Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Sun Jun 22, 2025 11:17 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: Joel
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 9:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am
Posts: 9053
Interesting.....

http://www.stuff.co.nz/4525584a1823.html

_________________
Apols


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 9:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:40 pm
Posts: 3561
Location: Still trying to find myself
I don't like the look of this.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 9:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 11:26 pm
Posts: 5832
Location: number 8
i dont like the look of this

Image

_________________
I have forgotten more than you will ever know


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 9:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:55 pm
Posts: 5095
its simple enough joel is under contract for another year which he previously agreed to if he wants to go and play for wellington they offer a transfer fee pools find acceptable and pools let him go

its not rocket science is it

the pfa should advise joel that he has a contract with pools so its up to the club to agree to let him go

also has joel broken any rules by agreeing a contract with another club while employed by pools

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 9:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:42 pm
Posts: 6592
Location: Hartlepool - for now....
The contract may have been agreed to by someone representing Porter.

I hope he stays because he is going to be very hard to replace...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 9:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:55 pm
Posts: 5095
Jonny wrote:
The contract may have been agreed to by someone representing Porter.

I hope he stays because he is going to be very hard to replace...


but joel would have to have given them permission to represent him

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 9:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:42 pm
Posts: 6592
Location: Hartlepool - for now....
no6bus wrote:
Jonny wrote:
The contract may have been agreed to by someone representing Porter.

I hope he stays because he is going to be very hard to replace...


but joel would have to have given them permission to represent him


He probably did but technically he was out of contract until his year option was activated wasn't he?

As far as i know you can speak to clubs as long as there is less than 6 months to run on your contract?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 9:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 12:58 am
Posts: 253
Location: hartlepool
So if he stays, which is the probable option, we have a striker who doesnt want to be here ! Great eh !! :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 9:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:55 pm
Posts: 5095
well was he though he had a contract up to june 30th with a further years option so was he free to talk to other clubs but he will be in jan 2009

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 9:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:55 pm
Posts: 5095
ProudPoolie wrote:
So if he stays, which is the probable option, we have a striker who doesnt want to be here ! Great eh !! :roll:


all the more reason to play well and make wellington part with some money to get him over there

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 10:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:55 pm
Posts: 5095
moore didnt settle here joel has
boydy thought he was better than he is and thought little hartlepool were holding him back :laugh:
how do you know pools arent paying joel what hes worth

the article the other week about stopping if he gets a 3 year contract was his get out clause
he can try and get away and keep the fans on his side by saying i would stop but i need a 3 year contract knowing 1 wouldnt be forthcoming so he can bugger off into the sunset
given his injury record while he has been here would you sign him up for 3 years (serious question)

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 10:57 pm 
chip fireball wrote:
ian moore was under contract, as was adam boyd. it didnt stop them leaving. cant see that porter is any different.


if pools want to keep him they should pay him what he is worth.

in any event a sizeable minority on here were saying back in august and september that he was crap/uninterested/a one season wonder/finished with the game etc.

i would dig out the posts but i cant be arsed.


if he wants to go let him go now and try and find somebody to replace him.



Dig em out chip, dig em out........ :roll:

The club should pay him what he's worth..... FFS I'm sure he's not on buttons and the club has acted within its right to extend his contract or what ever the term is, he signed it of his own free will back whenever

Is it only me that think Saint Joelo might try and fook of for nowt, well it won't happen, IOR will make sure of that


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 10:59 pm 
no6bus wrote:
moore didnt settle here joel has
boydy thought he was better than he is and thought little hartlepool were holding him back :laugh:
how do you know pools arent paying joel what hes worth

the article the other week about stopping if he gets a 3 year contract was his get out clause
he can try and get away and keep the fans on his side by saying i would stop but i need a 3 year contract knowing 1 wouldnt be forthcoming so he can bugger off into the sunset
given his injury record while he has been here would you sign him up for 3 years (serious question)


If I'm honest - no I wouldn't

But I would use the contract option to squeeze a fee out of Wellington Phoenix

No point in keeping a player who doesn't want to be here - he won't perform anyway, take the money & put it to getting a decent replacement (problem is out manager hasn't the best record at signing players - at least entertaining ones)


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 11:00 pm 
no6bus wrote:
moore didnt settle here joel has
boydy thought he was better than he is and thought little hartlepool were holding him back :laugh:
how do you know pools arent paying joel what hes worth

the article the other week about stopping if he gets a 3 year contract was his get out clause
he can try and get away and keep the fans on his side by saying i would stop but i need a 3 year contract knowing 1 wouldnt be forthcoming so he can bugger off into the sunset
given his injury record while he has been here would you sign him up for 3 years (serious question)



Chip would, chip loves him, Chip would give him a fifty year contract even if his legs fell off.............


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 11:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 12:58 am
Posts: 253
Location: hartlepool
chip fireball wrote:
ian moore was under contract, as was adam boyd. it didnt stop them leaving. cant see that porter is any different.


if pools want to keep him they should pay him what he is worth.

in any event a sizeable minority on here were saying back in august and september that he was crap/uninterested/a one season wonder/finished with the game etc.

i would dig out the posts but i cant be arsed.


if he wants to go let him go now and try and find somebody to replace him.


If he goes then there will be no tears on my face, tbh aslong as he is replaced (unlike moore) i will be happy for him to move on !! So there is no need to go and dig posts out chip, my opinion hasnt changed.

If he stays we will see him every now and then in between injuries with a bit of skill every now and then.

If he goes though what is the kit man gonna do, he wont need to get grass stains off his shorts when he plays!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 11:05 pm 
chip fireball wrote:
ian moore was under contract, as was adam boyd. it didnt stop them leaving. cant see that porter is any different.




We received half a million pounds for Adam Boyd an absolute master stoke selling him for that after the injury plagued last season he had at Pools, we won promotion easily and Boyd has his Luton contract ripped up at the end of that season, as good a piece of business as you will ever see on Pools part.

We also received a fee for Moore, and Tranmere went through the correct procedure to sign him.

If Porter has agreed a deal with Wellington while he still has a year option here he is completely out of order and would go way down in my estimation. This year option was mentioned by the Wellington boss months ago, and he even said it was 50:50 as it was Pools call.

It is massively different how can you not see that!!?


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 11:07 pm 
ProudPoolie wrote:
chip fireball wrote:
ian moore was under contract, as was adam boyd. it didnt stop them leaving. cant see that porter is any different.


if pools want to keep him they should pay him what he is worth.

in any event a sizeable minority on here were saying back in august and september that he was crap/uninterested/a one season wonder/finished with the game etc.

i would dig out the posts but i cant be arsed.


if he wants to go let him go now and try and find somebody to replace him.


If he goes then there will be no tears on my face, tbh aslong as he is replaced (unlike moore) i will be happy for him to move on !! So there is no need to go and dig posts out chip, my opinion hasnt changed.

If he stays we will see him every now and then in between injuries with a bit of skill every now and then.

If he goes though what is the kit man gonna do, he wont need to get grass stains off his shorts when he plays!!


Unfair that banghead

Joel is a bloody good player - but I suspect there are more problems to come with his knees (hence I wouldn't give him a three year contract)


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 11:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 12:58 am
Posts: 253
Location: hartlepool
Cowboy wrote:
ProudPoolie wrote:
chip fireball wrote:
ian moore was under contract, as was adam boyd. it didnt stop them leaving. cant see that porter is any different.


if pools want to keep him they should pay him what he is worth.

in any event a sizeable minority on here were saying back in august and september that he was crap/uninterested/a one season wonder/finished with the game etc.

i would dig out the posts but i cant be arsed.


if he wants to go let him go now and try and find somebody to replace him.


If he goes then there will be no tears on my face, tbh aslong as he is replaced (unlike moore) i will be happy for him to move on !! So there is no need to go and dig posts out chip, my opinion hasnt changed.

If he stays we will see him every now and then in between injuries with a bit of skill every now and then.

If he goes though what is the kit man gonna do, he wont need to get grass stains off his shorts when he plays!!


Unfair that banghead

Joel is a bloody good player - but I suspect there are more problems to come with his knees (hence I wouldn't give him a three year contract)


Ok i'll re-phrase it, Joel can be a great player, but you dont see enough of it and if he doesnt want to be here then welcome to the board !!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 11:13 pm 
chip fireball wrote:
no6bus wrote:
moore didnt settle here
:roll:

you dont seriously believe that surely ? and it was just coincidence he signed for a team managed by his dad ?



Why didn't his Dad sign him in the summer then when he was free agent, surely that would have been a bit easier?? Oh and why did he nearly sign for Oldham?

They paid a fee for him when if his desire was to play for his Dad he wouldn't have ended up at Pools in the first place.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 11:28 pm 
chip fireball wrote:
so you let a bloke walk out cos his family live on the other side of the pennines, but you wont let a bloke go whose wife and kids are on the other side of the planet ???????????

if he wants to go let him go. why insist on a fee for him ? its not like the money is going to be ploughed back into the team is it ? or did i miss the boyd money being spent and a striker being signed to replace moore ?


Fair point about family

I would still have a fee though - he is under contract so we are entitled to ask for a fee (even though, on reflection it will not be re invested in new players)


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 4:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:55 pm
Posts: 5095
chip fireball wrote:
so you let a bloke walk out cos his family live on the other side of the pennines, but you wont let a bloke go whose wife and kids are on the other side of the planet ???????????

if he wants to go let him go. why insist on a fee for him ? its not like the money is going to be ploughed back into the team is it ? or did i miss the boyd money being spent and a striker being signed to replace moore ?


so moores fee wasnt spent on a specific player but we loose £750000 a year unforgivable :roll:
you slated moore for doing what joel wants to do :roll:
you make out that you are in the know with what players at pools earn :roll:
joel should put a transfer request in and do it the honourable way instead of trying to con the fans :shock:

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 7:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am
Posts: 9053
I don't see what could be gained by digging out any old posts where people have constructively criticised a player's performance other than for you to say 'I told you so'.

I stick by any assessment I made of any player at any time, if they go on to prove me wrong (which Joel has done convincingly) then that's fine by me. I would rather be proved wrong than right.

_________________
Apols


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 8:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am
Posts: 9053
Nobodys Hero wrote:
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

Wind up alert.

rolfl rolfl rolfl rolfl


sctatchinghead sctatchinghead

_________________
Apols


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 9:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
the one thing nobody on here knows for certain is what Porter himself actually wants.

to agree a contract with wellington could have been backup to not getting a new contract with Pools. he may be happy to stay with us and may try to discuss an extra year on his contract. who knows?

however i do beleive pools have done this to get a fee. even if its a daft 50,000 its money that could be put towards the fee for duffy for example.

Joel is my favourite player of all time and i would be devastated to see him go. but we all move on, and i would love to see duffy or that lad bishop from bury sign for us.

good luck Joel, whatever happens.

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 9:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 10:27 pm
Posts: 3115
It's possible that Joel doesn't know what he really wants, or he is prepared to go with either option & make the best of it. I agree with misterb2001, good luck to Joel whatever happens.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 12:47 pm
Posts: 64
Location: London
i was away in prague at the weekend playing in a footy tournament with one of mackay's mates - on the friday he was texting him to found out if he'd been kept on and confirmed that he had.

anyway i asked him if he knew about any of the other players and he said all he'd heard was that our star striker (i presume porter!) had been offered a new contract but on less money...

clearly this is a rumour from a squad player to a mate - so take this post in the manner it's meant - not really sure if them taking up an option on his contract fits with talk of him being offer a new one but on less....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 2:23 pm 
Ian Moore went because he didn't sit well with the idea of three hours training and five hours driving a day. He lives in Warrington doesn't he?? He gave it a go, it didn't work, he left.


But don't let that get in the way of a good, but inexorably flimsy, theory..... :grin: :grin:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 4:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:46 am
Posts: 16992
Location: The people's democratic illegal republic of Catalonia
chip fireball wrote:
indeed as soon as wilson signed craddock, porter was back on the bench.

I think this confirms ADG's wind-up theory. :wink:
I leave it to the reader to count how many times Craddock started ahead of Porter and vice versa.

_________________
No, your children are not the special ones.
(Nor is your dog.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 4:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 10:31 am
Posts: 2885
Location: The South
Geordie pooly wrote:
anyway i asked him if he knew about any of the other players and he said all he'd heard was that our star striker (i presume porter!) had been offered a new contract but on less money...


Your heard star striker and thought Porter, strange, I thought Foley sctatchinghead

_________________
The moon is made of cheese, FACT.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 6:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:46 am
Posts: 16992
Location: The people's democratic illegal republic of Catalonia
chip fireball wrote:
when pools signed craddock it was porter and not barker who initially made way for him

Nobody made way for him initially. Craddock started just once in front of Porter.

Cheltenham: Craddock on bench, eventually comes on for Thompson
Northampton: Ditto
B'muff: Craddock starts, Joel on bench, Mackay comes on for Craddock then Joel comes on for Foley.
Oldham: Craddock and Porter both on bench. Joel comes on for Vince Barker after 20 minutes. Craddock plays no part.
Gillingham: Joel starts, Craddock on bench and plays no part.
Huddersfield: Ditto
Tranmere: Joel starts, Craddock on bench, eventually comes on for Mackay. Joel taken off after 84 minutes due to injury.

And that is the whole of the Craddock history.

In all Joel missed 100 minutes of play out of 720 during that period. Hardly enough for him to get upset about.

_________________
No, your children are not the special ones.
(Nor is your dog.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 8:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 2:35 pm
Posts: 1544
Location: stuck in my bivvy on the ressy with my delkims and 4k of scopex squid livers
fook the big nosed little ingrate. two dodgy knees and a shyte attitude. the only thing he's good at is teapotting banghead :evil:

skippy and chippy up a tree, K-I-S-S-I-N-GEE :laugh: :grin:

no seriously, pay him whatever he wants and guarantee him a start every week stpid :roll: bbolt


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 9:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 12:58 am
Posts: 253
Location: hartlepool
aido87 wrote:
fook the big nosed little ingrate. two dodgy knees and a shyte attitude. the only thing he's good at is teapotting banghead :evil:

skippy and chippy up a tree, K-I-S-S-I-N-GEE :laugh: :grin:

no seriously, pay him whatever he wants and guarantee him a start every week stpid :roll: bbolt


rolfl rolfl rolfl


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 10:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:10 am
Posts: 3572
I want Porter to stay but I want him to be happy. I wouldn't force anyone to continue living at the other side of the world if they didn't want to.

He's no Jack Ross.

The comments questioning his ability are insane.

The comments questioning his attitude are insane.

He has been nothing but brilliant towards Hartlepool fans. There is a good player/fan relationship going on there and this mess doesn't dent it.

But if Wellington Pheonix get their way then it could put future contracts in jepordy as players will try and game the system when they have the clause where their contract can be extended by a year.

"We haven't moved any closer but we're still tapping away." Well Wellington you can stop tapping away as you won't get anywhere as our club is run like a business and believes in the value of contracts. If you think Joel is worth it then start acting serious and make an offer instead of trying to get a feebie.

It's a mess for Hartlepool and for Joel. I have no sympathy for Wellington.

If Porter does leave then I wish him the very best.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 11:57 pm 
DanielGaunt wrote:
There is a good player/fan relationship going on there and this mess doesn't dent it.


It's that what's caused all the problems isn't it....allegedly?!?! :shock: :shock:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 10:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am
Posts: 20758
Fuck him.

_________________
I'd recommend a more stealthy plan than googling 'afternoon tea dog'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 6:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 2:35 pm
Posts: 1544
Location: stuck in my bivvy on the ressy with my delkims and 4k of scopex squid livers
chip !! you didn't.....did you ??? :shock:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Joel
PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2008 12:22 am 
:laugh: :laugh: rolfl :laugh: :laugh:


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: bobby lemonade, Christaff, Corner Flag, Ethel Cardew, JackVet, Kettering Poolie, loyal_fan, Mikey, Mikey76, millhouseseats, Our Younguns Dad, Ozzy Saltburn, Pooliebod, Snowy, stupoolie, Winston Ingram and 157 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.