that was

LeicesterPoolie · **Joined:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:48 pm **Posts:** 1278

embarassing.

We used to be a team that played football.
What is he turning us into, there's no shape, no creativity, no hope :evil:

poolieinnottingham · **Posted:** Sun Nov 18, 2007 7:04 pm

We looked fine until they scored, then we resorted to lumping it forward.

I think he made the wrong decision by taking Joel off. Play the ball anywhere in his 'zone' and it will stick to him. Although I rate Barker, he is not as mobile as Porter and he can't create as well as him.

When Porter went off we lost a valuable outlet which let Bournemouth get their tails up.

Why didn't Wilson use the last sub?

LeicesterPoolie · **Joined:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:48 pm **Posts:** 1278

poolieinnottingham wrote:

We looked fine until they scored, then we resorted to lumping it forward.

I think he made the wrong decision by taking Joel off. Play the ball anywhere in his 'zone' and it will stick to him. Although I rate Barker, he is not as mobile as Porter and he can't create as well as him.

When Porter went off we lost a valuable outlet which let Bournemouth get their tails up.

Why didn't Wilson use the last sub?

Why didn't he start with the right team.

McCunnnie at right back, Sweeney in the middle, Brown on the right
I'm assuming Monkhouse and Robson are injured.

The Lightning Tree · **Joined:** Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:30 pm **Posts:** 5804

I'm assuming he doesn't rate MCunnie as a right back banghead

I'm assuming Barker is his love child banghead

I'm assuming he's fell out with Monkhouse

I'm assuming he hasn't a clue what he's doing sometimes banghead

Kolley Kibber · **Posted:** Sun Nov 18, 2007 8:08 pm

Definitely not good enough, mediocre throughout. McCunnie and Boland in the centre just didn't work (can someone explain to me why Sweeney was only given 10 minutes?). The defence also seemed very jittery, they made a below average side look better than they were.

However, I thought Moore had a good game on right, the best game I've seen him have for Pools anyway. Brown was influential once again but he's not a winger; I'd love to see him and Porter up front. Budtz, for the most part, seemed sound and I felt sorry for Porter, he was unlucky to be taken off.

Must try harder!

LeicesterPoolie · **Joined:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:48 pm **Posts:** 1278

Kolley Kibber wrote:

However, I thought Moore had a good game on right, the best game I've seen him have for Pools anyway. Brown was influential once again but he's not a winger; I'd love to see him and Porter up front. Budtz, for the most part, seemed sound and I felt sorry for Porter, he was unlucky to be taken off.

The problem with Moore is he wanders too much, which leaves the right back with two men to contend with
and also means we have two players down the left, getting in each other's way.
He also has a knack of disappearing, can't remember him being involved much, in the last twenty minutes, or so.

As for Porter, you missed one word out 'again'

Kolley Kibber · **Posted:** Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:00 am

LeicesterPoolie wrote:

Kolley Kibber wrote:

However, I thought Moore had a good game on right, the best game I've seen him have for Pools anyway. Brown was influential once again but he's not a winger; I'd love to see him and Porter up front. Budtz, for the most part, seemed sound and I felt sorry for Porter, he was unlucky to be taken off.

The problem with Moore is he wanders too much, which leaves the right back with two men to contend with
and also means we have two players down the left, getting in each other's way.
He also has a knack of disappearing, can't remember him being involved much, in the last twenty minutes, or so.

As for Porter, you missed one word out 'again'

We looked far more solid down the right than we did the left imo. Brown is class but he's not a left-winger and Humphreys is not a left back, by any stretch of the imagination. I was happy enough with Moore's overall performance.

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:33 am

chip fireball wrote:

not sure what barker has to do to get subbed.

Be on a Hatrick with 2 goals!!!! :shock:

The only time I can recall Wilson taking Barker off was the other week in the FA Cup after he'd scored twice!!!!

townendtimmy · **Posted:** Tue Nov 20, 2007 10:34 pm

chip fireball wrote:

he missed an open net from 2 yards and set them up for the first goal with a woeful pass when under no pressure. the lad marking him got man of the match he kept him so quiet but yet again he gets the full ninety.

instead wilson takes off porter, one of our few creative players, and brings on the right footed striker foley on the left hand side of midfield.

i have no idea what goes through his head sometimes.

is monkhouse officially dead ?

No but he hasnt been very good this season barring his goal against Orient in a game which he was still crap compared to the monkhouse we saw last season.

that was

Gadgies online