this season

tigro · **Posted:** Fri Jul 24, 2009 9:52 pm

Is a hard league, york are a poor team, what are your thoughts on our finishing league position next year? when do you think turner will be sacked?

Yubep · **Joined:** Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm **Posts:** 25266

Is he even the manager to be sacked?

tigro · **Posted:** Fri Jul 24, 2009 9:55 pm

nothing has been said about him being manager, so as far as im aware he is still DOF

alybaba · **Posted:** Fri Jul 24, 2009 9:57 pm

When a certain high profile manager signs :wink:

tREE_wiTH_hAMStER · **Joined:** Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am **Posts:** 20758

tigro wrote:

nothing has been said about him being manager, so as far as im aware he is still DOF

So he wont be getting sacked then :roll:

Fetish_Bob · **Posted:** Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:17 pm

tigro wrote:

Is a hard league, york are a poor team, what are your thoughts on our finishing league position next year? when do you think turner will be sacked?

York are a poor team ????????? what do you base that on, they drew with Leeds , yes we should be beating them, but what do you base the statement that York are a poor team on?????? unless you had a laptop or logged on from a mobile the time of your post probably means you weren't there.

Warwick Hunt · **Posted:** Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:21 pm

tigro wrote:

Is a hard league, york are a poor team, what are your thoughts on our finishing league position next year? when do you think turner will be sacked?

On the performance of our friendlies we may be lucky to finish in last place.

Hopefully though we'll just get the bad games out of our season before the season starts.

Gibsons Beard · **Posted:** Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:24 pm

Fetish_Bob wrote:

tigro wrote:

Is a hard league, york are a poor team, what are your thoughts on our finishing league position next year? when do you think turner will be sacked?

York are a poor team ????????? what do you base that on, they drew with Leeds , yes we should be beating them, but what do you base the statement that York are a poor team on?????? unless you had a laptop or logged on from a mobile the time of your post probably means you weren't there.

Im pretty certain York will have been more "up" for the leeds game than against us. Leeds also managed a draw, we got beat 2-0 and had 0 or 1 shots on target according to reports.

tigro · **Posted:** Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:45 pm

york are 2 leagues below us, there for compared to us, there are a poor team violin

Mute Witness · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:10 am **Posts:** 3572

I thought York played quite well to be honest. Their number 8 looked handy as did their ginger central defender. I'd happily have a few of their players at Hartlepool to be 100% honest.

misterb2001 · **Posted:** Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:56 pm

Mr Gaunt wrote:

I thought York played quite well to be honest. Their number 8 looked handy as did their ginger central defender. I'd happily have a few of their players at Hartlepool to be 100% honest.

does that not show how far we have 'fallen' so to speak, rather than how good they are

Mute Witness · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:10 am **Posts:** 3572

misterb2001 wrote:

Mr Gaunt wrote:

I thought York played quite well to be honest. Their number 8 looked handy as did their ginger central defender. I'd happily have a few of their players at Hartlepool to be 100% honest.

does that not show how far we have 'fallen' so to speak, rather than how good they are

A bit of both. York will have a good season in the Conference imho and may get promoted.

parmopooly · **Posted:** Sat Jul 25, 2009 12:19 am

already survival looks like it will be an achievement!!
I'm not very confident after four consecutive defeats, where by all accounts we have easily been second best in every game
They have to click soon or else MK could signal a heavy defeat to start the campaign

Gibsons Beard · **Posted:** Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:32 am

parmopooly wrote:

already survival looks like it will be an achievement!!
I'm not very confident after four consecutive defeats, where by all accounts we have easily been second best in every game
They have to click soon or else MK could signal a heavy defeat to start the campaign

It may be for the best if we start off badly as IOR may finally get the message re CT. A good replacement may keep us up. CT wont.

HUFC Poolie · **Posted:** Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:37 am

Who would seriously want to take the job here? The Vic has a revolving door, Granted not as bad as the mags but not far off.

The Lightning Tree · **Joined:** Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:30 pm **Posts:** 5804

Yes but have the players he has signed actually improved the team

tigro · **Posted:** Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:43 am

doesnt look like it from the results at the moment.

Gibsons Beard · **Posted:** Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:44 am

HUFC Poolie wrote:

Who would seriously want to take the job here? The Vic has a revolving door, Granted not as bad as the mags but not far off.

This is probably true but surely taking a gamble on anybody is better than sitting it out waiting for the inevitable to happen.

The Lightning Tree · **Joined:** Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:30 pm **Posts:** 5804

Still these results count for nothing but it does raise hopes if we're actually competing and winning against teams like York.

tigro · **Posted:** Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:52 am

No they dont, but they give you a damn good insight to what the coming season will bring, at the moment it doesnt look too promising.

TalbotAvenger · **Posted:** Sat Jul 25, 2009 10:05 am

HUFC Poolie wrote:

Who would seriously want to take the job here? The Vic has a revolving door, Granted not as bad as the mags but not far off.

Chris TURNER + 15-Dec-2008 ---- 28 7 6 15 38 50 25 32.1
Danny WILSON 13-Jun-2006 15-Dec-2008 133 58 29 46 199 166 43.6 50.9
Paul STEPHENSON + 01-Feb-2006 13-Jun-2006 16 3 8 5 15 20 18.8 35.4
Martin SCOTT 04-May-2005 01-Feb-2006 39 11 10 18 42 55 28.2 36.8
Neale COOPER 26-Jun-2003 04-May-2005 110 48 26 36 180 147 43.6 51.5
Mike NEWELL 21-Nov-2002 30-May-2003 29 13 9 7 42 36 44.8 55.2
Colin WEST + 07-Nov-2002 21-Nov-2002 2 1 1 0 3 2 50 66.7
Chris TURNER 24-Feb-1999 07-Nov-2002 193 82 47 64 266 220 42.5 50.6

So, apart from the two caretaker managers, that SIX managers in a decade, hardly a revolving door, is it?

Gibsons Beard · **Posted:** Sat Jul 25, 2009 10:08 am

TalbotAvenger wrote:

HUFC Poolie wrote:

Who would seriously want to take the job here? The Vic has a revolving door, Granted not as bad as the mags but not far off.

Chris TURNER + 15-Dec-2008 ---- 28 7 6 15 38 50 25 32.1
Danny WILSON 13-Jun-2006 15-Dec-2008 133 58 29 46 199 166 43.6 50.9
Paul STEPHENSON + 01-Feb-2006 13-Jun-2006 16 3 8 5 15 20 18.8 35.4
Martin SCOTT 04-May-2005 01-Feb-2006 39 11 10 18 42 55 28.2 36.8
Neale COOPER 26-Jun-2003 04-May-2005 110 48 26 36 180 147 43.6 51.5
Mike NEWELL 21-Nov-2002 30-May-2003 29 13 9 7 42 36 44.8 55.2
Colin WEST + 07-Nov-2002 21-Nov-2002 2 1 1 0 3 2 50 66.7
Chris TURNER 24-Feb-1999 07-Nov-2002 193 82 47 64 266 220 42.5 50.6

So, apart from the two caretaker managers, that SIX managers in a decade, hardly a revolving door, is it?

Thats probably not bad compared to some teams!

HUFC Poolie · **Posted:** Sat Jul 25, 2009 10:19 am

TalbotAvenger wrote:

HUFC Poolie wrote:

Who would seriously want to take the job here? The Vic has a revolving door, Granted not as bad as the mags but not far off.

Chris TURNER + 15-Dec-2008 ---- 28 7 6 15 38 50 25 32.1
Danny WILSON 13-Jun-2006 15-Dec-2008 133 58 29 46 199 166 43.6 50.9
Paul STEPHENSON + 01-Feb-2006 13-Jun-2006 16 3 8 5 15 20 18.8 35.4
Martin SCOTT 04-May-2005 01-Feb-2006 39 11 10 18 42 55 28.2 36.8
Neale COOPER 26-Jun-2003 04-May-2005 110 48 26 36 180 147 43.6 51.5
Mike NEWELL 21-Nov-2002 30-May-2003 29 13 9 7 42 36 44.8 55.2
Colin WEST + 07-Nov-2002 21-Nov-2002 2 1 1 0 3 2 50 66.7
Chris TURNER 24-Feb-1999 07-Nov-2002 193 82 47 64 266 220 42.5 50.6

So, apart from the two caretaker managers, that SIX managers in a decade, hardly a revolving door, is it?

So a manager comes here knowing he could well be sacked after 2 seasons.. :roll:

Gibsons Beard · **Posted:** Sat Jul 25, 2009 10:36 am

HUFC Poolie wrote:

TalbotAvenger wrote:

HUFC Poolie wrote:

Who would seriously want to take the job here? The Vic has a revolving door, Granted not as bad as the mags but not far off.

Chris TURNER + 15-Dec-2008 ---- 28 7 6 15 38 50 25 32.1
Danny WILSON 13-Jun-2006 15-Dec-2008 133 58 29 46 199 166 43.6 50.9
Paul STEPHENSON + 01-Feb-2006 13-Jun-2006 16 3 8 5 15 20 18.8 35.4
Martin SCOTT 04-May-2005 01-Feb-2006 39 11 10 18 42 55 28.2 36.8
Neale COOPER 26-Jun-2003 04-May-2005 110 48 26 36 180 147 43.6 51.5
Mike NEWELL 21-Nov-2002 30-May-2003 29 13 9 7 42 36 44.8 55.2
Colin WEST + 07-Nov-2002 21-Nov-2002 2 1 1 0 3 2 50 66.7
Chris TURNER 24-Feb-1999 07-Nov-2002 193 82 47 64 266 220 42.5 50.6

So, apart from the two caretaker managers, that SIX managers in a decade, hardly a revolving door, is it?

So a manager comes here knowing he could well be sacked after 2 seasons.. :roll:

But surely all managers know this in the current climate whichever club they manage!?

balltofeet · **Posted:** Sat Jul 25, 2009 10:49 am

Although not a fan of Turner, remember the big game bottler allegation in his first spell, I would not spend another salary on a new manager I would actually support Turner and give him the salary to sign a centre half maybe from Boro, Mackems, Mags reserves who is not slow or one of their 19 year olds on loan initially.

misterb2001 · **Posted:** Sat Jul 25, 2009 10:51 am

i'm sure it wont be difficult to get a good centre back in bbolt

PJ_Poolie · **Posted:** Sat Jul 25, 2009 11:49 am

balltofeet wrote:

Although not a fan of Turner, remember the big game bottler allegation in his first spell, I would not spend another salary on a new manager I would actually support Turner and give him the salary to sign a centre half maybe from Boro, Mackems, Mags reserves who is not slow or one of their 19 year olds on loan initially.

A 19 year old kid in the back four is just about the last thing we need, the defence hasn't been the same since Danny Wilson retired the only natural leader we had in Micky Barron.

poolymadandstupid · **Posted:** Sat Jul 25, 2009 1:01 pm

Fetish_Bob wrote:

tigro wrote:

Is a hard league, york are a poor team, what are your thoughts on our finishing league position next year? when do you think turner will be sacked?

York are a poor team ????????? what do you base that on, they drew with Leeds , yes we should be beating them, but what do you base the statement that York are a poor team on?????? unless you had a laptop or logged on from a mobile the time of your post probably means you weren't there.

No way are York a poor team,I think they will be much better than last season.

Mute Witness · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:10 am **Posts:** 3572

poolymad wrote:

Fetish_Bob wrote:

tigro wrote:

Is a hard league, york are a poor team, what are your thoughts on our finishing league position next year? when do you think turner will be sacked?

York are a poor team ????????? what do you base that on, they drew with Leeds , yes we should be beating them, but what do you base the statement that York are a poor team on?????? unless you had a laptop or logged on from a mobile the time of your post probably means you weren't there.

No way are York a poor team,I think they will be much better than last season.

Seconded. They're 34/1 for the title....I fancy those odds.

parmopooly · **Posted:** Sun Jul 26, 2009 11:37 pm

I'll be amazed if anyone but Luton comes top in that league

ronaldo · **Joined:** Thu Dec 13, 2007 1:53 pm **Posts:** 861

They are only friendlies, they are not important. After six games, its only early days , after 16 games, there is still two thirds of the season to go, we just need to put a run together, we have been unlucky with injuries, no one has really turned us over yet. At xmas, we need to do bette in the second half of the season, an automatic place is not out of reach. Mid Feb we need to get a run together if we are to make the play offs, March OMG we are in a relegation fight and we need to stick together if we are going to survive. HEARD THIS ALL BEFORE nothing ever changes at pools.

misterb2001 · **Posted:** Tue Jul 28, 2009 6:38 pm

ronaldo wrote:

They are only friendlies, they are not important. After six games, its only early days , after 16 games, there is still two thirds of the season to go, we just need to put a run together, we have been unlucky with injuries, no one has really turned us over yet. At xmas, we need to do bette in the second half of the season, an automatic place is not out of reach. Mid Feb we need to get a run together if we are to make the play offs, March OMG we are in a relegation fight and we need to stick together if we are going to survive. HEARD THIS ALL BEFORE nothing ever changes at pools.

its septic peg!!

Warwick Hunt · **Posted:** Tue Jul 28, 2009 7:55 pm

ronaldo wrote:

They are only friendlies, they are not important. After six games, its only early days , after 16 games, there is still two thirds of the season to go, we just need to put a run together, we have been unlucky with injuries, no one has really turned us over yet. At xmas, we need to do bette in the second half of the season, an automatic place is not out of reach. Mid Feb we need to get a run together if we are to make the play offs, March OMG we are in a relegation fight and we need to stick together if we are going to survive. HEARD THIS ALL BEFORE nothing ever changes at pools.

You are Chris Turner and I claim my five pounds.

this season

Gadgies online