Get up get out be what you are

Nobodys Hero · **Posted:** Sun Aug 23, 2009 8:58 am

Oh yes

ANTHRAX · **Posted:** Sun Aug 23, 2009 9:38 am

i totally agree

change in personnel all over the pitch, takes time, butgreat signs already

tREE_wiTH_hAMStER · **Joined:** Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am **Posts:** 20758

Wow a post from ADG that doesnt have a dig at board members. :shock:

Good post, but id have thought bthe "attacking side for home games" would take less time to sort than the defence at away games??

Defence wise i dont think were going to have any problems, its just creativity that worries me but hopefully it will come!

Nobodys Hero · **Posted:** Mon Aug 24, 2009 6:55 am

Dont wanna be nobodys hero

Nobodys Hero · **Posted:** Mon Aug 24, 2009 7:25 am

you cant say crap on the radio

Dugoutpaddy · **Joined:** Sat Sep 02, 2006 10:23 am **Posts:** 1772

ADG wrote:

Tree_With_Hamster wrote:

Wow a post from ADG that doesnt have a dig at board members. :shock:

Good post, but id have thought bthe "attacking side for home games" would take less time to sort than the defence at away games??

Defence wise i dont think were going to have any problems, its just creativity that worries me but hopefully it will come!

To be better defensively its obvious something had to change. the flair of last season has been sacrificed, in the short term, for graft. Thats not to say we dont have flair players, as we do.

So it is easier to make us harder to beat, than it is to make us harder to beat, as well as making us great attack wise.

So pleased I was of help there.

Its just a shame that piece of education was lost to you, as you have me on ignore.

is that better?

Mr Ripper · **Posted:** Mon Aug 24, 2009 9:59 am

Dugoutpaddy wrote:

ADG wrote:

Tree_With_Hamster wrote:

Wow a post from ADG that doesnt have a dig at board members. :shock:

Good post, but id have thought bthe "attacking side for home games" would take less time to sort than the defence at away games??

Defence wise i dont think were going to have any problems, its just creativity that worries me but hopefully it will come!

To be better defensively its obvious something had to change. the flair of last season has been sacrificed, in the short term, for graft. Thats not to say we dont have flair players, as we do.

So it is easier to make us harder to beat, than it is to make us harder to beat, as well as making us great attack wise.

So pleased I was of help there.

Its just a shame that piece of education was lost to you, as you have me on ignore.

is that better?

It is now. :wink:

katcha · **Posted:** Mon Aug 24, 2009 10:17 am

i think you both want to move on and stop trying to wind every fekker up - it's fairly tedious.

Compo · **Posted:** Mon Aug 24, 2009 10:21 am

I remember Pele's account of Denmark in the Euro Championships when the won it and the following world cup when Norway done well. He said these teams bore you to death for 70 minutes score a goal and then defend for the following 20 and win 1-0. I couldnt care less if pools do this all season a win is a win.

Dugoutpaddy · **Joined:** Sat Sep 02, 2006 10:23 am **Posts:** 1772

katcha wrote:

i think you both want to move on and stop trying to wind every fekker up - it's fairly tedious.

poolie bri · **Posted:** Mon Aug 24, 2009 12:29 pm

ADG wrote:

Three consecutive away clean sheets, with a completely new team. Fantastic stuff.

CT knew he needed to sort out the defensive comedy that was last season, he has done it very well.

We need to work on the attacking side for home games, but that will take time.

In the meantime, lets just get tighter in home games as well, and if it means we draw a few 0-0 then so be it.

Its actually great to a poolie again.

Dont underestimate the remarkable job CT has done, in a short space of time.
when was it not great to be poolie?
Last seasons joke team, thats team, cos you defend from the front, is already a long distance memory.

Love it.

That is all.

Get up get out be what you are

Gadgies online