Chris Turner's line up tomorrow...

PJ_Poolie · **Posted:** Thu Dec 18, 2008 1:47 pm

I'd very be surprised :wink:

if it wasn't this;

Budtz

Sweeney
Collins
Nelson
Humphreys

Jones
Liddle
Clark
Robson

Kyle
Porter

TforTurner · **Joined:** Wed Sep 03, 2008 12:37 pm **Posts:** 689

I'd leave Collins out, put Clark at CB, Jones at CM and Monkhouse on the right.

Edit: And swap Kyle for Tymon.

Hugh's Left Foot · **Joined:** Wed May 07, 2008 5:45 pm **Posts:** 130

I'd like to see...

Budtz

Liddle
Clark
Collins
Humphreys

Monkhouse (R)
Jones
Sweeney
Robson (L)

Porter
Mackay

Matty_Robson's_Chin · **Joined:** Tue Mar 13, 2007 12:57 pm **Posts:** 2155

I'd leave them all out and get 11 strippers on......it could work.

poolieinnottingham · **Posted:** Thu Dec 18, 2008 2:19 pm

I would say Rowell should get the nod over Jones. I like Jones, but Rowell seemed to have a bit more about him against Hereford.

Tax Paying Poolie · **Joined:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am **Posts:** 9053

I'd definitely play Rowell after last week, Monkey would struggle to get on the bench if I was in charge!

Bluetooth · **Joined:** Sun Apr 27, 2008 7:11 pm **Posts:** 614

Rowell instead of liddell fromt he original lineup for me.

Kolley Kibber · **Posted:** Thu Dec 18, 2008 3:05 pm

TforTurner wrote:

I'd leave Collins out, put Clark at CB, Jones at CM and Monkhouse on the right.

Edit: And swap Kyle for Tymon.

Tymon has been average to poor every time I have watched him play this season for the reserves. I don't think he's ready.

Mr Ripper · **Posted:** Thu Dec 18, 2008 3:33 pm

TforTurner wrote:

I'd leave Collins out, put Clark at CB, Jones at CM and Monkhouse on the right.

Edit: And swap Kyle for Toman.

Return of the Pixie? :shock:

scotty-pools10 · **Joined:** Mon Jul 28, 2008 9:49 pm **Posts:** 178

I think the team should be

Butsz

Liddle
Collins
Nelson
Humps

Sweeney
Rowell
Clark
Robson

Porter
and because of our limitations in strikers Kyle

tREE_wiTH_hAMStER · **Joined:** Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am **Posts:** 20758

Team I have a sneaky suspicion we may see......

................Budtz.................
......Clark.....Collins.....Nelson.......
Sweeney..............................Robson
........Jones.....Liddle.....Monky.........
..............Kyle...........Porter

Turner used to quite like his 3-5-2 and lets be honest we have no full backs so maybe Sweens and Robson a bit futher forward. Turner likes his big target men so Kyle will play. He likes playing young uns too so maybe Rowell in for Monky.

Or he may opt just to keep it how it is! :laugh:

parmopooly · **Posted:** Fri Dec 19, 2008 11:13 am

the options for midfield when everyone's fit must be one of the biggest choices, if not THE biggest choice in League One - that's one area we aren't short of personnel. I really hope Porter's fit, we badly need him and like everyone else in the team I think he'll be raring to go tonight.

TforTurner · **Joined:** Wed Sep 03, 2008 12:37 pm **Posts:** 689

Tree_With_Hamster wrote:

Team I have a sneaky suspicion we may see......

................Budtz.................
......Clark.....Collins.....Nelson.......
Sweeney..............................Robson
........Jones.....Liddle.....Monky.........
..............Kyle...........Porter

Turner used to quite like his 3-5-2 and lets be honest we have no full backs so maybe Sweens and Robson a bit futher forward. Turner likes his big target men so Kyle will play. He likes playing young uns too so maybe Rowell in for Monky.

Or he may opt just to keep it how it is! :laugh:

I like the look of that team clappp

(except Kyle :evil:

)

parmopooly · **Posted:** Fri Dec 19, 2008 11:21 am

he'll play every minute until the end of his loan spell, but nobody will be sad to see the back of him for sure

BillinghamPoolie · **Posted:** Sat Dec 20, 2008 12:45 am

PJ_Poolie wrote:

I'd very be surprised :wink:

if it wasn't this;

Budtz

Sweeney
Collins
Nelson
Humphreys

Jones
Liddle
Clark
Robson

Kyle
Porter

Spot on, 11 out of 11, how do you do it PJ?

Matty_Robson's_Chin · **Joined:** Tue Mar 13, 2007 12:57 pm **Posts:** 2155

TforTurner wrote:

Tree_With_Hamster wrote:

Team I have a sneaky suspicion we may see......

................Budtz.................
......Clark.....Collins.....Nelson.......
Sweeney..............................Robson
........Jones.....Liddle.....Monky.........
..............Kyle...........Porter

Turner used to quite like his 3-5-2 and lets be honest we have no full backs so maybe Sweens and Robson a bit futher forward. Turner likes his big target men so Kyle will play. He likes playing young uns too so maybe Rowell in for Monky.

Or he may opt just to keep it how it is! :laugh:

I like the look of that team clappp

(except Kyle :evil:

)

So, fair enough, you dont like Kyle, but he put 2 in the onion bag, still shiit is he?

PJ_Poolie · **Posted:** Sat Dec 20, 2008 11:40 am

BillinghamPoolie wrote:

PJ_Poolie wrote:

I'd very be surprised :wink:

if it wasn't this;

Budtz

Sweeney
Collins
Nelson
Humphreys

Jones
Liddle
Clark
Robson

Kyle
Porter

Spot on, 11 out of 11, how do you do it PJ?

I have my sources!!

misterb2001 · **Posted:** Sat Dec 20, 2008 12:02 pm

PJ_Poolie wrote:

BillinghamPoolie wrote:

PJ_Poolie wrote:

I'd very be surprised :wink:

if it wasn't this;

Budtz

Sweeney
Collins
Nelson
Humphreys

Jones
Liddle
Clark
Robson

Kyle
Porter

Spot on, 11 out of 11, how do you do it PJ?

I have my sources!!

Daddys or HP?

tREE_wiTH_hAMStER · **Joined:** Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am **Posts:** 20758

Matty_Robson's_Chin wrote:

TforTurner wrote:

Tree_With_Hamster wrote:

Team I have a sneaky suspicion we may see......

................Budtz.................
......Clark.....Collins.....Nelson.......
Sweeney..............................Robson
........Jones.....Liddle.....Monky.........
..............Kyle...........Porter

Turner used to quite like his 3-5-2 and lets be honest we have no full backs so maybe Sweens and Robson a bit futher forward. Turner likes his big target men so Kyle will play. He likes playing young uns too so maybe Rowell in for Monky.

Or he may opt just to keep it how it is! :laugh:

I like the look of that team clappp

(except Kyle :evil:

)

So, fair enough, you dont like Kyle, but he put 2 in the onion bag, still shiit is he?

No, he scored twice so is now one of the best players ever.

:roll:

PJ_Poolie · **Posted:** Sat Dec 20, 2008 12:24 pm

Tree_With_Hamster wrote:

No, he scored twice so is now one of the best players ever.

:roll:

The stick Kyle is starting to get is doing my fooking head in.

This goon in the Cyril Knowles is always on his back every time he does something slightly wrong he's mouthing off, Kyle was actually biting like fook at the bloke last night. Did you see his goal celebration after his second? and the way he was waving at the Cyril Knowles at the end of the game? Well that was all aimed at this one gobshite who I never hear actually shouting anything of encouragement to any Pools players. The annoying thing is, is from were we sit you can't actually see who this voice belongs to because something needs saying to him!

He is frustrating because on his day he is a huge handful, unfortunately when he's having an off day he's awful but last night he was the former and quite easily could have had a hat trick, he was very unlucky to curl that great effort just around the wrong side of the post.

Gerry Mandrake · **Joined:** Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:23 pm **Posts:** 1429

5 in 13 isn't bad at all, especially when he didn't play for so long before he joined us.
If he played to that form all season, he'd have 17/18 goals over the season.
I wouldn't complain, but Pools fans don't like bit target men who score goals do they. stpid

tREE_wiTH_hAMStER · **Joined:** Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am **Posts:** 20758

Gerry Mandrake wrote:

5 in 13 isn't bad at all, especially when he didn't play for so long before he joined us.
If he played to that form all season, he'd have 17/18 goals over the season.
I wouldn't complain, but Pools fans don't like bit target men who score goals do they. stpid

"score goals"? So who are you talking about now?

Fact is half the time he doesnt even try or just cant be arsed. If a player doesnt give 100% every game then he can fuck of for all I care and Kyle falls into that bracket. He has played well in 2 maybe 3 games. Whoop de do!

Gerry Mandrake · **Joined:** Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:23 pm **Posts:** 1429

Some players struggle to play at 100% every game and I have no doubt Kyle is one of them.
Barker & Kyle are similar players, Kyle doesn't give 100% every game whereas Barker does. Who would you prefer?

tREE_wiTH_hAMStER · **Joined:** Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am **Posts:** 20758

Gerry Mandrake wrote:

Some players struggle to play at 100% every game and I have no doubt Kyle is one of them.
Barker & Kyle are similar players, Kyle doesn't give 100% every game whereas Barker does. Who would you prefer?

Barker.

Gerry Mandrake · **Joined:** Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:23 pm **Posts:** 1429

chip fireball wrote:

Gerry Mandrake wrote:

Some players struggle to play at 100% every game and I have no doubt Kyle is one of them.
Barker & Kyle are similar players, Kyle doesn't give 100% every game whereas Barker does. Who would you prefer?

spoken like a bloke who probably hasnt even seen kyle play. :roll:

Only at home mind.

PJ_Poolie · **Posted:** Sat Dec 20, 2008 1:51 pm

Kyle is frustrating because if he'd used the assets he's got ie. He's massive, built like a brick wall, he has a good touch, also he is very mobile and quite quick for a big man, to the affect he should do he'd be awesome but for whatever reason he doesn't very often. It's as if someone needs to get hold of him and shake him into action, somebody should be appointed every game to wind him up before hand! The Huddersfield game for example when their fans were having a go, and the Brighton game was similar he was brilliant because they actually got the bloke ticking.

That tosser I was on about from the Cyril Knowles should sit in the Rink End and have a go to get him going!

Chris Turner's line up tomorrow...

Gadgies online