Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Thu Aug 07, 2025 6:28 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: Football League Approval
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 11:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2015 11:30 am
Posts: 11
Football League approval HAS been given to TMH contrary to the inaccurate Mail and Echo reports. This takeover has been ready to be finalised for days but certain people continually obstruct it being finished.........read into that what you may.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Football League Approval
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 11:15 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:40 pm
Posts: 3561
Location: Still trying to find myself
Where have you got this info from then?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Football League Approval
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 11:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am
Posts: 20758
Thanks Peter.

_________________
I'd recommend a more stealthy plan than googling 'afternoon tea dog'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Football League Approval
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 11:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:23 am
Posts: 514
yeh, ok then. Thanks for that.
Have you had the ceremonial bunker welcome yet? If not, I suspect you'll get it in this thread!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Football League Approval
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 11:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 3:32 pm
Posts: 6817
gateway wrote:
Football League approval HAS been given to TMH contrary to the inaccurate Mail and Echo reports. This takeover has been ready to be finalised for days but certain people continually obstruct it being finished.........read into that what you may.


Marvellous.

And you join to tell us this just after the window closes.

How very very convenient.

_________________
Actually, my name is contrary fat twat. Dinnertime is my middle name. Does that make you HORNY?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Football League Approval
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 11:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:09 pm
Posts: 300
Say this was the case (I don't for a second believe it is) why would the FA refuse to comment? If everything had gone through, surely the FA would've commented.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Football League Approval
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 11:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:23 am
Posts: 514
And why wouldn't Pools release a statement stating everything was going through weeks ago?
There was never a takeover.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Football League Approval
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 11:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 11:25 am
Posts: 382
Location: Back of Beyond
Bearing in mind Gateway is blaming Ken / Russ for the hold up then this doesn't support the scam theory.

It is either:

a) total bollox from someone just wanting to cause a nuisance
b) total bollox from someone linked to TMH justifying why the deal wasn't / isn't going to be finalised
c) true and TMH are credible with Russ/Ken either wanting to get the best deal for them or for the club

Obviously I want it to be c) and don't really care if Russ/Ken are looking after their own or the clubs best interests as long as it goes through.

Won't hold my breath though as if FL approval had been given I guess they would have confirmed this rather than refusing to comment.

_________________
Blue blooded to the end!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Football League Approval
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 11:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 11:25 am
Posts: 382
Location: Back of Beyond
Sorry chaps, you beat me to it!

_________________
Blue blooded to the end!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Football League Approval
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 11:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:23 am
Posts: 514
The thing is, if FL approval had gone through, there would be nothing stopping Harris going to the Mail or Echo and giving his story.
But he hasn't gone public has he? But we know why don't we.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Football League Approval
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 11:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 11:25 am
Posts: 382
Location: Back of Beyond
kev_hufc wrote:
And why wouldn't Pools release a statement stating everything was going through weeks ago?
There was never a takeover.


To be fair it would be entirely in line with Ken's usual PR, no comment until he is ready / deal in done.

Don't believe there was never a takeover although how credible it is/as is open to debate.

As Gateway is blaming Ken/Russ then clearly he/she is not part of the scam conspiracy.

Could still of course be total bollox.

_________________
Blue blooded to the end!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Football League Approval
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 11:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 11:25 am
Posts: 382
Location: Back of Beyond
kev_hufc wrote:
The thing is, if FL approval had gone through, there would be nothing stopping Harris going to the Mail or Echo and giving his story.
But he hasn't gone public has he? But we know why don't we.


Not saying it is true but the only legitimate reason would be that they all have agreed not to comment until the deal is done.

Again this could be total bollox as we are all being kept in the dark.

When we do all emerge into the light lets hope it is the promised land rather than eternal hell and damnation!

I'm not planning to pack a coat!

_________________
Blue blooded to the end!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Football League Approval
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 12:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:23 am
Posts: 514
Let's look at it from a slightly different angle then, and i'm not saying I do believe a word of what gateway has posted, but let's pretend for a second that I do....
Is gateway blaming Ken and Russ? There's nothing in his post actually saying they are the individuals to blame.
What if the "certain people continually obstruct it being finished" are those from TMH2014?
Why, I wouldn't know, this is why I don't believe any of it because it just sounds like a complete made up story with no evidence to back it up.
I truly believe that if anything was really going ahead, there would be club representatives making statements answering to everyone on social media about this 'takeover' Why would they want negative press when there was to be a positive outcome? No company in their right minds would want that, it makes them look bad unnecessarily.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Football League Approval
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 12:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:23 am
Posts: 514
I've just spotted gateways first post (another thread) where he does blame Ken & Russ.
So scrap the first bit of what I've just said!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Football League Approval
PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2015 3:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:09 pm
Posts: 300
gateway wrote:
Football League approval HAS been given to TMH contrary to the inaccurate Mail and Echo reports. This takeover has been ready to be finalised for days but certain people continually obstruct it being finished.........read into that what you may.


.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: Arthurpoolie, Bazil, bobby lemonade, Brian Honour's Left Foot, charlesI, charltonclive, Darylmore, DrPool, dstanley5, dykey, Gerry Mandrake, JBPoolie, JohnnyMars, Jules, jumbodabber, Manchester Exile, Ozzy Saltburn, pollyo, PTID, Snailwood2, stupoolie, Warwick Hunt and 292 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.