Curbishley

LeicesterPoolie 2 · **Joined:** Sat Jan 17, 2009 7:20 pm **Posts:** 127

What a completely biased cockney tosser.

According to him, there was only one team on the pitch :evil:

Obafemi Obsession · **Posted:** Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:30 pm

Wanker.

Poolie of Kent · **Posted:** Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:31 pm

Yeah, even I scratched my head at a couple of points he said.

Pierrepoint · **Joined:** Sat Jan 17, 2009 3:04 am **Posts:** 1723

the biggest wånker was the one in black on the pitch...he should NEVER be allowed to tread inside Victoria Park again he is an absolute cock!!

LeicesterPoolie 2 · **Joined:** Sat Jan 17, 2009 7:20 pm **Posts:** 127

you mean the one in the black, with the green top :wink:

Pierrepoint · **Joined:** Sat Jan 17, 2009 3:04 am **Posts:** 1723

LeicesterPoolie 2 wrote:

you mean the one in the black, with the green top :wink:

I mean the referee he had no "green bits" on my TV

Yes but he is a that cockend.. Wonder if he apologises forhis cock-up AGAIN this time fookin wånker

Scooby Blue · **Joined:** Sun Mar 02, 2008 2:12 am **Posts:** 374

wasn't he the ref who sent jack ross off in the cup match at the vic with brentford a few years ago - and it was the fastest ever recinded red card - so he had another go at Ross afew weeks later at Stockport. sure this is the same one

Mute Witness · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:10 am **Posts:** 3572

Scooby Blue wrote:

wasn't he the ref who sent jack ross off in the cup match at the vic with brentford a few years ago - and it was the fastest ever recinded red card - so he had another go at Ross afew weeks later at Stockport. sure this is the same one

Dunno if it was the fastest ever recinded red card, Daly's vs. Chester was quicker I think. But you are correct on the other counts.

PoolieBarnes · **Posted:** Sat Jan 24, 2009 9:00 pm

Coincidentally Jack Ross scored today for St. Mirren.

Poolsrme · **Posted:** Sat Jan 24, 2009 9:49 pm

Jack Ross......know the name, but do we need to mention him on here :roll:

TheGingerPoolie · **Posted:** Sat Jan 24, 2009 10:06 pm

Jack Ross?

What a 'lovely lovely person'.

shepshedpoolie · **Posted:** Sat Jan 24, 2009 11:19 pm

This thread is goin off on a tangent................Alan Curbishley is a tw@t all he did was run pools down. Typical southern biased television coverage imo.

Montpoolier · **Posted:** Mon Jan 26, 2009 1:33 pm

Well, despite one or two factual errors about Hartlepool, I thought the commentary was remarkably uncondescending, nowhere near as insulting as the commentary on Southend's replay against Chelsea for example.
The commentators spoke as though they were expecting more from Pools, much as if they were criticising a Premiership side. The main talker said repeatedly that we needed just that extra bit of quality and he was damnned right. He refrained from using clichés like "overachieving", "giving the Privilegedship giants a run for their money", or "brave performance".

I reckon anyone who complains about Saturday's commentary has a bit of an persecution complex to be honest.

Freaky Teeth · **Posted:** Mon Jan 26, 2009 1:38 pm

Richard Head wrote:

Well, despite one or two factual errors about Hartlepool, I thought the commentary was remarkably uncondescending, nowhere near as insulting as the commentary on Southend's replay against Chelsea for example.
The commentators spoke as though they were expecting more from Pools, much as if they were criticising a Premiership side. The main talker said repeatedly that we needed just that extra bit of quality and he was damnned right. He refrained from using clichés like "overachieving", "giving the Privilegedship giants a run for their money", or "brave performance".

I reckon anyone who complains about Saturday's commentary has a bit of an persecution complex to be honest.

Just what i thought :grin:

Also said Pools was a very well run club and had been very welcoming over the last 48 hours clappp

And said Hartlepool was a great place and great place to live :shock:

TalbotAvenger · **Posted:** Mon Jan 26, 2009 1:40 pm

Richard Head wrote:

Well, despite one or two factual errors about Hartlepool, I thought the commentary was remarkably uncondescending, nowhere near as insulting as the commentary on Southend's replay against Chelsea for example.
The commentators spoke as though they were expecting more from Pools, much as if they were criticising a Premiership side. The main talker said repeatedly that we needed just that extra bit of quality and he was damnned right. He refrained from using clichés like "overachieving", "giving the Privilegedship giants a run for their money", or "brave performance".

I reckon anyone who complains about Saturday's commentary has a bit of an persecution complex to be honest.

Well according to that bin dipper on setanata, Hartlepool weren't 'hammered', but were well beaten

The closing statement of a cock of the highest order

Curbishley

Gadgies online