Pooly_Imp wrote:Can we have the football separate from the politics again please? Preferably with the politics not on an open forum. Everyone can still participate in what they want to and you won't have to change the way you moderate (not asking for that). What do you think? Any chance?
Flying Hogans wrote:Pooly_Imp wrote:
The real argument for not having a stand alone politics area of The Bunker is that it would die on it's arse in no time.
Flying Hogans wrote:Pooly_Imp wrote:Can we have the football separate from the politics again please? Preferably with the politics not on an open forum. Everyone can still participate in what they want to and you won't have to change the way you moderate (not asking for that). What do you think? Any chance?
The 'you don't have to read them' argument will be along any minute and it's absolutely true.
It's equally true that most of the people who come on here to make a comment about Pools or the ownership saga don't use it to exchange poltical opinions. Maybe because there's loads of other places where you can do that?
This is the only forum where any Poolie can come on (without a private invitation) to agree or disagree with other Poolies about the only thing that unites us all - we support this football club.
The real argument for not having a stand alone politics area of The Bunker is that it would die on it's arse in no time.
Snowy wrote:If it’s going to be a football only forum with the other stuff separate, this place will be like a ghost town….like a lot of the boards who operate like that…lots of activity pre and post match then dead…good territory for obsessives but boring to human beings.
If you don't like the political stuff don’t read the political stuff, don’t read anything you ain’t interested in…it’s like saying get rid of electric sockets you can get a shock if you stick your todger in …well don’t stick it in then.
I hope it’s nowt to do with a certain Party’s followers getting a bit twitchy because they get hammered on here on a regular basis for being totally useless….and losing the plot.
Call me suspicious, but nowt surprise'sme.
Snowy wrote:I believe people can express any view (within reason) providing people don’t resort to vile or abusive language, …. but one man’s opinion is as valid as another man’s opinion..whether either one is correct is in the hands of the Gods..
PTID wrote:Be like a panto at the moment with the dearth of info or meaningful matches - "the new keepers shite" "oh no he isn't" ......
I'm sure once the season kicks off the majority of threads will be about football, club ownership, etc
Pooly_Imp wrote:Snowy wrote:I believe people can express any view (within reason) providing people don’t resort to vile or abusive language, …. but one man’s opinion is as valid as another man’s opinion..whether either one is correct is in the hands of the Gods..
Didn't ask for any of that to stop, just for it to be separate and perhaps private. It gets toxic. That's why no other clubs mix it up. I've checked out loads of forums looking for the opposition view on things and none of that is in there.
Snowy wrote:Pooly_Imp wrote:Snowy wrote:I believe people can express any view (within reason) providing people don’t resort to vile or abusive language, …. but one man’s opinion is as valid as another man’s opinion..whether either one is correct is in the hands of the Gods..
Didn't ask for any of that to stop, just for it to be separate and perhaps private. It gets toxic. That's why no other clubs mix it up. I've checked out loads of forums looking for the opposition view on things and none of that is in there.
Football itself can get really toxic too, do we quarantine that as well.
If you are going to put different topics under different headings what’s the difference between how it is now, it’s still under a different heading that needn’t be read….putting on a separate forum would change nothing, it would still be accessible, unless you ban it completely.
PTID wrote:Or we might get less, who knows?
Smokin Joe wrote:Sorry but this proposed initiative smacks of 'Cancellation Culture' at its worst.
Pooly_Imp wrote:Snowy wrote:Pooly_Imp wrote:Snowy wrote:
It’s how most forums do it. Football discussions get nowhere near as bad. We might even get more contributers if things stick to the football.
Snowy wrote:I believe people can express any view (within reason) providing people don’t resort to vile or abusive language, …. but one man’s opinion is as valid as another man’s opinion..whether either one is correct is in the hands of the Gods..
Jamie1952 wrote:Snowy wrote:I believe people can express any view (within reason) providing people don’t resort to vile or abusive language, …. but one man’s opinion is as valid as another man’s opinion..whether either one is correct is in the hands of the Gods..
Or your hands Snowy,
Snowy wrote:Pooly_Imp wrote:Snowy wrote:Pooly_Imp wrote:Snowy wrote:
It’s how most forums do it. Football discussions get nowhere near as bad. We might even get more contributers if things stick to the football.
Doesn’t get ‘nowhere near as bad’…..so we’d attract more people…..?….. which usually boils down to a two sided slogathon about whose right and whose wrong…sounds like politics of football to me.
Sounds tedious to me….just more people doubling up to choose point 1 or point 2 but about football.
I doubt you’ll get more, are people that timid they’re put off by politics….nah.
Pooly_Imp wrote:
You're thinking about it far too much. It’s the political windbagerry and 'edgey' stuff separated from the football. That's it.
Pooly_Imp wrote:Political threads have praised Tommy Robinson, said that black players shouldn't play for England and that Muslims. There's one fans forum in the country where that could be mixed in directly and openly with what people think of the new left back. That is no kind of normal.
Snowy wrote:Pooly_Imp wrote:Political threads have praised Tommy Robinson, said that black players shouldn't play for England and that Muslims. There's one fans forum in the country where that could be mixed in directly and openly with what people think of the new left back. That is no kind of normal.
So everyone has to suffer because the odd post is offensive to others…?
If it’s illegal the moderators should remove it , but one man’s offence taken is another man’s point of view …so it’s a balancing act most of the time….. and if it became all football, that same attitude would be apparent with football comments which can be quite offensive too and the perpetrators are oblivious to their own offence they give out.
Stocksfield_Poolie wrote:Whatever happened to the good old saying "Sticks and Stones...."
Stocksfield_Poolie wrote:Whatever happened to the good old saying "Sticks and Stones...."
PTID wrote:It's as true today as it was the day it was first said. Hurty words never hurt as much as physical violence do they?
It's people funding offense in almost anything said or done that they disagree with that is bollocks.
Pooly_Imp wrote:Can we have the football separate from the politics again please? Preferably with the politics not on an open forum. Everyone can still participate in what they want to and you won't have to change the way you moderate (not asking for that). What do you think? Any chance?
Pooly_Imp wrote:PTID wrote:It's as true today as it was the day it was first said. Hurty words never hurt as much as physical violence do they?
It's people funding offense in almost anything said or done that they disagree with that is bollocks.
Thanks Mr Expert on everything.
derwent wrote:Pooly_Imp wrote:Can we have the football separate from the politics again please? Preferably with the politics not on an open forum. Everyone can still participate in what they want to and you won't have to change the way you moderate (not asking for that). What do you think? Any chance?
Discussions about current affairs which affect all of our lives are on the lips of most people these days and seeing those topics appear on here is no surprise and realistically the topics are expected.
As long as the topics or posts are legal and don't threaten the forum or it's members then they are legitimate. The normal response to your request Mr Imp is if you don't want to read or discuss certain topics then you are free to ignore them.
you are also free to find another forum more suitable to your personal tastes and beliefs.
Ever since it's inception this forum has included political comment, debate or argument. It's not new and I suspect there is a bit of embarrassment around when people who put their faith in Starmer and his Government realise they are getting change but not exactly the change they expected.
I don't want to see or encourage different departments to appear simply because individuals or indeed groups dislike what they are reading.
Whilst I respect your request and your right to express it, I feel it is not in the best interests of the forum to follow your suggestion. That is my judgement as moderator but you are free to approach the owner as always.
derwent wrote:Pooly_Imp wrote:PTID wrote:It's as true today as it was the day it was first said. Hurty words never hurt as much as physical violence do they?
It's people funding offense in almost anything said or done that they disagree with that is bollocks.
Thanks Mr Expert on everything.
Now now Mr Imp, no need to lower the tone. There is no record on here even suggesting Mr PTID considers he knows everything. Argue your case by all means but please allow others to disagree with you without getting personal about it.
Pooly_Imp wrote:Stocksfield_Poolie wrote:Whatever happened to the good old saying "Sticks and Stones...."
Its meaningless like a lot of old bollocks phrases.
Pooly_Imp wrote:PTID wrote:It's as true today as it was the day it was first said. Hurty words never hurt as much as physical violence do they?
It's people funding offense in almost anything said or done that they disagree with that is bollocks.
Thanks Mr Expert on everything.
Pooly_Imp wrote:derwent wrote:Pooly_Imp wrote:Can we have the football separate from the politics again please? Preferably with the politics not on an open forum. Everyone can still participate in what they want to and you won't have to change the way you moderate (not asking for that). What do you think? Any chance?
Discussions about current affairs which affect all of our lives are on the lips of most people these days and seeing those topics appear on here is no surprise and realistically the topics are expected.
As long as the topics or posts are legal and don't threaten the forum or it's members then they are legitimate. The normal response to your request Mr Imp is if you don't want to read or discuss certain topics then you are free to ignore them.
you are also free to find another forum more suitable to your personal tastes and beliefs.
Ever since it's inception this forum has included political comment, debate or argument. It's not new and I suspect there is a bit of embarrassment around when people who put their faith in Starmer and his Government realise they are getting change but not exactly the change they expected.
I don't want to see or encourage different departments to appear simply because individuals or indeed groups dislike what they are reading.
Whilst I respect your request and your right to express it, I feel it is not in the best interests of the forum to follow your suggestion. That is my judgement as moderator but you are free to approach the owner as always.
Well thanks for responding. You're off the mark with me and Starmer. I'm like Snowy, it doesn't matter what colour the rosette on the chest. Go for who you think is least shit. I do advocate ignoring what you don't want to read. Unfortunately there are many in here who seem incapable, perhaps it's a more complex filtering skill than I imagined. I thought perhaps compartmentalising subjects might help. It works for many many others. The willingness to have quite extreme views expressed openly alongside quite innocent Pools related matters that outsiders can, will and do freely access is weird. You won't find it elsewhere, probably for good reason. Of course the old dinosaurs are going to reject change. Its in their nature and it is they who are doing the windbagging. But you're right, I AM free to find a forum elsewhere or even not at all. I would suggest that as it's the same old buggers (said not in a particularly unfriendly way) doing the same old gum bumping that many are choosing the latter.
Grayhoundend wrote:Pooly_Imp wrote:derwent wrote:Pooly_Imp wrote:Can we have the football separate from the politics again please? Preferably with the politics not on an open forum. Everyone can still participate in what they want to and you won't have to change the way you moderate (not asking for that). What do you think? Any chance?
Discussions about current affairs which affect all of our lives are on the lips of most people these days and seeing those topics appear on here is no surprise and realistically the topics are expected.
As long as the topics or posts are legal and don't threaten the forum or it's members then they are legitimate. The normal response to your request Mr Imp is if you don't want to read or discuss certain topics then you are free to ignore them.
you are also free to find another forum more suitable to your personal tastes and beliefs.
Ever since it's inception this forum has included political comment, debate or argument. It's not new and I suspect there is a bit of embarrassment around when people who put their faith in Starmer and his Government realise they are getting change but not exactly the change they expected.
I don't want to see or encourage different departments to appear simply because individuals or indeed groups dislike what they are reading.
Whilst I respect your request and your right to express it, I feel it is not in the best interests of the forum to follow your suggestion. That is my judgement as moderator but you are free to approach the owner as always.
Well thanks for responding. You're off the mark with me and Starmer. I'm like Snowy, it doesn't matter what colour the rosette on the chest. Go for who you think is least shit. I do advocate ignoring what you don't want to read. Unfortunately there are many in here who seem incapable, perhaps it's a more complex filtering skill than I imagined. I thought perhaps compartmentalising subjects might help. It works for many many others. The willingness to have quite extreme views expressed openly alongside quite innocent Pools related matters that outsiders can, will and do freely access is weird. You won't find it elsewhere, probably for good reason. Of course the old dinosaurs are going to reject change. Its in their nature and it is they who are doing the windbagging. But you're right, I AM free to find a forum elsewhere or even not at all. I would suggest that as it's the same old buggers (said not in a particularly unfriendly way) doing the same old gum bumping that many are choosing the latter.
May be thats why the Bunker is unique
Pooly_Imp wrote:derwent wrote:Pooly_Imp wrote:PTID wrote:It's as true today as it was the day it was first said. Hurty words never hurt as much as physical violence do they?
It's people funding offense in almost anything said or done that they disagree with that is bollocks.
Thanks Mr Expert on everything.
Now now Mr Imp, no need to lower the tone. There is no record on here even suggesting Mr PTID considers he knows everything. Argue your case by all means but please allow others to disagree with you without getting personal about it.
Look closer, look longer, look between the lines.
Pooly_Imp wrote:Grayhoundend wrote:Pooly_Imp wrote:derwent wrote:Pooly_Imp wrote:Can we have the football separate from the politics again please? Preferably with the politics not on an open forum. Everyone can still participate in what they want to and you won't have to change the way you moderate (not asking for that). What do you think? Any chance?
Discussions about current affairs which affect all of our lives are on the lips of most people these days and seeing those topics appear on here is no surprise and realistically the topics are expected.
As long as the topics or posts are legal and don't threaten the forum or it's members then they are legitimate. The normal response to your request Mr Imp is if you don't want to read or discuss certain topics then you are free to ignore them.
you are also free to find another forum more suitable to your personal tastes and beliefs.
Ever since it's inception this forum has included political comment, debate or argument. It's not new and I suspect there is a bit of embarrassment around when people who put their faith in Starmer and his Government realise they are getting change but not exactly the change they expected.
I don't want to see or encourage different departments to appear simply because individuals or indeed groups dislike what they are reading.
Whilst I respect your request and your right to express it, I feel it is not in the best interests of the forum to follow your suggestion. That is my judgement as moderator but you are free to approach the owner as always.
Well thanks for responding. You're off the mark with me and Starmer. I'm like Snowy, it doesn't matter what colour the rosette on the chest. Go for who you think is least shit. I do advocate ignoring what you don't want to read. Unfortunately there are many in here who seem incapable, perhaps it's a more complex filtering skill than I imagined. I thought perhaps compartmentalising subjects might help. It works for many many others. The willingness to have quite extreme views expressed openly alongside quite innocent Pools related matters that outsiders can, will and do freely access is weird. You won't find it elsewhere, probably for good reason. Of course the old dinosaurs are going to reject change. Its in their nature and it is they who are doing the windbagging. But you're right, I AM free to find a forum elsewhere or even not at all. I would suggest that as it's the same old buggers (said not in a particularly unfriendly way) doing the same old gum bumping that many are choosing the latter.
May be thats why the Bunker is unique
Uniquely what though?
Stocksfield_Poolie wrote:You can move the threads anywhere you like, they will still end up involving a debate between Snowy and Jamie!
Return to The Ripper & Monkeybutt Forum
Dodgepots browsing this forum: Essex poolie, Johnjo1, Pigeonace1, PTID, Smokin Joe, stevven, Trefre and 673 guests