Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Tue Jul 22, 2025 3:13 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 

Who'd you prefer
Chris Turner 16%  16%  [ 6 ]
Neale Cooper 84%  84%  [ 31 ]
Total votes : 37
Author Message
 Post subject: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 3:04 am
Posts: 1723
I know this is pointless poll but who would you prefer as manager.

_________________
SING YER HEARTS OUT FOR THE LADS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:28 pm 
We don't have a manager so anybody who has a track record and mr Director of whatever it is can go back upstairs..

Turner got tactics wrong tonight and its time for him to start looking at himself


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
I would prefer Chip Fireball for manager.

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:31 pm 
Mr blobby would be a good candidate


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
tigro wrote:
Mr blobby would be a good candidate


An improvement anyway :shock:

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:58 pm 
Grave wrote:
tigro wrote:
Mr blobby would be a good candidate


An improvement anyway :shock:


clappp

who the hell chose turner over cooper? sctatchinghead


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 2:04 pm
Posts: 2361
Location: The Town End
sorry :uhoh:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:42 pm
Posts: 6592
Location: Hartlepool - for now....
Are we going to harp on about Cooper for fukking ever?

I liked the bloke but going on about him all the time is pointless. We have had a steady start, Turner deserves at least until the fa cup 1st round is over and done with before we start being hyper critical? Lets give the bloke a fair chance - can we?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 10:05 pm 
Jonny wrote:
Are we going to harp on about Cooper for fukking ever?

I liked the bloke but going on about him all the time is pointless. We have had a steady start, Turner deserves at least until the fa cup 1st round is over and done with before we start being hyper critical? Lets give the bloke a fair chance - can we?


No? sctatchinghead


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 10:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
Jonny wrote:
Are we going to harp on about Cooper for fukking ever?

I liked the bloke but going on about him all the time is pointless. We have had a steady start, Turner deserves at least until the fa cup 1st round is over and done with before we start being hyper critical? Lets give the bloke a fair chance - can we?


Turner should have until late October/early November. He needs to start getting some consistency from the team.

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 10:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:40 pm
Posts: 3561
Location: Still trying to find myself
Even if all was forgiven and Cooper came back tomorrow, what are the chances he could do the same this time around?


I'd still pick him above Turner though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 12:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm
Posts: 22671
It's a crying shame that he didn't get thes support he needed when he was here.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 12:49 am 
Grave wrote:
Jonny wrote:
Are we going to harp on about Cooper for fukking ever?

I liked the bloke but going on about him all the time is pointless. We have had a steady start, Turner deserves at least until the fa cup 1st round is over and done with before we start being hyper critical? Lets give the bloke a fair chance - can we?


Turner should have until late October/early November. He needs to start getting some consistency from the team.



You were wank ing yoursen daft about CT and the team last week and sucking up to all and sundry to gain bumhole points

But now you are back to normal

Praise the Lord, I thought these painkillers were sending me bandy!


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 12:50 am 
They are!!!! :laugh: :laugh:

:wink: :grin:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 7:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 3:04 am
Posts: 1723
Jonny wrote:
Are we going to harp on about Cooper for fukking ever?

I liked the bloke but going on about him all the time is pointless. We have had a steady start, Turner deserves at least until the fa cup 1st round is over and done with before we start being hyper critical? Lets give the bloke a fair chance - can we?


Well Turner's getting a fair crack of the whip as far as I'm concerned. His record with the other two clubs he has managed speaks volumes.

FFS Would you hire someone who managed to get sacked from his other two jobs due to incompetence and then put him in charge stpid .

He wouldn't even need to be sacked just moved back upstairs..

Get some one in who actually achieved something with the club.

The feel good factor would return and maybe just maybe the crowds.

But that would mean Uncle Ken having to admit he wrong in sacking the guy in the first place and I don't think that would ever happen.

I know its a "what if" but imagine what we may have achieved if Cooper hadn't been sacked ..
,

_________________
SING YER HEARTS OUT FOR THE LADS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
yeah we probably would have got beat and not got into the playoffs at all :wink:

oh and turner has had 3 clubs, not 2, its only fair you use the full picture not just the wanky bits to prove your point

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 3:04 am
Posts: 1723
Ok then if we're dealing with truths hes had four and three out of the four haven't been of the required standard ie. the last three times he's been a manager he hasn't achieved much...

Lets face it hes only the manager now by default but he talks to fans so must be ok.. :roll:

Do you advocate we do a Scootty and wait until Ben Clark chins him before we move him on??

_________________
SING YER HEARTS OUT FOR THE LADS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
no i simply advocate giving him a fair chance with the squad he has put together. He has another 5 weeks or so for me, if we are in or around the bottom 4 then he should bite the bullet and move aside.

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
TalbotAvenger wrote:
Grave wrote:

Turner should have until late October/early November. He needs to start getting some consistency from the team.



You were wank ing yoursen daft about CT and the team last week and sucking up to all and sundry to gain bumhole points

But now you are back to normal

Praise the Lord, I thought these painkillers were sending me bandy!


I have never been a fan of CT but I was prepared to give him some credit for some decent signings this season and a few decent results (only a few unfortunately). I think last nights game is quite damning regardless of the importance of the game. Its easy to over-react following a positive or negative performance and I think most on here have done so during the season. I think giving CT another 3 or 4 weeks will have given us and IOR plenty of opportunity to assess whether he is right for the job. If we are hovering around midtable then it would be hard to argue against him but obviously if we are around the relegation places (despite the backing he has had from IOR) then I think he should be on his way back 'upstairs'.

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
ADG wrote:
Surely the witch hunt should start on 31st October?


sctatchinghead

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:31 am 
Offline
Partially Top Guano Man
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 11:09 pm
Posts: 11204
Location: i am busy right now, can i ignore you some other time?
It pointless looking back at Cooper, or any other manager that has been in charge under IOR, they simply wont re-employ them. Some on here will ,now say, well they re-empoyed Turner, but they didn't bring him back as Manager, and ,technically, he's still only caretaker, though its now 10 month's since he was appointed as caretaker.

I said at the time I didn't think he was the man ,long term, I still don't, but I also said I would support him as Manager, until, or if, we were fighting relegation, for that reason I will still support him and his teams on a match day. How long that last's will depend on results.

I pointed out at the time that since leaving Pools in November 2002 ,he had a win ratio of 1 in 4(approx). Now although we have won 3 away games so far this season( I'm counting Coventry,before anyone says it's 2) which is an improvement on the last couple of seasons per game ratio, his win rate is now less than the 1 in 4, having lost exactly twice as many as he has won. (11 wins 22 defeats 9 draws)

It's with that win ratio percentage, that I can see why fans are now calling for his head, fans who, although they probably wont admit it, where over the moon when he was appointed caretaker manager.

The simple fact is that a lot of managers of any of the 92 clubs would be under pressure with that record, if you put it as a season it would read played 42 pts 42, 4 games of a season left and something like 3 wins out of 4 to have a chance to avoid relegation. a big ask of any team who had only managed 11 wins all the rest of the season.

I said I wanted him to prove me wrong, it looked with the points we were picking up away, he may have been on the way, but after 14 games, the jury is still out in my opinion Some people say give him till end October , 4 more games (on current win ratio it 1 win) some say end of November, 7 more games (on current win ratio possibly still only 1 win, maybe 2) some say end of December, 13 more games (on current win ratio possibly 3 wins), so come end December, 3 more wins and for good measure I will say we lose 6, (he has lost exactly twice as many as he has won in this spell as manager) so that leaves 4 games drawn. So an extra 13 points up to end of December.

Pools record would read played 24 points 25. Yes it's all hypothetical, and based simply on current win ratio statistics which we all know can change, but if that was our points tally in December , we would certainly be in the bottom 4.

So if those results were to carry on, then my support would certainly have gone by the end of this year.

_________________
I was awoken last night by Darlo fans in the street playing football with a hedgehog
I was absolutely digusted and about to call the RSPCA when the hedgehog went 1-0 up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm
Posts: 25266
I'd personally drive to scotland and go pick cooper up if that would get him back.

_________________
Michaelbarron ‏@Mickyb22
@9howie yes defo I need my mate for golf and social ‪#bessiemate


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
Yubep wrote:
I'd personally drive to scotland and go pick cooper up if that would get him back.



No.


That would scare him off.

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
Fetish_Bob wrote:
It pointless looking back at Cooper, or any other manager that has been in charge under IOR, they simply wont re-employ them. Some on here will ,now say, well they re-empoyed Turner, but they didn't bring him back as Manager, and ,technically, he's still only caretaker, though its now 10 month's since he was appointed as caretaker.

I said at the time I didn't think he was the man ,long term, I still don't, but I also said I would support him as Manager, until, or if, we were fighting relegation, for that reason I will still support him and his teams on a match day. How long that last's will depend on results.

I pointed out at the time that since leaving Pools in November 2002 ,he had a win ratio of 1 in 4(approx). Now although we have won 3 away games so far this season( I'm counting Coventry,before anyone says it's 2) which is an improvement on the last couple of seasons per game ratio, his win rate is now less than the 1 in 4, having lost exactly twice as many as he has won. (11 wins 22 defeats 9 draws)

It's with that win ratio percentage, that I can see why fans are now calling for his head, fans who, although they probably wont admit it, where over the moon when he was appointed caretaker manager.

The simple fact is that a lot of managers of any of the 92 clubs would be under pressure with that record, if you put it as a season it would read played 42 pts 42, 4 games of a season left and something like 3 wins out of 4 to have a chance to avoid relegation. a big ask of any team who had only managed 11 wins all the rest of the season.

I said I wanted him to prove me wrong, it looked with the points we were picking up away, he may have been on the way, but after 14 games, the jury is still out in my opinion Some people say give him till end October , 4 more games (on current win ratio it 1 win) some say end of November, 7 more games (on current win ratio possibly still only 1 win, maybe 2) some say end of December, 13 more games (on current win ratio possibly 3 wins), so come end December, 3 more wins and for good measure I will say we lose 6, (he has lost exactly twice as many as he has won in this spell as manager) so that leaves 4 games drawn. So an extra 13 points up to end of December.

Pools record would read played 24 points 25. Yes it's all hypothetical, and based simply on current win ratio statistics which we all know can change, but if that was our points tally in December , we would certainly be in the bottom 4.

So if those results were to carry on, then my support would certainly have gone by the end of this year.


Cracking post! clappp

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
cooper is in the past, lets remember his time fondly, but pretty pretty please move on!

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 3:04 am
Posts: 1723
misterb2001 wrote:
cooper is in the past, lets remember his time fondly, but pretty pretty please move on!



So is Turner so in your words ,"Its time to move on!" (oh and have I mentioned his record with his other clubs... )

_________________
SING YER HEARTS OUT FOR THE LADS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
turners 'good times' are certainly in the past. but uncle ken wants to give him a crack to see if he can do it again.

Maybe he will, if not lets hope both parties spot it and admit it early enough and move on.

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
Pierrepoint wrote:
misterb2001 wrote:
cooper is in the past, lets remember his time fondly, but pretty pretty please move on!



So is Turner so in your words ,"Its time to move on!" (oh and have I mentioned his record with his other clubs... )


How is Turner in the past if he's currently in charge of our first team? sctatchinghead

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:32 am 
ADG wrote:
CT has set himself up for a fall.

He has stated that this is the best squad pools have ever had. A very dangerous thing for him to say, because if we slide down the table, he will have to go.

Neale Cooper is/was the greatest manager we have had.

CT cannot compare to Cooper.

But, CT compares more than favourably with Danny Foookin Wilson, in my opinion.

Maybe we just need to be careful what we wish for.


I think that the achievements of Clough, Knowles, Murray and Turner all surpass what was done by the excellent Neale Cooper.

Clough and Knowles built quickly great teams from bad teams with very little money.

Murray had some money but built the first Pools side ever to be competitive in League One and gave us some of our greatest cup achievements.

Turner (admittedly with money) took a bloody awful side with no morale and dragged us from our lowest point- heading for certain relegation- and then built quickly a very good side, which he improved year on year.

I guess as he took us 14 points clear and got us one of our 3 promotions you could even make a case for Newell as having achieved more.

I still don't get the 20/20 rose tinted spectacles that make Cooper a genius of the standing of Ferguson or Clough.

When he was sacked it wasn't only on the player power/personal problems front. It was that combined with the fact that we had been garbage for the last 3 months and were going to miss the play-offs - a form sacking.

The real great managerial achievement at Pools in this golden, rich, IOR age is Martin Scott's. To take a good team and make it a bad team with zero morale was an incredible feat. It also had the effect of making Cooper look very good in contrast.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 12368
I think it needs to be taken into account that Cooper had two seasons in the third tier and, in both, we reached the play offs. No other manager since the old third division north days has achieved anything anywhere near that.

_________________
Come on Pools


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:30 pm
Posts: 5804
Cooper showed passion which I have never seen from a pools manager in the 30 odd years i've been going.
His post match speech would have been the opposite of what turner spoke. He'd have probably had the players on seaton beach this morning. Turners probably given them the day off.

_________________
The future has a way of arriving unannounced. In two days tomorrow will be yesterday!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm
Posts: 25266
ADG wrote:
There was a feel good factor around Cooper. When we lost, he felt it, and we felt it. He connected with the fans. I dont think the club realised just how much.

Turner is trying to get there, and he needs time.


Turner works in a results business, he will get given time if he gets the results.

The job he is in does not need great pr, it doesnt need soundbytes about this and that, it needs results.

It's as simple as that.

_________________
Michaelbarron ‏@Mickyb22
@9howie yes defo I need my mate for golf and social ‪#bessiemate


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 1:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 12368
ADG wrote:
He needs time to get results. Although, to be fair he has already got a few.

We are probably 4 points behind what would make us all comfortable. So he isnt far off.

Every defeat without wins increases the pressure though.

Friday is vital. Lose this then the natives will be a lot more than restless.

And I will argue that Turner isnt in the results business, whatever that godawful phrase means, but he is in the safey Business.

If he makes Pools safe in League one, he has done his job. Anything better is a bonus.


Surely results and safety go hand in hand sctatchinghead
We achieved safety last season, then Turner persuaded IOR to fund the acquisition of eleven new players. I think improvement to reflect IOR's investment will be expected.
I don't think IOR will be doing cartwheels over just being safe, I certainly won't. We've just had two seasons of "just being safe" and none of us cared for the experience very much.

_________________
Come on Pools


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 1:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 12368
ADG wrote:
Alright then, just how many results does he have to get?

Or does he deserve to be critisised every time we lose, even if we are top of the league?

When I said safe, I meant safe. Not dicing with death last game of the season.

So if we get to 50 points, or whatever the magic figure, by the end of March I will treat that as success.

And then I will expect him to improve on it the following season.

If we had beaten Exeter we would have been in the top 10. Just how much better than that does CT have to achieve before everyone is happy?

Surely the talk of getting rid of CT isnt based on the result of the paint pot trophy?

I am assuming that you, like the majority of Pools fans, are expecting an improvement on last season. My assumption is based on your statement above where you say that safe to you means better than scrapping for survival on the last day.
Up to press we have not made any improvement in either our points tally or our position compared with last season.


I don't think I have read anywhere on this board where anybody has said that Turner needs to go purely based on last night's result.
Most people, myself included, are sticking to the facts surrounding Mr Turner. His record in this league is atrocious and until it improves, if ever, he is going to be subjected to criticism over it. I would dare argue that Turner's record in this league, should anyone care to analyse it, would show him to be one of the worst, if not THE worst, in the history of third tier football in this country.
If he improves, as you seem to believe he will, then I will come on here and heap praise and adulation on him. Until then I am facing facts as they are, not as I would wish them to be, and would strongly recommend you do the same.

_________________
Come on Pools


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 2:21 pm 
Offline
Partially Top Guano Man
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 11:09 pm
Posts: 11204
Location: i am busy right now, can i ignore you some other time?
pde147 wrote:
ADG wrote:
CT has set himself up for a fall.

He has stated that this is the best squad pools have ever had. A very dangerous thing for him to say, because if we slide down the table, he will have to go.

Neale Cooper is/was the greatest manager we have had.

CT cannot compare to Cooper.

But, CT compares more than favourably with Danny Foookin Wilson, in my opinion.

Maybe we just need to be careful what we wish for.


I think that the achievements of Clough, Knowles, Murray and Turner all surpass what was done by the excellent Neale Cooper.

Clough and Knowles built quickly great teams from bad teams with very little money.

Murray had some money but built the first Pools side ever to be competitive in League One and gave us some of our greatest cup achievements.

Turner (admittedly with money) took a bloody awful side with no morale and dragged us from our lowest point- heading for certain relegation- and then built quickly a very good side, which he improved year on year.

I guess as he took us 14 points clear and got us one of our 3 promotions you could even make a case for Newell as having achieved more.

I still don't get the 20/20 rose tinted spectacles that make Cooper a genius of the standing of Ferguson or Clough.

When he was sacked it wasn't only on the player power/personal problems front. It was that combined with the fact that we had been garbage for the last 3 months and were going to miss the play-offs - a form sacking.

The real great managerial achievement at Pools in this golden, rich, IOR age is Martin Scott's. To take a good team and make it a bad team with zero morale was an incredible feat. It also had the effect of making Cooper look very good in contrast.


Sorry, to be pedantic, but he didn't we were 4points clear when he left, Newell got us 14 points clear.

_________________
I was awoken last night by Darlo fans in the street playing football with a hedgehog
I was absolutely digusted and about to call the RSPCA when the hedgehog went 1-0 up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 2:37 pm 
Offline
Partially Top Guano Man
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 11:09 pm
Posts: 11204
Location: i am busy right now, can i ignore you some other time?
Quote:
Like he said Bob....


Whoops misread that, would delete my reply but as you've pointed out my error it will be here for proof. I read it as Turner took us 14 points clear , my apologies.

_________________
I was awoken last night by Darlo fans in the street playing football with a hedgehog
I was absolutely digusted and about to call the RSPCA when the hedgehog went 1-0 up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: who'd you prefer as manager
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
derwent wrote:
ADG wrote:
Alright then, just how many results does he have to get?

Or does he deserve to be critisised every time we lose, even if we are top of the league?

When I said safe, I meant safe. Not dicing with death last game of the season.

So if we get to 50 points, or whatever the magic figure, by the end of March I will treat that as success.

And then I will expect him to improve on it the following season£.

If we had beaten Exeter we would have been in the top 10. Just how much better than that does CT have to achieve before everyone is happy?

Surely the talk of getting rid of CT isnt based on the result of the paint pot trophy?

I am assuming that you, like the majority of Pools fans, are expecting an improvement on last season. My assumption is based on your statement above where you say that safe to you means better than scrapping for survival on the last day.
Up to press we have not made any improvement in either our points tally or our position compared with last season.


I don't think I have read anywhere on this board where anybody has said that Turner needs to go purely based on last night's result.
Most people, myself included, are sticking to the facts surrounding Mr Turner. His record in this league is atrocious and until it improves, if ever, he is going to be subjected to criticism over it. I would dare argue that Turner's record in this league, should anyone care to analyse it, would show him to be one of the worst, if not THE worst, in the history of third tier football in this country.
If he improves, as you seem to believe he will, then I will come on here and heap praise and adulation on him. Until then I am facing facts as they are, not as I would wish them to be, and would strongly recommend you do the same.


Derwent, you talk a great deal of sense. if we had a best newcomer award then you would deserve it.

]

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: Bluestreak, charltonclive, Christaff, DCooper170, garthwd, Hawklord, Jazzmorgans123, JBPoolie, Jules, Kettering Poolie, Mctee1908, Mulvaney, Porter’s porter, PTID, Robbie10, Splod, Stocksfield_Poolie and 417 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.