Excuses Excuses!!!!

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Sun May 18, 2008 1:01 am

http://www.darlington-fc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10339~1314602,00.html

No....I don't think they did!!!! :roll:

I think what cost you was the fact that Rochdale scored more penalties than you!!!! :roll:

yloop · **Posted:** Sun May 18, 2008 1:03 am

i think the fact their players were fooking gash might have added to their problems. I don't see his comments on that though

HUFCWop · **Joined:** Tue May 22, 2007 7:30 am **Posts:** 373

According to him Rochdale should never have had a freekick for their first goal. Maybe a less biased opinion might point out the ridiculous penalty Darlo were awarded followed by a very harsh sending off. Darlo had all the major decisions yet still fooked it up.

Gibsons Beard · **Posted:** Sun May 18, 2008 9:56 am

Yeah, injuries cost his side. The fact that he had 10 or 11 players out injured meant that his squad was depleted to about 50 fit players! It must have been very tough getting a decent starting 11 out of that squad.

Nugget

Sarf · **Joined:** Wed Sep 05, 2007 6:31 pm **Posts:** 323

gravedisorder wrote:

Yeah, injuries cost his side. The fact that he had 10 or 11 players out injured meant that his squad was depleted to about 50 fit players! It must have been very tough getting a decent starting 11 out of that squad.

Nugget

After reading your comments, I conclude that Ripper is spot on about you

Gibsons Beard · **Posted:** Sun May 18, 2008 11:55 am

Sarf wrote:

gravedisorder wrote:

Yeah, injuries cost his side. The fact that he had 10 or 11 players out injured meant that his squad was depleted to about 50 fit players! It must have been very tough getting a decent starting 11 out of that squad.

Nugget

After reading your comments, I conclude that Ripper is spot on about you

What has Ripper said about me like?

PJ_Poolie · **Posted:** Sun May 18, 2008 1:18 pm

MadJohn wrote:

HUFCWop wrote:

According to him Rochdale should never have had a freekick for their first goal. Maybe a less biased opinion might point out the ridiculous penalty Darlo were awarded followed by a very harsh sending off. Darlo had all the major decisions yet still fooked it up.

Agreed. That comment just made Penney look like a buffoon. I expect better from him to be honest.

They should have dealt with the free kick, the referee wasn't responsible for the shocking piece of goalkeeping by Stockdale. As I said yesterday I've never seen Pools get the rub of green from a ref in big game like that ever, Effions 'penalty' V Bristol City anyone? Westies red at Cardiff? The disallowed 'goal' at Rushden? They benefit from some ridiculous decisions and still fook up!!

Mr Ripper · **Posted:** Mon May 19, 2008 10:58 am

gravedisorder wrote:

Sarf wrote:

gravedisorder wrote:

Yeah, injuries cost his side. The fact that he had 10 or 11 players out injured meant that his squad was depleted to about 50 fit players! It must have been very tough getting a decent starting 11 out of that squad.

Nugget

After reading your comments, I conclude that Ripper is spot on about you

What has Ripper said about me like?

I think he is referring to your signature and inferring that the statement was made about you. rolfl

Gibsons Beard · **Posted:** Mon May 19, 2008 12:45 pm

Mr Ripper wrote:

I think he is referring to your signature and inferring that the statement was made about you. rolfl

LOL, I pity Sarf. It must be a hard life being so thick :laugh:

yloop · **Posted:** Mon May 19, 2008 2:09 pm

Nobodys Hero wrote:

When darlow cleared one of the line in the last minute........have a look at it again......and convince me Rochdale shouldnt have had a penner when the clown in goal clearly pushed Dagnall? out of the way.

I saw that but as it was behind everyone there's no way the ref could have seen. Although he did give the loids a pen for something he didn't see cause nothing happened!

yloop · **Posted:** Mon May 19, 2008 2:17 pm

was too busy being felt up by randy loid fans

Excuses Excuses!!!!

Gadgies online