Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Fri Jul 18, 2025 4:49 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: 0 -2
PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 3:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 7:02 pm
Posts: 381
Looks like we have our work cut out for us. We will need to see some real fight to get something out of this match.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 0 -2
PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 3:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am
Posts: 9053
Dodgy defending for the first by all accounts. Plenty of time to get one back and then it'll be game on.

Good first half for ex Poolies/loaned out Pools players; Ian Moore, Danny Coles, Kevin Kyle and Micheal Mackay all notched

_________________
Apols


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 0 -2
PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 4:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm
Posts: 25266
it's got to the point now where it would be a decent bet betting on ex-poolies to notch every week, be a cheeky accumulator that.

_________________
Michaelbarron ‏@Mickyb22
@9howie yes defo I need my mate for golf and social ‪#bessiemate


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 0 -2
PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 5:10 pm 
Beaten by a better team, cant say pools did anything wrong, charlton were just far far better.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: 0 -2
PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 5:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 7:02 pm
Posts: 381
tigro wrote:
Beaten by a better team, cant say pools did anything wrong, charlton were just far far better.


Fair enough comment. Seems there were a few chances toward the end of the match. Onward and upward.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 0 -2
PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 5:46 pm 
MadJohn wrote:
We were comfortable for the first 20 minutes then shot ourselves badly in the foot for their opening goal. Charlton were the better side for much of the rest of the first half and for the first 20 minutes of the second half. Then Pools finished strongly. Charlton deserved their victory and look a good solid side who will challenge, but some of the comments leaving the ground would suggest we were outclassed from start to finish which simply wasn't the case.


Concurring fully with Mr John!
SOme of the Mill House whingers were really getting on my chesticles - look its first home game, gift of a first goal, & we struggled to get in the game until last 20 mins. Charlton looked a half decent team (after the gift).

Behan looks like Bob Newton and was my MoM. Got a shot like a rocket as well!

Thats all !


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: 0 -2
PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 5:48 pm 
I may be completly bonkers here but why did Boyd get a chorus of "booooooo" ? :roll:

I thought he did ok.. bbolt


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: 0 -2
PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 5:50 pm 
i think the boos were because he was being subbed, aimed at Turner me thinks.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: 0 -2
PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 5:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 7:02 pm
Posts: 381
MadJohn wrote:
HUFC Poolie wrote:
I may be completly bonkers here but why did Boyd get a chorus of "booooooo" ? :roll:

I thought he did ok.. bbolt

I've no idea what the fook that was about. Whether they were booing Boyd or the decision to take him off, the usual gobshites in the Mill seats were bang out of order.




Perhaps we should rename the Mill House Stand to the Moan House Stand.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 0 -2
PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
MadJohn wrote:
We were comfortable for the first 20 minutes then shot ourselves badly in the foot for their opening goal. Charlton were the better side for much of the rest of the first half and for the first 20 minutes of the second half. Then Pools finished strongly. Charlton deserved their victory and look a good solid side who will challenge, but some of the comments leaving the ground would suggest we were outclassed from start to finish which simply wasn't the case.


We were probably not 'outclassed' but there was a definite gulf between the sides. Charlton never really got going (thank god). I think Jones would have made a difference had he played. We lost it in midfield today.

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 0 -2
PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 7:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:40 pm
Posts: 3561
Location: Still trying to find myself
HUFC Poolie wrote:
I may be completly bonkers here but why did Boyd get a chorus of "booooooo" ? :roll:

I thought he did ok.. bbolt



They might have been saying booerns.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 0 -2
PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 7:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 6476
MadJohn wrote:
We were comfortable for the first 20 minutes then shot ourselves badly in the foot for their opening goal. Charlton were the better side for much of the rest of the first half and for the first 20 minutes of the second half. Then Pools finished strongly. Charlton deserved their victory and look a good solid side who will challenge, but some of the comments leaving the ground would suggest we were outclassed from start to finish which simply wasn't the case.


Spot on again Mr Mad, I spoke to Mutters after the match and he said 'was it just me or did we play ok there' we agreed with what he was saying he must have heard the comments as you John. Charlton will be up near the top at the end of the season and apart from their 2 goals they didn't really create that much


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 0 -2
PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 7:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
Warwick Hunt wrote:
HUFC Poolie wrote:
I may be completly bonkers here but why did Boyd get a chorus of "booooooo" ? :roll:

I thought he did ok.. bbolt



They might have been saying booerns.


I certainly heard Hans Moleman shouting booerns


_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 0 -2
PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 8:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
ElvisAintDead wrote:
More positives than negatives from me. We now have a Goalkeeper who can catch, save and kick.

We now have a proper Striker who can put it about a bit AND control the ball AND lay it off.

We lacked a bit of pace, James Brown will provide that, and Colin Larkin.

Didn't enjoy it, 'cos we lost but we DId play quite well especially 1st 20 and most of the 2nd half.


Very true. Boydy is tooo slllloooooowwww. get larkin alongside Behan (who I think was excellent) and brown on the right wing and we will be more mobile and creative.

Oh, and Flinders looked 100x better than last seasons "keepers" although he didnt really have much to do.

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 0 -2
PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 10:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 9787
Location: Just down the road from the Telstar
ElvisAintDead wrote:
More positives than negatives from me. We now have a Goalkeeper who can catch, save and kick.

We now have a proper Striker who can put it about a bit AND control the ball AND lay it off.

We lacked a bit of pace, James Brown will provide that, and Colin Larkin.

Didn't enjoy it, 'cos we lost but we DId play quite well especially 1st 20 and most of the 2nd half.


100% agree with that, Jones in for Sweeney will also help. I'm usually the most sadly optimistic Poolie, thinking 'we can still get back in this' right to the end, but I had settled for a 2-0 defeat from half way through the second half.

_________________
I like the comfort zone. It's where all the sandwiches are.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 0 -2
PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 11:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:09 pm
Posts: 8066
Location: Five minutes from the Priestfield Stadium.
I think we just had to accept today that Charlton were a better side than us., just like when we played them in the League Cup a few years back.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 0 -2
PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 11:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 11:26 pm
Posts: 5832
Location: number 8
ElvisAintDead wrote:
More positives than negatives from me. We now have a Goalkeeper who can catch, save and kick.

We now have a proper Striker who can put it about a bit AND control the ball AND lay it off.

We lacked a bit of pace, James Brown will provide that, and Colin Larkin.

Didn't enjoy it, 'cos we lost but we DId play quite well especially 1st 20 and most of the 2nd half.


agreed

_________________
I have forgotten more than you will ever know


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 0 -2
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 4:40 pm
Posts: 906
Location: The UKplc
Wise words Chip !

_________________
ישראל יחי


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 0 -2
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 5:27 pm
Posts: 1589
chip fireball wrote:
fraid to say i thought we played shyte today compared to first home game of last season.

a few looked out of their depth, and i have to say a couple didnt look interested.

dunno about flinders, hard to judge on that performance. the two full backs had poor games i thought, and the midfield were all over the place.

only real bright spot for me was the performance of behan who had a really good game, although i thought rowell looked bright when he came on. at least he passed the ball on the deck .

the team will take time to gel, so im not writing the season off already, but was hugely disappointed today after 2 great away results.


Dont really see what the first game of last season has got to do with anything.
We gave away a daft first goal but Charlton were the better team on the day.
I dont think we looked out of our depth and certainly didnt see any players who didnt look interested, we were up against a good side. Agree Behan looked quality.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 0 -2
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 7:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:28 am
Posts: 971
Location: you will find me here there and everywhere
Grave wrote:
ElvisAintDead wrote:
More positives than negatives from me. We now have a Goalkeeper who can catch, save and kick.

We now have a proper Striker who can put it about a bit AND control the ball AND lay it off.

We lacked a bit of pace, James Brown will provide that, and Colin Larkin.

Didn't enjoy it, 'cos we lost but we DId play quite well especially 1st 20 and most of the 2nd half.


Very true. Boydy is tooo slllloooooowwww. get larkin alongside Behan (who I think was excellent) and brown on the right wing and we will be more mobile and creative.

Oh, and Flinders looked 100x better than last seasons "keepers" although he didnt really have much to do.


A great post by EAD, but you Grave, had to have a dig at someone didnt you? Is Boydy now your target? Just cos he didnt have a great game? And I just love the way you want Larkin up front based on the evidence of never actually having seen him play.

I take it you want McSweeney out of the side based on one game too do you? Since you want arguably. our most talented striker to play there.

Fook me. :roll: :roll:

_________________
78 revolutions a minute now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 0 -2
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 8:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:28 am
Posts: 971
Location: you will find me here there and everywhere
chip fireball wrote:
a few looked out of their depth, and i have to say a couple didnt look interested.


I hope that post was tongue in cheek, otherwise its quite a stupid thing to say. Please tell us which players werent interested then.

_________________
78 revolutions a minute now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 0 -2
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 8:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:30 pm
Posts: 5804
I'm more worried about the crowd, after a decent start to the season less than 4500 :shock: Puts to bed a few of the predictions on here. This fooooking town banghead

_________________
The future has a way of arriving unannounced. In two days tomorrow will be yesterday!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 0 -2
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 9:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
ADG wrote:
Grave wrote:
ElvisAintDead wrote:
More positives than negatives from me. We now have a Goalkeeper who can catch, save and kick.

We now have a proper Striker who can put it about a bit AND control the ball AND lay it off.

We lacked a bit of pace, James Brown will provide that, and Colin Larkin.

Didn't enjoy it, 'cos we lost but we DId play quite well especially 1st 20 and most of the 2nd half.


Very true. Boydy is tooo slllloooooowwww. get larkin alongside Behan (who I think was excellent) and brown on the right wing and we will be more mobile and creative.

Oh, and Flinders looked 100x better than last seasons "keepers" although he didnt really have much to do.


A great post by EAD, but you Grave, had to have a dig at someone didnt you? Is Boydy now your target? Just cos he didnt have a great game? And I just love the way you want Larkin up front based on the evidence of never actually having seen him play.

I take it you want McSweeney out of the side based on one game too do you? Since you want arguably. our most talented striker to play there.

Fook me. :roll: :roll:



*EDITED*

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 0 -2
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 10:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am
Posts: 9053
Grave's comments are in line with the opinions I've heard from people talking about Boydys performance yesterday. I don't see the problem myself, he hasn't been abusive and most people have suggested we could do with some pace upfront which Larkin would provide. Why start fcking squabbling over it?

_________________
Apols


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 0 -2
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 10:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 1:07 pm
Posts: 1664
Location: it feels like my birthday
The Lightning Tree wrote:
I'm more worried about the crowd, after a decent start to the season less than 4500 :shock: Puts to bed a few of the predictions on here. This fooooking town banghead


There is still a recession going on, and recent stats say the towns un-employment rose, 45%......
if you had to choose a game out of the 3 this month, maybe this would not be it...

_________________
TSCE


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 0 -2
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 10:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
just out of curiosity, how many 'big' ( :roll: ) teams to Barnsley and Burnley have within 40 miles of them?

They may be smaller towns however, their catchment areas could be much larger

just a thought sctatchinghead

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 0 -2
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
MadJohn wrote:
By the way, I'm not sure when the Bunker is worse: when it is laughably over-negative towards Pools, or when opponents are laughably overpraised. Charlton looked a good side but let's not get carried away. Like chip I also thought they were light up front, but they also looked vulnerable at the back especially down their left. Had we taken even one of our chances (and I would say we created at least as many good ones as Charlton, maybe more) it could have been a different game. And we didn't play particularly well.

spot on, Charlton were a good team and will be up in the top 6. But barring their 30 minute spell either side of half time i think we more than matched them.

We had two great free kicks by Behan which were very well saved and created one or two decent chances as well. where as they really only created the two goals (one of which we created for them!)

I think we struggled once it went to 2-0 and they defended pretty well and nullified us.

Charlton were good but not great.

We showed very good flashes but still looked very much like a 'work in progress' team.

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 0 -2
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
MadJohn wrote:
misterb2001 wrote:
just out of curiosity, how many 'big' ( :roll: ) teams to Barnsley and Burnley have within 40 miles of them?

They may be smaller towns however, their catchment areas could be much larger

just a thought sctatchinghead


Within 40 miles of Burnley? Manchester United, Manchester City, Blackburn, Leeds. Liverpool (and Everton) are only maybe 50 miles away. The "big" three is a ridiculous excuse for a Hartlepool fan.

thanks for blowing my possible theory out of the water, bounder banghead :wink:

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 0 -2
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
misterb2001 wrote:
MadJohn wrote:
misterb2001 wrote:
just out of curiosity, how many 'big' ( :roll: ) teams to Barnsley and Burnley have within 40 miles of them?

They may be smaller towns however, their catchment areas could be much larger

just a thought sctatchinghead


Within 40 miles of Burnley? Manchester United, Manchester City, Blackburn, Leeds. Liverpool (and Everton) are only maybe 50 miles away. The "big" three is a ridiculous excuse for a Hartlepool fan.

thanks for blowing my possible theory out of the water, bounder banghead :wink:


:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 0 -2
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 9787
Location: Just down the road from the Telstar
Something that really pissed me off yesterday sat in the Mill House, was the big cheer that went up for Drogba's last minute cross, that fluked into the goal to give Chelsea a win. Bastads((c)adg)
banghead

_________________
I like the comfort zone. It's where all the sandwiches are.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 0 -2
PostPosted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 4:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 7:36 pm
Posts: 932
Not seen many BORER shirts around town though, why is that?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: bobby lemonade, charlesI, Darlo4ever, DCooper170, dstanley5, Elephant Rock, Essex poolie, Flying Hogans, Gatehouse, Gerry Mandrake, Infidel, itwontwork, Jamie1952, Jules, loyal_fan, mander, Mctee1908, mugsy, Mute Witness, MutleyRules, Pirlo's Beard., Poolie24, Pooly_Imp, Reg, Robbie10, Stomper409, stupoolie and 195 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.