play us???

Am I the only then that could clearly see Dawson get the whole of the ball and not the man?

I need to see that again to make sure.

I thought at the time that it was criminal to give Leeds a 96th minute penalty. No wonder the 'Spurs fans booed at the end of the game - they were seconds away from a place in the next round.

Stfu for christs sake.

Mick Tait's Head Bandage · **Posted:** Sat Jan 23, 2010 8:43 pm

Poolie of Kent wrote:

H99 wrote:

As much as I hate Leeds I thought they deserved it and it was a defo pena!!! But I can't stand there goalie still. Does this mean the replay will be before or after they play us???

Am I the only then that could clearly see Dawson get the whole of the ball and not the man?

I need to see that again to make sure.

Wairafuckinbit.........you clearly seen Dawson win the ball.........but you need to see it again to be sure

I thought at the time that it was criminal to give Leeds a 96th minute penalty. No wonder the 'Spurs fans booed at the end of the game - they were seconds away from a place in the next round.

PJ_Poolie · **Posted:** Sat Jan 23, 2010 8:44 pm

Is their really any need Tree?

tREE_wiTH_hAMStER · **Joined:** Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am **Posts:** 20758

PJ_Poolie wrote:

Is their really any need Tree?

Yes. that post makes it more obvious than ever that its a reg on the wind up.

PJ_Poolie · **Posted:** Sat Jan 23, 2010 8:47 pm

Tree_With_Hamster wrote:

PJ_Poolie wrote:

Is their really any need Tree?

Yes. that post makes it more obvious than ever that its a reg on the wind up.

No he is saying he wasn't sure it was a penalty which is fair enough, it wasn't clear cut.

No need to tell him to "shut the fuck up" really is their for saying that?

tREE_wiTH_hAMStER · **Joined:** Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am **Posts:** 20758

1) he never got the whole of the ball from any angle at all. And to suggest he never got the man! :roll:

2) "Its criminal to give a pen in 96th minute" What the fuck?

Loid Haw-Haw of Sussex · **Posted:** Sat Jan 23, 2010 8:59 pm

group hug again ..

tREE_wiTH_hAMStER · **Joined:** Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am **Posts:** 20758

ElvisAintDead wrote:

Tree_With_Hamster wrote:

PJ_Poolie wrote:

Is their really any need Tree?

Yes. that post makes it more obvious than ever that its a reg on the wind up.

How many more f*** times??? 5 or 6 of the "Regs" have MET PoK. He's TPP's cousin. Paranoid or what??!!!

Yawn.

PJ_Poolie · **Posted:** Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:00 pm

He's a 18 or 19 year old lad who supports Pools I don't think he deserves abuse just for offering his opinion I know we all have a laugh with him but I think telling someone to "shut the fuck up" is going a bit far to be honest.

Warwick Hunt · **Posted:** Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:08 pm

I didn't see the game but to be honest I wanted Leeds to get hammered.

tREE_wiTH_hAMStER · **Joined:** Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am **Posts:** 20758

ElvisAintDead wrote:

Yawn.

Agreed, you're a bore. A tedious, shite-hawking bore.[/quote]

Wow you actually gave an opinion of your own!!! clappp

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 22671

I've just made a note to use the phrase 'shite hawk' more often in conversation.

Gibsons Beard · **Posted:** Sat Jan 23, 2010 11:53 pm

POK does come out with some shiite like. Surely to god he could check his posts before he actually clicks the 'submit' button. I cant blame anyone who hasnt met him for presuming he is on the wind up.

I irritate people but at least I actually try to! :grin:

hufc01 · **Joined:** Mon Jul 23, 2007 7:11 pm **Posts:** 14

agree with POK. I also think he got the ball. Soft penalty in my opinion. confised

tREE_wiTH_hAMStER · **Joined:** Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am **Posts:** 20758

Im glad none of you are referees.

Poolie of Kent · **Posted:** Sun Jan 24, 2010 2:46 pm

We could probaly do a damnsight better job than the Leeds and Colchester refs. :laugh:

tREE_wiTH_hAMStER · **Joined:** Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am **Posts:** 20758

Well after a few replays you got the penalty decision wrong and he didnt have that and got it right first time. Says everything.

Spurs v Leeds

Gadgies online