Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 11:34 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 

Reasons for Pools mid-table finish
Poll ended at Fri Apr 25, 2008 10:02 pm
The death of Michael Maidens - team mental breakdown 3%  3%  [ 1 ]
Some poor referreeing decisions - Luton A, Southend, Swansea 6%  6%  [ 2 ]
Some poor performances - Northampton A 13%  13%  [ 4 ]
Injuries at regular intervals 16%  16%  [ 5 ]
Managerial decisions 63%  63%  [ 20 ]
Total votes : 32
Author Message
 Post subject: Pools' finish 2007/08
PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:09 pm
Posts: 8066
Location: Five minutes from the Priestfield Stadium.
What do you reckon ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pools' finish 2007/08
PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 3:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm
Posts: 22649
I think all of them are partially to blame but in my opinion the main reason is that we will finish exactly where we should based on the quality of the players we have. We're simply no better than mid table.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pools' finish 2007/08
PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 11:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:46 am
Posts: 16992
Location: The people's democratic illegal republic of Catalonia
Hard to argue with that John. If we were Chelsea, spending tens of millions, and finished mid-table we'd have every reason to look for reasons.

Here's a thought for the day: season in, season out, half the clubs in every division finish below midway. They all have their reasons.
As for the other half, I bet you won't find many teams looking for reasons they didn't finish lower. :wink:

_________________
No, your children are not the special ones.
(Nor is your dog.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pools' finish 2007/08
PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:42 pm
Posts: 6592
Location: Hartlepool - for now....
Mr I wrote:
I think all of them are partially to blame but in my opinion the main reason is that we will finish exactly where we should based on the quality of the players we have. We're simply no better than mid table.


I personally think that we have under achieved a tad, mainly due to Wilsons poor team selections and tactics at times....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pools' finish 2007/08
PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm
Posts: 22649
I agree that selections are partially to blame as are all the other things listed. My eyes were opened a bit the other week when for the first time I took a good look at what players were available and there weren't many options. I think Danny Wilson has been trying to find a formula in which the total is greater than the sum of its parts.

Why generally have we lost against the better teams and got reasonable results against the lesser ones?
Why do the players not perform magnificently every week?
Why do we concede so many goals?
Why do we fail to entertain each time we take to the pitch?

It's dead simple, we've got decent players but not exceptional ones. We're a mid table non-entity.

I expect a fairly major clear out in the summer.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pools' finish 2007/08
PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 1:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 6:01 pm
Posts: 2038
Location: Leeds
I think that the poll's biased for the reasons Mr. I gives - there's no mention of the defence's underperformance or the team's inability to compete wholesale.

Whoever chose the death of Michael Maidens before any of the other four is wrong, I think. As tragic as it was, I don't think it affected many on the pitch (apart from Boland against Brighton, perhaps?)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pools' finish 2007/08
PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 1:08 pm 
I think whoever used (or even considered it as an option) as an option in the poll is insensitive to say the least stpid I'm sure the players would be horrified at the use of that as an excuse.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pools' finish 2007/08
PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 1:40 pm 
I chose that simply because i thought you had to choose 3 (evidently you don't judging by the way the votes have gone), the other 2 were non-arguments (as is the Maidens one) but as I thought I had to choose one of them I picked that one.

Anyway, onto the original topic...

The reason for this season is lack of self belief, particularly in defence and in a lot of cases some baffling team choices/tactical decisions.

I can't agree that the players aren't good enough to do well, I think the squad we have is very strong. I think confidence, the lack of a decent 'keeper and the inclusion of poor players at the expense of our better players made a major impact. When you're winning the team picks itself and the football flows, when we're not playing well it's down to the manager to pick the best team and get the players performing to the best of their ability. Wilson has failed on that for one reason or another and needs to take a look in the mirror rather than playing the blame game with players.

I don't like to see people out of their jobs but I genuinely believe Wilson is out of his depth and will not be in charge next season.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pools' finish 2007/08
PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 1:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:23 am
Posts: 3141
totally agree on that point pj
as for mr i how many of the lesser teams have we done well against morcambe hereford millwall for instance
i would like to give wilson a formula

_________________
Image
innocent of all charges and still no evidence
it is easy to accuse when you dont have to prove


go back to your drum and your anti depressants yes you


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pools' finish 2007/08
PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 1:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm
Posts: 22649
Hereford are a decent team and will go up this season, Morecambe was a travesty. The one thing I can't get my head round is why hardly anyone blames the people on the pitch for even a smidgen of responsibility.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pools' finish 2007/08
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 9:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 6:33 pm
Posts: 7199
Location: Costa Del Sussex
gremmlin wrote:
totally agree on that point pj
as for mr i how many of the lesser teams have we done well against morcambe hereford millwall for instance
i would like to give wilson a formula

Good point gremmlin league-2 opposition have given you the runaround :laugh:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pools' finish 2007/08
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 10:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm
Posts: 22649
Nobodys Hero wrote:
Why do you suppose at ALMOST every other club that underachieves the manager gets sacked?




My point is that I'm not convinced that we have under achieved. I think we've ended up where we should have because we don't have enough quality in the team. Overhaul the defence completely and we've got a chance.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pools' finish 2007/08
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm
Posts: 22649
Nobodys Hero wrote:
but we were still only given one choice. Wilson rarely picked our best 11.

For that reason I cant agree with you.



I know no more than you regarding his reasoning but I suspect he was trying to build a team that gelled, that doesn't always neccecitate playing playings in order of ability.

Here's an example: Newcastle were running away with the title a few years ago until Asprillia arrived, he was the most skillful player in the place but nobody, least of all his team mates, had any idea what he was going to do next. According to Steve Black he was the single reason that they blew the title that year.

My point is that you build a team that works. I refuse to accept the ridiculous notion that any manager would intentially try to put out a team that wasn't in his opinion the best option given availability and choice of formation.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pools' finish 2007/08
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 10:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm
Posts: 22649
Nobodys Hero wrote:
So you somehow accept the logic of picking Foley ahead of Monkhouse? stpid


On the face of it no. But neither you mor I know what was going on behind the scenes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pools' finish 2007/08
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 10:21 pm 
Mr I wrote:
Nobodys Hero wrote:
but we were still only given one choice. Wilson rarely picked our best 11.

For that reason I cant agree with you.



I know no more than you regarding his reasoning but I suspect he was trying to build a team that gelled, that doesn't always neccecitate playing playings in order of ability.

Here's an example: Newcastle were running away with the title a few years ago until Asprillia arrived, he was the most skillful player in the place but nobody, least of all his team mates, had any idea what he was going to do next. According to Steve Black he was the single reason that they blew the title that year.

My point is that you build a team that works. I refuse to accept the ridiculous notion that any manager would intentially try to put out a team that wasn't in his opinion the best option given availability and choice of formation.


That is bullshit invented by the media. Thats bollox to say Newcastle lost the title because of Asprilla.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pools' finish 2007/08
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 10:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm
Posts: 22649
Nothing to do with the media, this was a comment direct to me by Steve Black. Blacky was an integral part of the management team at Newcastle at the time.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pools' finish 2007/08
PostPosted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37204
PJ_Poolie wrote:
I think whoever used (or even considered it as an option) as an option in the poll is insensitive to say the least stpid I'm sure the players would be horrified at the use of that as an excuse.
I see where you're coming from, but Yubep was right to include it because in certain sections of the media it's been drawn out and dusted down as an excuse sadly. :roll:

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: ALMoody, bobby lemonade, congress_tart, Elephant Rock, Gerry Mandrake, Infidel, JackVet, JohnO55, Jules, Kettering Poolie, loan_star, Mikey, Mikey76, Ozzy Saltburn, Pooliebod, stupoolie, Tonto1968, Winston Ingram and 183 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.