Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Wed Jun 18, 2025 3:37 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Team for tomorrow
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:43 am
Posts: 508
Sweeney doesn't play there. :sweeeet:

_________________
Slack as a slack door knob!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team for tomorrow
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 10:27 pm
Posts: 3115
Surely Przemyslaw Kazimierczak will be in goal.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team for tomorrow
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 1:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:08 am
Posts: 7
the team for me has to be;

gk.

ALB

def.
mcunnie
antwi
collins
humphreys

mid
sweeney
liddle
brown

str
barker
porter
makay


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team for tomorrow
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 1:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 4:40 pm
Posts: 414
Location: Hartlepool
GK- Lee-Barrett

RB- McCunnie
CB- Collins
CB- Nelson
LB- Humphreys

RM- Brown
CM- Sweeney
CM- Liddle
LM- Robson

ST- Mackay
ST- Porter


Bench-
Budtz
Foley
Antwi
Elliott
Barker

Watch Wilson shock the lot of us and stick himself on the bench rolfl

_________________
POOLS POOLS POOLS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team for tomorrow
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 1:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
I'd play Nelson beside Collins cos they've got previous together.

I'd also stick with the good old 4-4-2.

GK Lee-Barrett
RB McCunnie
LB Liddle
CB Nelson
CB Collins
RM Brown
LM Humphreys
CM Sweeney
CM God knows, either Thompson or Boland
CF Porter
CF Mackay



Although I'll be amazed if Danny-boy does that.

He'll play Richie at the back and will doubtless start Barker up front. :roll:

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team for tomorrow
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 1:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:40 pm
Posts: 3561
Location: Still trying to find myself
Hawklord wrote:
Surely Przemyslaw Kazimierczak will be in goal.


I think Wilson was going to put his name on the team sheet but he ran out of ink


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team for tomorrow
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 1:59 pm 
Barrett
McCunnie
Collins
Nelse
Humphreys
Brown
Liddle
Thompson
Monkhouse
Porter
Mackay


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team for tomorrow
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 2:54 pm 
This is the team as seen by my spies;

ALB
Sweeney Collins Nelson Humphreys
Brown Boland Liddle Thompson
Barker Porter


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team for tomorrow
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 3:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
MadJohn wrote:
PJ_Poolie wrote:
This is the team as seen by my spies;

ALB
Sweeney Collins Nelson Humphreys
Brown Boland Liddle Thompson
Barker Porter


No Monkhouse then sadx

I would be surprised to see Thompson getting the nod on the left. I know it's been his regular position over the years and it could work, but I thought we could try to get Robson running at them if Monkhouse wasn't available.


rolfl rolfl rolfl

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team for tomorrow
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 3:04 pm 
MadJohn wrote:
PJ_Poolie wrote:
This is the team as seen by my spies;

ALB
Sweeney Collins Nelson Humphreys
Brown Boland Liddle Thompson
Barker Porter


No Monkhouse then sadx

I would be surprised to see Thompson getting the nod on the left. I know it's been his regular position over the years and it could work, but I thought we could try to get Robson running at them if Monkhouse wasn't available.


It's not as if the position is alien to the guy he's been capped by England playing there and he's never had any pace he'l l hopefully get over some quality crosses. At least the team is balanced ie. no right footer no no discipline or physical presence (yes Foley) exposing Humphreys to two players all night like on Tuesday.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team for tomorrow
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 3:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:23 am
Posts: 3141
after last weeks snow we need an escape goat so who do you reckon will get the chop

_________________
Image
innocent of all charges and still no evidence
it is easy to accuse when you dont have to prove


go back to your drum and your anti depressants yes you


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team for tomorrow
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 3:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
gremmlin wrote:
after last weeks snow we need an escape goat so who do you reckon will get the chops in for tea?


Antwi?

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team for tomorrow
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 3:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
MadJohn wrote:
Mr Ripper wrote:
rolfl rolfl rolfl
If we took the smilies off you, you'd be mute :razz: :roll:

But yes, I realise that we have reached something of a peculiar situation when Robson can be suggested as a solution. Strange days indeed. confised



I wasn't laughing at the thought of Robson, I think he would do a good job if given the chance.

I was laughing at the suggestion that there would be any sort of logic behind Wilson's thinking. :grin:

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team for tomorrow
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 4:00 pm 
PJ_Poolie wrote:
This is the team as seen by my spies;

ALB
Sweeney Collins Nelson Humphreys
Brown Boland Liddle Thompson
Barker Porter


I made an error actually sources suggest that Jan Budtz will be back in nets tomorrow not as I put originally ALB.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team for tomorrow
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 4:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
PJ_Poolie wrote:
PJ_Poolie wrote:
This is the team as seen by my spies;

ALB
Sweeney Collins Nelson Humphreys
Brown Boland Liddle Thompson
Barker Porter


I made an error actually sources suggest that Jan Budtz will be back in nets tomorrow not as I put originally ALB.


:evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead :evil: banghead

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team for tomorrow
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 4:07 pm 
It doesn't make any difference neither is any good I actually think I prefer Budtz :shock: That's not to say that I rate him, it's like choosing between Rob Moverley and Steve Jones....


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team for tomorrow
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 4:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
PJ_Poolie wrote:
It doesn't make any difference neither is any good I actually think I prefer Budtz :roll: That's not to say that I rate him, it's like choosing between Rob Moverley and Steve Jones....


Cheltenham game apart, Lee-Barrett has looked 100 times the keeper that Budtz will ever be.

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team for tomorrow
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 4:10 pm 
He is hopeless at dealing with crosses, he even flaps at them during the drills in the warm up I was watching him at Keepmoat the other night seen as they sold no fooking beer :evil:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team for tomorrow
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 4:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
PJ_Poolie wrote:
He is hopeless at dealing with crosses, he even flaps at them during the drills in the warm up I was watching him at Keepmoat the other night seen as they sold no fooking beer :evil:


They didn't sell beer?

Thank fk I never went.

By all accounts the performance was bad enough, but suffering that in a dry ground... stpid

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team for tomorrow
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 4:14 pm 
Mr Ripper wrote:
PJ_Poolie wrote:
He is hopeless at dealing with crosses, he even flaps at them during the drills in the warm up I was watching him at Keepmoat the other night seen as they sold no fooking beer :evil:


They didn't sell beer?

Thank fk I never went.

By all accounts the performance was bad enough, but suffering that in a dry ground... stpid


I wouldn't have been bothered but we were in the ground an hour before kick off to have a pint or three banghead

They had bars they just weren't open....


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team for tomorrow
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 5:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:42 pm
Posts: 6592
Location: Hartlepool - for now....
Lee Barrett is a clown.....

Bring back Big Jan Budtz...... clappp


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team for tomorrow
PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 8:19 pm 
They are both shit :laugh:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team for tomorrow
PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 9:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:46 am
Posts: 16992
Location: The people's democratic illegal republic of Catalonia
PJ_Poolie wrote:
They had bars they just weren't open....

The bar I went in was open :wink:

But expensive sadx

_________________
No, your children are not the special ones.
(Nor is your dog.)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: Bazil, Brian Honour's Left Foot, charltonclive, Chrissy Stevo, Cow Corner, Darylmore, Davcla, Devo, DrPool, fckpoolie, Flying Hogans, Freaky Teeth, garthwd, Gerry Mandrake, Grayhoundend, Infidel, Jamie1952, jamiepoolie, JBPoolie, JohnnyMars, jonnyraf, Jules, Kettering Poolie, Mctee1908, Mikey, Mikey76, millhouseseats, Ozzy Saltburn, Pitlad, Poolie_merv, Pooliebod, PTID, Rinkender, Saladswerver, Sandman, Sedgefield Poolie, Snowy, Stocksfield_Poolie, Stomper409, UKP and 226 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.