Oi, You! Danny Wilson

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 22566

Bullock. Why ?

Tax Paying Poolie · **Joined:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am **Posts:** 9053

I have never believed in stories about clauses in contract saying X must play in every game but I can't see a possible reason why 3 managers would play that little rat every game.

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 22566

Thats what I keep on wondering. Surely these managers can see he has never performed so he must be doing something good in training that we never see.

I am truly bamboozled by it.

Tax Paying Poolie · **Joined:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am **Posts:** 9053

Its not even like he puts in a good performance ever so often (like Efo) to warrant his selection.

He doesn't do anything wrong, he just does absolutely nothing.

TalbotAvenger · **Posted:** Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:29 pm

Tax Paying Poolie wrote:

Its not even like he puts in a good performance ever so often (like Efo) to warrant his selection.

He doesn't do anything wrong, he just does absolutely nothing.

He is the 2006 version of Scott Sloan

Mr Poolz · **Joined:** Sun Aug 20, 2006 6:34 pm **Posts:** 484

Tax Paying Poolie wrote:

Its not even like he puts in a good performance ever so often (like Efo) to warrant his selection.

He doesn't do anything wrong, he just does absolutely nothing.

Sounds completely like Jonjo Dickman.

Tax Paying Poolie · **Joined:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am **Posts:** 9053

Quakerz wrote:

Tax Paying Poolie wrote:

Its not even like he puts in a good performance ever so often (like Efo) to warrant his selection.

He doesn't do anything wrong, he just does absolutely nothing.

Sounds completely like Jonjo Dickman.

Equally gay surnames, too.

Mr Poolz · **Joined:** Sun Aug 20, 2006 6:34 pm **Posts:** 484

Dickman actually LOOKED poncey, never mind playing like one or having a gay surname.

Tax Paying Poolie · **Joined:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am **Posts:** 9053

Quakerz wrote:

Dickman actually LOOKED poncey, never mind playing like one or having a gay surname.

Yup, people with gay surnames- they're everywhere!

Cowboy · **Posted:** Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:40 pm

MadJohn wrote:

Surprising fact for you. Pools have played 19 league games this season. Bullock has started just three.

Well, it surprised me anyway confised

How many sub appearances though? Sixteen by any chance?

Mr Poolz · **Joined:** Sun Aug 20, 2006 6:34 pm **Posts:** 484

Tax Paying Poolie wrote:

Quakerz wrote:

Dickman actually LOOKED poncey, never mind playing like one or having a gay surname.

Yup, people with gay surnames- they're everywhere!

Indeed!

Tax Paying Poolie · **Joined:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am **Posts:** 9053

MadJohn wrote:

Cowboy wrote:

MadJohn wrote:

Surprising fact for you. Pools have played 19 league games this season. Bullock has started just three.

Well, it surprised me anyway confised

How many sub appearances though? Sixteen by any chance?

Half right. Eight :laugh:

And how many games was he complete and utter effing garbage in, don't worry about counting that one up!

Montpoolier · **Posted:** Mon Dec 04, 2006 7:37 am

Rather than WHY BULLOCK I'd prefer to ask Danny WHY NO FOLEY or even WHY NO STRACHAN.
That doesn't mean I'm sticking up for Bullock like!

Salty · **Posted:** Mon Dec 04, 2006 1:45 pm

according to the isle of mull 'poolie' Bullock HATES pools....FACT! :evil:

Salty · **Posted:** Mon Dec 04, 2006 1:51 pm

nothing alledged about it!

townendtimmy · **Posted:** Mon Dec 04, 2006 1:55 pm

stop paying the tosser the alleged 3k a week and let him leave in january if hes that desperate to be away rage

Montpoolier · **Posted:** Mon Dec 04, 2006 3:14 pm

Mr ADG wrote:

richard head wrote:

Rather than WHY BULLOCK I'd prefer to ask Danny WHY NO FOLEY or even WHY NO STRACHAN.
That doesn't mean I'm sticking up for Bullock like!

Thank fook for that. If you did stick up for Bullock your credibilty rating would go to zero and would never recover.

The thing is I've seen Foley and Strachan do good things but I've never seen Bullock do bad things. The highlights tend not to show players being outstandingly anonymous. So I'm taking everybody's word for how bad he is.

PJ_Poolie · **Posted:** Mon Dec 04, 2006 5:02 pm

Bullock was more involved than usual on Saturday he missed a sitter to make it 2-0 the gave away the stupid free kick for the winner. It makes a change from normally having nothing to say about his 'performance.'

Never has a Pools player boiled my piss as much much as Lee Bullock.

Foley didn't look that ill walking to the CO-OP near Moss Rose with Phillip Turnbull at about 2 o'clock MadJohn!

Spender · **Posted:** Mon Dec 04, 2006 7:37 pm

MadJohn wrote:

richard head wrote:

Mr ADG wrote:

richard head wrote:

Rather than WHY BULLOCK I'd prefer to ask Danny WHY NO FOLEY or even WHY NO STRACHAN.
That doesn't mean I'm sticking up for Bullock like!

Thank fook for that. If you did stick up for Bullock your credibilty rating would go to zero and would never recover.

The thing is I've seen Foley and Strachan do good things but I've never seen Bullock do bad things. The highlights tend not to show players being outstandingly anonymous. So I'm taking everybody's word for how bad he is.

Well Foley and Strachan should be playing right now for the reserves against Sheff Utd B so I assume neither will be starting tomorrow night for the first team. The website says Foley is returning from illness, so maybe that explains his absence on Saturday.

The reserves game is at Worksop. Do we know anyone who could give us a match report? :grin:

Regrettably, I was over in Cheshire on a job for much of the day, otherwise it would have been my pleasure. It would seem from the score though that there wasn't a lot to talk about.

Oi, You! Danny Wilson

Gadgies online