Couldn't believe my eyes last night reading The Mail.

If I hadn't gone to the match on Saturday I would have been convinced by their report that Jan Budtz was better than Petr Cech and that Pools played like Brazil and were unlucky to lose against the footballing equivalent of the Harlem Globetrotters.

Now fair enough it's a local paper (and I buy it everyday cos despite it being maligned I generally like reading it) and it might be expected to show a little bias, but that report was just silly.

Why don't they cut the cack and tell it like it really was?

Are they just sucking up to the club cos they don't want to upset them like they have in the past?

Or is it just rank bad journalism?

The report I read was by a Bernadette ???

Isn't that PoolieGirl ?

That's not the one that had a double page spread in last night's paper though.

not I