But can those who dont attend the game on Tuesday night refrain from having a go at Wilson and the team between 745 pm and approx 2140pm.

If you cant be bothered to attend the game, or cant go for whatever other reason, at least wait until people who have attended give their opinions on the game.

I not asking people to stop posting opinions, I just think that coming on here or any other forum for that matter, having digs at formations, player positions and substitutions when not even bothering to support the team,and the game is still in progress, is of no relevance. Posting scores, etc I dont have a problem with, but posting negative opinions , ( I may be surprised, if winning they may just be positive postings) is in my opinion out of order, no problem with them at the end of the game at least then others who have attended may actually give an insight into what happened in the 90 minutes.

It just a thought, though I think I have more chance of the Pope coming out in favour of contraception.

I can understand what you're saying Bob. But people can still have opinions during the match, due to the fact that they are listening to commentary, coming live from the match, that is giving them a good insight into how the team are playing.

***** Newsflash******Newsflash*******Newsflash******

Invention called 'The Wireless' will allow people who don't attend to garner an opinion on the match

***** Newsflash******Newsflash*******Newsflash******

Invention called 'The Wireless' will allow people who don't attend to garner an opinion on the match[/quote]

FURTHER NEWSFLASH......................WHAT IT GIVES IS SOMEONE ELSES OPINION THAT PEOPLE LISTENING TO IT THEN GIVE AN OPINION ON.

I been at games then read reports/listened to radio interviews, and come to the conclusion that I was at a different game. So any opinion based on radio/Poolsworld is on someone elses opinion. So why not wait till fans who have ATTENDED the game give their opinions. Not a lot of difference really, a FANS POINT OF VIEW, or a RADIO COMMENTATORS VIEW.

..but you get 100 different opinions, if we got beat 6-0 we'd have some still saying it was brilliant performance.

FURTHER NEWSFLASH......................WHAT IT GIVES IS SOMEONE ELSES OPINION THAT PEOPLE LISTENING TO IT THEN GIVE AN OPINION ON.

I been at games then read reports/listened to radio interviews, and come to the conclusion that I was at a different game. So any opinion based on radio/Poolsworld is on someone elses opinion. So why not wait till fans who have ATTENDED the game give their opinions. Not a lot of difference really, a FANS POINT OF VIEW, or a RADIO COMMENTATORS VIEW.[/quote]

If we wait for fans opinions, rather than commentators opinions, it's much the same, but if we can't or don't want to be there, it's the next best thing available to us.

a FANS POINT OF VIEW, or a RADIO COMMENTATORS VIEW

And normally A POOLS PLAYERS VIEW

Thats someone who is usually qualified to give an insiders viewpoint and talk about whats going wrong or right from a local expert point of view.