I think he had a greater impact on the fans than we think,

How many of us ridiculed his constant ue of 'lets take the positives out of the game' even when everyone present knew there wasnt any to take after yet another below par performance?

And for the majority on here, thats what you do, ignore the blatently obvious, and grasp at straws looking for the positives - we all know where that got Scotty. Well done Martin you've brainwashed a good number of fans into your way of thinking.

Just because you dont want us to be bad, dont recognise that we have problems wont make them go away!

Give me one example of this utter tripe you spout.

I believe that its all a bit cosy touchy feely at Pools. Successful managers tend to be disciplinarians not mates of the players;
Capello v McLaren for instance. Gerrard / Stevie G. Beckham v Becks. 'Do what you're effing told' v 'what do you think mate?'

Honestly I don't think I've ever read a bigger load of tripe on this message board than that.

You and Scooty have a lot in common.....

For a start, you both love the sound of your own voice

Read through the majority of posts on here from the rose tinted brigade - not too hard is it?

Anyone with a negative post is generally slated - and criticised for their view on the basis that everyone should see the positives even when as I said there are any and then start grasping at straws to look for some

Give me an example, one example. Back up what you've said surely that isn't difficult.

Now you really are talking tripe.. How anybody can take satisfaction out of trying to force people into a negative way of thinking about OUR football club is beyond me.. You are officially beyond help mate and i suggest you do NOT attend anymore games this season .

You seem to feed off negativity and making people aware of your negative vibes at every opportunity, It's funny how you are never about after a positive result but if the lads have a bad game you blow it out of proportion. Take the goal keeper for example we know he's bad we discussed he's bad but what we don't do is start thread after thread about the same thing to try and make yourself look good.

Your a tool we know your negative but spare the supporters that tripe that you keep spouting because quite frankly your bordering ignore list and im sure i am not the only one.

I've been criticised for being too or constantly negative, but when I see what I see at games where there are no positives to take from it how can you help but be negative - as ive said on another thread maybe it depends who you are as to whether you are free to criticise the club, team or players

Congratulations you join Sussex on my ignore, i am sure you 2 will make a good couple

I want one example of anyone saying yesterdays performance was a good one? Can you back up your claims? Surely if this is so prevalent on this message board it would take you seconds to find one? I want to see an example of this 'Martin Scott legacy' surely that isn't too much to ask of you?

If you can't it makes what you are saying just noise, superfluous hot air.

Where did I say I was talking about yesterdays game, I was talking in general terms about the rose tinted brigade on here who cant stand any criticism of their beloved team whether warrented or not.

But as you asked, taken from my thread yesterday entitled absoslute utter rubbish

It could be argued that we should have won the game, we got into a position to win and sloppyness cost us. Saying we should of won isn't saying we played well is it? I want an example of the 'legacy of Martin Scott' because I think that's the biggest pile of poo I've ever read on here.

I must admit this is one of the worst threads I've ever read. And that is saying something.

But the point is its grasping at straws to be positive- we should have won - no we shouldnt we were utter tosh against a poor walsall side

Nope. I still don't know what you are talking about.

So now saying 'we should have won' is clutching at straws We were winning 2-1 with eight minutes left to say we should of won is a perfectly fair call, at home in that situation you should be able to close out a game you SHOULD win.

We didn't because we were yet again naive and got caught out. The conditions didn't help either side the pitch was rock hard and bumpy, it was windy, it was never going to be a classic but we should have ground out a win.

You're fooking priceless pal, priceless. The Martin Scott Legacy how ridiculous......

I don't know why you bite PJ.

So shooting someone down in flames is now 'biting'?

He talks shite and deserves to be told so.

I'm just saying is it worth it? You can't educate pork and you can't polish turds can you?

[quote="PJ_Poolie"][ The conditions didn't help either side the pitch was rock hard and bumpy, it was windy, it was never going to be a classic but we should have ground out a win. [quote]

now we start to blame the pitch for an inept performance and another two points are lost in a must win game - even Turner admits that

If we go down and I sincerley hope we dont I wonder how many of you will still be taking the positives of another relagation season

A bad match to Reef, is like Viagra to an impotent man.

No I'm not blaming the pitch, it was a fairly even game but not very high on quality I'm suggesting the conditions were a factor for both teams. The surface was hard and the wind was howling, not really condusive to free flowing football. We gave as good as we got but it was never a good performance.

If we go down you'll do a sex wee.

rumour has it that the fourth stall from the right in the bogs at the mayfair centre is already pencilled in as the venue for reef and gravetree's end of season relegation soiree.

If we took your thoughts literally, we'd be expected to win every match at home, ... if only it was as easy as the thought process in your 'mind' demands it should be. That's part of the joy of footy, it's unpredictable.

... they're drilling the hole in the partition as we speak.

That says more about your mind than mine.