Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Fri Jul 04, 2025 7:12 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: ALB V Budtz
PostPosted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 5:42 pm 
With help of Mr MadJohn's fine site I've looked into both keepers records at Pools and it obviously doesn't make pretty reading;

Budtz has played in goal on 34 occasions for Pools. He's kept 6 clean sheets and conceded 45 goals at 1.32 per game.

ALB has played on 31 occasions for Pools. He's kept 3 clean sheets (yes that's 3) and conceded 55 goals at 1.77 per game.

So yesterday we shipped our 100th goal since the Big Greek departed. Ben Clark and Micheal Nelson had been rocks in that previous season with a dependable keeper behind them, in fact keeping clean sheets in half of the league games.

So based on that old cockfingers is better at keeping the ball out of the net than ALB. At the moment it appears that a lot of the efforts on target against us end up in the back of the net. I think Budtz is more out and out howler prone but he's also more likely to actually make a good save and should be playing, I don't care how shite he is he's the best we've got.

So in summing up....





FFS DANNY SIGN A KEEPER
banghead banghead banghead banghead


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: ALB V Budtz
PostPosted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 5:45 pm 
PJ. I respect you. But you are starting to sound like Tree/Grave/Rev. We all know we need two new keepers!


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: ALB V Budtz
PostPosted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 5:47 pm 
Obafemi Obsession wrote:
PJ. I respect you. But you are starting to sound like Tree/Grave/Rev. We all know we need two new keepers!


The bit at the end was meant to be a joke, the point I was making is that statistically we have a better goalkeeper at the club than the one who is currently playing. We'd be better with Budtz until January.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: ALB V Budtz
PostPosted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 5:57 pm 
The thing that has always staggered me in this argument is that most people seem to champion the idea that if the centre backs are shit, it's the goalkeepers fault. When the centre backs are OK, it's fine pairing in central defence.'

Here's an important thought, right?

For Fleetwoods second goal, the ball came RIGHT over the top and left the midfielder one on one, who duly scored. As did Leeds the week before.

How's that the keepers fault?? sctatchinghead sctatchinghead


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: ALB V Budtz
PostPosted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:06 pm 
Spender wrote:
The thing that has always staggered me in this argument is that most people seem to champion the idea that if the centre backs are shiit, it's the goalkeepers fault. When the centre backs are OK, it's fine pairing in central defence.'

Here's an important thought, right?

For Fleetwoods second goal, the ball came RIGHT over the top and left the midfielder one on one, who duly scored. As did Leeds the week before.

How's that the keepers fault?? sctatchinghead sctatchinghead


The centre backs have been rightly hammered Mr Spender by most people of here, I seem to remember Nelson being compared to faeces not so long back.

You couldn't blame ALB for either goal yesterday but sometimes keepers pull defenders out of the shit in that situation, when the lad shot he had barely got out of his six yard box aren't you supposed to narrow the angle? On two occasions he failed to come to edge of the area when it was easy to and Nelson had to clear hurriedly when all it would have taken is a bit of communication, he flapped at crosses and generally put his team mates under needless pressure. He then let himslef down by retaliating. His overall performance was about four out of ten.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: ALB V Budtz
PostPosted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
PJ_Poolie wrote:
With help of Mr MadJohn's fine site I've looked into both keepers records at Pools and it obviously doesn't make pretty reading;

Budtz has played in goal on 34 occasions for Pools. He's kept 6 clean sheets and conceded 45 goals at 1.32 per game.

ALB has played on 31 occasions for Pools. He's kept 3 clean sheets (yes that's 3) and conceded 55 goals at 1.77 per game.

So yesterday we shipped our 100th goal since the Big Greek departed. Ben Clark and Micheal Nelson had been rocks in that previous season with a dependable keeper behind them, in fact keeping clean sheets in half of the league games.

So based on that old cockfingers is better at keeping the ball out of the net than ALB. At the moment it appears that a lot of the efforts on target against us end up in the back of the net. I think Budtz is more out and out howler prone but he's also more likely to actually make a good save and should be playing, I don't care how shite he is he's the best we've got.

So in summing up....





FFS DANNY SIGN A KEEPER
banghead banghead banghead banghead


Those stats suggest Tree was right about ALB been even worse than Budtz :shock:

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ALB V Budtz
PostPosted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 7:10 pm
Posts: 1101
Although i'm not making excuses for ALB, for the first goal yesterday he did start to move off his line quite early but slipped on the shiite pitch, that probably cost him 2-3 yards and a possible save.

However i do agree that we need 2 new keepers, sooner rather than later.

_________________
Get your shit and get out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ALB V Budtz
PostPosted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
chip fireball wrote:
how long is dimis loan at swansea ?

he was on the bench for them today so i cant see the loan going beyond its agreed period.

if its up this month surely wilson should step in ?


and if not Dimi, why not try David Stockdale? he is on loan to Rotherham at the minute and i'm sure he would be good enough for League 1

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ALB V Budtz
PostPosted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37383
I wonder if Barry Watling has kept himself fit..... sctatchinghead

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ALB V Budtz
PostPosted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 8:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
Roy Tunks may be available assuming he is not playing in Serie A or something

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ALB V Budtz
PostPosted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 8:40 pm 
They both shit surely Cook must be better than these.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: ALB V Budtz
PostPosted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 8:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
townendtimmy wrote:
They both shiit surely Cook must be better than these.


another one who was brought in for the future

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ALB V Budtz
PostPosted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 8:44 pm 
Hes 19 if hes good enough hes old enough. Theres better keepers in the northern league than the two weve got.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: ALB V Budtz
PostPosted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 11:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am
Posts: 20758
I said yonks ago that Budtz was better than ALB and you all mocked me.

Nice to see the stats backing me up.

_________________
I'd recommend a more stealthy plan than googling 'afternoon tea dog'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ALB V Budtz
PostPosted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 12:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:42 pm
Posts: 6592
Location: Hartlepool - for now....
I can remember ALB making about 3 decent saves in his spell in the team. He isn't good enough. He never pulls the team out of the shite, he is a conference keeper at best....!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ALB V Budtz
PostPosted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 10:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:54 pm
Posts: 13354
Location: on me bike
Jonny wrote:
I can remember ALB making about 3 decent saves in his spell in the team. He isn't good enough. He never pulls the team out of the shite, he is a conference keeper at best....!


there isn't a Conference team who would ahve him either IMO.
His standard is probably Wearside League, and that's no exaggeration, Barrett the same. Piss piss piss poor the pair of them, a more woeful situation is hard to imagine

_________________
personal assistant to Nelson the German Shepherd


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ALB V Budtz
PostPosted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 4:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am
Posts: 20758
Thing is I think they are nothing like each other at all. Budtz dropped some awful clangers and I mean awful but about 1 or 2 every 6 or 7 games id say. The rest of the time he actually SAVED shots (some great svaes which were soon forgotten) and very few times did I think "he should have done better there". With ALB he doesnt drop huge clangers but is at fault for nigh on a goal a game and cannot make any saves other than ones straight at him.

So in short Budtz makes less errors but they usually stand out more.

Neither are of Dimi's quality but if we want to keep clean sheets and actually see a keeper make something called a "save" then sorry but we need Budtz in goal ahead of Barrett.

_________________
I'd recommend a more stealthy plan than googling 'afternoon tea dog'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ALB V Budtz
PostPosted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 4:40 pm 
I don't see how you can rely on bare stats without finding out the sorts of goals conceded. Some goals are unstoppable and some are the result of errors other than goal-keeping errors


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: ALB V Budtz
PostPosted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 4:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am
Posts: 20758
Florence wrote:
I don't see how you can rely on bare stats without finding out the sorts of goals conceded. Some goals are unstoppable and some are the result of errors other than goal-keeping errors


You cant rely fully, agreed. But they can be used as a guide.

_________________
I'd recommend a more stealthy plan than googling 'afternoon tea dog'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ALB V Budtz
PostPosted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 4:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
Tree_With_Hamster wrote:
Florence wrote:
I don't see how you can rely on bare stats without finding out the sorts of goals conceded. Some goals are unstoppable and some are the result of errors other than goal-keeping errors


You cant rely fully, agreed. But they can be used as a guide.


You mean that you can use them to back up any given argument depending upon how you present them! :laugh:

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ALB V Budtz
PostPosted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm
Posts: 25266
Why did alb keep spitting on his hands when he elbowed that geezer on saturday?

Just looked weird.

_________________
Michaelbarron ‏@Mickyb22
@9howie yes defo I need my mate for golf and social ‪#bessiemate


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ALB V Budtz
PostPosted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 5:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am
Posts: 20758
Yubep wrote:
Why did alb keep spitting on his hands when he elbowed that geezer on saturday?

Just looked weird.


Maybe he expected to be sent off so thought Budtz would need the extra grip in his gloves?

_________________
I'd recommend a more stealthy plan than googling 'afternoon tea dog'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ALB V Budtz
PostPosted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 7:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am
Posts: 9053
At Cheltenham last season Budtz made an unforgivable mistake just before half time that went through his fingers and got Cheltenham back in the game when they'd never threatened.

He then made two or three absolutely superb saves in the second half to keep the score at 1-1.

It makes you think that if Barrett had been in goal that day; he'd have probably saved their equaliser but we'd have ended up losing because he doesn't have the ability to make quality saves.

_________________
Apols


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: Arthurpoolie, bobby lemonade, Bostonpoolie, charltonclive, Cow Corner, Daz2, derwent, dykey, edludlam18@gmail.com, fckpoolie, Flying Hogans, Gerry Mandrake, itwontwork, JohnnyMars, jon_d97, jumbodabber, Kettering Poolie, kevin pooles gloves, loyal_fan, Manchester Exile, pollyo, poolie1966, Poolie_on_Tyne, Pooliebod, Pooly_Imp, Roy Hogan's Wig, Sandman, Stomper409, Stotty1908, stupoolie, Tonto1968, Tonyb and 249 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.