Interesting

Gibsons Beard · **Posted:** Mon Sep 21, 2009 2:48 pm

ADG wrote:

http://www.hartlepool.vitalfootball.co.uk/article.asp?a=171021

So, changes eh?

I think we may see this team.

--------------Flinders---------------

Haslam Liddle Collins Austin

-------------Humphreys-------------

Brown----------Jones--------Monkhouse

-------Bjornsson-------Boyd---------

Good bench of

Cook
Hartley
Fredriksen
Behan
Sweeney
McSweeney
Larkin

Oh my, that team would upset a few on here. :laugh:

I actually agree completely with that team. I certainly think Ritchie should get a chance in there. Boyd deserves a full game too. clappp

RichyHpool · **Posted:** Mon Sep 21, 2009 5:00 pm

Id go along with that side, some people might not agree but i prefer Brown out on the wing, u can still expect 10 to 15 goals from him out there and it gives you a chance to put another striker in. I dont think McSweeney is playing well out there either. Would be a shame for Behan because i like him alot but i just think he looks a bit tired as he hasnt had a break for a while what with the Irish league more than half way through. As for Austin im keeping my fingers crossed he is in at left back, hartley aint done too bad but again its another player out of his natural position. It does need freshening up!

PJ_Poolie · **Posted:** Mon Sep 21, 2009 5:08 pm

I would agree with that team apart from one position.

I'd play Austin at Right Back and play Hartley or Halslam left back. I think Austin adds more going forward so it would make sense him playing in his strongest position on the right on his stronger foot. I'd actually stick with Hartley as it keeps the team balanced with right footers on the right and left footers on the left.

katcha · **Posted:** Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:30 pm

Gibsons Beard · **Posted:** Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:32 pm

katcha wrote:

:roll:

Jonny · **Posted:** Mon Sep 21, 2009 11:32 pm

That team looks good to me..... clappp

alybaba · **Posted:** Tue Sep 22, 2009 12:47 am

Even stevie wonder could have seen a few changes coming saturday

tREE_wiTH_hAMStER · **Joined:** Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am **Posts:** 20758

I agree with that team. Im no Humps fan but would rather see him in the middle than the hologram. Although maybe have Humps further forward than Jones? Have always said Brown is best on right wing and I stick to it. Mcsweeney runs all day but very little end product.

Mr Ripper · **Posted:** Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:52 am

From what I've seen McSweeney has a hell of a cross on him and he seems to be able to dig it out from underneath his feet when it looks impossible to swing an accurate cross in. Brown's still better like, but that's no reflection on McSweeney.

misterb2001 · **Posted:** Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:03 am

is there only me who thinks that the boyd/bjornsson partnership is way to slow to be seriously considered as a viable alternative and we will just pump long balls up to the Iceman?

tREE_wiTH_hAMStER · **Joined:** Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am **Posts:** 20758

misterb2001 wrote:

is there only me who thinks that the boyd/bjornsson partnership is way to slow to be seriously considered as a viable alternative and we will just pump long balls up to the Iceman?

When he came on against Wycombe, we started hitting the ball on the floor which was bizzare.

Interesting

Gadgies online