After scoring the two very well taken goals on Tuesday night does Mr Foley deserve a chance to start the game on Saturday?

He certainly deserves to keep his place on the bench. Him and Porter wouldn't be the first time we've had two strikers on the bench and it also gives us left and right wing cover. Foley for Gibb? sounds like a no brainer*

*Disclaimer: never seen Gibb play like.

I'd go with Joel and Barker then Foley on as sub with 35 mins left if things aren't going to plan. If they are going to plan, bring him on with 15-20 mins to go as his ball retention is excellent and he'll keep the ball in the Donny half.

how about playing porter and foley on the wings as it seems barker and moore have to start

The team should be......

..................................Jan Budtz..........................

McCunnie..............Nelson..............Antwi............Elliott

...................Sweeney........Boland........Liddle............

.......................................Brown.............................

...........................Barker..............Foley.....................


note - I wouldn't complain if Clark was slotted in the defence.........

keep him on the bench but give him a little extra few mins each time till he has the stamina for a full game
which he probably thinks he can manage already

Deffo better coming of the bench and useing his energy last 20-30 mins when others are tireing

When you consider how Cooper used to play Porter - getting him to run himself into the ground for 60-70 mins then sending a fresh striker on - with such devastating effect then I suppose Porter starting and Foley taking over for the last 20 makes a lot of sense.

I think people are doing david foley a massive dis-service. The lad scored 2 very well taken goals against a team in a higher league than pools yet very few seem to think he deserves a chance. How negative are you lot? Suggesting that he is only good for 30
Minutes is very patronising, he will still beat offside traps and cause problems from the start.

i am not showing any disrespect to Foley always been an admirer of his
but in professional football it takes seasond pros time to get match fit
he should be nurtured and as i said give just that bit extra every time
it never did Fairclough at the scousers any harm being a super sub

DONT ANYONE DARE SAY BEFORE MY TIME

I really don't know who Fairclough is but I know that players a lot younger than Foley have been given chances and excelled. The lads confidence must be sky high,

BUT THAT NEEDS CURBING ALL DOWN TO GOOD MANAGEMENT

So the lads confidence is sky high and you think that it shouldn't be.....?

what he said

but it did do fairclough harm didnt it he couldnt hack the expectancy of being on 90 minutes

http://www.liverpoolfc.tv/team/past_pla ... airclough/

WHAT WOULD A BUS DRIVER KNOW
AND FAT ONE AT THAT
COLLECT YOUR PRIZE TOMORROW

i am not fat just the wrong height for my weight old man

WHAT ABOUT THE EXTRA BIG SEAT THEY ORDERED JUST FOR YOU
AND THE FITTER THOUGHT IT WAS A BACK SEAT

i will have to knack you tomorrow old man

dont let the glasses the crooked knees and the arched back put you off sonny just watch out for my stick

good banter this lads

pardon i heard that

It would be interesting to know who the 3 people are who think Moore hould start, maybe they have seen something in his game? or maybe they are called Mr Southend, Mr Quakerz and MSN....?

Maybe there are some people who think that if you're going to give something a try you should allow at least, oh, let's say three games to see if it works.
But if Porter starts I have no problem with that either - Danny knows what his plans are; we don't.

The question is....will he be?

I've just realised the difference in the dates!!!
For a while there I was thinking, "what the fuck.........................."?