Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Mon Jul 07, 2025 6:49 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 130 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2022 11:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 4:44 pm
Posts: 3294
Location: Cloud 9
Snowy wrote:
ed-t-ball wrote:
The Tory party is hugely funded by Russian oligarchs and people with close ties to Putin.
Sanctions are very limited.
Boris the lying twat is sailing far too close to the wind with this corruption.
He's really out of his depth and in a whole lot more shit than he can cope with.


The level of sanctions have been agreed to go up on a sliding scale by all Party’s at the security conference today. So every country is singing from the same hymn sheet and not just Boris. Sorry to ruin a good theory, but the facts are what they are.


There is no 'level' of sanctions which has been implemented or threatened worthy of the description. He has backed himself into a corner controlled from Moscow.
Proper puppet of corruption.

_________________
"We Londoners pride ourselves on not being impressed by anything except the annual visit of Hartlepool's fans" David Hepworth of Mirror Sport on Saturday.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2022 12:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 12:03 am
Posts: 295
Flying Hogans wrote:
I don't agree with where you started but I agree with that. All the reports this morning suggest Putin thinks an all-out attack can bring about the rapid collapse of Ukrainian resistance and the fall of the current government. If that happens he'll have 'won' - assuming he thinks starting a new Cold War is winning. In the long run a new arms race will destroy Russia's economy and bring about regime change just like it did in the 1980s.

If the Ukrainians fight back effectively, armed by the West - and show no signs of giving up, ever - he'll find himself in a long war with a lot of dead and maimed Russians as happened in Afghanistan. No amount of state propaganda will keep the Russian people happy with that situation for long.


Yeah, the Ruble is worth nothing, most of the world won't trade with you, the stuff you can get is extra expensive because your currency isn't worth the paper it's printed on. Even your allies like China get a bit iffy because their country wholly relies on trade with the west. Not a great position to be in.

Definitely not the sort of position you can fight a major global conflict from.

derwent wrote:
My worry is the threat by Putin where he says any interference will be met by immediate response and that response will have consequences beyond what the world has ever experienced ( or words to that effect)
What is he saying or threatening? Nuclear attacks? Or is he bluffing?
Until I'm convinced he is bluffing I am taking the line that this madman will press the big button and that he includes sanctions as interference.
So whatever he means by his threat, he will fulfil it.
We're backing a rat into a corner and most of the experts seem to think that eventually, as the sanctions bite, the Russian people will turn against him.
What will be his parting shot is the big question.


There isn't a big red button sitting on his desk. To nuke somewhere, he has to give an order, knowing the consequences, and others knowing the consequences have to carry that order out.

Even if Putin is actually insane (and not just someone who knows exactly what he can and can't get away with) everyone between him and the "big red button" would have to be equally mental. Those people between him and said hypothetical button are in very senior positions. Regimes like Putin's usually fall when their Generals have had enough and stage a coup. It's happened since the Romans were around, a good example is Romania in the late 80s. Ceaușescu ordered his army to kill and round up protestors, his generals didn't want to order troops to kill their own people, they took him out instead. Russia's generals aren't going to sit by and let Putin turn their country and the rest of the developed world into a nuclear crater.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2022 1:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37440
ed-t-ball wrote:
Snowy wrote:
ed-t-ball wrote:
The Tory party is hugely funded by Russian oligarchs and people with close ties to Putin.
Sanctions are very limited.
Boris the lying twat is sailing far too close to the wind with this corruption.
He's really out of his depth and in a whole lot more shit than he can cope with.


The level of sanctions have been agreed to go up on a sliding scale by all Party’s at the security conference today. So every country is singing from the same hymn sheet and not just Boris. Sorry to ruin a good theory, but the facts are what they are.


There is no 'level' of sanctions which has been implemented or threatened worthy of the description. He has backed himself into a corner controlled from Moscow.
Proper puppet of corruption.

We’ll try again, what part of ‘sliding scale of sanctions’ to increase in severity according to Putins actions do you have a problem understanding. It was agreed on Wednesday at the summit between the UK, US and all the European countries.
We ain’t gonna go to war over Ukraine, they’ll just bleed him financially.
And who would you like in charge instead of Boris......?

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2022 1:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2015 11:45 pm
Posts: 2002
"Among the many threats he issued in his declaration of war, the most chilling was reserved not for Ukraine but for the “outside forces” who might come to its defense, a thinly veiled reference to Kyiv’s allies in the U.S. and Europe. Addressing them toward the end of his speech, Putin said: “Anyone who tries to get in our way, let alone tries to threaten us and our people, should know that Russia’s answer will be immediate, and it will lead to consequences of the sort that you have not faced ever in your history.”"

ok vlad ...message received loud and clear....boris...cometh the hour..cometh the man..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2022 1:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 10:34 pm
Posts: 3553
Donald,where's your trousers.Bring back Trump!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2022 2:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2015 11:45 pm
Posts: 2002
taliban...putin...next in the queue ...little rocket man ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2022 2:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 4:44 pm
Posts: 3294
Location: Cloud 9
Snowy wrote:
There is no 'level' of sanctions which has been implemented or threatened worthy of the description. He has backed himself into a corner controlled from Moscow.
Proper puppet of corruption.

We’ll try again, what part of ‘sliding scale of sanctions’ to increase in severity according to Putins actions do you have a problem understanding. It was agreed on Wednesday at the summit between the UK, US and all the European countries.
We ain’t gonna go to war over Ukraine, they’ll just bleed him financially.
And who would you like in charge instead of Boris......?[/quote]

A sliding scale which increases in severity - well we started off with Russia sending troops into another country overtly and covertly and we did practically fuck all. So from a practically negligible start we escalate to umming and ahhing when they invade, bomb and murder innocent people I wonder what part of sliding scale you have a problem understanding.

We won't bleed him financially for reasons I have already pointed out..

I'd like someone who isn't corrupt.

_________________
"We Londoners pride ourselves on not being impressed by anything except the annual visit of Hartlepool's fans" David Hepworth of Mirror Sport on Saturday.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2022 2:33 pm 
Online

Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 12365
ziggysawdust wrote:
Flying Hogans wrote:
I don't agree with where you started but I agree with that. All the reports this morning suggest Putin thinks an all-out attack can bring about the rapid collapse of Ukrainian resistance and the fall of the current government. If that happens he'll have 'won' - assuming he thinks starting a new Cold War is winning. In the long run a new arms race will destroy Russia's economy and bring about regime change just like it did in the 1980s.

If the Ukrainians fight back effectively, armed by the West - and show no signs of giving up, ever - he'll find himself in a long war with a lot of dead and maimed Russians as happened in Afghanistan. No amount of state propaganda will keep the Russian people happy with that situation for long.


Yeah, the Ruble is worth nothing, most of the world won't trade with you, the stuff you can get is extra expensive because your currency isn't worth the paper it's printed on. Even your allies like China get a bit iffy because their country wholly relies on trade with the west. Not a great position to be in.

Definitely not the sort of position you can fight a major global conflict from.

derwent wrote:
My worry is the threat by Putin where he says any interference will be met by immediate response and that response will have consequences beyond what the world has ever experienced ( or words to that effect)
What is he saying or threatening? Nuclear attacks? Or is he bluffing?
Until I'm convinced he is bluffing I am taking the line that this madman will press the big button and that he includes sanctions as interference.
So whatever he means by his threat, he will fulfil it.
We're backing a rat into a corner and most of the experts seem to think that eventually, as the sanctions bite, the Russian people will turn against him.
What will be his parting shot is the big question.


There isn't a big red button sitting on his desk. To nuke somewhere, he has to give an order, knowing the consequences, and others knowing the consequences have to carry that order out.

Even if Putin is actually insane (and not just someone who knows exactly what he can and can't get away with) everyone between him and the "big red button" would have to be equally mental. Those people between him and said hypothetical button are in very senior positions. Regimes like Putin's usually fall when their Generals have had enough and stage a coup. It's happened since the Romans were around, a good example is Romania in the late 80s. Ceaușescu ordered his army to kill and round up protestors, his generals didn't want to order troops to kill their own people, they took him out instead. Russia's generals aren't going to sit by and let Putin turn their country and the rest of the developed world into a nuclear crater.


I don't recall mentioning a button on his desk, it is a figure of speech.
Obviously he will have to order it and others will have to carry it out, just like he ordered the march into Ukraine without actually donning his boots himself.
All the so called experts are saying that effective sanctions will cripple his country and eventually lead to his demise, when the Russian nation eventually get the message. The generals obviously haven't so far rebelled at his current orders, just like previous generals didn't stop Stalin murdering millions of their countrymen, or Hitler's generals didn't object to carrying out the orders to murder six million Jews.
Putin's generals have just invaded a sovereign country of 44 million people, who voted, almost unanimously for independence, without provocation and knowing that the entire Western World would condemn their action and take steps in retaliation. They haven't opposed that order.
All madmen in history have a record of getting their own way and Putin is a madman. I can't, therefore share your confidence that he won't order the button to be pressed, nor can I rely on the refusal of it's pressing, so we'll have to agree to disagree on that one.
You have already said that it would not be smart to declare war on a nation with their nuclear power.
The West is about to declare financial war on them in an attempt to strangle them into submission. Putin refers to any interference being dealt with immediately with consequences that have never been seen before.
Have you a take on that??

_________________
Come on Pools


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2022 2:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2015 11:45 pm
Posts: 2002
"Proper puppet of corruption"

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/barr ... 76606.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2022 2:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 12:03 am
Posts: 295
derwent wrote:
ziggysawdust wrote:
Flying Hogans wrote:
I don't agree with where you started but I agree with that. All the reports this morning suggest Putin thinks an all-out attack can bring about the rapid collapse of Ukrainian resistance and the fall of the current government. If that happens he'll have 'won' - assuming he thinks starting a new Cold War is winning. In the long run a new arms race will destroy Russia's economy and bring about regime change just like it did in the 1980s.

If the Ukrainians fight back effectively, armed by the West - and show no signs of giving up, ever - he'll find himself in a long war with a lot of dead and maimed Russians as happened in Afghanistan. No amount of state propaganda will keep the Russian people happy with that situation for long.


Yeah, the Ruble is worth nothing, most of the world won't trade with you, the stuff you can get is extra expensive because your currency isn't worth the paper it's printed on. Even your allies like China get a bit iffy because their country wholly relies on trade with the west. Not a great position to be in.

Definitely not the sort of position you can fight a major global conflict from.

derwent wrote:
My worry is the threat by Putin where he says any interference will be met by immediate response and that response will have consequences beyond what the world has ever experienced ( or words to that effect)
What is he saying or threatening? Nuclear attacks? Or is he bluffing?
Until I'm convinced he is bluffing I am taking the line that this madman will press the big button and that he includes sanctions as interference.
So whatever he means by his threat, he will fulfil it.
We're backing a rat into a corner and most of the experts seem to think that eventually, as the sanctions bite, the Russian people will turn against him.
What will be his parting shot is the big question.


There isn't a big red button sitting on his desk. To nuke somewhere, he has to give an order, knowing the consequences, and others knowing the consequences have to carry that order out.

Even if Putin is actually insane (and not just someone who knows exactly what he can and can't get away with) everyone between him and the "big red button" would have to be equally mental. Those people between him and said hypothetical button are in very senior positions. Regimes like Putin's usually fall when their Generals have had enough and stage a coup. It's happened since the Romans were around, a good example is Romania in the late 80s. Ceaușescu ordered his army to kill and round up protestors, his generals didn't want to order troops to kill their own people, they took him out instead. Russia's generals aren't going to sit by and let Putin turn their country and the rest of the developed world into a nuclear crater.


I don't recall mentioning a button on his desk, it is a figure of speech.
Obviously he will have to order it and others will have to carry it out, just like he ordered the march into Ukraine without actually donning his boots himself.
All the so called experts are saying that effective sanctions will cripple his country and eventually lead to his demise, when the Russian nation eventually get the message. The generals obviously haven't so far rebelled at his current orders, just like previous generals didn't stop Stalin murdering millions of their countrymen, or Hitler's generals didn't object to carrying out the orders to murder six million Jews.
Putin's generals have just invaded a sovereign country of 44 million people, who voted, almost unanimously for independence, without provocation and knowing that the entire Western World would condemn their action and take steps in retaliation. They haven't opposed that order.
All madmen in history have a record of getting their own way and Putin is a madman. I can't, therefore share your confidence that he won't order the button to be pressed, nor can I rely on the refusal of it's pressing, so we'll have to agree to disagree on that one.
You have already said that it would not be smart to declare war on a nation with their nuclear power.
The West is about to declare financial war on them in an attempt to strangle them into submission. Putin refers to any interference being dealt with immediately with consequences that have never been seen before.
Have you a take on that??


Bit of a difference between "Kill X group of people/Invade X weaker nation" and "Do this knowing most of us are going to die and the ones who survive aren't going to have a country."

Nukes are a final option in every possible way. If Putin and his inner circle were in a Fuhrerbunker situation, basically under siege with opposing armies a few streets away, they have nothing to lose and you would probably see nukes being fired.

Until that point, it's all posturing. If it isn't, there's bugger all you can do about it anyway. Beyond moving to the middle of nowhere and stockpiling a few years' worth of food.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2022 3:09 pm 
Online

Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 12365
ziggysawdust wrote:
derwent wrote:
ziggysawdust wrote:
Flying Hogans wrote:
I don't agree with where you started but I agree with that. All the reports this morning suggest Putin thinks an all-out attack can bring about the rapid collapse of Ukrainian resistance and the fall of the current government. If that happens he'll have 'won' - assuming he thinks starting a new Cold War is winning. In the long run a new arms race will destroy Russia's economy and bring about regime change just like it did in the 1980s.

If the Ukrainians fight back effectively, armed by the West - and show no signs of giving up, ever - he'll find himself in a long war with a lot of dead and maimed Russians as happened in Afghanistan. No amount of state propaganda will keep the Russian people happy with that situation for long.




Yeah, the Ruble is worth nothing, most of the world won't trade with you, the stuff you can get is extra expensive because your currency isn't worth the paper it's printed on. Even your allies like China get a bit iffy because their country wholly relies on trade with the west. Not a great position to be in.

Definitely not the sort of position you can fight a major global conflict from.

derwent wrote:
My worry is the threat by Putin where he says any interference will be met by immediate response and that response will have consequences beyond what the world has ever experienced ( or words to that effect)
What is he saying or threatening? Nuclear attacks? Or is he bluffing?
Until I'm convinced he is bluffing I am taking the line that this madman will press the big button and that he includes sanctions as interference.
So whatever he means by his threat, he will fulfil it.
We're backing a rat into a corner and most of the experts seem to think that eventually, as the sanctions bite, the Russian people will turn against him.
What will be his parting shot is the big question.


There isn't a big red button sitting on his desk. To nuke somewhere, he has to give an order, knowing the consequences, and others knowing the consequences have to carry that order out.

Even if Putin is actually insane (and not just someone who knows exactly what he can and can't get away with) everyone between him and the "big red button" would have to be equally mental. Those people between him and said hypothetical button are in very senior positions. Regimes like Putin's usually fall when their Generals have had enough and stage a coup. It's happened since the Romans were around, a good example is Romania in the late 80s. Ceaușescu ordered his army to kill and round up protestors, his generals didn't want to order troops to kill their own people, they took him out instead. Russia's generals aren't going to sit by and let Putin turn their country and the rest of the developed world into a nuclear crater.


I don't recall mentioning a button on his desk, it is a figure of speech.
Obviously he will have to order it and others will have to carry it out, just like he ordered the march into Ukraine without actually donning his boots himself.
All the so called experts are saying that effective sanctions will cripple his country and eventually lead to his demise, when the Russian nation eventually get the message. The generals obviously haven't so far rebelled at his current orders, just like previous generals didn't stop Stalin murdering millions of their countrymen, or Hitler's generals didn't object to carrying out the orders to murder six million Jews.
Putin's generals have just invaded a sovereign country of 44 million people, who voted, almost unanimously for independence, without provocation and knowing that the entire Western World would condemn their action and take steps in retaliation. They haven't opposed that order.
All madmen in history have a record of getting their own way and Putin is a madman. I can't, therefore share your confidence that he won't order the button to be pressed, nor can I rely on the refusal of it's pressing, so we'll have to agree to disagree on that one.
You have already said that it would not be smart to declare war on a nation with their nuclear power.
The West is about to declare financial war on them in an attempt to strangle them into submission. Putin refers to any interference being dealt with immediately with consequences that have never been seen before.
Have you a take on that??


Bit of a difference between "Kill X group of people/Invade X weaker nation" and "Do this knowing most of us are going to die and the ones who survive aren't going to have a country."

Nukes are a final option in every possible way. If Putin and his inner circle were in a Fuhrerbunker situation, basically under siege with opposing armies a few streets away, they have nothing to lose and you would probably see nukes being fired.

Until that point, it's all posturing. If it isn't, there's bugger all you can do about it anyway. Beyond moving to the middle of nowhere and stockpiling a few years' worth of food.


I know that there is nothing I can do but that won't stop me talking about it or having an opinion about it.
Putin has to be stopped, taken out, assassinated or whatever description suits because, until that happens, he is a threat to World peace/destruction. If his generals etc can't see that and act upon it then we have to at least worry over it.
Your analogy of the bunker is not dissimilar to mine of a rat in a corner and I agree with it. We are about to sanction him and his country nearer and nearer to that scenario.
That is my opinion.

_________________
Come on Pools


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2022 3:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2015 11:45 pm
Posts: 2002
"Putin has to be stopped, taken out, assassinated or whatever description suits because, until that happens, he is a threat to World peace/destruction"

operation...assassinate vlad.....british intelligence have a man ready to go....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PtlT3ZF4Wc


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2022 3:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 4:44 pm
Posts: 3294
Location: Cloud 9
poolie1 wrote:


I know, there are a few of the fuckers around.

_________________
"We Londoners pride ourselves on not being impressed by anything except the annual visit of Hartlepool's fans" David Hepworth of Mirror Sport on Saturday.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2022 3:48 pm 
Online

Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 12365
poolie1 wrote:
"Putin has to be stopped, taken out, assassinated or whatever description suits because, until that happens, he is a threat to World peace/destruction"

operation...assassinate vlad.....british intelligence have a man ready to go....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PtlT3ZF4Wc


Aw shit, I wanted the job !!!

_________________
Come on Pools


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2022 5:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37440
Vlad will get his way and no one will stop him because he may be just mad enough to go too far....... no one wants to risk it but he has to be got rid of somehow, he’s acting like Stalin did in 1939 when he marched into Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and what was left of Poland after the Germans had finished with it. He tried it with Finland and got his arse well kicked but they had to reach a compromise with him. (In all instances, the intelligentsia, officials, priests, politicians teachers etc, they and their families were deported to the Gulag or eliminated).
Trouble is, who wants to risk the chance of a nuclear war?
Time the armed forces were beefed up as at present most NATO forces are as weak as piss... the peace dividend at the fall of the USSR was an illusion. To people like him we present a sorry sight, obsessed with woke social nonsense and irrelevant fripperies, we look weak so he pounces. It’s what he does.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2022 7:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 12:03 am
Posts: 295
Snowy wrote:
Vlad will get his way and no one will stop him because he may be just mad enough to go too far....... no one wants to risk it but he has to be got rid of somehow, he’s acting like Stalin did in 1939 when he marched into Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and what was left of Poland after the Germans had finished with it. He tried it with Finland and got his arse well kicked but they had to reach a compromise with him. (In all instances, the intelligentsia, officials, priests, politicians teachers etc, they and their families were deported to the Gulag or eliminated).
Trouble is, who wants to risk the chance of a nuclear war?
Time the armed forces were beefed up as at present most NATO forces are as weak as piss... the peace dividend at the fall of the USSR was an illusion. To people like him we present a sorry sight, obsessed with woke social nonsense and irrelevant fripperies, we look weak so he pounces. It’s what he does.


The other issue is political division and general hopelessness. The majority of people look around and don't see much worth fighting for these days. That needs sorting out.

If our leaders have any sense, wokeness will go out the window pretty quick and a healthy (not Hitlerish) level of nationalism will take its place. Wages and living standards will improve, capitalism will start working again (businesses might realise operating under Vlad won't be as fun and stop treating the workforce like shite).

Mind, I'm probably wrong and we'll all actually be getting an atomic suntan by June. Who knows?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2022 7:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 4:15 pm
Posts: 677
Under the Soviet Union Russians were encouraged to settle in the east of Ukraine and the result will be a split in the country. Seems very similar to the encouraging of Protestants to settle in the north of a Catholic country resulting in a split.

Ukraine, strategic military operations, not war.
Falklands, engagements, not war.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 9:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:22 pm
Posts: 19729
[quote="ziggysawdust"]

The other issue is political division and general hopelessness. The majority of people look around and don't see much worth fighting for these days. That needs sorting out.

If our leaders have any sense, wokeness will go out the window pretty quick and a healthy (not Hitlerish) level of nationalism will take its place. Wages and living standards will improve, capitalism will start working again (businesses might realise operating under Vlad won't be as fun and stop treating the workforce like shite).

Nationalism is basically football rivalries times 100. All a bit of religeon into the mix and you get disputes and wars. If it was not for power and money as well what actually is the need for any wars. We are all humans at the end of the day with different colours and languages but basically all the same with a bite to eat and a cup of water needed being our basic requirements. Doubt my future of mankind will never happen ever but you can live in hope for a future where the present situation is a thing of the past.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 12:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2018 10:10 am
Posts: 1539
In the 80s, all English clubs were kicked out of European cups indiscriminately due to the actions of one club.

Why won't Uefa do the same with Russia today?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 12:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:22 pm
Posts: 19729
$ $ $ $.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 12:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2018 10:10 am
Posts: 1539
All Leipzig Aren't We?

Dire times when it's an energy drink company vs a fascist regime.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 12:03 am
Posts: 295
accrington fan wrote:
Nationalism is basically football rivalries times 100. All a bit of religeon into the mix and you get disputes and wars. If it was not for power and money as well what actually is the need for any wars. We are all humans at the end of the day with different colours and languages but basically all the same with a bite to eat and a cup of water needed being our basic requirements. Doubt my future of mankind will never happen ever but you can live in hope for a future where the present situation is a thing of the past.



Nah you need some uniting factor to keep a nation viable. What's the point otherwise?

Now you could say it causes wars, and you're probably right. But, like nukes, if one side has it and the other doesn't, the side with it has a major advantage. Look at Europe in WW2, the Germans were obviously massively nationalistic, the Italians were in a slightly different way, The Russians still call the whole thing "The Great Patriotic War", and Britain had a bunch of lads who were brought up with stories about our achievements. Oh and the Americans are self-explanatory.

Look at every nation that has ever fought for independence or resisted a larger occupying force. They're not really fighting for democracy, or communism, or whatever else gets painted over it all afterwards. Most of them are going this is my home, the people around me are my friends, and we aren't going to lay down and let whoever these arseholes are take it without a fight. Over the last few years that sort of attitude has been described as stupid and in some ways evil. We're not supposed to care about any of that, because if you do you're basically Hitler, despite every side having that attitude back then.

Pretty sure it's countries like Russia and China (who still hold these beliefs) pushing this "Your country did bad things, you should be ashamed of it. Nationalism is bad" nonsense to weaken the West.

I wish we lived in a world where everyone was equal and got along, but that's just not reality is it? We're tribal as a species, you have to find common ground with those around you and work for each other. It's all you can do.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 6:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2015 11:45 pm
Posts: 2002
i see our E.U friends are now really ratcheting up the pressure on vlad ....saying no to expelling him from the credit card system...and no to refusing to buy his oil and gas...but this decision should send him "ballistic".....well done E.U...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-60530513


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 6:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2018 10:10 am
Posts: 1539
The worst part about them getting kicked from Eurovision, is that Britain lost its chance to not come bottom again!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 6:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm
Posts: 22665
Putin can't win. We defeat at him every time with our diversity and inclusiveness.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 6:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2015 11:45 pm
Posts: 2002
mr i...please note the recent comments by vlads foreign minister....invasion is only to ensure that ukraine has a "diverse" and "inclusive" government.....his words......now that's what i call really taking the piss... :obscene-moneypiss:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 7:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 12:03 am
Posts: 295
News just in: Craig Harrison appointed manager of the Chechen shock unit right before their crucial clash against Ukraine tomorrow. Think he'll leave a troop or two on the front line while defending an artillery barrage or is that not his style?

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 11:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 10:34 pm
Posts: 3553
ed-t-ball wrote:
Heard a Russian diplomat on the radio just laugh when asked about the effect of the sanctions Boris has announced. A few individuals and 3 small banks its a joke he said.



It's just the beginning..just be thankful we don't have comrade corbyn in charge,eh..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 8:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 4:44 pm
Posts: 3294
Location: Cloud 9
Corbyn stood in parliament and identified Putin's influence in and funding of the Tory party over 4 years ago and the Tories lied and denied.
It's a fact.

_________________
"We Londoners pride ourselves on not being impressed by anything except the annual visit of Hartlepool's fans" David Hepworth of Mirror Sport on Saturday.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 9:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37440
ed-t-ball wrote:
Corbyn stood in parliament and identified Putin's influence in and funding of the Tory party over 4 years ago and the Tories lied and denied.
It's a fact.

Corbyn said....... :laugh: :laugh:
Ok state the fact, just because you say it’s a fact proves nothing.
Corbyn and his ex Diane Abbot are blaming NATO for the problem, really ?

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 10:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 4:44 pm
Posts: 3294
Location: Cloud 9
He said it on record in the House of Commons. That is a fact.

_________________
"We Londoners pride ourselves on not being impressed by anything except the annual visit of Hartlepool's fans" David Hepworth of Mirror Sport on Saturday.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 10:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2015 12:08 pm
Posts: 716
Very true Mr Ball and now they can't deny it


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 11:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 10:34 pm
Posts: 3553
Snowy wrote:
ed-t-ball wrote:
Corbyn stood in parliament and identified Putin's influence in and funding of the Tory party over 4 years ago and the Tories lied and denied.
It's a fact.

Corbyn said....... :laugh: :laugh:
Ok state the fact, just because you say it’s a fact proves nothing.
Corbyn and his ex Diane Abbot are blaming NATO for the problem, really ?



NATO are the aggressors wtf!! It does you make you wonder what planet them two and their supporters are from. sctatchinghead


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 12:05 pm 
Online

Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 12365
Sussex UK wrote:
Snowy wrote:
ed-t-ball wrote:
Corbyn stood in parliament and identified Putin's influence in and funding of the Tory party over 4 years ago and the Tories lied and denied.
It's a fact.

Corbyn said....... :laugh: :laugh:
Ok state the fact, just because you say it’s a fact proves nothing.
Corbyn and his ex Diane Abbot are blaming NATO for the problem, really ?



NATO are the aggressors wtf!! It does you make you wonder what planet them two and their supporters are from. sctatchinghead


What do you expect from a bunch of Marxists.
Corbyn's lot would have responded with sanctions on Ukraine. I can never fathom out why the marxists in this country don't go and live in this land of milk and honey, especially now as their marxist friends in Russia are rapidly running out of friends elsewhere.

_________________
Come on Pools


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 12:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37440
ed-t-ball wrote:
He said it on record in the House of Commons. That is a fact.

Just because he said it, doesn’t make it a fact.
By ‘facts’ I mean details, not supposition or wishful thinking.
Just imagine if he’d won the election, ......on second thoughts, best not, phew!!

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 1:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2015 12:08 pm
Posts: 716
Corbyn is an irrelevant argument, he's not in power , however, a Conservative Party that has funded elections with Russian money is very much in power. They are lucky that the vast majority of people are coming together including most of Parliament


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 1:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 4:44 pm
Posts: 3294
Location: Cloud 9
Snowy wrote:
ed-t-ball wrote:
He said it on record in the House of Commons. That is a fact.

Just because he said it, doesn’t make it a fact.
By ‘facts’ I mean details, not supposition or wishful thinking.
Just imagine if he’d won the election, ......on second thoughts, best not, phew!!


Can't you read?

_________________
"We Londoners pride ourselves on not being impressed by anything except the annual visit of Hartlepool's fans" David Hepworth of Mirror Sport on Saturday.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 1:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2015 11:45 pm
Posts: 2002
27...now its boris and russian collusion ?...oh ffs...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDWulaHN55s


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 2:45 pm 
Online

Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 12365
poolie1 wrote:
27...now its boris and russian collusion ?...oh ffs...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDWulaHN55s


My wife said when it all started " I wonder how long it will take for the usual thickos call to have all of the blame for this to be dumped at the door of number 10".
This is the problem with marxists, they think the rest of us are as dumb and gullible as they are, which is probably a good thing because god forbid the day when ordinary Brits see them as a possible regime.
Both the Russian and Chinese regimes (and you can chuck the North Koreans in the pot) exist because the people are oppressed and are never allowed an alternative. Hundreds, probably more like thousands, are being arrested all over Russia as we speak for daring to question the actions of their leaders. The same leaders who have vast sums of money squirreled away. These people have more capital than the capitalists.
Imagine the rage emanating from the marxists in this country if their right to peaceful protest was greeted with mass arrest. Guess who would be pretesting at the front......yes you've got it....Corbyn and Abbott.
Forty two faced hypocrites.

_________________
Come on Pools


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 3:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2015 11:45 pm
Posts: 2002
pacifist appeasement in the face of fascist aggression...will we ever learn....

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/wha ... t-ukraine-


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 4:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37440
ed-t-ball wrote:
Snowy wrote:
ed-t-ball wrote:
He said it on record in the House of Commons. That is a fact.

Just because he said it, doesn’t make it a fact.
By ‘facts’ I mean details, not supposition or wishful thinking.
Just imagine if he’d won the election, ......on second thoughts, best not, phew!!


Can't you read?

I’ll try it slowly...... JUST BECAUSE JEREMY SAYS SOMETHING DOESN’T MEAN YOU HAVE TO BELIEVE IT.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 4:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37440
Poolie27 wrote:
Corbyn is an irrelevant argument.........

Ah , common ground at last.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 6:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2015 12:08 pm
Posts: 716
Poolie 1 I didn't say collusion at all just dirty money at the top of our political system , as for fuckwit ......


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 6:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2015 11:45 pm
Posts: 2002
27..."a Conservative Party that has funded elections with Russian money"..this is what you said..you have a problem with your short term memory pal ?...a common fuckwit characteristic i'm afraid...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 6:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2015 12:08 pm
Posts: 716
At least I'm not a fool , you need a bit of class my friend


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 7:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37440
‘A bit of class sctatchinghead dear, oh dear.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 7:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2015 11:45 pm
Posts: 2002
27...."At least I'm not a fool".....your opinion ....which you are entitled to "my friend"....... :doh:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 7:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2015 12:08 pm
Posts: 716
Embarrassing.....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 7:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2015 11:45 pm
Posts: 2002
27...."embarrassing"? ....absolutely....but dont be too hard on yourself.....you'll get over it eventually...especially with your powers of recall.. :doh:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What's the chances
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 8:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 10:34 pm
Posts: 3553
poolie1 wrote:
pacifist appeasement in the face of fascist aggression...will we ever learn....

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/wha ... t-ukraine-





Macron has seized a russian ship in the channel,we just need to get corbyn and his gullible supporters on it..


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 130 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: BansteadPoolie, bobby lemonade, charltonclive, derwent, Essex poolie, Ethel Cardew, Flying Hogans, Freaky Teeth, Gibo1991, Grayhoundend, JBPoolie, JohnnyMars, jumbodabber, Kettering Poolie, Manchester Exile, Mctee1908, nbthree3, Ozzy Saltburn, pollyo, Poolie_on_Tyne, pools85, Pooly_Imp, PTID, Roy Hogan's Wig, Snailwood2, Splod, stupoolie, UKP and 227 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.