Yesterday parking, today swearing

ptbap · **Posted:** Fri Jan 18, 2008 1:19 pm

http://www.hartlepoolmail.co.uk/news/Ob ... 3685805.jp

In my opinion, this case was a complete waste of tax payers money and only went to court so the police can justify their large presence at football games.

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Fri Jan 18, 2008 2:25 pm

Exactly Mr.Bap....the 2 arrests that day were definetly done to justify there presence!!!! :evil:

The lad in question is a very quiet lad....who doesn't swear at Football matches????

And why the need to photograph him coming out of Court????

It's all the shoplifting druggy burgaling mugging smackrats that should be photographed but very rarely have their photos in The Mail!!!! :evil:

We should be made aware of the kunts....not someone who 'swore' at a Football match!!!! :evil:

Frank????

Mr Ripper · **Posted:** Fri Jan 18, 2008 2:52 pm

What a load of toss.

Should never have been lifted never mind ended up in court.

Exactly what laws would you be breaking if you were to blow up Hartlepool Police Station with a big fat bomb?

mouldy old dough · **Posted:** Fri Jan 18, 2008 3:25 pm

Liam is A great lad stands near me at the game never in any bother always got a smile on his kipper on that day he shouted at leeds fans who were doing the same big deal .

yloop · **Posted:** Fri Jan 18, 2008 3:25 pm

I walked past when that happened, another example of the police justifying their presence. Perhaps they should be in town arresting the smackheads who accost people for money

Saladswerver · **Joined:** Mon Sep 04, 2006 7:08 pm **Posts:** 194

i would just like to say that after speaking to lliam half of the stuff that was said in court didnt happen...he did not get a warning.. did not walk away ....he swore a couple of times which he admitted and apologised as soon as he was pulled up by the police....im thinking of making an official complaint as i believe the officer has added stuff that didnt happen....by the way i am his dad

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:42 pm

I hope the Musker who arrested him was proud of him/herself!!!! :evil:

dawlishmonkey · **Joined:** Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:53 am **Posts:** 1588

whats a victim surcharge then? and who was the victim in this case?

Saladswerver · **Joined:** Mon Sep 04, 2006 7:08 pm **Posts:** 194

MutleyRules wrote:

I hope the Musker who arrested him was proud of him/herself!!!! :evil:

the musker in question admitted he was a leeds fan...and he was based in redcar

GroovyCrimes · **Posted:** Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:57 pm

I would love to see you make a successful complaint.
I wont condone hooliganism,but there are too many unjustified arrests these days & the police know they can get away with it because anyone at football is deemed guilty before we start.

katcha · **Posted:** Fri Jan 18, 2008 6:03 pm

most police statements say the same and just the name and the crime are different

appeal - they have cctv - marry it up to the event

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Fri Jan 18, 2008 11:19 pm

GroovyCrimes wrote:

I wont condone hooliganism.

Well Aye!!!! :roll:

mouldy old dough · **Posted:** Sat Jan 19, 2008 1:53 pm

Just to let you all know Liam swore again last night at the match but i'll hazzard a guess he was not the only one. rolfl

Yesterday parking, today swearing

Gadgies online