Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 11:51 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: Is this geometrically possible
PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 8:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:48 pm
Posts: 1278
"You think we have turned a corner and them we are right back to square one"

quote from the DW's after match comments on the Pools site

_________________
Form is temporary
Class is permanent


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this geometrically possible
PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 8:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37186
Surely you'd have to turn four corners....? sctatchinghead...By the way he was praising Barker on TFM tonight i'll be surprised if ghe isn't playing Monday.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this geometrically possible
PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 8:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:13 pm
Posts: 514
Location: Somewhere between stupid and clever. It's a fine dividing line sometimes.
Snowy wrote:
Surely you'd have to turn four corners....? sctatchinghead...By the way he was praising Barker on TFM tonight i'll be surprised if ghe isn't playing Monday.


Well it sure looks like we are missing Barker doesn't it?

_________________
There's no way Chuck Norris is harder than Stallone. Even if he did serve in 'Nam.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this geometrically possible
PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 8:28 pm 
Sure looks like we missing something, a likeable manager :wink:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this geometrically possible
PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 8:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:43 pm
Posts: 1508
Location: by the small door
Turning a single 180 degree corner will get you back to where you started from. Shrewd cookie this DW :laugh:

_________________
My glass isn't half full or half empty - its just too small


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this geometrically possible
PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 8:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
We dont need Barker, we just need to sort the defense out. DW is a cock

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this geometrically possible
PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 8:46 pm 
Obafemi-Obsession wrote:
Snowy wrote:
Surely you'd have to turn four corners....? sctatchinghead...By the way he was praising Barker on TFM tonight i'll be surprised if ghe isn't playing Monday.


Well it sure looks like we are missing Barker doesn't it?


No it looks like we are as frustratingly inconsistent as we have been all season with or without him. By all accounts we defended terribly today. That's got bugger all to do with who's up top.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this geometrically possible
PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 8:53 pm 
PJ_Poolie wrote:
Obafemi-Obsession wrote:
Snowy wrote:
Surely you'd have to turn four corners....? sctatchinghead...By the way he was praising Barker on TFM tonight i'll be surprised if ghe isn't playing Monday.


Well it sure looks like we are missing Barker doesn't it?


No it looks like we are as frustratingly inconsistent as we have been all season with or without him. By all accounts we defended terribly today. That's got bugger all to do with who's up top.



So its nothing to do with how the players are trained? Right thats ok then.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this geometrically possible
PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 9:01 pm 
townendtimmy wrote:

No it looks like we are as frustratingly inconsistent as we have been all season with or without him. By all accounts we defended terribly today. That's got bugger all to do with who's up top.



So its nothing to do with how the players are trained? Right thats ok then.[/quote]

Eh!?

We kept clean sheets in half of our games last season, did that have nothing to do with training then?

You can point at team selections and breaking up Nelson and Clark or the goalkeeping situation but Nelson has been off the boil for a lot of the season. I'm sure he's being 'trained' exactly as he was in previous seasons when he was playing well. You can't train people not to make individual errors.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this geometrically possible
PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 9:27 pm 
Snowy wrote:
Surely you'd have to turn four corners....? sctatchinghead...By the way he was praising Barker on TFM tonight i'll be surprised if ghe isn't playing Monday.


Anyone with any sense that saw the game today would be surprised if Barker isn't playing on Monday. We had absolutely eff all up front.
Having said that the only players to come out of that with any credit were Monkhouse, possibly Humps and Liddle and Porter for scoring.
Thought Robson and Foley did ok when they came on.
It was a bad day from start to finish, shiit journey, shiit ground, shiit match, shiit ref, etc etc etc.
Then to top it off Didn't see Mr Ticklehill, so no ridiculous match reports to laugh at and Mr Chip hasn't been on bulling Joel up :evil: banghead :evil:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this geometrically possible
PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:05 pm 
Joel just about came out of the game with a bit of credit, he took his goal well, clean through one on one with the keeper dead central and finished it cool as you like. (that means dead easy, not as cool as you, like!)
Defence was all over the place again, was happy with it beforehand cos Antwi has done ok at full back the last few times, but none of the players appeared comfortable with it and after every mistake there was loads of finger pointing and whinging.
Sweeney was terrible and at one point came in for quite a bit of stick for one terrible pass to Mackay who had moved position ages before Sweeney decided to pass it, only for Sweeney to do what he does too much of lately, start waving his arms about and blame everyone but himself, anyhow I think the fans put him straight on that one.
Mackay was anonimous.
Monkhouse was our best player especially in 2nd half, but nearly lost the plot late on when Crewe started taking the piss.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this geometrically possible
PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:07 pm 
PJ_Poolie wrote:
townendtimmy wrote:

No it looks like we are as frustratingly inconsistent as we have been all season with or without him. By all accounts we defended terribly today. That's got bugger all to do with who's up top.



So its nothing to do with how the players are trained? Right thats ok then.


Eh!?

We kept clean sheets in half of our games last season, did that have nothing to do with training then?

You can point at team selections and breaking up Nelson and Clark or the goalkeeping situation but Nelson has been off the boil for a lot of the season. I'm sure he's being 'trained' exactly as he was in previous seasons when he was playing well. You can't train people not to make individual errors.[/quote]

So if Nelson has made so many mistakes why has he been continously selected even though he has made so many mistakes. The manager picks the team, he trains em, he studies them all week so the buck lays with him. Just like any other management set up i would of thought.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this geometrically possible
PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:31 pm 
this season has more twists and turns than chubby checker,we have'nt had a settled team all season, we just seem to get things sorted and we get an injury or dw starts pratting about over tinkering when there is no need,surely he could have blooded some of the younger players,instead of some of the crap loan players he brought in(god am i not loking forward to mondays game) just wondering which team turns up?


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this geometrically possible
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 12:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 9787
Location: Just down the road from the Telstar
After building Collins up to be a superhero, it's seems from the few comments so far, that he is human after all. So the big question is not will Clark return, but who will partner him Collins or Nelson?

For me the team on Monday should be..

Lee-Barratt
McCunnie Collins Clark Humphries
Sweeney Liddle Boland Monkhouse
Brown Porter

Subs: Nelson McKay Barker Robson Foley

_________________
I like the comfort zone. It's where all the sandwiches are.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this geometrically possible
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 1:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:48 pm
Posts: 1278
doesn't McCunnie get three games, for a straight red ?

_________________
Form is temporary
Class is permanent


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this geometrically possible
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 1:11 am 
Only one game for a professional foul or two yellows.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this geometrically possible
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 1:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 9787
Location: Just down the road from the Telstar
LeicesterPoolie wrote:
doesn't McCunnie get three games, for a straight red ?


It's only 3 games for 'violent conduct'.

_________________
I like the comfort zone. It's where all the sandwiches are.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this geometrically possible
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 3:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:46 am
Posts: 16992
Location: The people's democratic illegal republic of Catalonia
LeicesterPoolie wrote:
"You think we have turned a corner and them we are right back to square one"

quote from the DW's after match comments on the Pools site


He might have said loads of things that are geometrically impossbile in his time but this ain't one of them.

"You THINK we have turned a corner".
- Implication: yes but finally we haven't turn a corner have we.

"...and them [sic] we are right back to square one"
- Implication: therefore since we never turned a corner we didn't really change anything; so we are back where we started aren't we.

Dove il problema?

_________________
No, your children are not the special ones.
(Nor is your dog.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this geometrically possible
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 12:53 pm 
chip fireball wrote:
so he accepts we have made no progress at all this season and that whatever he does the defence is still pants ?



Whats more fecking annoying is Bennyworth was a defender werent he confised they should be brought in for extra coaching where they going wrong.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this geometrically possible
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 1:09 pm 
townendtimmy wrote:
chip fireball wrote:
so he accepts we have made no progress at all this season and that whatever he does the defence is still pants ?



Whats more fecking annoying is Bennyworth was a defender werent he confised they should be brought in for extra coaching where they going wrong.


Yes Ian Bennyworth was a defender.

To blame him for the current debacle is a tad harsh though and I don't think he should be giving the players extra coaching. This could prove difficult seen as he hasn't been seen around the club since half time at Feethams in 1991/92. We were three down......


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this geometrically possible
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 2:53 pm 
PJ_Poolie wrote:
townendtimmy wrote:
chip fireball wrote:
so he accepts we have made no progress at all this season and that whatever he does the defence is still pants ?



Whats more fecking annoying is Bennyworth was a defender werent he confised they should be brought in for extra coaching where they going wrong.


Yes Ian Bennyworth was a defender.

To blame him for the current debacle is a tad harsh though and I don't think he should be giving the players extra coaching. This could prove difficult seen as he hasn't been seen around the club since half time at Feethams in 1991/92. We were three down......


So considering you are employed by an employee Mr PJ and your form dipped you werent selling as many tellies or pensions for instance what would your manager say/do. Im sure they would coach you or put there arm around you and try and find out what the problem is, so why should football at pools be any different.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this geometrically possible
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:17 pm 
:grin: :grin: :grin: :grin:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this geometrically possible
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:40 pm 
I know what you are saying Timmy I apologise, I was being facetious with you after getting you're Bennyworth's and Butterworth's mixed up.

I don't see how a defender who left the club 17 years can help :laugh: :wink:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this geometrically possible
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:48 pm 
PJ_Poolie wrote:
I know what you are saying Timmy I apologise, I was being facetious with you after getting you're Bennyworth's and Butterworth's mixed up.

I don't see how a defender who left the club 17 years can help :laugh: :wink:


Apologies accepted but you seems a tad angry this fine day Mr PJ :laugh:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this geometrically possible
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:50 pm 
PJ_Poolie wrote:
I know what you are saying Timmy I apologise, I was being facetious with you after getting you're Bennyworth's and Butterworth's mixed up.

I don't see how a defender who left the club 17 years can help :laugh: :wink:



Considering Nelson and Antwis performances this season i may reserve judgement on that statement.


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: Bluestreak, bobby lemonade, Essex poolie, garthwd, GingerGinola, Infidel, JBPoolie, loyal_fan, millhouseseats, Our Younguns Dad, Ozzy Saltburn, Pooly_Imp, stupoolie and 208 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.